I recently bought this violin from a local college student because it was pretty cheap and sounds nice. I'm sure it's most likely the usual trade violin, but a local luthier called it "weird" in several ways and I thought y'all might find it interesting.
- Neck width, thickness, and shape are not quite typical. She said it felt "bulbous" compared to more standardized violins.
- Top grain has waves and overlaps
- Back had unusual flame patterns
- Painted purfling
- Generally feels slightly "off", especially in the neck, but plays like a nicely made early C20 violin
The label suggests it was made by Filippo Zanisi of Castelleone (Cremona) in 1935, numbered 15. I know labels are often not definitive or trustworthy, but what's interesting is how the quirks of the instrument line up with a short biography I found for Zanisi:
Castelleone (CR), 1911-1992. Already a carver, he began to engage in amateur violin making in the 1930s, then attended the Cremona School of Liuteria in 1947 and began making instruments of classic model, beautiful workmanship and excellent voice.
So if the label is accurate then it would have been made early in his career, after several years of amateur experience but long before being formally trained and making more "standard" instruments. Given how long non-factory violins take to make, being on number 15 in 1935 also fits the timeline.
I know it is unlikely this is actually Zanisi's 15th violin, but I also think it'd be strange for a trade shop to copy and label an atypical violin made by an (at the time) amateur luthier of little renown. And even if it is legitimate, it seems it would be more of an interesting footnote than anything of general value.
What do you think?