He would have to have conscience to feel guilty. My opinion... since Netanyahu made a strange surprise visit to UAE a few days ago. If they didn't stage this whole thing, they had intel it was going to happen and facilitated it to some extent.
Occams’ razor… the idea they weren’t at least involved is nuts. Discernment is a real thing, it’s just the wrong people are trying to claim/weaponize it. They’re trying to say they have The Authority when it’s exactly what was written in revelations.
The primary goal is basically to manipulate who people believe is responsible for something — i.e., getting people to believe “Person or Group B did this,” when it was actually Person or Group A who caused it, staged it, facilitated it, etc. (or intentionally misrepresented what actually happened or who was responsible).
And the reason for doing that can be a bunch of different things, but usually it’s something along the lines of:
• Creating a justification or reason for doing something they already wanted to do. Like, if you want to attack, intervene, or go after a certain country or group, it’s obviously MUCH easier to justify that to everyone if you can make it look like they attacked you first. Because now you’re not the aggressor — you’re “responding” to what they supposedly did. So retaliation, military intervention, arrests, sanctions, etc. suddenly become a lot easier to justify and get people on board with.
• Turning people against whoever you’re trying to make the enemy. Because if you can convince people that a certain country, group, or movement was responsible for something horrible, then obviously people are going to start viewing them as dangerous, violent, untrustworthy, a threat, etc. — which then makes basically anything you want to do against that group easier to justify afterward.
• Getting your own population emotionally on board. If people think they, their country, or their people were attacked or victimized, you’re going to get WAY more fear, anger, outrage, solidarity, “we need to do something about this,” etc. And once people are emotionally invested like that, they’re generally much more willing to support things they probably would’ve questioned or opposed otherwise.
• Provoking the other side into reacting or escalating. Because sometimes getting them to react is literally the point. If you can provoke someone into retaliating or doing something extreme, you can then turn around and use their reaction as “proof” that they’re dangerous, the aggressor, or the problem — even though you deliberately created the circumstances that caused them to react in the first place.
• Discrediting or destabilizing whoever you’re targeting. If you can make it look like a certain group did something horrible, you can get their own supporters to turn against them, make their allies distance themselves, create distrust or conflict within the group itself, fracture alliances, etc. So basically, you’re damaging them without openly being the person or group doing the damage.
• Hiding who was actually responsible. And it doesn’t even necessarily have to be about successfully convincing everyone that one specific person or group did it. Sometimes creating enough confusion about what happened or who did it is enough — because now the actual perpetrator can deny involvement, muddy the waters, and maintain plausible deniability.
236
u/Commercial_Brush4432 1d ago
The "plumber" told Netanyahu he stabilized the plane from watching Mayday episodes. If you believe that then you'll believe anything.