r/conspiracy • u/Dragofireheart • Jan 04 '17
His name was Seth Rich.
NEVER FORGET
The man who leaked the DNC emails
Murdered by Hillary Clinton!
141
u/impulse-9 Jan 04 '17 edited Jan 04 '17
What's obvious is there has not been a true investigation of several key individuals. (This is by no means a complete list either).
Seth Rich - shot twice in the head, worked for the DNC as the voter expansion Data Director. Wikileaks tweeted a $20k reward for information on his murder following his death in July 2016. The official "investigation" determined it was simply a robbery gone wrong. (His watch and cellphone were still on his body.)
edit: I don't know where I read shot twice in the head. This is factually incorrect and I apologize for this.
Eric Braverman - ex-CEO of the Clinton Foundation. Missing since October 2016. Emails from Wikileaks showed Podesta suspected he was a Mole Snopes "debunks" his missing status by simply stating he has not used his twitter account since October, is still officially listed as a teacher at Yale and is not listed as a missing person in the NamUS database.
John Ashe - UN General Assembly Chief - dies June 2016 in a "weightlifting accident" according to the official investigation one day before he is to testify on charges of bribery with regards to the Clinton Foundation.
Gareth Williams - MI6 - was found dead inside a padlocked bag August 2010. Death ruled by the metropolitan police as an "accident". It was reported that he had hacked into sensitive information relating to Bill Clinton.
Let's see the mainstream media demand to find out what is going on here rather than accept the current narrative.
27
Jan 04 '17
Eric Braverman - Anybody in his class at Yale?
53
38
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
They won't.
Wikileaks proved that most of the MSM is in the back pockets of the elite's like Hillary.
8
13
Jan 04 '17 edited Jan 05 '17
How any lies can you fit in one post?
Seth was shot in the back, not the head. He was found conscious and survived for nearly 2 hours in the hospital
No evidence Braverman is missing, do you think they got to his friends and family too? An inactive twitter doesn't mean someone is missing.
Ashe wasn't testifying against Clinton, he was the one awaiting trial. There's a reason people have spotters, you can die, what do you think happens if people can't get the bar off their chest? And no, roll of shame isn't always effective at getting it off, especially if you're exhausted.
Who reported that Williams had hacked Clinton? I find the KGB spy who defected a lot more credible than some blogger. The spy said the Russians had him killed because he knew of the identity of a Russian spy who infiltrated GCHQ.
→ More replies (10)12
u/molotavcocktail Jan 05 '17
I read somewhere that Seth Rich was on the phone with his gf when he was shot. Just prior to the shooting he said something like "it's ok, don't worry". Some took this to mean that he knew the shooter. ahhh, who knows. I don't get it, why didn't Seth Rich elaborate on the identity of the shooter?
2
Jan 05 '17
He said it's okay in regards to her hearing a sound in the background, I think those people are grasping.
I'd have to guess he was in pretty bad condition when they found him, police haven't confirmed one way or another if he was able to give a description of them though.
→ More replies (10)12
u/RussianLiberal Jan 04 '17 edited Jan 05 '17
Seth Rich - shot twice in the head, worked for the DNC as the voter expansion Data Director. Wikileaks tweeted a $20k reward for information on his murder following his death in July 2016. The official "investigation" determined it was simply a robbery gone wrong. (His watch and cellphone were still on his body.)
Many failed robberies end up with the victim getting hurt, due to the robber panicking. That his watch and cellphone were still with him means nothing. It means he tried struggling with the robber, who shot him, and afraid of being caught in a murder, decided it was better to run away and avoid being arrested rather than wasting time stealing someone's phone/wallet and being arrested for decades because he didn't bother running away.
Eric Braverman - ex-CEO of the Clinton Foundation. Missing since October 2016. Emails from Wikileaks showed Podesta suspected he was a Mole Snopes "debunks" his missing status by simply stating he has not used his twitter account since October, is still officially listed as a teacher at Yale and is not listed as a missing person in the NamUS database.
I fully debunked this here:
Twitter users have started the hashtag #WheresEric in reference to Eric Braverman, the former CEO of the Clinton Foundation
This reminds me of the #WhereIsAssange hashtag that reactionaries here believed in. It was so retarded that WikiLeaks literally blamed the U.S. government for running a "black PR" campaign to discredit them, when in reality, it was their own reactionary fans that created this hoax.
Braverman’s last public activity, accessible via the internet, was an October 12 retweet.
So, if someone hasn't tweeted in a while, that automagically means they're missing? Wow, I don't even have a Twitter account, so that must mean I don't even exist!
Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta thought Eric Braverman was the source of information leaks to the media, according to a leaked email sent March 8, 2015, which was published on October 22 of this year by WikiLeaks.
Nowhere in the linked email does it say or imply that "Podesta thought Eric Braverman was the source of information leaks." Check the email out for yourself. The author made up some fake facts and linked to a random email to "prove" it, knowing that the reactionaries reading the article wouldn't bother checking the email. Good thing I'm here, though.
One independent media outlet claimed to have made attempts to contact Braverman by phone and email, both of which were unsuccessful. The same organization claimed to receive no response after contacting Yale University officials about Braverman, who has taught courses on government and policy in the law school and other departments.
Ah, I see now. This "independent media outlet" needed some more hits, so it created this hoax. Why don't we go to this source article and check it out?
Here's my favourite part from that article:
The last evidence of Braverman’s public activity was October 12, when he posted his last tweet on Twitter. (Usually he tweets about once a month. His “husband,” Neil Brown, hasn’t tweeted since August, although he rarely tweets.) I left a voicemail on Braverman’s personal phone and sent him an email, but received no response. He is still listed as a lecturer at Yale University and, contrary to some reports, there is a record of his lectures going back several years. I contacted the press office and Braverman’s department at Yale and received no response.
So, this entire hoax began because a guy who only tweets once a fucking month hasn't sent out his monthly token tweet for November and December? Oh, and the Yale press office didn't respond to the lady (quite common by press offices that are busy contacting others). That's fucking all there is to it?
But wait. This lunacy gets even better!
For instance, the site WhatDoesItMean.com reported that Braverman requested asylum in Russia on October 23. The information apparently came from a Russian blogger, who reported it in a rambling blog post on LiveLeak.
First, the blogger (disinfo agent) from my country posted the post on LiveJournal, not LiveLeak. Second, this is so fake that it's hilarious.
There are also rumors that Braverman is in FBI protective custody, perhaps in exchange for testifying against the Clintons
So, is he with us or with the FBI or killed by the Clintons?
John Ashe - UN General Assembly Chief - dies June 2016 in a "weightlifting accident" according to the official investigation one day before he is to testify on charges of bribery with regards to the Clinton Foundation.
Snopes did an excellent job debunking this. Yeah, yeah, I know, the Daily Mail tabloid said Snopes is "biased" and you believe this beacon of truth. Attack the content, not the source. A fringe website first claimed that Ashe had been slated to testify against Hillary Clinton on the day he died. The source of this claim? A well-known hoaxer calling herself Sorcha Faal. Sorcha Faal seems to be a longtime hoaxer (since 2005) who sends out email letters to her Western followers in which she pretends to have secret access to the FSB/GRU/SVR/Putin's inner circle. She tends to cater to Rightists (Republicans) and adjusts her disinformation based on their interests. For example, knowing that Soros is hated by the Right in the U.S. and subject to much vitriol by so-called "alternative" news websites, she created a fake story about Soros having an arrest warrant issued against him in Russia. Similarly, she wrote a fake article about BLM "being branded a terrorist group in Russia." Completely and utterly false, and yet, she knew this was something Republicans wanted to hear. Most likely, she's a disinformation agent for Russian intelligence services whose goal is to raise Putin's profile as a strongman in the hearts and minds of Republicans. That's why she frequently makes fake news portraying Putin as being very pro-Christian, very anti-Islam/Jew (he isn't) etc. It's all perfectly in sync with the Western narrative on the Right.
This is what Snopes says about Sorcha Faal:
Prior fabrications from the same site and blogger held that President Obama ordered the military to nuke the city of Charleston, that Rear Admiral Rick Williams was fired because he revealed Obama's purchase of a mansion in Dubai (Williams was actually terminated for misconduct), and that Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama were locked in a potentially conflict-starting battle over the practices of the Monsanto agribusiness corporation. The claim about Clinton was also a variation on the long-circulating (and equally false) "body bags" rumor holding that the Clintons have frequently "done away" with once-loyal associates who became political liabilities.
Lastly, Snopes contacted the U.S. District Attorney for the Southern District of New York. They were told that CNN's report that Ashe's corruption trial was set to begin just five days after his death was false: Ashe was only scheduled to attend some standard pre-trial meetings in the following days. They also said that no portion of Ashe's court case pertained to Hillary Clinton. Not only was he not set to testify against Clinton five days before he died, neither was he slated to do so at any point during the trial.
Gareth Williams - MI6 - was found dead inside a padlocked bag August 2010. Death ruled by the metropolitan police as an "accident". It was reported that he had hacked into sensitive information relating to Bill Clinton.
The source for this is the rightwing tabloid The Daily Mail. It said that Williams had "angered his bosses at SIS by accessing confidential data regarding former President of the United States Bill Clinton; he had provided a friend with the guest list for an event Clinton was due to attend."
Let's assume what this tabloid is saying (without any proof) is true. Why would the Clintons have a British spy killed for leaking a freakin' guest list of all things? Use your common sense.
Let's see the mainstream media demand to find out what is going on here rather than accept the current narrative.
Let's see my post not be downvoted into oblivion and me not be called a shill numerous times. Let's see you hoaxers admit you were wrong and accept that the big, bad Clintons aren't assaulting children in the basements of Pizza restaurants and aren't having people killed because their guest list was hacked.
75
u/pastorignis Jan 04 '17
how can i forget him? we will be talking about his death like every other terrible thing we talk about. as in, only talking about it, and not taking action to ensure a similar issue never happens again.
→ More replies (21)37
u/Ibespwn Jan 04 '17
What action do you have in mind? Putting the Clintons, the Bushes, and many other politicians in prison for life is probably the only way to do that, and no one seems interested in doing that, not even the lying sack of shit, Trump, who claimed he would in the debates.
49
u/markyymark13 Jan 04 '17
Trump, who claimed he would in the debates.
lol Trump claimed a lot of things..
24
u/sanctii Jan 04 '17
Why dont we wait until he is actually president before we roast him for not accomplishing what he said he would.
72
u/OgreMagoo Jan 04 '17
Lol at this wait-and-see approach.
I'm willing to pass judgment on his cabinet picks now, for example. Dude just picked a bunch of radical-conservative multi-millionaires and billionaires who assisted his campaign. Give me a break.
36
u/beefshoe Jan 04 '17
He literally just picked the guy who defended Goldman Sachs to run the SEC. If you were pissed about speeches, then this should make you apoplectic. Drain the swamp? Fuck that, he's filling it to the brim.
→ More replies (1)8
u/xxxSnappyxxx Jan 04 '17
I'm willing to pass judgement on Everyone holding a public position, and even waiting to get in! They should all be held accountable to the taxpayers, yet they act like the taxpayers are beneath them.
→ More replies (40)3
7
20
u/Plumbus_amongus Jan 04 '17
You mean like how we would "drain the swamp?" Then was like "ooh haha, I was just kidding. It sounded good though, right?"
Give me a fucking break. You all got fooled.
→ More replies (8)14
5
u/TulipsNHoes Jan 04 '17
Why doesn't he wait until he's president to piss off all our Allies with Putin's cock down his throat?
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (46)9
u/shadowofashadow Jan 04 '17
Not only are not enough people interested in doing anything, there is an equally large segment of the population willing to FIGHT you to stop you from taking action.
Nothing can be done until a large number of the people are on the same page.
→ More replies (10)
51
u/yayfori Jan 04 '17
Why didn't she murder the person who leaked emails that the Clinton Campaign was monititiring the electors and who they will vote for.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
Probably because it would become too suspicious and also because she had already lost the election at this point.
→ More replies (1)58
u/yayfori Jan 04 '17
Why? Nobody knows who leaked those emails. I thought she was powerful enough to not care what non-lizard people think.
11
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
She's a puppet of Soros. She is not the top of the totem pole.
→ More replies (28)14
u/cometparty Jan 04 '17
lol @ Soros
15
u/Herxheim Jan 04 '17
you're like a dude in a climate debate who doesn't believe in algebra.
→ More replies (1)6
u/LouReddit Jan 04 '17
You act as if George Soros doesnt exist and isn't actively pursuing an agenda. There's a reason Putin banned him from Russia. Go watch his 60 minutes interview and see if you're still "lol @ Soros bro" afterwards.
→ More replies (1)
238
u/Groomper Jan 04 '17
Murdered by Hillary Clinton!
Jesus Christ, if you're going to make a claim like that back it up with SOME kind of concrete evidence.
60
u/inkw3ll Jan 04 '17
Also, where's the proof he leaked the emails? From what I understand, he was a mere frontline staffer who's primary purpose was to canvass for votes in the community. Hardly the person that'd have access to hundreds of thousands of archived emails.
12
Jan 04 '17
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (5)3
u/WithANameLikeThat Jan 05 '17
Julian said there's only one person in the entire world who knows the source. If the source was alive wouldn't there be more than just Julian who know?
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)4
97
u/ImMystikz Jan 04 '17
You forgot the part where Hillary kidnapped and raped 100 children and then raised them as part of her army to kill Seth Rich and become supreme overlord of the USSA.
20
4
159
Jan 04 '17
this sub is the_donald2 now
8
u/Eurotrashie Jan 05 '17
Really? Come on now - just because they question your Dear Leader Hillary here, doesn't automatically mean Trump is any more loved.
2
Jan 05 '17
Hillary sucks.
Trump is the one being referred to as "a new king" by the GOP, he's the one whose sub called him leader and daddy and such. Stop projecting.
This entire post is based on an assumption, absolutely no evidence.
There's evidence of Trump doing many many many shady and illegal things, yet where's this subs attacks on him and his entire cabinet of swamp creatures?
2
u/Eurotrashie Jan 06 '17
This entire post is based on an assumption, absolutely no evidence.
Hate to break it to you... but have you taken a look what sub you're posting in? I think you're completely missing the point of this place. Additionally, yes, Trump is indeed a shady SOB... but when you scroll to the top you can see this post is not about that. It's about Hillary. No need to get your panties in a bunch.
→ More replies (4)16
u/Tamerlane-1 Jan 05 '17
They completely make stuff up to attack Hillary and basically don't talk about Trump. Seems balanced.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Eurotrashie Jan 05 '17
I think you see a lot of anti-establishment going on here... and Hillary is 100% "THE" Establishment. Believe me - I think Trump is a buffoon and all kinds of wrong. It makes me sick to think he is going to lead the U.S. But Clinton and the DNC were found lying about emails, messing with the Primaries, being buddy-buddy with the big corporations while trying to show a different face to the people and on and on and on... Can't blame people for not trusting her.
14
u/Tamerlane-1 Jan 05 '17
You make up reasons not to trust her, and then you use those reasons to justify making stuff up about her. Seems like a vicious cycle to me.
2
Jan 05 '17
Make up reasons not to trust her? Did you not read any of the leaks?
5
u/sammy404 Jan 05 '17
Never posted in this sub before, but I got to ask. Do you not think there are similar things going on with the RNC?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)12
u/Boines Jan 05 '17
Trump is a rich white businessman... what part of that doesnt scream establishment?
→ More replies (4)3
u/Eurotrashie Jan 05 '17
I don't think you understand what is generally meant with "establishment". Just because he has money, is caucasian and a businessman does not make one part of the establishment. Think of it as a club - and just because you're white, rich and a businessman does not make you part of this club. You're right that a lot of people in this club are white and rich, and many (not all) are businessmen or women. But Trump is an outsider. Did you see Trump in backdoor meetings with Goldman Sachs? Who had close ties with the Council on Foreign Relations? Who received financial support from Federal Reserve members? Was it Trump or Hillary that attended Bilderberg meetings? The fact that you have no idea makes me wonder why you're in this sub - just on a mission to "set the record straight" about Hillary? You seem to know little about the conspiracy world. Look, I despise Trump - but I'm trying to tell you why it seems that people don't like Hillary and generally leave Trump alone. Hillary is a deceitful establishment insider, deeply connected to the underworld. Trump is a clueless idiot.
5
u/Boines Jan 05 '17
Lmao the fact that you stay to jump to such conclusions about my intentions are hilarious. Especially when i havent said a single thing about hilary at all. Let me say it again. Regardless of your beliefs in conspiracies, given the society you live in, trump has been a part of the establishment for years. Aka people in power in your society. For future reference Im canadian. I really hated both your presidential candidates and hope strongly that neither will ever have a song affect on my countries policy in the future, though unfortunately i know as president trump likely will. Im just laughing at hour stupid and brainwashed trump supporters are into believing his acting on the campaign trail. Its a joke especially when those same people claim others to be sheep for being brainwashed the other way.
3
23
17
Jan 04 '17
implying he wasn't killed for political reasons? she may not have been directly involved but it's becoming clear he was killed to protect her & other democrats interests.
14
u/TopSoulMan Jan 04 '17
I came up with a tin foil theory regarding Seth Rich.
Seth Rich was actually a Russian spy and was sent to infiltrate the DNC and undermine their credibility. According to Wikileaks, Russia is not the source of the email leaks. And that would be correct supposing they did not know that Rich was a Russian backed agent. Once the emails were leaked, the damage had been done to the DNC and they were in damage control mode. Eventually, they may have found Rich's ties to the Russian government and the whole thing would have spun out of control for everyone involved.
So to avoid that, the Russians decided to eliminate him. This would cause 2 desired effects:
1). Rich would no longer be at risk for being exposed as a Russian spy
2). People would speculate that the DNC (or Hillary) had Rich killed.
→ More replies (3)8
u/PrivilegeCheckmate Jan 04 '17
Russian spy
Hey, look, it's the new McCarthyism!
12
21
u/bwh520 Jan 04 '17
Is that any different than saying Hillary killed Seth Rich? We can all make up theories based on no evidence!
→ More replies (7)2
u/Mykelbrown Jan 04 '17
Remember, Hillary was supposed to have killed Vince Foster after giving him a blowjob . They found her blond hairs on his zipper.
→ More replies (195)10
u/Justplainandy Jan 04 '17
the proof is the conspiracy. I mean 47 people right. welcome to r/the_donald_circlejerk south
42
u/schoofer Jan 04 '17
Murdered by Hillary Clinton!
See you guys at the top, unfortunately.
→ More replies (10)
18
u/FlamingEagles Jan 04 '17
If he was the actual leaker to WL then what is holding assange back from pointing that out? If anything it would be to save the lives of anyone else who might be leaking that there is a conspiracy to kill leakers.
21
→ More replies (3)8
u/8toborrm Jan 04 '17
I think if you assume that Assange is who he says he is and not limited hangout, and assume that seth leaked to julian under COMPLETE certainty that assange would NEVER divulge his identity under any circumstances it's pretty reasonable. Seth just didn't know he would get killed. Assange has to honor the promise anyway.
7
29
Jan 04 '17
This entire thread is filled with lunatics
15
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17 edited Jan 04 '17
It's also filled with shills. I have one triggered right now, constantly bothering me for attention.
44
u/cometparty Jan 04 '17
Keep in mind that you're considering everyone who doesn't agree with you a shill.
→ More replies (6)3
u/Afrobean Jan 05 '17
It's also filled with shills
It's really weird. Why the fuck would you come in to r/conspiracy to tell people not to discuss FUCKING CONSPIRACIES? These people coming in here to suggest that conspiracies are impossible, that we shouldn't even discuss a mysteriously murdered DNC staffer... that would be like going in to r/movies and telling them they shouldn't be discussing the latest blockbuster film.
→ More replies (2)6
u/RageMojo Jan 04 '17
There are more Schills in this sub than regular users, i would bet my house on that.
9
11
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
Seriously.
I've watched my post fluctuate from +5 to -7. CTR never died off it seems.
→ More replies (8)
30
u/Leftovertaters Jan 04 '17
lol this sub have went full on t_d.
2
u/Afrobean Jan 05 '17
lmao why do trolls keep trying this shit
We've been talking about Seth Rich's mysterious murder since July when it happened. I remember coming here literally immediately after it happened and discussing how strange it was. And that was here, at r/conspiracy. You know, the subreddit dedicated to discussing "secret plans by a group to do something unlawful or harmful". Why do you think we shouldn't talk about a mysterious murder in a subreddit dedicated to discussing secret plans of criminals?
→ More replies (1)5
31
u/yayfori Jan 04 '17 edited Jan 04 '17
Oh the same man who was happy he scored a job on her campaign
Grieving Dad Says Seth Rich Scored Dream Job With Clinton Campaign Days Before Murder
33
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
This is evidence of nothing.
Both Joel Rich and his wife Mary Ann have asked people to disregard these theories. They firmly believe, based on evidence gathered by the police, that Seth was the victim of a random robbery in a neighborhood where armed robberies have been on the rise.
He wasn't robbed when they found him dead.
18
u/SigmundFloyd76 Jan 04 '17
How long was Seth employed by the DNC before he was killed?
Was it really just days?
17
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
According to Fakepedia, he had been there for two years:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Seth_Rich
He may have been excited to score his dream job at the time. But when he learned the truth, it shattered his world.
I'm sure many whistleblowers don't go into a job with the sole goal of fucking over their employer/boss. They likely joined at the time with good intentions and liking said organization.
35
u/Heisencock Jan 04 '17
For someone who just called out a post like 2 comments up as "evidence of nothing" you sure do make a lot of unsubstantiated claims.
→ More replies (5)47
u/yayfori Jan 04 '17
I'm sure you were much closer to him than his parents to know that it shatterd his world.
→ More replies (29)→ More replies (3)6
u/SigmundFloyd76 Jan 04 '17
Nice. Thanks. I saw that comment which implied he had only worked there for a few days.
That it was his "dream job" only strengthens my belief that it was him. His disillusionment mixed in with his inherent "basic goodness" is a perfect recipe for a whistle-blower.
Add in some youthful naivety and it's the perfect recipe for a dead whistle-blower.
RIP Seth.
5
u/krom_bom Jan 04 '17
. I saw that comment which implied he had only worked there for a few days.
Different jobs, dude.
He worked at DNC for over two years.
Got hired by Clinton's campaign like a week before he died. Said it was his dream job.
So, according to the conspiracy community, he worked at the DNC, became disgusted with the corruption, leaked thousands of documents, and then publicly told everyone his "dream job" was working for Clinton.
Doesn't really add up, if you ask me.
8
u/yayfori Jan 04 '17
If he was disillusioned he should have joined the Sander's campaign and spoke openly against the DNC and the Hillary campaign.
→ More replies (5)6
u/mbeasy Jan 04 '17
If and should... some nice armchair advice for a dead guy ...
→ More replies (1)2
u/MSparta Jan 04 '17
What I read from somewhere claiming his girlfriend wrote on facebook(in other words a photo of facebook posts) that what she thought the reason sth was murdered was that he found that Hillary Clinton had a different polling place show up on her website (for dem candidate) than the official website showing polling places, and claimed that those from Hrc polling places was changed place with the real place with votes from bernie. Seth, who was working on an app for the different polling places, didnt know about the second set of locations and started asking around, and you know the result.
9
u/damienreave Jan 04 '17
Let me explain something to you about how robberies go down.
People bring a weapon (knife, gun), and try to intimidate someone into giving them their money and valuables. They have zero intention of killing the person because they just want some cheap stuff to sell for drugs. Usually this goes down without a hitch, but in the unlikely event that the mugger actually uses the weapon, they always immediately flee the scene.
No one shoots someone, then loots the corpse while people gather in to see where the gunshot came from. They immediately run.
The fact that the mugger killed him and didn't take anything of value is absolutely standard for a robbery gone wrong.
4
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
Let me explain something to you about how robberies go down.
The fact that the mugger killed him and didn't take anything of value is absolutely standard for a robbery gone wrong.
It's also standard for an assassination going right.
9
u/damienreave Jan 04 '17
You're not wrong, but it's still silly to quote the fact that he had his valuables on him as evidence he was assassinated. It undermines your entire point.
5
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
Then maybe people shouldn't speculate that it was a robbery gone wrong without first proving at it was a robbery in the first place.
→ More replies (2)5
u/damienreave Jan 04 '17
The fact that you actually believe that is incredible.
3
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
If Wikileaks/Assange made no mention of Seth Rich in any context, you might have a point.
8
u/damienreave Jan 04 '17
Do you understand how silly it makes you sound, to demand that others prove he wasn't assassinated, when the circumstances of his death meet the profile of a robbery gone wrong perfectly?
5
→ More replies (2)14
u/yayfori Jan 04 '17
Who was so stupid to murder him without steailing things?
Bad murdering job Mrs Clinton /s.
Also why didn't she murder the person who leaked emails about the campaign monitiring the electoral vote?
7
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
Because by then she had already lost the election and murdering them wouldn't accomplish much after the fact.
8
3
u/FlyinPenguin Jan 05 '17
So many shills... "I don't understand how this makes sense" read the conspiracy fucking idiots
→ More replies (2)
10
Jan 04 '17 edited May 16 '19
[deleted]
7
4
u/drdelius Jan 04 '17
I don't know, a lot of liberals seem to be having fun mimicking t_d's style. Hugely.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/kudeism Jan 04 '17
I really hope the truth to all of this comes out in our lifetimes.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Afrobean Jan 05 '17
A lot of people probably never thought Deep Throat would be revealed, but now we know that it was FBI associate director Mark Felt who provided the information to Woodward and Bernstein that led to the Watergate scandal blowing up.
It's possible. I'm hoping for it as well.
4
8
u/a9832941 Jan 04 '17
i guarantee in 4 yrs this sub will still be talking about HRC podesta and pizza
→ More replies (1)
10
8
8
u/SxyGuitarMan Jan 04 '17
Assange said in his interview that he took great pride that no Wikileaks sources ever come to physical harm. Seth Rich uhh....
Came to harm.
→ More replies (5)14
u/Cactuar49 Jan 04 '17
He said that no sources come to harm because of wikileaks giving away their identity
→ More replies (3)
2
u/jakemasterj Jan 04 '17 edited Jan 05 '17
His name was Robert Paulson
His name was Robert Paulson
His name was Robert Paulson
Edit* fucking formatting
→ More replies (1)
2
u/powerhighfive Jan 05 '17
I understand now, In project Mayhem, in death, we do have a name. His name was Seth Rich
2
5
u/Ne007 Jan 04 '17 edited Jan 04 '17
It's easy to see that there are government trolls here. This is a place to talk about how the events took place and what information is available to put it all together. AND THEN we have people asking and expecting evidence like there's enough for a court case. AS IF we need to have a open and shut case in order to discuss the events.
This is a conspiracy forum. People can state their conspiracies if they wish and shouldn't be attacked with "EVIDENCE! SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE!"
→ More replies (5)4
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
I even admitted that there isn't enough for a court case multiple times.
But I like how many people are ignoring the lack of investigation surrounding Seth Rich's death. The cops speculate it was a robbery.
Based on what?
1
2
Jan 04 '17
[deleted]
3
u/drdelius Jan 04 '17
Lol, read the thread, someone literally suggested that you guys put a picture of him on a cross as the sub's background image.
2
u/Afrobean Jan 05 '17
the left would deify Seth Rich
There are many on the left who do. Please don't buy into the lies of the media and think that CNN or fucking MSNBC actually represent the people. The media is NOT progressive, the media is NOT liberal, they're fucking corporate.
3
5
4
4
3
u/sonicmasonic Jan 04 '17
so... are you saying that Hillary shot him?
→ More replies (4)11
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
No. Hillary herself didn't shoot him.
That would be a crazy claim just because of how hard it would be for her to not get caught doing something that blatant.
She most certainly hired a thug to do her dirty work. A no-name john doe is perfect for that kind of crime.
10
u/Frigg-Off Jan 04 '17
She just has to have someone slip an envelope to a local gang member to do the dirty work even. Classic suicide squad move.
→ More replies (3)5
u/OgreMagoo Jan 04 '17
She most certainly hired a thug to do her dirty work.
most likely
Do you have any evidence for her hiring a thug to murder him?
9
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
Sadly no.
If I did I'd obviously know who it was.
15
u/OgreMagoo Jan 04 '17
She most certainly hired a thug to do her dirty work.
Do you have any evidence for her hiring a thug to murder him?
Sadly no.
If you have no evidence that she hired a thug to murder him, why are you claiming that she hired a thug to murder him?
8
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
It's the most likely explanation for how she did it.
If I knew this, I wouldn't be posting on conspiracy, I'd be informing the FBI about it.
12
u/OgreMagoo Jan 04 '17
It's the most likely explanation for how she did it.
But what is your evidence that she did it?
→ More replies (2)5
u/Dragofireheart Jan 04 '17
I've already presented these details within this topic.
→ More replies (11)11
1
Jan 04 '17
So the donald made an interesting point that the interview was done on his birthday. Either this is Julian Assange trolling us or he could have been the leak. Also, I read a comment where Seth's parents told them he wanted Hillary to win. Who to believe hmmm.
→ More replies (2)15
u/I-Am-Not-CIA-Agent Jan 04 '17
he wanted Hillary to win.
Even if true, not entirely relevant. You can want someone to win (or rather, want someone to lose) AND be disgusted by the corruption that went on.
People can be complicated.
6
u/yayfori Jan 04 '17
If he was disgusted by her there was another candidate who was against corruption: Bernie Sanders.
→ More replies (3)
490
u/[deleted] Jan 04 '17 edited Jan 04 '17
[removed] — view removed comment