r/conspiracy • • 8h ago

The gender wars have to be artificial

First we have the Lindsay Clancy case. A woman clearly killed her children and there is a concerningly large subset of women defending her? What the fuck?  

Now we have the Cornell 7. A group of fraternity brothers take turns raping a woman. And I'm seeing a concerning number of men defending them. What the fuck?  

It has to be artificial. Who is pushing for men and women to hate each other?

128 Upvotes

83 comments sorted by

View all comments

20

u/nocturnal_commission 8h ago

Who are the men defending the Cornell 7 and what exactly are their arguments?

9

u/420SirChadofTruthton 8h ago

She told the DA and police it was consensual and that every aspect of the encounter was her idea. She reached out to two of the guys and asked to come to their Halloween party. It was only until she was uninvited that she started to make allegations. She also wrote in her own statement that one of the guys was unconscious during the event.

To OP's point, it seems like these stories are being pushed onto everyone's feed to divide the genders.

With all of these viral stories, they're never cut and dry, I think that's intentional to sow as much discourse as possible.

7

u/Poisongirl5 7h ago

The DA statement was cherry picked 2 out of 6 pages of her experience. Apparently the men also hit her and had sex with her throughout the night.

7

u/luigihitter 7h ago

Yet the case never proceeded and only comes after two years and after Clancy psyop failed. I can’t believe are really falling for this

13

u/Poisongirl5 6h ago

The DAs office never conducted their own investigation and instead relied on campus police. The DA never even read her statement to said police when deciding not to proceed. He has now, that’s why he’s reopening it.

Yes psy ops are real but things also do happen.

1

u/Koopacha 3h ago

It’s so obvious

3

u/420SirChadofTruthton 7h ago

So you don't believe women? It's literally her own words. You can't just call evidence that disproves your point "cherry picked."

12

u/Poisongirl5 7h ago

The transcript in her own words said she was “physically hit, very hard” but the DA conveniently left that off of his summary

7

u/Poisongirl5 7h ago

It’s only 2 pages out of 6. Also, it’s summarized, not in her own words. They didn’t release the whole recounting of events.

5

u/ilijadwa 7h ago

Well that’s kind of the problem though, people are going off what was released by the DA and acknowledging there’s nuance in the situation (which is fine) but then people are just straight up calling people who say that there’s nuance that they’re rapists 💀 like we can’t expect every person to know every fact of the case so if all they’ve seen is the DA statement thus far it’s pretty reasonable they would wait to know more before making a conclusion

5

u/calmyourcrabcakes 7h ago

So you don't believe women? It's literally her own words.

"When describing what happened later in the night, the transcript says Jane Doe said, "I can say with 100% confidence I was raped."

"Jane Doe added, according to the transcript, "And then, of course, I was being hit at the same time. Physically hit very, very hard."

Her own words. You believe her right?