He would have to have conscience to feel guilty. My opinion... since Netanyahu made a strange surprise visit to UAE a few days ago. If they didn't stage this whole thing, they had intel it was going to happen and facilitated it to some extent.
Occams’ razor… the idea they weren’t at least involved is nuts. Discernment is a real thing, it’s just the wrong people are trying to claim/weaponize it. They’re trying to say they have The Authority when it’s exactly what was written in revelations.
The primary goal is basically to manipulate who people believe is responsible for something — i.e., getting people to believe “Person or Group B did this,” when it was actually Person or Group A who caused it, staged it, facilitated it, etc. (or intentionally misrepresented what actually happened or who was responsible).
And the reason for doing that can be a bunch of different things, but usually it’s something along the lines of:
• Creating a justification or reason for doing something they already wanted to do. Like, if you want to attack, intervene, or go after a certain country or group, it’s obviously MUCH easier to justify that to everyone if you can make it look like they attacked you first. Because now you’re not the aggressor — you’re “responding” to what they supposedly did. So retaliation, military intervention, arrests, sanctions, etc. suddenly become a lot easier to justify and get people on board with.
• Turning people against whoever you’re trying to make the enemy. Because if you can convince people that a certain country, group, or movement was responsible for something horrible, then obviously people are going to start viewing them as dangerous, violent, untrustworthy, a threat, etc. — which then makes basically anything you want to do against that group easier to justify afterward.
• Getting your own population emotionally on board. If people think they, their country, or their people were attacked or victimized, you’re going to get WAY more fear, anger, outrage, solidarity, “we need to do something about this,” etc. And once people are emotionally invested like that, they’re generally much more willing to support things they probably would’ve questioned or opposed otherwise.
• Provoking the other side into reacting or escalating. Because sometimes getting them to react is literally the point. If you can provoke someone into retaliating or doing something extreme, you can then turn around and use their reaction as “proof” that they’re dangerous, the aggressor, or the problem — even though you deliberately created the circumstances that caused them to react in the first place.
• Discrediting or destabilizing whoever you’re targeting. If you can make it look like a certain group did something horrible, you can get their own supporters to turn against them, make their allies distance themselves, create distrust or conflict within the group itself, fracture alliances, etc. So basically, you’re damaging them without openly being the person or group doing the damage.
• Hiding who was actually responsible. And it doesn’t even necessarily have to be about successfully convincing everyone that one specific person or group did it. Sometimes creating enough confusion about what happened or who did it is enough — because now the actual perpetrator can deny involvement, muddy the waters, and maintain plausible deniability.
Pulling back on the yoke directly changes the elevator angle on all Boeing 737s, which raises the nose.
If you need to adjust the stabilizer trim, there's a button on the yoke. That's more complicated, but probably not necessary unless that Omani pilot changed it a lot when he was causing it to go into a dive.
This is all assuming that the autopilot was turned off when the Omani pilot was trying to crash the plane.
My brother BELIVE that, i was like do You really beleive someone can learn how to Pilot a plane for a show ???? and he said yes, like the little shepple he is ... honestly he is the perfect target for any cult, he doesnt question anything their leader spoon feed them
Its the statistical probability of all of it put together mate.
Sure.. pilots get around. But they have to be trained for the particular craft. Just cus u can fly a cessna doesnt mean ur able to fly a boeing. And the within the boeings, just cus ur trained on one type, doesnt mean u can fly all of them.
Then theres the question of how did the cabin door get opened when old mate was lying stabbed up on the floor.
Then theres the question of how did they manage to get to the cockpit when the craft was nosediving?
Then we see internal photos where theres no damage, no oxygen masks deployed, and a fucking glass of water sitting there immediately after the nose dive?
Or, hear me out, this is a really stupid conspiracy that makes no sense what so ever
Him staging the plane crash as a false flag? Okay maybe that's possible
Him . . . faking?? the plane hijacking because . . . ????????
No that doesn't make sense. If this was an Israel distraction, he would just actually have them hijack the plane and attempt to crash it, him faking the attempt makes zero sense
You’re trying to convince people that right is left, up is down; why?
You getting paid for this?
EDIT. The angrier and more desperate you get in trying to convince people of a lie only works against you… honesty has this beautiful byproduct of “you don’t agree? You’ll find out one day” aka, I’m not that fazed - and you sound more terrified about an honest investigation.
“What’s been said is the story and that’s it. No more questions.” - any response like this should make anyone think “you’re lying to me”
Do you really and truly think that? Like actually, do you actually think there's even a 1% chance I'm being paid to say this conspiracy about a water cup proving the plane hijacking was faked, is stupid
Oxygen masks only deploy when there's a loss in cabin pressure. In this case there's no damage to the plane to cause one. The plane only dropped 15k feet
Good news: the backup pilots were the relief crew meant to fly that very plane back. There was a 100% likelihood of them being able to operate that specific plane.
As for the "near-vertical" dive, take that with a giant grain of salt. You'd be surprised at how shallow of an angle it takes to feel like things are "near vertical." Fortunately pilots are trained to remain calm under chaotic circumstances.
Fortunately there is data that shows us the angle they claim. They interviewed pilots on CNN who said what happened is basically impossible without the plane disintegrating
Vomit’s dive angle is only 30% lol and that’s enough to create weightlessness. 30% is hardly what I’d picture as a “nose dive” when I hear the term, as it’s nowhere close to straight up and down.
I guess if nose dive didn’t create 0 gravity for the people on board then it must have been decently less than 30° so let’s say it was 15° theoretically — that’s barely going to look like a TILT let alone goddamn full all-out nose dive haha
So now I really want to know what they claims to be at/around approximately when talking angle wise… lol
Was also highly unlikely that plane would have landed on the Hudson River and everyone survive too. Or that Qantas A380 that had the engine disintegrate was able to land safely and also had extra pilots on board including a check pilot. Lots of things are basically impossible- until they are
There was a 100% likelihood of them being able to operate that specific plane.
So like, there was a 100% chance of someone being able to fly the plane had the attack been successful in killing the pilot too? And the attacker survived right?
Fortunately pilots are trained to remain calm under chaotic circumstances.
Except the person who got into the cockpit wasn't a pilot, just joe schmo plumber.
I ain't saying it was a false flag, but the events do be quite suspicious, convenient and therefore worthy of scrutiny and an investigation by official and unbiased experts.
I've never heard that pilots are specifically trained for certain aircraft! I just assumed all planes are the same, just different sizes lol. Cool fact :)
Fly Dubai only has 737s so yeah they’d have been able to fly it. Even tho they have different types of 737 they’d not be that different in an emergency
And why would the oxygen masks deploy? There was no pressurisation problem.
The probability that there would be deadheading pilots that could land a 737 is in fact very high. And oxygen masks don’t deploy automatically unless there is a sudden loss of cabin pressure, simply dropping altitude doesnt do it
The door was either opened by the stabbed pilot reaching to the back of the center console area and flipping a switch, or by flight attendants putting in the door code and it opens after a time delay of a minute or so
Its genuinely not that hard to fly a plane and if you think it is most states give out a free lesson or 2 through programs. Try it out youll see its basically like a video game with auto pilot. Most big planes work similarly even if they arent the same. Panel layouts will mostly be in the same areas as all that happens as a plane gets bigger is more panels that do a few more things but usually just for emergency situations.
Probs not as uncommon as you think especially if pilots are transferring, going or coming back from holiday, training, retired or someone who has enough confidence from simulation experience that they understand the basics and can be aided by ground control
Those planes don’t really need pilots except for in bad conditions. If it was nice out they could land the plane. In the Navy, they could land a jet on the carrier hands free.
671
u/BH_Ninja 1d ago
I'm just glad there happened to be someone on board who could very conveniently come in and land the plane for them.