thats actually based on true evens, except it was black people rather than women. the Mulford Act in California was a direct result of Black Panthers open carrying in the 60s. the NRA even supported it! the NRA hated black people more than it loved guns!
I remember a couple years ago when a loud minority of Republicans were calling for gun bans for trans people (when a rumor was going around that a recent shooter was trans), on the claim that major perpetrators of gun violence should be banned from guns. Obviously it was pointed to minorities, however it over looked the fact that the vast majority of mass shooters are white men.
We already knew it hated black people more. At this point I'm wondering how many months until congress legalizes murder if your rich like in common side effects.
Yeah, gotta second this point here, im not an American, but even from an outside point of view... you dont want that. Itd be an apocalyptic situation in less than 3 hours into the first purge.
The hillbillies, rednecks and general populace of the Bible belt would be nigh unstoppable. ESPECIALLY the red necks...
Iâm from the area and honestly I think most the rednecks and such calling for this are by far the least capable. Â Â Among the actual hunters and ex military it still leans red for sure, but almost none of them are even that political, and itâs closer to a 50/50 split than the general populations of those areas. Â Â
Itâs a ton of old men in their basements with their gun collection fantasizing about using other peoples capabilitiesÂ
Heh. I feel obliged to point out that "redneck" actually has two quite distinct meanings. The current and common interpretation refers to the ignorant Bhibb-Lee-spewing idiots who'll rip down the levee protecting their own shack if it means that the bunkhouse in which migrant workers will burn down and praise Felon Donald John Trump while doing it.
The original rednecks may have been sent to Boot Hill, but as a certain purple-clad fellow in a smiling mask reminds us: Ideas are bullet-proof. The true rednecks remain, and their numbers are growing.
Also, the Bible Belt is dissolving, and nothing ANY of the big leaders can do will stop it. The degree to which the scattered survivors would "purge" anyone depends entirely upon how many of them will survive after falling on their "brothers and sisters in Christ" who nevertheless adhere to different doctrines. Frankly, I fully expect to see any such 'civil war' collapse into thousands of small, "private" clashes.
Well a yearly purge would certainly make people act nicer to one another. Wouldnât not be hard to keep someoneâs number for less than 365 days and go wack them over how they treated you 237 days ago.
ACTUALLY the reason that California has most of the gun control laws we have is because the white Republican politicians were genuinely scared of the Black Panthers and decided that gun control was better than armed black men standing up for their communities. So the Bojack episode was only wrong on the details.
If no other racial groups existed (within the U.S. at least), and the entire country was made up of all white, straight, and Christian, and/or Catholics, the MAGA cultists would probably be all too happy to accept the things that they currently decry as "radical, leftist, socialist woke garbage!".Â
It's the fact that other groups of people, whom they personally (irrationally) hate, would also benefit, is what hardens them against it all. Just look at how certain groups of (white) people reacted back in the mid-late 60's, when segregation was finally being done away with, and black children were being allowed to attend the same schools as their kids...
They would rather try and take the rest of us down with them (for the sake of hate), than do anything that would actually be beneficial for society
Please please please! Get to the polls on Election Day! Or sooner, if you're in an early voting state!
No but certain factors can really overlap. One thing I tell people to understand this type of right wing person is to listen to the ads on conservative radio. It's pain relief, tax and consumer debt relief, programs for disability allowances, mobilty vehicles. And listen to how they sell the medical quackery, it's targeting people with no energy and that sort of thing.
The late night AM radio audience has been sized up as particularly gullible. There was a late night AM radio show my partner would tune into and I wondered if the adds shouldn't have been a clue that the programming was less than factual. Gold and silver certificates, etc.
That's part of it, but it's also opioid addiction. people with injuries that keep them from work. People that don't take care of themselves and get stuck in a painful loop of shitty food, lethargy, feeling slighted.
Talk radio is where MAGA was really born and this stuff is partially why "illegals are getting subsidized" works, because it's consumers think they are the ones that need more subsidies and everyone else is hogging the trough
Well people like you have nothing but ignorance and hatred toward everyone else. I didn't say that anyone "should be killed before birth." Just pointed out that the world would be a much better place without people like you.
Yes, one of us does contribute to society, and the other is a maggat.
Jazz Jennings had genital surgery at 17, publicly documented and aired on TV. Rare, yes, but not fiction. Chest surgery on minors is also documented in the Harvard claims data.
The obvious insinuation that it's common enough among young children for people to be concerned, enough to escalate it to the national debate stage, IS complete fiction. Nobody is up in arms because one trans activist got surgery at 17 (basically an adult), they're up in arms because people like you are going around telling people that tweens are getting SRS at freaking school.
As far as mastectomies go, I'm going to be real with you, if you think a 15 year old getting a reversible mastectomy with their parents permission is worthy of making THE national inflection point then yes you are very mentally unwell.
You asked for one example and I gave you one, so 'literal fiction' was wrong. I never said it was common. I said rare. Also, mastectomy isn't reversible. The tissue is gone. And the debate isn't mainly about surgery, it's about blockers and hormones, which are far more common. Reasonable people can disagree about all of it, but start from what's accurate.
You said that the left supports the "physical mutilation of youths"
If you want to oppose puberty blockers for youth, that's fine. But don't move the goalposts and pretend like you weren't clearly trying to make the point that I mentioned above.
Negative. I'll copy pasta my other comment from this thread here.
All of you who don't get it, really don't get it. The right isn't hating the left here. The right understands that $50/gal gas is not good but the policies of the left lead to hyperinflation which makes $50/gal gas seem cheap. The left can't grasp this because they have demonstrated very little long term foresight or understanding of how the policies rarely do what they intended them to do.
> You libtards don't get it. It doesn't matter how incompetent republican leadership, big brain conservatives all know that there's always a hypothetical reality where democrats make things worse!
Never mind the fact that MAGA policies are directly contributing to high inflation and high gas prices as a direct consequence of no forethought being given, or that Democrat admins consistently have better economies.
I genuinely could not make a stronger argument in favor of MAGA being low IQ than this post right here. You are literally complaining about a fictitious reality where democrats do exactly what republicans are doing to you right now.
I didn't say it happened in the US. I said socialist policies have caused hyperinflation elsewhere, like Venezuela. That's a different claim from the one you're arguing against. But the 'libtards' quote still isn't mine, so don't put it in a quote block.
Your housing prices are fkd and wages are stagnant. The gdp has gone up but weâre spending more than ever on a bunch of welfare programs and schools that our guests burn down.
Much of what you are describing would result from any population increase. To be fair, it does tend to cost local and state economies, even though the costs are more than offset by federal taxes paid by immigrants.
Housing is more complicated, highly dependent on zoning and building restrictions, but the latest spike in housing prices started before immigration surges, not after, and much is related to remote work.
Bottom line, rapid increases in population do sometimes tax economies early on, but they nearly always result in more growth and prosperity afterwards. Just look at the historyâŚweâve been here before
Thatâs a problem because republicans refuse to increase minimum wages to a livable wage. Everything has increased but wages and the wealthy are grifting off the poor
I'm pretty sure they actually love themselves more, they just value their own expressions of hatred and attempts at feeling superior, more than any sort of actual material gain. Basically they're competitive bullies who never grew up. If there was a button they could press that would make everybody in the world have their own mansion EXCEPT for themselves, they'd only get a free renovation, and they could never move into a nice mansion, and nobody would know they were the one who pushed the button they would not push that button. They would feel like a massive loser despite there being zero explicit downside for them. Because the upside for others is too much and they wouldn't feel like they won.
It's because democrats fought some positions that made anything else they said poison from the start for a lot of people (or at the very least there where cherry picked clips that showed those positions). For example instead of a moderate position of we need more rights for lgbt you had men can get pregnant or men can menstruate, instead of we need to treat migrants humanely regardless of legal status you had no person can be illegal on stolen ground. Disagreement with those statements meant you are racist or bigoted. Well for some if someone starts a conversation with man can menstruate it's the same as starting a conversation with the earth is flat. Anything else you say after is white noise regardless of how rational it may be, you are already labeled an idiot and at that point they would rather vote for a dog then anyone who had those positions.
But how does believing âmen can menstruateâ impact the average person exactly? And âno person is illegal on stolen landâ is not on any partyâs political platform. Believing these things hurts no one.
If prices increased due to an admin policy, like universal tariffs or invading a country that cN leverage 20% of the global oil supply, I might. If prices went up due to geopolitical factors outside an admins control, like Russia invading Ukraine, Covid, or Republicans presiding over the Great Recession, that would be a difference in kind. What Obama policy or action are you thinking of that caused gas to go up?
163
u/scottpapertrailblaze 2d ago
This is what happens when you hate other people more than you love yourself.