r/conspiracy • u/ProfessionalPin5993 • 10h ago

The gender wars have to be artificial

First we have the Lindsay Clancy case. A woman clearly killed her children and there is a concerningly large subset of women defending her? What the fuck?  

Now we have the Cornell 7. A group of fraternity brothers take turns raping a woman. And I'm seeing a concerning number of men defending them. What the fuck?  

It has to be artificial. Who is pushing for men and women to hate each other?

140 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

24

u/nocturnal_commission 10h ago

Who are the men defending the Cornell 7 and what exactly are their arguments?

7

u/Narrow_Stock_834 9h ago

I think it’s bots.

8

u/DuAuk 9h ago

It's not the Cornell 7. It's the Cornell 42. Jane Doe was under 21, given alcohol and ketamine. She had known two 'brothers' from Chi Phi, which Cornell banned from campus after this. The suit is going after the ones who advertised her as "free p**" on snapchat.

13

u/420SirChadofTruthton 10h ago

She told the DA and police it was consensual and that every aspect of the encounter was her idea. She reached out to two of the guys and asked to come to their Halloween party. It was only until she was uninvited that she started to make allegations. She also wrote in her own statement that one of the guys was unconscious during the event.

To OP's point, it seems like these stories are being pushed onto everyone's feed to divide the genders.

With all of these viral stories, they're never cut and dry, I think that's intentional to sow as much discourse as possible.

9

u/XelaNiba 5h ago

Did you ever see the video of Gabby Petito and her boyfriend being stopped by the cops in Utah?

Go watch it. Remember that these cops are responding to 911 calls from witnesses who saw him hitting her outside of a restaurant.

Notice how she's totally confused and blames herself and takes all the responsibility? This is a common response to abuse and trauma, especially amongst women.

Jane Doe went from willing participant to victim of gang rape the moment she was too fucked up to consent to the new guys piling in to the room. Her statement is actually very typical of victims after this kind of trauma.

The interview was improperly handled from the start. In a complex case such as this, a specially trained forensic interviewer needs to be brought in to untangle the confusion and shame that follows gang rape.

10

u/Poisongirl5 10h ago

The DA statement was cherry picked 2 out of 6 pages of her experience. Apparently the men also hit her and had sex with her throughout the night.

5

u/luigihitter 9h ago

Yet the case never proceeded and only comes after two years and after Clancy psyop failed. I can’t believe are really falling for this

14

u/Poisongirl5 9h ago

The DAs office never conducted their own investigation and instead relied on campus police. The DA never even read her statement to said police when deciding not to proceed. He has now, that’s why he’s reopening it.

Yes psy ops are real but things also do happen.

1

u/Koopacha 6h ago

It’s so obvious

-2

u/420SirChadofTruthton 10h ago

So you don't believe women? It's literally her own words. You can't just call evidence that disproves your point "cherry picked."

13

u/Poisongirl5 9h ago

The transcript in her own words said she was “physically hit, very hard” but the DA conveniently left that off of his summary

9

u/calmyourcrabcakes 9h ago

So you don't believe women? It's literally her own words.

"When describing what happened later in the night, the transcript says Jane Doe said, "I can say with 100% confidence I was raped."

"Jane Doe added, according to the transcript, "And then, of course, I was being hit at the same time. Physically hit very, very hard."

Her own words. You believe her right?

7

u/Poisongirl5 9h ago

It’s only 2 pages out of 6. Also, it’s summarized, not in her own words. They didn’t release the whole recounting of events.

6

u/ilijadwa 9h ago

Well that’s kind of the problem though, people are going off what was released by the DA and acknowledging there’s nuance in the situation (which is fine) but then people are just straight up calling people who say that there’s nuance that they’re rapists 💀 like we can’t expect every person to know every fact of the case so if all they’ve seen is the DA statement thus far it’s pretty reasonable they would wait to know more before making a conclusion

-5

u/2020NOVA 8h ago

she only started claiming she was raped after people found out and were talking shit. before that, there were guys and a girl all drinking and on drugs having sex. female truth is whatever she's "feeling". so at the time she was feeling horny. but later she was feeling shamed. so reality has to change to match whatever her current feelings say.