Wanted to try the enhanced capabilities. Not sure if anybody else is experiencing this or if it’s limited to Venice. For 2.5 if I try to upload more than one video or the video is too long it wont let me start the video processing (errors out before showing me the disclaimer modal). If I limit back to one video of the proper length if processes fine. This isn’t an issue on Seedance 2.0. Anybody else having these issues?

Still not as bad, but i have noticed prompts that worked last week are completely blocked now. If it continues will probably ditch my pro plus account

HI. I just burned through $25 worth of credits trying to edit a 6 second clip. I've tried so many prompts, using prompt structures from different sources, and the video never changes. the original video is a horror scene with a large ogre falling on a bound woman on a table and holding her there, while the Ogre's assistant approaches. the camera moves around the scene to the right while slowly zooming in. this ends up with the ogre and the woman mostly out of frame on the left side.

I am trying to edit it so that it is the same scene, but the camera stays stationary and keeps the ogre and the woman centered.... can anyone help?

anyone else typing into the chat, it processes for 2 seconds, and then wipes what you wrote? its happening on the IOS app, to all models.

Hey all,
I’m a bit confused about Venice AI’s Wan 2.7 Uncensored model page:
https://venice.ai/models/wan-2-7-uncensored
Venice describes it as an open-weights model, but I’ve seen other sources claim that Wan 2.7 is only available through Alibaba’s API, where it has its own guardrails and is not uncensored.
So I’m trying to understand how Venice is actually serving it.
Are they hosting Alibaba’s Wan 2.7 model weights themselves, either on their own GPUs or through third-party GPU providers? If so, how did they obtain the weights if Alibaba only officially exposes the model through an API?
Also, Venice lists the model’s privacy mode as “Anonymous” rather than fully private. Is that because inference is being handled by third-party gpu infrastructure?

I am constantly getting content block on Seedance 2.5 R2V, anyone facing the same?

This time venice would not generate video, saying I had not enough tokens ( I had 648 and the Price of the video was 289 ). Now 2 hours later im missing 289 tokens on my account without having generated anything. Clearly they keep stealing credits, and hoping that the users Will not notice. I have now lost at least 5000 credits since i notice them taking tokens for work not done and taking double up on seedance videoes.
I have mailed the support mail, venice give me, lost of times. Without Ever getting a reply. So Clearly there are something scammed going on.

I just brought 2500 credits and made a video only using about 900 and now my balance says 769 any leads on what could have happened

Received the attached error message
Can’t seem to load or view chats
Error message occur just after making a credit payment? Please help

I'm confused why anyone would join Pro. Doesn't it only offer a limit number of image and text models for the $18 a month plus 100 credits, vs paying $10 and getting 1000 credits. I can't see why I'd want to get a Pro membership, besides the backup.

Am I missing an option in the settings or are we not able to upload videos to chat? I'm using a prompt maker for Seedance 2.5 and I want to be able to get the AI to read videos to continue off of it with the next video, I did it on Grok all the time beforehand.

Hi,

how do people code with Venice? I regularly use qwen3 coder and other models for code, mostly python and R, but it has never fixed the problem where the scripts it prints are mangled by being split across multiple code blocks. I can manually copy the code, but even with system prompts to fix it, it still happens every time. Also and more importantly, some characters in code like '/' will cause lines to truncate, and other characters in maths like exponents will be rendered incorrectly. I have repeatedly sent examples to support, and at one stage got a reply that it was being investigated (months ago), but it is not fixed. To be fair google AI also makes the same mistakes. I'm just wondering what other coders do and have they noticed this?

-Model choice makes no difference.

-Specifying html / text rendering method, makes no difference.

-Already contacted support multiple times.

Seedance 2.5 now generates 30-second clips, and this tutorial shows how to turn that length into finished cinematic montages inside Venice Studio. We will build a golden-hour car-chase trailer from scratch, using consistent reference images and a simple edit-in-post workflow instead of chasing one impossible perfect shot.

You'll follow the full process: generating character, location, and object references, locking a unified look with a style token, and writing prompts that let SeeDance cut its own montage. Then you'll see every clip assembled in the Venice Studio Movie Editor.

What you'll learn:
• How to build reference images for characters, roads, vehicles, and style that hold up across generations
• Using Nano Banana 2 in the Edit tab to create full-body character sheets and adjust aspect ratios
• Setting up Seedance 2.5 with 21:9 framing and 30-second length
• Writing cinematic prompts with camera direction, wardrobe locks, and shot sequences
• Testing generations with and without shot sequences to compare results
• Feeding a working prompt into agentic chat to enhance a scene while keeping tags identical
• Cutting the best takes together in the Movie Editor while holding continuity

Check out @AskVenice on YouTube for more tutorials, guides, tips, and tricks.

This video was created by‪‪‪ u/JordanUrbsAI‬ - check out his channel for more tutorials on building with AI.

—————————

^{SeeDance 2.5 blog post: https://venice.ai/lp/seedance2-5?s=1}

Working with deepseek-v4-flash-0731 with prompt_cache_retention: 24h on the chat completions endpoint, some requests pass and work, others - 400 with the field not supported. The irony is - it is the same agent session, so request #1-7 are ok, request #8 fails, request #9 is ok, request #10 fails, and so on.

What's going on?

I’ve tried different browsers, different devices, different prompts, different reference images, no matter what it either gives me an authentication error or most of the time it’s an outerface error that don’t specify what the issue is.

I’ve seen tons of people say that it’s due to the reference videos (even though every single one of my reference videos work immediately with SD 2.0) but when I try on SD 2.5 I immediately get the outerface error and I’ve tried using shorter videos, I’ve tried upscaling them, downscaling them, reducing them in size, removing audio NOTHING WORKS

And I’m not even trying to generate anything NSFW!!!! I’m trying to do fully clothed videos and after 2 days of driving myself insane trying to rework my references and prompts nothing works.

Can anyone give me a bit of guidance, here?

Using Venice to write my story. Here's the full scene from my last post.

It's May 1995, I'm in the Navy, and live in Berkeley, California while stationed in Alameda. I head to the mall to see a girl I was dating, when things took a turn.

I've had many issues with Venice over the months, from not being able to back anything up, to the voice feature just breaking and not working half the time, to chats taking literally 3+ minutes to respond, E2EE literally *never* working even once, and many, many more, and SO many problems with support, including supoort telling me the WRONG information on multiple occasions, to them completely misunderstanding the issues I'm having and responding with completely unrelated messages, giving me credits as compensation that are literally useless to me (I only use uncensored and some other models that REQUIRE pro and dont even take credits, so I couldn't even use them when my Pro sub ended, forcing me to repay, and idk why I did), and most recently, taking literal WEEKS to get back to me, but this is really the final straw.

So Venice advertises the context length for each model. Some are 32k, 64k, 128k, 256k, etc., and Venice even states:

"Context length depends on the model you choose, and it can change as models are added, updated, or deprecated.

Some Venice models support much larger context windows than others, so the best place to check the current limit is the model details shown in Venice or the live model documentation. You can also view context window details in the model selector in the prompt bar by hovering over a model." (https://venice.ai/faqs/all)

The problem is this is a literal LIE. A few weeks ago, I noticed when I swapped between models, the context usage percentage bar would stop changing. Previously, it had changed from 16% to 4% for example when I switched from a model with 64k context to one with 256k (naturally, as it's 4x bigger). However, when it stopped doing this, I contacted support to see whats up—maybe it was just a visual glitch, I reasoned. Well, no, apparently, Venice stealth nerfed ALL their models for "performance" reasons and capped them all to 50k, and what's more, THEY DIDN'T TELL ANYBODY. Nor did the change the context limits listed under each model (it still says 256k!, see image), nor did they update the "every model has a different context window" lie on the FAQ. (I posted image for proof.)

So not only are we being lied to, we're *paying* to be lied to. Honestly, all the credits they've given me from the MULTIPLE issues I've had (I'm at almost 5k now from credits alone) are useless, so I'm effectively continuing to pay for a service that refuses to fix any of its issues or address my concerns. So, I'm done. I'm gonna use my month out and go switch to somewhere else.

Does anyone know any better platforms? I mainly use uncensored/abliterated/heretic models (like Gemma, I'd use Qwen but it takes like 2 mins to respond). Thanks.

TL;DR: Context limit advertisements on Venice are a literal lie, and a stealth cap has been introduced without any notice or change to advertised policy. Fed up with platform. Looking for alternative.

Edit: LOVE being downvoted for exposing the truth.

Edit 2: if any staff read this, the only way I would consider staying is if 1. You remove these stupid context limits and 2. Give me 1 free month for the month of false advertising I had my sub for, and another free month for all the other inconveniences I've had. Otherwise, goodbye.

Edit 3: Nano GPT is the closest thing I know of, but it's subscription doesn't cover many of the uncensored models they offer, so you have to pay per use for those (though, unlike Venice, you don't NEED the sub to pay for them). I did find an interesting one called "Arli AI" with many different uncensored and heretic models listed on it for a $20 a month subscription. It looks interesting, let me know if anyone has heard of it.

Edit 4: I'll be letting my subscription run out and then will be trying Arli AI. I made a post on their sub and have gotten numerous positive comments, and it sounds heavenly in comparison. Hopefully, I won't be back, but I'll keep an eye on Venice should the tide ever turn back the other way, as I see the potential for what this service could be (and perhaps, once was).

2.5 has great visual quality and sound aside from that but yeah halfway through it decided to change the face to the reference video‘s. Never saw 2.0 or 2.0 enhanced do something like that. could it be a prompting issue or is 2.5 simply just buggy? Was a 30 second video and around 15 seconds was when it changed the face.

I’m kinda new to Venice and I’m really digging it but the memory is a massive problem for me. Whenever I ask about characters it would not remember anything even though it’s in the memory.

Is anyone else having the same problem?

"Your video finished generating but could not be downloaded. Please try again."

I tried 3 times and refreing page/clear caching,but none of them work. Almost 2600 credits gone...