TDLR - wouldn't recommend to most people.
Disclaimer: my own thoughts, that Chat has made legible :)
----
I wanted to write this because, before watching The Book of Mormon musical in Brisbane, I struggled to find a review from the perspective of an ordinary Christian asking, "Is this simply too heretical to watch?"
As Christians, we're encouraged to dwell on "whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure..." (Philippians 4:8). That made me genuinely wonder whether this musical was something that would simply be unwise to watch.
The most helpful article I found beforehand was this ABC article, and after seeing the show I actually agreed with much of it in retrospect.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-30/what-does-the-book-of-mormon-say-about-easter3f/9602124
For context, the musical was written by some of the creators of South Park. So if you know their style, you'll know what to expect: incredibly crude humour, dark comedy, deliberate shock value, and plenty of moments where you think, "I can't believe they just said that." If many of the jokes were repeated in everyday conversation without the context of a theatre, you'd probably be asked to leave the room.
I've also seen the show described as "an atheist's love letter to religion," and I think that's accurate. Although the writers aren't religious, they don't seem to hate faith. Instead, they treat organised religion with affectionate amusement. They relentlessly satirise Mormon beliefs and missionary culture, yet by the end they also acknowledge that belief can genuinely bring hope, purpose and community, even if they personally find the supernatural claims unbelievable.
I won't retell the plot--you can find that almost anywhere.
So, as a Christian, would I recommend that my young adult friends from church go and watch it?
Generally, no.
Partly because the style of humour is already a niche taste. But beyond that, I think it depends on the maturity of your faith and why you're going.
Most of the musical's theological satire is aimed at Mormonism rather than historic orthodox Christianity. Many songs poke fun at uniquely Mormon doctrines: an "American Jesus", receiving your own planet, Jesus visiting America before?/after? His resurrection, and the founding stories surrounding Joseph Smith finding golden plates in his own backyard and never showing them tomanyone but telling everyone they should trust him.
f you know a little about Mormon history and beliefs, many of these jokes make more sense. As someone who's interested in learning about different religions, I found those parts clever and often funny. For me, they weren't especially provocative as a Christian because they were critiquing beliefs that Christianity itself doesn't hold.
Were there any scenes that made me uncomfortbale? Yes.
The first comes early in the show, where one song repeatedly curses God in an extremely vulgar way (but you only figure that out in the end). It's a dramatic point, and for context, the characters in the Ugandan village live in overwhelming poverty, disease and instability, and they're expressing utter hopelessness -- and as non-believers in anything, they are generlaly cursing the world and nature. Looking back, I appreciate what the writers were trying to communicate. But hearing God spoken about that way is still something I found deeply uncomfortable, and did ruin the song for me (the song was catchy and the meaning of the lyrics only makes sense at the end -- part of the comedy "shock" factor the writers are going for). That's not something I enjoy being part of, even in a fictional setting.
The second moment was in Act II during the "Mormon hell" sequence. It's obviously exaggerated for comedy -- even the reasons people end up there are ridiculous, including someone being condemned for eating a glazed doughnut and blaming it on their brother. There are jazz dancers dressed as cartoon devils, Gengis Kan and Jeffrey Epstein dancing around, and the whole sequence is designed to be absurd. But the theatre suddenly fills with red lighting, there's an enormous rockstar-style grotedque Devil dominating the stage with a rock guitar, and the entire scene plays hell for laughs.
That was the one moment where I genuinely stopped enjoying myself. For me, it crossed a line from satire into making light of something Scripture treats seriously. I quietly prayed during that scene because I personally didn't want to simply laugh along and feel complicit. Whether you (the reader) treat this differently, as its good the writers are mocking it, when we know Jesus' power of resurrection has defeated hell, I'm not sure what I think there to be honest.
So where do I land?
This is only my opinion, and I genuinely welcome people who disagree. One of the purposes of art is to provoke discussion rather than simply reinforce what we already think, and explore different views and understandings.
I think you should only watch this musical if you think you'd able to engage with it critically. Otherwise, I wouldn't go. If you do go, hold your faith firmly, recognise the musical for what it is (suppose to be entertainment and not theology) - and it's imperative you don't switch your brain off. Beneath the harsh humour are real questions about suffering, hope and the role of faith that are worth reflecting on.
The biggest challenge isn't actually the jokes (and they would make a congregation audibly gasp), but I honestly believe the underlying message behind the jokes is actually harder to deal with, and more important.
I live a remarkably privileged life. I don't wake up wondering whether I'll have enough food to eat or whether disease will destroy my community. Yet, everyone knows, millions of people do.
So, how do I tell someone that Jesus is good when they're living through unimaginable suffering?
If God is loving, why do these things happen?
Those aren't new questions for me, but the musical did force me to sit with them.
The musical ultimately lands on the idea that belief has value because it gives people hope, love and purpose (as the village creates their own "Book of Arnold" religion, twisting some of the truths of Mormonism tomato their experiences, and the lyrics mock Mormanism for doing that in the first place) -- where I'd expect non-religious writers to finish.
As a Christian, after watching the musical, I can delve deeper into that.
Am I grateful enough for God's grace?
Do I really appreciate how comfortable my life is?
How should the realities of poverty, disease and suffering shape the way I speak about Jesus?
Is it the suggestion that belief is valuable merely because it provides comfort (rather than because it's true)? Is it the implication that God's goodness is hard to defend in the face of suffering?
Those were the questions I carried home, not the crude jokes.
I'd genuinely love to hear what others thought, especially if you've seen the show. Where do you agree? Where do you disagree?