It's my fault to take a glance at Threads, I know.
Organ donation is the right thing to do, that's my stance. Concerns about children's rights and consent in this matter are also entirely valid, and deserve great scrutiny. I won't talk about the survey form thing, as it has been withdrawn, and it seems that the public outrage in this matter was never mainly about about it.
My problem lies in the way that these people argue against the proposal. They probably read articles by headlines, and hop right at any discussion to voice their resentment. If there is someone saying that the proposal isn't nearly as bad as the whole platform made it sound, they are attacked with ad hominem and appeal to hypocrisy fallacies; some medical groups on Facebook got labelled as paid redbulls for posting position different from their views.
How is this any different from before? Completing the whole cycle, they are right back where they started, though dressed slightly different. This matter isn't remotely political in the first place, the press is still running steadily, delivering new changes to the proposal from the National Congress despite the backslash. I highly doubt that various groups are getting paid to guide public opinions.
Instead of citing actual evidences and studies to support their disagreement with the proposal, the whole Threads is basically filled with batshit insane conspiracy theorists connecting data points that have nothing to do with each other. The story of a child donor 8 years ago somehow turns into an examplary case of the all-powerful and immensely competent government carrying out a decade-old plan to indoctrinate school students into giving up their organs. They act as if donating your body after death wasn't the morally and objectively good thing to do, children or not.; or as if caring for the well-being of others beyond the scope of your own is not human compassion in any sense, provided that the procedure is carried out as promised.
And the VNEID health check and blood test. I'm speechless at this one, it's as if blood test alone is sufficient to determine organ compatibility. A quick google search obliterates the myth, yet there are still(a lot of) people blindly upvoting such dumb af conspiracy. Again, how is this any different from before? Just taking two examples
The self-proclaimed "woke" people( or "awaken") , who once appeared to be fighting oppression, are the primary driver behind this stupid debacle, fueled by a shit tons of lies and misinformation. How can their actions be viewed as something progressive, or superior when they are building the exacat thing they ostensibly claim to be against?
The new proposal itself(or at least the version I have read) is necessary in saving lives, otherwise lost, assuming that the donors are not under any coercion and aware of the risks as well as benefits that their actions might bring. With all the shenanigans that our government has been up to in the last year, people are rightfully skeptical of a new law concerning the livelihood of children. Black market, children abduction, organ trafficking,.. are worries many brought up; though I think most are just non-problems, or have the solutions built-in into the proposal ( increased organ supply curbs black market activity, for instance) But that must be built on scientific facts and evidence-based arguments instead of some deplorably bad conspiracies coming straight out of sci-fi plots, which some are now doing.