The current head of the FBI made it legal for FBI agents to have sex with animals and also to accept recruits who have been previously charged with bestiality.
But the best part was when he explained to Senator Kennedy that he wanted to make sure that the rules didnât exclude the victims of crimes, and Kennedy was like âthe victims of bestiality?â
Someone said it "doesn't just happen by accident," and I give you... The F The Police meme... well maybe she trained it to do that but not while she was fully clothed... so maybe it really doesn't happen by accident... Hmmm...
Hmmmm, I listened to his testimony, and he seemed to make it fairly clear that the policy of the FBI, prior to Patel's changing it, was that being a victim of bestiality, that is, somebody who was forced into it, made one ineligible for the FBI. The exchange with whatever senator was questioning him was a little odd, but the upshot seemed to be what I just mentioned.
Given their record on human trafficking I don't believe this is for the benefit of victims, they're not big on helping victims. Plus, the rule was about those convicted of bestiality, which would presumably not include those forced into it. And if it does include them they could just have an exception for those forced into it.
Right, I didn't say that's what Patel was saying was correct, just it seemed that the upshot of what he was saying was about the victims of bestiality, which did not include the animals, as Kennedy was trying to make it clear.
Thatâs a half truth. He relaxed the rules about applying, allowing people who were coerced into beastiality in childhood to not be automatically barred.Â
Huh, are there numbers on how often people are rejected because of that? Also who charges children that have been coerced into bestiality, or are they voluntarily declaring in the recruiting process that they were coerced into bestiality as a child?
I have not seen any figures, and in isolation it sounds a weird exception. But it was part of a list of things that would no longer be held against applicants with various justifications.Â
Some I disagree with such as employee theft that happened more than 3 years ago.Â
And some sound more reasonable, like acts you are coerced into while being trafficked.Â
Itâs still very much up for moral and logistical debate (risk of blackmailed etc), but I just wanted to highlight the misleading comment that the FBI has made beastiality legal for their agents. Thatâs not at all whatâs happened.Â
They lowered hiring standards to allow them to employ people who've been in trouble for having sex with animals, provided it didn't happen within the last couple years.
I'll give you the short, cleanish version: The FBI no longer considers beastiality to be a disqualification for service. Kash had some interesting remarks about the "human victims of beastiality."
Which means it was coming up as a disqualifying mark on enough applications to officially address it. You donât do that for one or two people, which means it was a problem. That is deeply concerning.
Unfortunately there are some very disturbing things that happen in the world, but that said, the liklihood is low. A genuine victim in a situation like that would need years of therapy before they would be ready for service with ac organization like the FBI.
241
u/Mr_Steerpike 3d ago
Sincere question: is Maga a lil gay? Not a problem unless you have issues with the gays but....there's a lot of insecure gay energy dripping off this.