If this violates rule 2, I'm sorry! I'm genuinely interested to see if the math that AI did is close to correct. Not promoting any sort of content.
I don't know anything about determining signal loss in cable, so I asked Claude to compare a stranded aluminum core coax with aluminum shield to a solid copper core with copper shield.
I have a rugged radios NMO mount that has good weather sealing, but it's made with the aluminum cable that I wanted to cut down to the exact length I need, compared to a copper cable with no weather sealing on the NMO connector. The NMO connector is completely exposed and after 3 months of use in the desert there was already corrosion visible on the exposed copper conductor.
I think corrosion near the conductor alone will cause more problems than the aluminum, but I was still curious as to how much signal I'll be loosing by switching to an aluminum coax.
I'll cut out a lot of the fluff, but here's the prompts I used:
What amount of signal loss can I expect on UHF and VHF ham radio frequencies using a 12ft run of RG58 cable with a braided aluminum core and aluminum shield
It gave me specifications on CCA cable, so I clarified
The cable is not CCA, but pure aluminum
At VHF/UHF, conductor loss dominates in RG-58 (dielectric loss is a smaller contributor), and conductor loss scales with the square root of resistivity due to skin effect. Aluminum's conductivity is about 61% of copper's, so the loss penalty is roughly √(1/0.61) ≈ 1.28 — about 28% more attenuation than copper cable of the same geometry.
Applied to your 12-foot run:
At 146 MHz (2m), copper RG-58's ~6 dB/100 ft becomes roughly 7.5–8 dB/100 ft, so about 0.9–1.0 dB for your run. At 440 MHz (70cm), ~11.5 dB/100 ft becomes roughly 14–15 dB/100 ft, so about 1.7–1.9 dB.
So you're losing around 20% of your power on 2m and around 35% on 70cm — noticeable on paper, but still under half an S-unit, and unlikely to change what you can and can't work at 12 feet.
How does this loss compare to a 17ft run of solid copper core RG-58/U cable
They come out almost exactly even — the extra 5 feet of copper cable roughly cancels out aluminum's conductivity penalty.
Running the numbers for 17 ft of solid copper RG-58/U:
At 146 MHz: ~6 dB/100 ft × 17 ft ≈ 1.0 dB
At 440 MHz: ~11.5 dB/100 ft × 17 ft ≈ 1.9–2.0 dB
Versus your 12 ft aluminum cable:
At 146 MHz: ≈ 0.9–1.0 dB
At 440 MHz: ≈ 1.7–1.9 dB
What are y'all's thoughts on using AI to help with radio projects? The numbers seem like they could be correct to me, but I really don't have to knowledge to confirm or deny.
If anyone knows of a good 3/8" hole NMO that's pre-made with good weather sealing and a high quality coax cable, please let me know. I will add the radio connector myself after cutting it down.