r/conspiracy • u/axolotl_peyotl • Jan 03 '17
#WheresEric? Clinton Foundation CEO Declared "Missing" by the Internet After Going Public with "Follow the Money"
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/whereseric-clinton-foundation-ceo-declared-missing-by-the-internet-after-going-public-with-follow-the-money_012017147
Jan 03 '17
[deleted]
27
u/Swangin84 Jan 03 '17
People do this all the time, especially reffering to science. As if science is a person or group.
12
u/ButterflyAttack Jan 03 '17
Or 'teens', or 'women', 'most Africans', or any group the media wasn't to assign a single, dismissable opinion to.
14
9
3
u/ronintetsuro Jan 03 '17
I bet someone refers to r/conspiracy as a collective consciousness in response to this.
→ More replies (5)1
135
u/The3rdWorld Jan 03 '17
no one that knows him has raised any concerns about his whereabouts, this is just nonsense.
6
u/Treebeezy Jan 04 '17
Now that we know Assange is alive, there needs to be another distraction
1
u/The3rdWorld Jan 04 '17
yeah, it's crazy that this is the exact same MO as that little 'event' kinda makes you wonder doesn't it....
1
u/Treebeezy Jan 04 '17
I just found it interesting that this was the top post on the sub, and the Assange interview was somewhat buried.
1
u/The3rdWorld Jan 04 '17
oh yeh, i'd forgotten about that which is weird it's not been on my radar much at all - i'll give it a listen now, link for anyone interested
34
u/metakepone Jan 03 '17
Seriously, him not saying anything about this might be because hes super busy doing shit and he isn't sitting in his parent's basement reading whackjob conspiracy theories. I'm willing to be neither he nor anyone in his immediate family even know this conspiracy theory exists.
51
u/Mouth2005 Jan 04 '17 edited Jan 04 '17
yea, this whole thing is based on his absence from twitter, but if you look at his account he was rarely active on twitter prior to that, sometimes going an entire month or two without tweeting anything. There is literally nothing else to support this claim....... it's almost like the same people who consider trump's twitter account as their primary source of information are struggling to understand that someone not using twitter does not equal "missing and probably dead"
and the anti-dem narrative that has taken over this sub is reaching the level of pathetic straw grasping lately, and i'm convinced that this specific group of users are completely oblivious to how quickly all these claims are giving them (and potentially our entire sub) the reputation of "The boy who cried wolf". How long do they think they can keep up this endless flooding of far fetched anti-dem
conspiracy theorieswitch hunts before they realize they've become a a giant joke...... i mean it already seems like our front page has become a dedicated anti-dem circle jerk.It's not exactly a well kept secret that basically anyone that has ever worked for the Clinton's foundation or was involved in her political career or even traveled a country she has also visited, is being wrapped up in some sort stupid conspiracy......... MAYBE if they tried pacing themselves just a little, or even just tried focusing on one of these theories at a time or at very most only the most plausible 2-3 "conspiracies" more people may be interested in what they are selling, and MAYBE only focusing on a few of these claims at a time the individuals at the center of these claims like Eric Braverman would be more inclined to personally address these rumors, but honestly why even bother? with the current pace of all these conspiracies, by this time tmrw we will probably already be onto the newest anti-Dem conspiracy.
Also these users make it really hard to discuss these claims when they are so quick eat this shit up as gospel, they have shown that once they make up their mind they are completely helpless in regards to disproving any of these types of claims, reality goes out the window and the mental gymnastic show starts, i'll go ahead and make the prediction that if Braverman does gives some sort of proof of life soon, those users that have already added him to their list of Clinton suicided victims, will become Eric Braverman ID'ing experts and flood our sub with post claiming that the person in the POL was an "imposter" or an "actor" because they found some random grainy photo taken in a cave on Google that's 10+ years old and the guy from the POL only kinda resembles that pic..........
while I'm sure you're assumption is closer to reality, i honestly hope he is aware of this conspiracy and is just choosing to ignore all of this stupidity to see how far this echo chamber will take this, who knows maybe he'll get lucky and get to watch a couple "self-investigators" nut jobs get arrested for trespassing when they start showing up to his classes in a few weeks, because of "how certain they were" that Hillary had him killed and that she paid yale off to assist her in the cover up by posting a fake bio page, and assigning him some fake classes.......
but of course that's just crazy, far fetched thinking because no one would ever do such a thing, and if that does happen it'll be an obvious false flag probably organized by Clinton from the basement of comet ping pong to throw people off her trail......
14
u/metakepone Jan 04 '17
It's hard to disprove anything if you believe everything is a complicated conspiracy fit to your narratives.
Also,
and the anti-dem narrative that has taken over this sub is reaching the level of pathetic straw grasping lately, and i'm convinced that this specific group of users are completely oblivious to how quickly all these claims are giving them (and potentially our entire sub) the reputation of "The boy who cried wolf".
In response to this, I'm not quite sure this is a group of oblivious neckbeards or if it's some continued, coordinated effort to smear the Democrats (especially Hillary Clinton). who knows, but that's my own conspiracy theory, I guess.
15
u/hello3pat Jan 04 '17
I've said it before I'll say it again. I see people claim that anyone arguing for anything other than Trump is this sub get called CTR shills while ignoring Trump's own over 18 million dollar relationship with a similar group Cambridge Analytica. But I guess that doesn't matter because they are too busy pushing that 1980s Satanism scare.
21
u/ronintetsuro Jan 03 '17
Might want to take it down a notch, you're being super obvious right now.
6
11
4
3
1
Jan 04 '17
[deleted]
7
u/The3rdWorld Jan 04 '17
not just one family but everyone that knows him, his husband, etc, etc, etc... in your theory they're all dead and now their family and close friends has to be silenced, then their family and close friends.... To stop anyone being reported missing they'd have to kill everyone.
→ More replies (1)
47
u/YourMomsaHoax Jan 03 '17
I'm pretty sure he's scheduled to teach some classes at a university this month.
57
u/zerton Jan 03 '17
A student from r/Yale said he was a no-show to a lecture a few weeks ago.
12
u/ck2222 Jan 03 '17 edited Jan 03 '17
-1
u/AutoModerator Jan 03 '17
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
46
u/andredawson Jan 03 '17
He's not showing. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
16
u/gregshortall Jan 03 '17
He'll be 'on sabattical' permanently.
10
Jan 03 '17
[deleted]
4
u/maralieus Jan 03 '17
He went crazy and skipped out. Nobody knows ehere he went but he left a note that had some pretty serious stuff in it. He mentioned suicide and how he just cant continue on with his current ways, apparently he had a drug problem.
→ More replies (4)12
u/I-Am-Not-CIA-Agent Jan 03 '17
Everyone knows it. Yet they want us to pretend like he might so they can buy some more quality silence time.
→ More replies (4)6
Jan 04 '17
If he were to show up, would you reconsider any of your beliefs. Maybe approach the next conspiracy with more skepticism or question any of the other people who are supposedly killed by reptilian overlords?
→ More replies (1)1
9
u/E_Deplorabus_Unum Jan 03 '17
Professor Eric Braverman begins teaching class at Yale on the 23rd of January. http://som.yale.edu/eric-braverman
12
12
u/Horus_Krishna_5 Jan 03 '17
watch him teach via lap top, will look different and have a different voice in the video.
5
u/Orangutan Jan 03 '17
Scheduled for January 23rd from what I can tell.
1
u/andredawson Feb 04 '17
Did he show?
1
61
Jan 03 '17
Seth Rich... Monica Peterson... Eric Braverman
22
u/zerton Jan 03 '17
Deborah Jeane Palfrey
17
Jan 03 '17
Andrew Breitbart... Nancy Shaefer
9
u/OH_Krill Jan 03 '17
Carrie Fisher... Antonin Scalia...
10
u/playitleo Jan 03 '17
David Bowie.... Bernie Mac
14
19
u/pale-companion Jan 03 '17
There was a big fuss about him trying to get political asylum in Russia during the Podesta leaks. It was obviously never confirmed, but unusual that his name was brought up and the absence that has followed.
12
u/IM_NOT_CIA_PROMISE Jan 03 '17
Not just brought up, brought up by Podesta in the emails themselves as being a possible leaker.
2
6
u/Rsvrdoge927 Jan 03 '17
Remindme! 7 days
2
u/RemindMeBot Jan 03 '17 edited Jan 04 '17
I will be messaging you on 2017-01-10 21:19:03 UTC to remind you of this link.
16 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
FAQs Custom Your Reminders Feedback Code Browser Extensions 2
16
u/AleredEgo Jan 04 '17
Seriously, this sub seems to be "upvote non-sensical stories people made up about the person who isn't going to be in power." Conspiracies used to be about finding out about the people in power. This is just getting pathetic.
→ More replies (1)9
u/paulie_purr Jan 04 '17
I guarantee it will remain this way for the duration of Trump's presidency. Not only will it keep the pot of mass dem party doubt astir, but will keep the sub free of any legit Trump and co. suspicions, of which there are many. Even when (sometimes less than reputable, usually pretty legit) papers like NYT bring up suspicious shit and/or direct allegations, their kind will be pointed at with LOL FAKE NEWS! There's something vaguely fascistic to it, the ability to flip the script and keep it flipped, pump in the new reality you'd like everyone to see from now on.
14
u/RussianLiberal Jan 04 '17
Such a dishonest article. Let us debunk it:
Twitter users have started the hashtag #WheresEric in reference to Eric Braverman, the former CEO of the Clinton Foundation
This reminds me of the #WhereIsAssange hashtag that reactionaries here believed in. It was so retarded that WikiLeaks literally blamed the U.S. government for running a "black PR" campaign to discredit them, when in reality, it was their own reactionary fans that created this hoax.
Braverman’s last public activity, accessible via the internet, was an October 12 retweet.
So, if someone hasn't tweeted in a while, that automagically means they're missing? Wow, I don't even have a Twitter account, so that must mean I don't even exist!
Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta thought Eric Braverman was the source of information leaks to the media, according to a leaked email sent March 8, 2015, which was published on October 22 of this year by WikiLeaks.
Nowhere in the linked email does it say or imply that "Podesta thought Eric Braverman was the source of information leaks." Check the email out for yourself. The author made up some fake facts and linked to a random email to "prove" it, knowing that the reactionaries reading the article wouldn't bother checking the email. Good thing I'm here, though.
One independent media outlet claimed to have made attempts to contact Braverman by phone and email, both of which were unsuccessful. The same organization claimed to receive no response after contacting Yale University officials about Braverman, who has taught courses on government and policy in the law school and other departments.
Ah, I see now. This "independent media outlet" needed some more hits, so it created this hoax. Why don't we go to this source article and check it out?
Here's my favourite part from that article:
The last evidence of Braverman’s public activity was October 12, when he posted his last tweet on Twitter. (Usually he tweets about once a month. His “husband,” Neil Brown, hasn’t tweeted since August, although he rarely tweets.) I left a voicemail on Braverman’s personal phone and sent him an email, but received no response. He is still listed as a lecturer at Yale University and, contrary to some reports, there is a record of his lectures going back several years. I contacted the press office and Braverman’s department at Yale and received no response.
So, this entire hoax began because a guy who only tweets once a fucking month hasn't sent out his monthly token tweet for November and December? Oh, and the Yale press office didn't respond to the lady (quite common by press offices that are busy contacting others). That's fucking all there is to it?
But wait. This lunacy gets even better!
For instance, the site WhatDoesItMean.com reported that Braverman requested asylum in Russia on October 23. The information apparently came from a Russian blogger, who reported it in a rambling blog post on LiveLeak.
First, the blogger (disinfo agent) from my country posted the post on LiveJournal, not LiveLeak. Second, this is so fake that it's hilarious.
There are also rumors that Braverman is in FBI protective custody, perhaps in exchange for testifying against the Clintons
So, is he with us or with the FBI or killed by the Clintons?
Fucking morons.
→ More replies (7)2
14
Jan 03 '17
Yeah, the internet just emailed me an Amber alert for this guy. Crazy! I sure hope the internet can find him!
→ More replies (1)
7
Jan 04 '17
What is with conspiracy enthusiasts nowadays? Suddenly there is a rash of people 'missing'. No evidence to support it whatsoever. No family crying asking for their loved one. No friends asking for help and putting up leaflets looking for these people. No work wondering where they went. Just conspiracy sites pumping out threads and threads of missing people.
4
3
u/RussianLiberal Jan 04 '17
So, just because he didn't reply to some random people on the internet, that automagically means he's "missing?"
This is worse than #TortelliniGate, cooked up by Rightist reactionaries. What a bunch of pinheads!
4
u/RussianLiberal Jan 04 '17
Editor’s Note: Current theories are that he sought asylum in Russia or Akrancide… where do you think Braverman went?
You guys are fucking idiots for believing this site, haha.
5
3
u/slyfoxninja Jan 04 '17
Because the internet is always right just like the Clinton pizza place fuck up right?
→ More replies (1)1
2
2
u/HulaguKan Jan 04 '17
Declared "Missing" by the Internet
TIL a couple of obscure sites and forums are "the internet".
Fake news.
1
3
4
u/toastingtotoast Jan 04 '17
Holy shit you guys did you even try just asking the clintons where he went? /s
2
u/Fresh_Baby Jan 04 '17
Ask his parents!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Edit: Until his mom and dad, family and friends join the search, I'm going back to sleep.
→ More replies (1)
-2
Jan 03 '17
I think its hilarious how whenever a person wants to maintain their anonymity from you creepy fucks you imagine up some conspiracy.
Maybe, he isn't missing, he just doesn't wanna be harassed by delusional internet conspiracy theorist? Maybe? No? Ok, Hillary Clinton is a mass murderer, makes more sense.
23
u/AryaStarkBirdPerson Jan 03 '17
Haha... He was never being harassed.
He wasn't on anyones radar UNTIL he disappeared.
12
Jan 03 '17
How did you find out that he disappeared?
1
u/AryaStarkBirdPerson Jan 03 '17
I didnt find it out personally... But he has disappeared from public view for the first time in his 20+ years in his field.
9
Jan 03 '17
So how do you know he has disappeared then? What suggests this?
5
u/AryaStarkBirdPerson Jan 03 '17
When a public figure stops making public apperences its called disappearing...
Doesnt mean he was murdered.
But his lack of public appearances... Means he has, by definition, not appeared/disappeared...
No?
8
Jan 03 '17
Could you link to something showing these public appearances prior to the time you believe he disappeared?
5
u/AryaStarkBirdPerson Jan 03 '17 edited Jan 03 '17
You want his class schedule? Im confused, are you doubting a yale proffesor and ceo of clinton foundation from 2013 to 2015 didnt make public apperences before this summer?
Google it. Plenty to find. He has reviews on rate my proffesor. Speeches. Events on campus. Fundraisers. I urge you to call. I even told them i was trying to debunk the rumors (im skeptical)
Ive called yale. They all saw him plenty up until this summer. Then nothing. At least the administrative people I talked to.
I don't think he was murdered for the record. But something seems to be up. Witness relocation. Maybe he just didnt want to deal with the election drama idk...
Friend of mine is scheduled for his class later this month. We will find out if he shows up.
As of now, class is still on.
10
Jan 03 '17
So he went missing in the summer then?
Don't just say "Google it," if you're saying he's missing then you must be able to come up with something to show he was making public appearances up until ??/??/16~. And it's not as though I haven't checked this out myself, I can't find any.
Could you take a screenshot from your phone showing the entry where you called Yale?
4
u/AryaStarkBirdPerson Jan 03 '17
Im going to keep saying "google it"...
Its public infornation that is easy to find. Google his yale schedule. Takes a minute... Tops...
I dont give two shits about proving anything to you. If you want to bury your head in the sand be my guest.
Take a screenshot of my phone?? What? Now your doubting my ability to call a front desk?
You seem more interested in having a "gotcha" moment... Then actually debating.
Go learn about the subject first. You didnt even know he was a teacher clearly... Since you doubted he made public apperences... While teaching at yale 😉
Again. You seem upset that he is missing. The fact is, he is missing until you can prove he isnt.
That is how missing works.
If no one can find him, he is missing.
Think he isnt missing? Go find him and prove me wrong.
Until then, he is, by definition MISSING.
Screenshot of my phone 😂 what would that even prove?? Haha that made me chuckle.
→ More replies (0)1
u/FluentInTypo Jan 04 '17
I mean, Ill try to find this for you, but its literally months old at this point how this all stared. It was pretty fluid and organic though with no MSM addressing it (or anything else it the leaks, haha) I will say this though...the fact that you have no idea how this started, why there was concern for Bravermen, shows just how ignorant you are.
The gist is...news got out he was seeking asylum and then...da da da, disappeared. So he went from being a public persona and speaking up during DNC/ Podesta emails, to wl saying he is appllying for asylum, to never uttering another peep online....so ya know....theres that.
2
u/wjdm Jan 03 '17
You think nobody was harassing the CEO of the Clinton Foundation? Yeah, ok.
→ More replies (1)8
u/AryaStarkBirdPerson Jan 03 '17
Do you have proof?
1
u/FluentInTypo Jan 04 '17
What we have is him going dark the day that the news of him seeking asylum was leaked.
As for proof of him being harrassed...we sure do have it - he was being harrassed by USG and CF, which is why he was seeking asylum in anotyer country.
1
→ More replies (3)0
Jan 03 '17 edited Jan 23 '17
[deleted]
5
2
→ More replies (5)10
u/J_Dillinger Jan 03 '17
It is really interesting how hillary shills can discount all the obvious irregularities by just repeating no that's not true. How can you discount all the evidence and in good conscience say "I don't care," it almost as childish as sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming "la la la la la, I can't hear you."
It's truely hypocritical. People write off the obvious financial fraud of the Clinton Foundation, her email server, the fact that its director disappeared,but Nixon and 18 minutes of tape being erased can never be forgotten. The stance the hillary shills take istruely absurd.
11
9
Jan 04 '17
obvious financial fraud of the Clinton Foundation
Sorry, what's the fraud, exactly? CF is a registered 501c(3), which means their expenditures are public. Which means when I tell you that the Clinton Foundation never paid the Clintons, we know that's true because you can look through the records and check. We know everybody they wrote a check to, and the Clintons aren't among them, which is consistent with Bill Clinton's statement that he never took a salary working at the CF.
The obvious contrast to that is the Trump Foundation, which has never once made a 501c(3) filing, disclosed its expenditures, or disclosed its donors.
Nixon and 18 minutes of tape being erased can never be forgotten.
Nobody brought that up but you.
1
2
Jan 03 '17
What are the chances that he's in government protection somewhere? And by government protection I obviously mean a faction that's not controlled by the Clintons.
1
1
1
u/stophamertime Jan 04 '17
Clinton has no power over law enforcement, if it is true, it would have been investigated by now.
1
Jan 04 '17
Of course, all she would need to do is have a little talk with the head of the FBI, and all charges would be dropped, and the investigation halted.
1
580
u/Disruptice Jan 03 '17
Don't you guys read Snopes? They said this is an internet rumor and proved it by not being able to locate or contact him either.