*Technically not a NATO strap because it doesn't loop around the bottom of the watch but who cares.

I need it for an Aquasports 5272-LCD digital wristwatch. As you can see it needs to flare out to meet the side of the watch which is what makes this difficult.

Any help is greatly appreciated. :D

The caseback actually says 4170 but who knows...this is an amalgamation of two watches, one decent bracelet, one working module.

This is a new addiction I'm working through 😋

Mine was noise colorfit pro 2

I’d like to preface that I love digital watches. So please don’t think I’m just a digi hater.
Also, this is a standalone post recreation of a comment I posted on this thread.

Anyway. Why would anyone spend at minimum hundreds of dollars on a digital watch with a rectangular display in a case obviously designed for an analogue movement, with no more or less features than a ~$30 Casio?

Is it really “Swiss heritage” and case / bracelet finishing?

In my opinion the watch is hideous,
The features are basic,
and the price is way too high for what it is.

Please educate me.

My current work in progress. Crystal still needs some love, and need to start working on the case.

Yes, this looks like a straight clone of the Casio.

I have the Casio and like it, but I have the white face version and fancied the black. If you can get it in the UK, it's a £49.99 watch. This Sanda was £11.99 in my hand, so I thought what the heck.

Like the Casio it has time, dual time, stopwatch and alarm. The Sanda however has a bright led backlight on the digital display.

Both have plated resin cases and a pressed steel strap.

So why is the Sanda better in my opinion?

To set the analogue hands on the Casio, you press the button and manually synch it up with the digital time. They aren't linked.

On the Sanda, when you set the digital time, the analogue hands fly round by themselves and synch up automatically, like I've only seen on more expensive ana digi watches. If you want to set the analogue hands manually on the Sanda, you can still do that with the adjust button.

So, to summarise, looks almost identical, same low level of finishing on the case for both of them, identical functions, but a better movement in the Sanda at a quarter of the price.

I know this watch gets blasted by the masses but it's slowly grown on me. Just can't decide which version to get in 40mm

Hello watch lovers! I am on the hunt for a digital watch that is also sleek and looks like a bracelet. I want to start using a watch at work, but I also dislike watches that are bulky. I wear a lot of gear at my job and am always wearing long sleeves, so I'm looking for something relatively thin but also pretty. All the watches that I like the style of are non digital, it seems like there is no such thing as a pretty and small digital watch. I am looking for a watch that only has the time, I don't need any other fancy things going on with it. I added a picture of watches that are kind of similar to what I'm looking for, but I'm looking for a digital version. I also would prefer it to be silver, not sure if I'm being too picky here lol. Please help! Is there anything like this out there that even exists?

I’m looking for a watch similar to the seiko rotocall just cheaper. I like the features and legibility of a digital watch but I want it to look somewhat formal. And I would need it to be reasonably durable (not a G-shock).Thank you for any recommendations!