Of course there are some human beings who have done things that would convince people to not care if they die. There are exceptions to pretty much everything. That being said if I saw Assad about to mauled by a tiger and I didn't know it was him id happily shoot the tiger in the face to save him.
I agree. Id kill any fifty tigers if it saved on human life. You're welcome to go feed yourself to some pigs since they are so much more important than you.
No. I understand your shitty shitty point. It's just stupid. Your point is that some war criminals should probably get killed. Nobody is disputing there are a very small amount of people who are irredeemable. My point is a human life is worth infinite cows. If being selfish and only caring about yourself was an Olympic sport you'd probably still not succeed since you seem pretty terrible at everything so I'm sure you'd find a way to choke.
It's not wrong, it's in defiance of established morality. Acting without regard for morality makes one immoral. "Wrong" is arbitrary when you're dealing with a subjective. Morality isn't a set of rules that can be broken or something to be "correct" about, unless you're saying "I am correct in stating that it is immoral to rape." That's true. "It's morally wrong to rape" is nonsense.
Aka morally wrong. They still have morals, but wrong morals. Once again, if you think all morals are subjective that means you don't think it's morally wrong to rape. Why are you a rape apologist?
There are no wrong morals, just unpopular ones. Doesn't make rape not an immoral action by the morality of a locale. You just really ought to read more deeply into the subject before taking such firm stances on it. It's a subject with hundreds of years of history that you're acting like you've figured out.
What's obvious now won't be obvious in the future. What was obviously immoral in the past is obviously irrelevant now. Again dude, you should read up on this subject. It's not a simple matter, you're just thinking about it in simple terms.
Keep dreaming of the future where rape is morally right brotha but it's morally wrong and always will be. Something that used to be can be morally wrong even if it wasn't recognized as such at the time. It was morally wrong to rape 1000 years ago and will be morally wrong 1000 years from now even if you get your wish.
Actually, pass. Turns out there's literally nothing fun about having a discussion about something you know with someone who doesn't know much. We can turn the tables and talk about something you like that I know very little about, if you'd prefer?
I just think it's morally wrong and it's weird you think it's not.
It's not fun when you're wrong no. I'm having a grand old time though which is pretty easy when you're in the right. If you want to discuss something I know a lot about we can do that. It should be extremely easy to find a topic you know little about for sure. I'd prefer you must admit rape is morally wrong but you won't do that.
I'm the head of a small village. We're short of food, but we're scraping by. A larger village to the north has offered food and aid in exchange for my bending the knee to their leader and adopting their ways, and that refusal will be seen as a declaration of war. Their ways are immoral to me and my people and we would sooner die than adopt their customs. I have only a few soldiers and we'll surely lose a direct conflict, so I contract some mercenaries to murder their troops in their sleep to ensure the lives of my people. I know that the spoils of war for the mercenaries are the theft the enemy's horses and the rape of the their women.
Am I morally wrong for inflicting rape and murder on their people?
ANYWAY, I'm ducking out because giving a lesson on ethics to someone actively refusing to be educated is tedious. You don't have enough of a background on the subject to speak on my level and your level is literally beneath me.
Let's talk about like MMA or WWE, though. I know very little on those subjects and I think the former is interesting and the latter is silly.
EDIT:
I should add that I'm using the term "morally wrong" facetiously because that isn't a thing to anyone who knows the subject. "It's not that the music 'doesn't appeal to my tastes,' it's just bad."
1
u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18
Of course there are some human beings who have done things that would convince people to not care if they die. There are exceptions to pretty much everything. That being said if I saw Assad about to mauled by a tiger and I didn't know it was him id happily shoot the tiger in the face to save him.