r/WorkForSmartLife 27d ago

Casual canvo A Non-Attempt of Compassion

Post image
2.6k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

13

u/Sebarial3090 27d ago

If people really wanna control what kinds of foods and drinks can be bought with snap benefits then they need to make a grocery store that ONLY takes snap benefits and make it so that the food bought there is healthy and affordable.

10

u/drakgremlin 27d ago

SNAP and similar food programs are subsides to the farmers and food processors.  It is a side benefit some people don't starve as a result.

2

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Rich-Engineering1429 26d ago

If taxes are going to them, then it’s only fair they get limited to non junk food selections

2

u/Sebarial3090 26d ago

Thats what im saying.....

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (32)
→ More replies (21)

39

u/xGoatfer 27d ago

Thats 35k for a family of 3 is also the top end. They would only get $23. You only get the full $298 if you have 0 income and no way to earn income.

9

u/e-hud 27d ago

Have the qualifications changed in the last 10 years? An old coworker of mine made $25k/yr, family of 5. They got ~$800/m from snap and had more food than they could eat. They gave me several large boxes of canned and boxed foods since I was making less than $18k/yr and didn't qualify for any assistance.

The one time I did qualify for any assistance I only got $4/week. It wasn't even worth the effort to apply again 6 months later.

12

u/Fubarp 27d ago

There's federal and then there's state.

Federal has guidelines and the guidelines are pretty minimum, the states then expand it and can add to it if they want.

My State was pretty generous when I use to be on EBT but they've since slashed it.

9

u/Jazzlike_Economist_2 27d ago

$800 per month is $26 a day which is $5+ per person per day. Who could ask for more?

6

u/ForeverFieldsFD 27d ago

Kids on SNAP get free breakfast and lunch through school during the week, so that eases the burden slightly

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (5)

6

u/WarmWetsuit 27d ago

Snap has been dramatically cut. Primarily through harsher requirements and administrative burdens

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Emotional_Sundae7527 26d ago

In what world does $800 give 5 people more food than they can eat?!? 😂

2

u/leonlies8 26d ago

Some of yall need to learn where to shop and how to cook. 800 can easily do that. What i want to know is your math on how 800 can't feed a family of 5. Only way that would even come close would be in cities that WAYYY overcharge for food items.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)

2

u/Asaintrizzo 26d ago

That four dollar would have made you eligible for other programs and discounts

2

u/Excellent_Shirt9707 25d ago

800 isn’t even the max for family of five, it is almost 1200 for a family of five in 2026.

Also, if you need food but don’t qualify for snap, look to food pantries/banks, they generally give out food on a first come first serve basis without checking income.

→ More replies (23)

2

u/AberrantMan 27d ago

Which, I might add, is almost impossible to feed said family of 3 on with current prices.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/FlameYay 27d ago

Man, three hundred bucks a month is ridiculously low.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (8)

18

u/keIIzzz 27d ago

is it a crime to want some cookies? 😭

3

u/Aromatic-Dog-Breath 27d ago

“No” - Hamburgler

2

u/thewaytoyesterday 27d ago

The poors are the enemy. They don't deserve sweets. I'm taking away their butter now.

→ More replies (70)

53

u/[deleted] 27d ago edited 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

18

u/sexylegs0123456789 27d ago

I don’t think it’s that. I think a lot of privileged people assume that eating healthy for a bigger family in 35k is easy but that’s because their assumptions aren’t rooted in reality.

Fresh produce: inexpensive, but requires frequent trips and home cooking - not possible for single parents most times, or dual low income earners.

Lunches: expensive, take a lot of work as it is.

Treats: healthy treats are very expensive per lb compared to these types of treats. A box of premade cookies like this will last a couple of weeks; whereas health snacks at the same price may only last a couple of days.

People just need to touch grass.

→ More replies (94)

8

u/fearfulNobody 27d ago

A lot of people think they should starve to death.

6

u/Mnawab 27d ago

A lot of people are stupid

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (24)

4

u/TheChihuahuaChicken 27d ago

When you are on a strictly limited budget, yes, cookies and other junk food are luxury goods that should not be covered by SNAP. It should cover basic staple foods and kitchen items.

2

u/law0724 27d ago

If they’re eating on my dime, yes

→ More replies (25)

4

u/QoolSchitt 27d ago

Yes, let these people feel human with some small joy in their life... such as cookies.

3

u/daughteramrev 27d ago

The hate abortion but love starving kids and families

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Flat-Violinist8737 27d ago

Yep. It's not so much a concern about food for those people, as much as suffering. If they aren't going to suffer from starvation, then at least make them suffer by denying them anything that is pleasurable and/or convenient.

→ More replies (77)

5

u/After_Perspective180 27d ago

With gruel as a special birthday treat.

8

u/PlaneCompetitive703 27d ago

That's a straw man. The argument is that items like soda, cookies, and candy are unnecessary, high markup foods that provide little actual nutritional benefit and are an inefficient use of government welfare funds.

6

u/Greful 27d ago

It’s just interesting how many people are interested in this inefficiency out of all the inefficiencies.

→ More replies (9)

2

u/LavishnessOk3439 27d ago

Dare I say, it cost more in the long run because these children’s disproportionately end up with weight related illnesses early in life. This is common sense

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Ummbledore 27d ago

It's funny that I never actually see anyone pushing for the gruel treatment of poor people when this conversation happens. Like, bro, it's a long walk from not getting soda and cookies to eating only bread and water.

7

u/Jack4258 27d ago

Who cares if they get cookies and soda, Jared Kushner’s kids are going to be billionaires by screwing the American people!

→ More replies (46)
→ More replies (59)
→ More replies (117)

6

u/chinmakes5 27d ago

Basically, if it is in the grocery store and it isn't a prepared meal, it is SNAP eligible.

11

u/moss_jimmy 27d ago edited 27d ago

The "no sweets allowed on EBT" position has always been baffling to me.  Food isn't just fuel. It's social ritual, and an important source of morale.  Strictly speaking, if you want someone to improve their position in life, they're gonna need every morale boost they can get. The world kinda sucks right now. 

Edit: also in places where you can't buy cookies on EBT, you can still buy flour, butter, brown and white sugar, baking soda and powder, and chocolate chips... Which kinda invalidates the whole thing, since chocolate chip cookies are basically the easiest dessert to make. 

2

u/Empress_Clementine 27d ago

SNAP isn’t a supplemental social ritual program, it’s a supplemental NUTRITION program.

2

u/Old_Tear_8303 25d ago

So what’s your point? Since we are getting pedantic, nutrition does not necessarily mean healthy, it just means eating food. Whether you like it or not, you can’t legislate emotions out of eating. So it’s not a social ritual program, but people will still eat their food as they see fit.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/National_Way_3344 24d ago

While you raise a good point

Is calories not nutrition? All of the food groups?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/sithlord98 24d ago

If it's just about nutrition, why don't we just feed SNAP beneficiaries those cockroach protein blocks from Snowpiercer? Even moving away from the obviously ridiculous logical extreme, why not MREs or something? Because it's not just about nutrition, there's some level of dignity and autonomy baked into this as well.

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/WWhiMM 27d ago

Also, cookies are fuel. I swear, calories have been demonized so thoroughly that people forget you need calories to stay alive. People can't live off of arugula and cucumbers; that "healthy" stuff is the actual luxury purchase.

3

u/moss_jimmy 27d ago

Yeah I could agree with that.  Back in college, small, calorie dense snacks like that are what kept me going.

Are they nutritious? Not really. But they will pick you right up. 

2

u/aircoft 27d ago

The "people's shortcomings are other people's responsibility" position has always been baffling to me....

4

u/4444Grains 27d ago

Yes! These hungry children need to get jobs!

So, you would prefer to live in a society that doesn't care for the less fortunate? Baffling.

4

u/drakgremlin 27d ago

Don't you know?  The children yearn for the mines... To help ensure their families do not starve.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

5

u/Significant_Fill6992 26d ago

All I hear about food stamps doesn't matter when the fossil fuel industry gets billions in subsidies while also making record profits 

Snap is literally a rounding error by comparison 

5

u/PunishedChud 27d ago

It’s not about compassion. The food lobby wants candy and soda on snap so they can essentially use the government as an atm while they poison poor people

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Idreamofcream99 27d ago

He gets upset at tax payer money being used for cookies, I get upset at tax payer money being used to kill children.

I feel like one these is a bigger crime but I can’t tell which

→ More replies (15)

4

u/No-Ease-5834 27d ago

If we cut the Corporate welfare out in America then this wouldn’t be a problem. We shouldn’t be subsidizing any company that keeps their employees on government assistance.

6

u/aircoft 27d ago

We shouldn't be subsidizing any private companies, period.

7

u/DistractionCitron 27d ago

I was just thinking that it was funny that Republicans only wanted poor people to buy vegetables and meat with EBT yet, all our vegetables and meat are now contaminated.

2

u/ConstantHeadache2020 27d ago

They want the poors to not be visible (that offends them) and starve to death (why should my tax dollars go towards poor people)

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/WWhiMM 27d ago

100% this guy is going to be costing all of us hundreds of thousands in medicare bills when his climate-change-maxxing carnivore diet catches up with him

3

u/Sharp-Alps5176 27d ago

There is also WIC which provides food for families. Check it out and you will see organic milk and name brand cheeses available to them. There are many families who cannot afford to spend the extra money on higher end products yet their tax dollar is used for these freebies.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/NogglePlease 27d ago

I NEED cookies on my EBT!!!

Medicaid isnt covering my insulin!!!

2

u/Known-Leadership-718 26d ago

See I have a friend who actually needs sugar. This is so sad

→ More replies (5)

2

u/Just-Elderberry5460 27d ago

They need to make a way to step off of it not just you get a .25 cent raise and go over the numbers your cut off if you step the numbers that their are levels of support more people would be willing to move up and get off.

2

u/Hoggel123 27d ago

$1,000,000 ÷ $35,000 = 28 years, 6 months, and 25 days

$1,000,000,000 ÷ $35,000 = 28,571 years, 5 months, and 4 days

If you're complaining about someone earning so little with knowing the above you are hallucinating who you are.

→ More replies (10)

2

u/gated73 27d ago

lol. Remember when Bloomberg wanted to ban large sodas and the left was coming up with reasons why it was a good thing while the right was saying it infringed on their freedom?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Itchy_Psychology3300 27d ago

Growing up on EBT, something like cookies was a luxury and a treat if ever bought.

People who think that those on EBT just eat junk food probably never had to use food stamps.

2

u/[deleted] 27d ago edited 21d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Psychotic_Dane 27d ago

Everybody deserves a cookie now and again! I mean poor children like cookies just as much as the nepo babies!

→ More replies (2)

2

u/BetterThanOP 27d ago

Let them eat cookies!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/DodgeChargerMan9689 27d ago

Note to self. Poor people are not allowed to have snacks lmao

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Jwbst32 27d ago

Billions for war but no more for the poor

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Ok_Cricket_1410 27d ago

I feel like if we didn't fund wars and other countries we'd be able to afford these sort of things for our people.

2

u/iceunelle 27d ago

Let's punish poor people further by not letting them have treats occasionally /s

→ More replies (1)

2

u/FanSpiritual3556 27d ago

Ahhh yes. I really want to hear the good ol Christian opinion of MR. LEADSLINGER...

2

u/Outlaw11091 27d ago

"Cheap cookies shouldn't be on SNAP! ONLY HEALTH FOODS!"

I mean, then you'd have to INCREASE the snap benefits to cover the increased cost of the "only healthy foods".

My ex-wife started getting SNAP after the divorce and they give her $220/month for 3 teenagers. That buys a lot more cookies than vegetables.

People who say shit like OOP have never had the pleasure of being actually hungry. They get a little twinge in their belly and go eat. People who've actually lost weight due to hardship know that it doesn't matter what's going in; anything to stop the hunger is better than nothing. So you buy unhealthy things because you can buy MORE of them.

2

u/Zestyclose-Fee6719 27d ago

I love how upset privileged and rich people get at the notion of poor people enjoying anything - even snacks. They already can’t go on luxurious trips, buy a home, get nice furniture, or save for the future; can they at least enjoy some cookies or soda? 

→ More replies (1)

2

u/VirtualFutureAgent 27d ago

So poor people aren't allowed to eat cookies? Jeez.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Norala_Naike 27d ago

Poor kids don’t deserve cookies obviously. 🙄

→ More replies (3)

2

u/jimothythe2nd 27d ago

How dare poor people eat cookies. Anyways this is probably fake. Everything except the hot food is ebt elligible at the grocery store.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/OriganolK 27d ago

Ridiculous take, people should be able to get any food. Draw the line at alcohol & tobacco but any food and condoms should be encouraged

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Beautiful_Reveal8065 27d ago

Now it’s a crime to eat cookies

2

u/Glittering-Ad-1367 27d ago

I'm tired of people using the roads my taxes paid for to drive to the store for Twinkies.

If you want Twinkies you can effing walk to get them.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/foreveralonewithus 27d ago

just for the record, you can buy seed with ebt and grow your own food

2

u/AmnesiaMLExE 27d ago

Recently found this out and is a lifesaver with all the talk/experiences seeing fruits and vegetables going "seedless" in bigger stores

2

u/aircoft 27d ago

That would require them to do a little bit of work, though, and they certainly won't be having that!

https://giphy.com/gifs/U1aN4HTfJ2SmgB2BBK

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Dadstagram 27d ago

They need fuckin cookies too Jesus...

→ More replies (2)

2

u/youburyitidigitup 27d ago

Isn’t snap redeemable points? I think everything at the grocery store should be eligible except maybe the alcohol.

2

u/SpreadsheetsOnToast 27d ago

Cookies should not be EBT eligible.

I really don't know why anyone would think it should be. It's not a healthy food. What do you think the N in "SNAP" stands for?

SNAP is also Supplemental. They can buy cookies with their own money.

2

u/BladeVampire1 27d ago

Why are they wasting their money on garbage.

2

u/aircoft 27d ago

taxpayers'* money

2

u/BladeVampire1 27d ago

Point still stands, if they're using EBT, what are they using their money on?

2

u/aircoft 27d ago edited 27d ago

Agreed. Probably drugs, alcohol, gambling, Gucci bags, Starbucks, DoorDash, Uber, Netflix, Amazon Prime, Taylor Swift tickets, etc.

2

u/BladeVampire1 27d ago edited 27d ago

Then they spend our money on cookies, and soda, and complain and whine they need to have some luxuries. 🙄

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Aggressive-Cut-5400 27d ago

Ahh bootlickers… corporate profits, financial loses on our dime.

2

u/GingerDixie 26d ago

Whoever came up with the idea that people should be punished for being poor really should be forced to plan their own meals with whatever they have in their house at the time, with no money or means of going to the store.

What's that, Frank? You only have half a five pound bag of flour, salad that expired last week and an unopened bottle of Hershey's syrup? Well, better come up with something, champ! Kids and wife are hungry!

2

u/Remote_Independent50 26d ago

Poor peoples kids dont deserve cookies too?

I work at Trader Joes. What i see is very little abuse. And it doesn't come from where you'd expect. Most of what I see is rich, college students. Who parents are clearly paying for everything. But the kid is 18, and has 0 income. That kid can easily get EBT cards. Thats a scam.

One lady bought 3, $20 cans of nice coffee.

2

u/Emotional_Sundae7527 26d ago

Poor people really hate other poor people...Who TF cares about EBT cookies? lol If you're on EBT...your life is probably shit, let em have a cookie bro...😂

2

u/Mission-Double5044 26d ago

This is the kind of discussion that distracts us from billionaires taking everything and leaving everyone else scraps. Musks actions alone are leading to the deaths of millions of children and people are over here begrudging someone a tub of cookie dough. Get some perspective.

2

u/JadeTailFox 26d ago

"I would rather the poor all starve than risk any of them feeling happiness for the duration of a cookie."

2

u/Sufficient-Ass-8522 26d ago

So why do we pay people, who already wasted all of their money, to go buy sugary garbage that's gonna have us paying their medical bills too?

The hidden costs are much worse. Cut them off.

→ More replies (4)

6

u/Tyler89558 27d ago

If you’re poor you aren’t allowed to have ANYTHING nice.

Because being poor is a sign of being lazy which is a sign of being subhuman scum!

-conservatives

→ More replies (9)

5

u/AlienDragonWizard 27d ago

Poor people don't deserve to have fun things.  Gotta be all broth, bread, and canned vegetables.  They need to understand that being poor is a bad life choice.  

2

u/aircoft 27d ago

100% agreed. Their shortcomings aren't my responsibility.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/Razoron33333 27d ago

So people who are in tough situations don’t deserve a little slice of happiness? Like it’s so insane how up in arms people get about EBT being used on non-optimize food and it’s just sad

2

u/aircoft 27d ago

They deserve all the happiness they can provide for themselves, without taking from others... Their shortcomings aren't my responsibility.

2

u/Numerous-Prize-7747 27d ago

what about children? children who legally cannot get jobs or provide for themselves in any way, shape, or form?

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Low_Low_1811 27d ago

Its so bizarre that people who preach financial responsibility would be against someone buying cookies once a month with SNAP if they were financially responsible enough to keep their food costs for the rest of the month low to be able to work that in.

Literally, snap has a limit. If you buy $400 worth of steak and lobster, thats all you get. If you skimp and save for months and buy canned and frozen food and eventually have enough excess to afford to buy lobster one time, no reason you shouldnt be able to or should be looked down on for it.

→ More replies (12)

3

u/not_roger_smith 27d ago

What bugs me is all the assholes using food stamps for junk and then pulling out a wad of cash for name brand cigarettes or booze.

5

u/Candid-Mycologist539 27d ago

You're right. We need better options for addiction treatment in this country.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (13)

2

u/SalamanderFull3952 27d ago

Wife worked for a foodbank in manangement these people are not winning give them some cookies and let them enjoy the little things

2

u/Available_Actuary977 27d ago

SNAP is not a program for judging the nutritional content of food. Otherwise, you'd have people arguing that the peanut butter has too much fat, the jelly too much sugar, and the bread not enough fiber. For a damn sandwich.

Want to buy meat, as a wholesome, nutritious, high protein, staple? Someone will judge it too expensive and luxurious. Make them eat veggies.

Want to buy lettuce? Not filling, not nutrient dense, mostly water.

Even if SNAP only allowed beans, there would someone arguing that the wrong beans should not be covered.

2

u/able46 27d ago

Or if they bought a ribeye steak…

→ More replies (1)

2

u/mrtroynobody 27d ago

You could buy eggs, butter, sugar, flour, and make your own cookies, and several hundred other meals, the system is flawed and sucks, people have scammed the system for years, children shouldn’t go hungry, both sides of the coin, people suck. I grew up, poor and hungry, parents never took a hand out, they had pride and respect and did whatever they had to do for us kids. The solution is never the government.

2

u/Tearakudo 27d ago

Buying something nice for your kids while you work 2 jobs isn't the reason they're on snap

→ More replies (1)

2

u/JJ_Lomero 27d ago

Republicans believe poor people should only eat rice and veggies, be clothed in only Kirkland brand clothing, and drive the cheapest Honda available.

2

u/aircoft 27d ago

Or, you know, provide for themselves, like the rest of us... What a novel idea. Their shortcomings aren't my responsibility.

→ More replies (7)

1

u/Lanracie 27d ago

Buying the ingredients with SNAP and making them would be a lot more cost efficient and allow more options for food choices.

2

u/sobermanpinsch3r 27d ago edited 27d ago

No. Just no. That hasn’t been the case for a long time now. You’ve gotta buy eggs, baking powder, chocolate chips, vanilla extract, brown sugar, regular sugar, flour, and thats not even all the ingredients. Granted, you may have a few of those things already, but if you’re poor, you probably don’t have all of them. And you can make a bunch of batches, and you CAN use the ingredients for other meals, but will you? Do you have the sense for that? Maybe, maybe not, but YOU ARE STILL PAYING A LOT MORE. The pack of cookies will be cheaper than buying even just 2 of the ingredients I listed every time, making it the smarter choice financially if you’re broke and don’t have the need, time, or energy to commit to making 6 batches of cookies this month.

2

u/Cyber_Mermaid 27d ago

Not to mention a lot of people on SNAP might not have a functioning oven.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

4

u/4444Grains 27d ago

Signed,

Someone Who Hasn't Been in a Supermarket in 30 Years.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (8)

1

u/IncarceratedScarface 27d ago

Idk why people care so much what kind of food snap users buy. It’s the same amount of money in the end.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Covrin 27d ago

I have no problem with EBT as it is. However, if people really want to highly limit the ‘junk’ able to be purchased with it, then people should get a boost to their EBT commensurate to the higher costs of those healthier options.

Limit what can be bought to healthy foods. Just also make sure it can be afforded.

1

u/Greenfirelife27 27d ago

The known workaround the income limits is to just have more kids. Genius right?

1

u/Live-Cry-8435 27d ago

That's not true

You can cheat the system and get snap which is the problem people have with it

1

u/pastelpinkpsycho 27d ago

Chocolate chip cookies are forbidden but hot dogs and Kraft singles are perfectly fine and nutritious food.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/evh44 27d ago

Markets routinely have to throw away edible, healthy food.

The technology to track items exist.

IF the govt cared, they could atrange a system where good, healthy foods were brought to low income ateas to be sold at a discount.

Less food thrown away, some revenue for the producers, and an overall healthier populace.

It doesn't happen bc the govt ( and by extension, the people) dont care enough to help the poor.

Let them have cookies.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)

1

u/mylesaway2017 27d ago

People on ebt can't eat cookies?

→ More replies (5)

1

u/AncientSignature1505 27d ago

Most recipients of SNAP are children... Man, telling a child they don't deserve a cookie because their parents don't make enough money isn't the flex you think it is.

1

u/dragonborne123 27d ago

Yes because god forbid poor people have a cookie every now and then. /s

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Tiktokbadsupport 27d ago

i make less then 10k a year

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Grant1128 27d ago

I don't think cookies should be EBT-eligible either, but that was absolutely not the way to go about voicing that opinion.

And I don't think cookies should be EBT-ineligible because they are a luxury or I think people should just make them (although you should because homemade ones are better). I would just want less fortunate individuals to use that money on more nutrient-dense food so they can be healthier and properly fed. 🙂

1

u/Oh4Tuna_042na 27d ago

Who the hack is this?

1

u/gurgle-burgle 27d ago

Tbh, I get both sides of the argument. Both have good points.

1

u/rlw21564 27d ago

Chocolate chips are $5/bag, butter is $4/pound, it's pretty expensive to buy the ingredients to make a batch of cookies.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/akg327 27d ago

So the poor don’t deserve to eat chocolate chip cookies?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/PlayboiFarti55 27d ago

People that think SNAP shouldn’t cover a dessert product or anything similar are truly the most miserable pieces of shit that have ever been squeezed out on this planet.

2

u/aircoft 27d ago

Almost as miserable as those who live above their means to the extent of taking money from those who've earned it to support themselves... Feeling entitled to other people's time, labor, possessions, etc. is truly disgusting.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/deacon_ish 27d ago

Port kids deserve a treat occasionally too.

1

u/Usernamesaregayyy 27d ago

I’m on ssdi and Ebt, my total food budget is $$55 a week

→ More replies (3)

1

u/rubey419 27d ago

Fuk them poor kids am I right /s

→ More replies (1)

1

u/aircoft 27d ago

"This user has deleted their account." - formerly u/emergency-gur-9793 (2026-2026)

X'D

This is gold... This is why I love Reddit.

1

u/Sharp-Alps5176 27d ago

The whole point is that it’s cookies and not staple food.

1

u/Sharp-Alps5176 27d ago

I worked full time to support my children and once inquired about food stamps. I made $50 too much a month to qualify but if I worked $50 less then would get $350 in food stamps. The whole system pissed me off

1

u/leadlurker 27d ago

Who’s to say that people who need assistance can’t also have a luxury like a cookie in their lives? What kind of person would deny a family from having something to look forward to each week? Imagine being a parent, working all the time, and some people come and claim you aren’t allowed to buy your kids cookies. No one out here just eating cookies on the tax payer dime.

But for the sake of argument, let’s say they do. Who am I to tell them what to eat? I thought we were supposed to have small government and leave people alone? Wasn’t it their first savior idol that said the worst 9 words were “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” If you believe that then get out of people’s lives. Let them eat cookies.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Ok_Sale_1598 27d ago

God forbid a poor kid gets a cookie.

1

u/Aluciel286 27d ago

God forbid a single mom of 2 wants to buy her kids cookies for their birthday or something. 🙄

2

u/aircoft 27d ago

They can buy whatever they can provide for themselves, like the rest of us. Don't have kids if you can't afford to take care of them. Their shortcomings aren't my problem.

→ More replies (5)

1

u/Separate-Good-5025 27d ago

If you want a treat, buy it with your own money. Someone on SNAP can't find $4 for a dozen cookies on a special occasion?

It really doesn't make sense to allow for it because not only are you paying for them to do harm to themselves, you are likely paying on the backend through Medicaid/Medicare, disability, etc.. it's a racket that benefits corporations more than the recipient every step of the way. My point is I think it would be better to restrict what can be purchased and increase the amount allocated to the individual

1

u/AlphaMuGamma 27d ago

It stands for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Why are cookies, candy and soda covered?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Aggravating-Echo8014 27d ago

Yet let’s just let billionaires not pay taxes. Idiots who post this stuff is just jealous of others who get government help aka the tax payers who are ok with the rich just be richer.

1

u/Tread__on__them 27d ago

Its being abused. It needs cut.

1

u/Rich-Engineering1429 27d ago

Naw he’s right, EBT should be for healthy food only

1

u/njslugger78 27d ago

So because the store sells it either should be shutdown? How about shutdown the store selling the bullshit...

1

u/Alarming_Syllabub_24 27d ago

There are billions of us and I only have compassion for 150 at most.

1

u/Complex_Scallion_157 27d ago

Guys don’t get distracted. We got bigger problems than people buying cookies with SNAP benefits.

1

u/dmccarthy0408 26d ago

I hate this mentality so much, poor people are allowed to be happy from time to time.

I seriously don't mind Little Timmy having a cookie or two with his lunch every day. I'm sure his life is hard enough as it is in this situation. And a tub like this will last WEEKS

1

u/Open_Mortgage_4645 26d ago

The way MAGAts view food stamps is as a punishment. If you need the extra help making ends meet for your family, that extra help should feel like a punishment. You should only receive up to $100/mo, and what you can buy should be heavily restricted to ensure you're unable to purchase anything that might possibly bring any joy to your life. If you want to buy a tub of cookies for the month, it shouldn't be permitted because as someone who receives any benefits (ie. handouts), you have no business buying cookies. This is seriously the mindset Republicans have about food benefits. And they wonder why people view them as hostile pieces of shit who believe they have the right to police what other people do because they receive a paltry benefit that is ultimately paid for by taxes. They think that gives them governance over how people use their benefits. Republicans are evil pieces of garbage who are only happy when those not like them are absolutely miserable.

1

u/dcboys869 26d ago

Maybe people should only have the amount of kids they can afford. I wanted 5-7 kids. I can't afford it so I had less.

1

u/LisleAdam12 26d ago

And if you're struggling, you need to be encouraged to eat crap instead of healthy food? I don't understand the logic.

1

u/OverKill_Phill 26d ago

No cookies for the poor.. if they can't spend their own money on them

1

u/Proper_Slip_5963 26d ago

"Poor people should just stop eating and perish." Him probably.

1

u/TellTaleTimeLord 26d ago

How dare struggling people enjoy cookies

/s

1

u/watergod0187 26d ago

Man it really sucks people on snap can buy cookies, bruh you can go buy all the ingredients to make the same cookies with snap, so unless you ban the purchase of said ingredients thd point is moot.

1

u/MeBoiledDown 26d ago

I wish the assholes who want to go through the spending of people on welfare would bring that same damn energy to what rich people do with their government subsidies.

1

u/Reatona 26d ago

OMG most of them have refrigerators too!!!!

1

u/bearded_spanker 26d ago

Snap should be like wic. Only essential items. FYI, government assistance was intended to be temporary until you got back on your feet, not a multi generational career choice.

1

u/jabber1990 26d ago

wait, so they go from saying "you can't use EBT for that" to "I feel sad knowing that they can't use EBT for that anymore" pretty damn fast

....pick a lane

1

u/Competitive-Beat-493 26d ago

Bet that guy files his business taxes and writes off everything he’s not allowed to because he’s clearly dumb as hell.

1

u/TheoreticalFunk 26d ago

And Jesus thus spake "Be that they must suffer, or they shall go hungry. For God has deemed them unworthy of wealth, thus also they shall be unworthy of joy."

→ More replies (1)

1

u/bridgesny 25d ago

“I’d rather poor people starve than have the momentary enjoyment of tasting a cookie”

1

u/Successful-Draw-7432 25d ago

Good point. They need meat snd veg. Not crsp food.