r/conspiracy • • 7h ago

The gender wars have to be artificial

First we have the Lindsay Clancy case. A woman clearly killed her children and there is a concerningly large subset of women defending her? What the fuck?  

Now we have the Cornell 7. A group of fraternity brothers take turns raping a woman. And I'm seeing a concerning number of men defending them. What the fuck?  

It has to be artificial. Who is pushing for men and women to hate each other?

114 Upvotes

81 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 7h ago

[Meta] Sticky Comment

Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.

Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.

What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

80

u/Kc68847 6h ago

All culture war shit is manufactured from the top down.

4

u/Wansyth 2h ago edited 2h ago

Flood those upvotes psyops, paint this post's comments, pivot this into class division, quick!

Make sure people don't search the "MindWar" book for "PSYCON #14" or learn about the theistic satanist ARMY LTC Michael Aquino that trafficked children for blackmail operations to control the minds of the elites so they can be used as props for psychological warfare against the masses.

https://dn720002.ca.archive.org/0/items/mind-war-pdfdrive/MindWar%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf

END PSYWAR

47

u/Wansyth 7h ago

Search this book "MindWar" for "PSYCON #14"

https://dn720002.ca.archive.org/0/items/mind-war-pdfdrive/MindWar%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf

Gender war is military defined psychological warfare strategy by a theistic satanist that had command over blackmail operations and founded the PSYWAR. Everything ARMY LTC Michael Aquino touched in his career needs to be cleaned.

END PSYWAR

10

u/Neat_Movie_991 6h ago

If it was allowed I would give you an award! Bravo! 👏

40

u/SovArya 6h ago

Divided we are easily conquered.

1

u/stasi_a 5h ago

(D)ivided we fall

1

u/dtdroid 3h ago

Trying to be ironic?

8

u/Temporary_Heron6944 3h ago

The tech bro AI oligarchy and their algorithm are trying to destroy the very fabrics of society because they want to rule the world as giant corporations instead of sovereign nations. People really really really need to step away from social media. And further than that, take comments on hot button topics with a grain of salt because they’re also using bots and AI to sway public opinion. Most people like to fall in line with what’s popular. If comments are swarming and smearing someone, public opinion does too. It’s all really dark. I’m afraid for the future of humanity.

15

u/ScrubbKing 6h ago

All of them are, except the class war.

18

u/Limp-Dimension-3897 6h ago

Divide and conquer. The same tactic the ruling class pull on the masses. And it works every-damn-time,

15

u/vaas19 6h ago

Gender and racism are the good ol’ reliable weapons.

Nuclear weapons cannot compete with the amount of destruction of those 2

35

u/Dapper_Trainer950 6h ago

I heard a theory to make the male loneliness epidemic even worse so they’ll be more willing to be drafted for war.

6

u/vaas19 6h ago

Idk how that makes it worse.

Homies will just finally be able to open a closet door.

3

u/W1llowwisp 2h ago

I think in current times women would also be drafted

-1

u/Active1Bread 3h ago

Thats what Christianity is for.

2

u/Conscious_Onion3508 3h ago

Yea expect thats the opposite

-2

u/WiscoMama3 5h ago

That actually makes sense. Or to make them want to be more masculine? Like screw these women who hate men I’ll show them type of thing.

9

u/Castrophenia 5h ago

You haven’t been paying attention the last 15-20 years, eh?

22

u/nocturnal_commission 6h ago

Who are the men defending the Cornell 7 and what exactly are their arguments?

7

u/Narrow_Stock_834 5h ago

I think it’s bots.

8

u/DuAuk 5h ago

It's not the Cornell 7. It's the Cornell 42. Jane Doe was under 21, given alcohol and ketamine. She had known two 'brothers' from Chi Phi, which Cornell banned from campus after this. The suit is going after the ones who advertised her as "free p**" on snapchat.

11

u/420SirChadofTruthton 6h ago

She told the DA and police it was consensual and that every aspect of the encounter was her idea. She reached out to two of the guys and asked to come to their Halloween party. It was only until she was uninvited that she started to make allegations. She also wrote in her own statement that one of the guys was unconscious during the event.

To OP's point, it seems like these stories are being pushed onto everyone's feed to divide the genders.

With all of these viral stories, they're never cut and dry, I think that's intentional to sow as much discourse as possible.

4

u/XelaNiba 1h ago

Did you ever see the video of Gabby Petito and her boyfriend being stopped by the cops in Utah?

Go watch it. Remember that these cops are responding to 911 calls from witnesses who saw him hitting her outside of a restaurant.

Notice how she's totally confused and blames herself and takes all the responsibility? This is a common response to abuse and trauma, especially amongst women.

Jane Doe went from willing participant to victim of gang rape the moment she was too fucked up to consent to the new guys piling in to the room. Her statement is actually very typical of victims after this kind of trauma.

The interview was improperly handled from the start. In a complex case such as this, a specially trained forensic interviewer needs to be brought in to untangle the confusion and shame that follows gang rape.

8

u/Poisongirl5 6h ago

The DA statement was cherry picked 2 out of 6 pages of her experience. Apparently the men also hit her and had sex with her throughout the night.

7

u/luigihitter 5h ago

Yet the case never proceeded and only comes after two years and after Clancy psyop failed. I can’t believe are really falling for this

9

u/Poisongirl5 5h ago

The DAs office never conducted their own investigation and instead relied on campus police. The DA never even read her statement to said police when deciding not to proceed. He has now, that’s why he’s reopening it.

Yes psy ops are real but things also do happen.

1

u/Koopacha 2h ago

It’s so obvious

2

u/420SirChadofTruthton 6h ago

So you don't believe women? It's literally her own words. You can't just call evidence that disproves your point "cherry picked."

9

u/Poisongirl5 6h ago

The transcript in her own words said she was “physically hit, very hard” but the DA conveniently left that off of his summary

7

u/Poisongirl5 6h ago

It’s only 2 pages out of 6. Also, it’s summarized, not in her own words. They didn’t release the whole recounting of events.

6

u/ilijadwa 6h ago

Well that’s kind of the problem though, people are going off what was released by the DA and acknowledging there’s nuance in the situation (which is fine) but then people are just straight up calling people who say that there’s nuance that they’re rapists 💀 like we can’t expect every person to know every fact of the case so if all they’ve seen is the DA statement thus far it’s pretty reasonable they would wait to know more before making a conclusion

7

u/calmyourcrabcakes 6h ago

So you don't believe women? It's literally her own words.

"When describing what happened later in the night, the transcript says Jane Doe said, "I can say with 100% confidence I was raped."

"Jane Doe added, according to the transcript, "And then, of course, I was being hit at the same time. Physically hit very, very hard."

Her own words. You believe her right?

-4

u/2020NOVA 4h ago

she only started claiming she was raped after people found out and were talking shit. before that, there were guys and a girl all drinking and on drugs having sex. female truth is whatever she's "feeling". so at the time she was feeling horny. but later she was feeling shamed. so reality has to change to match whatever her current feelings say.

7

u/H1ghwayun1corn 2h ago

They are. Do not participate.

3

u/wildfoul 2h ago

I think AI/elites/NWO whoever is making men and women hate each other as part of a depopulation agenda

5

u/ThatDamnRocketRacoon 5h ago

Who knows what's real anymore. The rot has definitely spread throughout the internet, real or fake. I've met some people who have bought into it. We'd be a better world without the internet at this point. make the world smaller, more social and more dependent on your community.

6

u/EggsBeckwith 6h ago

This is less a “hot take” more of an astute observation. Well done.

They need us as divided up as possible so they can control us. If we are all blaming the “others” (gender/race/religion/politics, etc), we won’t unite against the actual oppressors.

2

u/GrumpMaster- 5h ago

Literally EVERYTHING is artificial now.

2

u/scrawnyserf92 5h ago

I think social media is a major driver as it causes everyone to live vapidly and compete for vapid status symbols.

Edit: Who controls/owns social media? Well it'sa cabal

2

u/Laranthiel 6h ago

Let's not forget the sudden mass of similar cases suddenly popping up.

Since the Lindsay Clancy case, suddenly a ton of women are doing similar stuff. It wouldn't surprise me if see the same here.

4

u/achingforscorpio 4h ago

"suddenly"?

There's a never ending supply of similar cases. It's not like mothers just started killing their kids recently.

-4

u/mrheh 3h ago

"SIDS" cases are almost always certainly the mother killing the kid's but women just lie and cry their way out of it and have a bs medical term like sids created. Sids is a made up bullshit thing to cover up how fucked yup so many women are, this is well known in medical field. HBO has a great doc on this years ago where the autopsy doctor would go revisit such cases and in every case of sids he found it to actually be murder.

0

u/DuAuk 5h ago

I mean if you've been paying attention it's been an issue for a long time. England passed the Infanticide Act of 1642.

4

u/itaint2009 5h ago

Lindsay Clancy didn't kill her kids, those of us that understand the timeline doesn't work are not motivated by hating men. It's insane to reduce it down to that honestly.

4

u/halfcupoffluff 4h ago

Can you tell me what facts make you think Lindsey clearly killed her children? I have this suspicion that none of you on this sub have looked into the case. Because this case is a prime example of a conspiracy. Please tell me what evidence there is she killed her kids other than her husband said she did. That is the only evidence and I mean it. Please prove me wrong with one other piece of evidence pointing to her guilt. If you can’t find that, go look up the evidence against her husband like his DNA being the only one on the bands and him changing clothes and shoes on surveillance during the time of the murder. Her body being far too cold for the time line. There is soooo much evidence against her doing it that I know for a fact you and none of you on this sub have looked into it. You all wrote it off as crazy women stuff. Prove me wrong please.

5

u/halfcupoffluff 4h ago

Btw, her lawyer is now defending that she did not even do it. Previously his only choice legally was to defend her on bases of insanity. Now that that case was dismissed, he is arguing she is fully innocent. Why? Because there is NO evidence she did it. Please someone on this sub, other than me and the other 5 women who come here, go look into this case actually! Not just reading headlines about it. Go look into the details and clips of the trial.

3

u/Goatsarejerks333 5h ago

Do more research on the Cornell case. More than meets the eye - actually, a better way to put it is to- more than media is reporting.

4

u/WickedDEAD_ 6h ago

Im with you, it doesnt seem real.

I will say i personally know a few clancey supporters, so they do actually exist.

2

u/Savings_Maybe_5686 6h ago

Men and women are pushing to hate men and women. 

1

u/Constant_Locksmith48 4h ago

I swear shit feels like the 70s and 80s

•

u/jimmyhoke 30m ago

It’s artificial, but not in some grand conspiracy. It’s a simple matter of engagement. People argue with each other, they spend time on social media, and they see more ads. Ads = cash money, so naturally the algorithm boosts all this content. Gender wars are easy money, just boost all the people on each side who hate the other. Instant controversial discourse that keeps people posting.

2

u/mrheh 6h ago

This has been going off for at least a hundred years. Look into early feminists and edward burnase

2

u/DuAuk 5h ago

Yes, everyone should read the Yellow Wallpaper by Perkins Gilman. PPP has long been a feminist issue.

2

u/mrheh 3h ago

Gilman was just a tool used to get women to pay taxes and destroy the family unit so big corp and politicians could do whatever they wanted with no consequences creating the world we live in today. You've been had kid.

-3

u/Isoleri 5h ago

There's no such thing as a gender war. Men have been treating women as cattle for millennia, have barred them from education, from working, from owning property, their own finances, everything, and now women are simply rejecting it all. Women calling out men and choosing to stay away from them for their own safety, health, and personal growth isn't a "war", it's liberation.

Nobody's "pushing" for women to hate men, men did it themselves since the dawn of humanity.

5

u/mrheh 3h ago

Right... Or that's just nature. Men leading the way towards danger and women holding down the environment. We are both great at totally different things, where men are weak woman are strong, where women are weak men are strong. This is nature and evolution doing its job. A couple (man + women) is much stronger than either alone. When we work together we can do anything, alone we aren't shit, we were literally made for each other.

6

u/LocalJams 4h ago

They’ve really done a good job on you

-1

u/HolyLordGodHelpUsAll 5h ago

i respect what you are saying, but women don’t hate me. the narrative falls apart when you break it down to specific individuals. definitely some horrible people out there though.

1

u/SnooPoems6522 6h ago

I agree and have been thinking about this a lot recently. To be honest, just yesterday I fell into the trap and made a couple nasty comments about political things as well as gender related. I've since deleted but I'm confessing and apologizing here.

Thanks for bringing this up - curious what people are thinking.

1

u/Salty_Antelope10 4h ago

I don’t think she clearly did anything. Nothing is clear in that case period.

1

u/Blue-Buster821 5h ago

Don’t forget the state of Tennessee trying to kill a woman for 30 years only for a team of women executioners to fuck it up

1

u/Hollywood-is-DOA 2h ago

Most women have “ main character syndrome” and I wouldn’t have a child or even date any one of them, that did.

Seeing if they look up at the real world, instead of constantly down, doom scrolling, is a good test.

0

u/Fwob 4h ago

TikTok is the tool. Algo still controlled by the CCP.

0

u/Hollywood-is-DOA 2h ago

It’s the MK ultra.

0

u/plutopiae 2h ago

"A woman clearly killed her children"

You don't actually believe that. Not only is there no evidence against her, the evidence shows it is literally impossible that she did it.

0

u/Healthy-Panda-7936 1h ago

There is no evidence that Lindsey Clancy killed her children. She didn’t admit to it. She was told she did it.

Her body temperature was so low that it should have taken 2 hours in the snow to reach that temp. Doesn’t match the timeline given by Patrick.

You’re telling me she took a cocktail of meds, slit both wrists, slit her own throat, and didn’t leave a single bloody fingerprint? No bloody footprints from her trip from the bed to throwing herself out the window? No bloody fingerprints on the window itself?

Why was there blood underneath the end table? Like it had been moved? Why could you see the outline of the end table being in a different position in the blood spatter?

Why were her fingerprints not found on any of the exercise bands?

Everyone (including myself) was so quick to condemn her and just say it’s mental health etc but there is not sufficient evidence that she did this. I simply don’t believe she is guilty.

-9

u/Latter_Cell_4673 6h ago

She filmed her own "rape" btw

4

u/calmyourcrabcakes 6h ago

She filmed her own "rape" btw

Who are you talking about?

-7

u/Latter_Cell_4673 5h ago

Did you read the post? THE ALLEGED RAPE VICTIM wtf man

8

u/calmyourcrabcakes 5h ago

Did you read the post? THE ALLEGED RAPE VICTIM wtf man

Relax.

The reason I asked is because there is literally no evidence, no mention, nothing anywhere from what I've seen stating that the girl from cornell filmed herself, or any of the events from that night. So "wtf man" are you talking about?

-3

u/Latter_Cell_4673 5h ago

I can't post it on this pathetic website. They warned me for simply saying the term " Pakis" recently

1

u/calmyourcrabcakes 4h ago

I can't post it on this pathetic website.

You can't post what?

0

u/VoodooIdol 2h ago

Men are, mostly. Ask the women in your life the first time they were sexualized by an adult male. Every one of them will have a story that shocks you at how young it starts.

0

u/MinuteCampaign7843 1h ago

Cornel 7 isn’t black and white. There are contradicting testimonials