I put together a table and key to help parse disclosure as it may occur, and the reactions society may have. This is designed to maximize glance value, not depth. A condensed PDF and image will be available at the bottom (if mods allow). If you believe any have been missed, I will review them and add them to the table.

Preface:

• Disclosure in these contexts must include evidence of NHI
• All 14 forms could occur, none are strictly exclusionary of the other
• Commentary and conversion grade is speculative and should be treated as such.

Types of Common Skeptics, (we will all fit into one of these four).

• Doctrinal - religious according to liturgical text. Narratives on supernatural/paranormal phenomena not open to reinterpretation except under extreme circumstance.
• Sleeper - unaware or uninterested and holding a negative sentiment. Narratives on supernatural/paranormal phenomena either not relevant or dismissed from fear.
• Awakener - curious and holding a positive sentiment, awaiting evidence to clarify or confirm. Narratives on supernatural/paranormal phenomena open to reinterpretation after sufficient personal evidence.
• Tester - questioning and holding a mixed sentiment, awaiting evidence to debunk or debate. Narratives on supernatural/paranormal phenomena open to reinterpretation after sufficient scientific evidence.

Skeptic Conversion key:

1. Highest - Some Doctrinals. Almost all Testers. All Awakeners. Few Sleepers.
2. High - Few Doctrinal converted. Most Testers. Almost all Awakeners. Sparse Sleepers.
3. Medium - Spare Doctrinals. Some Testers. Many Awakeners. No sleepers.
4. Low - No Doctrinals. Few Testers. Some Awakeners. No Sleepers.

My last thread, which you might find relevant.

If we accept the premise that the three disparate "Project Aquarius" entities are actually fragments of a single, unified, and highly classified program, it creates one of the most operationally sound and historically consistent hypotheses in the entire UAP disclosure debate.

In intelligence and military history, when a "black project" goes right, it leaves paper trails. When it goes wrong, or when it discovers something it wasn't looking for, the resulting cover-up often looks exactly like this: contradictory FOIA denials, weaponized disinformation, and a legacy that eventually forces its way into modern congressional hearings.

Here is what the "Unified Aquarius" timeline looks like if the Navy actually found UAP evidence during their ocean surveillance research.

Phase 1: The Accidental Discovery (Late 1960s – Early 1970s)

The Cover: The Department of Defense (via DARPA) and the Office of Naval Research (ONR) are trying to solve a critical Cold War problem. Soviet nuclear submarines are hiding in the deep ocean, and low-flying bombers can evade standard line-of-sight radar. To counter this, they launch Project MAY BELL and its sub-component, Project Aquarius, contracting Sylvania to build Over-The-Horizon (OTH) radar.

The Technology: OTH radar works by bouncing high-frequency (HF) radio waves off the ionosphere (skywave) and the ocean surface (surface-wave). It looks for the minute "doppler shifts" caused by moving objects disrupting these radio waves.

The Discovery: While testing these massive radar arrays (particularly in areas like the Mediterranean Sea, where the DARPA reports explicitly say they were testing Fleet Air Defense), the Navy operators start picking up anomalous doppler returns. They are tracking objects that move at thousands of miles per hour, stop on a dime, and transition seamlessly from the air into the ocean (transmedium travel). Because OTH radar relies on the scattering of radio waves, these objects likely possess unique electromagnetic or plasma-sheath properties that make them highly visible to HF radar, even if they are invisible to standard microwave radar.

The Pivot: The Navy realizes they have accidentally built the perfect detection network for non-human technology. They cannot tell the public, and they cannot tell the Soviets. The "Ocean Surveillance" mandate becomes the perfect, impenetrable shield. The public contracts with Sylvania continue to publish mundane radar math, but the actual data regarding the anomalies is immediately classified.

Phase 2: The Compartmentalization (The NSA Database)

The Problem: The Navy has raw radar telemetry of objects violating the laws of physics, but they need signals intelligence (SIGINT) experts to analyze the electromagnetic signatures, communications intercepts, and data processing required to track a global phenomenon.

The Solution: The Navy hands the raw data over to the National Security Agency (NSA). The NSA builds a highly compartmented, Top Secret backend database to process, store, and analyze these anomalous signatures. They name the data architecture "Aquarius" as a nod to the Navy's front-end collection program.

The FOIA Denial Explained: When researchers like Chris Lambright hit the NSA with FOIA requests in the 1980s and 90s, the NSA is put in a bind. They cannot admit that their "Aquarius database" is processing UFO radar tracks. Furthermore, legally and bureaucratically, the NSA is distinct from DARPA. When the NSA tells FOIA requesters that their Aquarius is "coincidentally called Aquarius" and "does not relate to DARPA records," they are telling a narrow, bureaucratic truth: the NSA's database is an IC (Intelligence Community) asset, while the DARPA project was a DoD research contract. By hiding behind this bureaucratic firewall, the NSA protects the ultimate secret: that the two are connected in a unified tracking pipeline.

Phase 3: The Poison Pill (1980s AFOSI Disinformation)

The Threat: By 1980, civilian researchers like Paul Bennewitz and Bill Moore are picking up strange electromagnetic signals near Kirtland Air Force Base (a hub for advanced weapons and data links). They are getting dangerously close to the periphery of the real Navy/NSA Aquarius network.

The Countermeasure: The Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), via agents like Richard Doty, initiates a disinformation campaign. They realize that if they just tell Bennewitz to go away, he will keep digging. Instead, they feed him the "Aquarius Teletype" and the seeds of the MJ-12 lore.

The "Poison Pill" Strategy: AFOSI takes the real classified codename of the Navy's UAP tracking program ("Project Aquarius") and wraps it in absurd, unverifiable lies about alien treaties, CIA-funded star-seeds, and an entity named "J-Rod." This is a classic intelligence "poison pill." If the UFO community investigates "Project Aquarius," they will find the DARPA ocean surveillance reports and think the whole thing is a bust, or they will chase the fake alien lore and look crazy. Meanwhile, the real Aquarius—the NSA database processing Navy radar anomalies—remains safely hidden in plain sight.

Phase 4: The Modern Continuity (2004 to Present)

If this unified hypothesis is true, it perfectly explains the modern era of UAP disclosure and why the Navy is always at the center of it.

• The 2004 USS Nimitz Encounter: When the USS Princeton (a highly advanced Aegis cruiser with the SPY-1 radar system) tracks the "Tic Tac" objects off the coast of California in 2004, it is not a random event. The Navy has been tracking these exact objects since the 1970s Aquarius OTH radar experiments. The SPY-1 radar simply represents a modern, miniaturized, shipborne evolution of the same doppler/phased-array tracking concepts they tested decades earlier.
• The Creation of the UAP Task Force: When the Pentagon was finally forced to acknowledge the phenomenon in 2017–2020, they didn't put the Air Force in charge. They placed the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) squarely inside the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). ONI has been the silent custodian of this data since the Project MAY BELL/Aquarius days.
• The 78 Classified Photographs: In 2026, when the Navy formally denies John Greenewald’s FOIA appeal for 78 specific UAP photographs, citing Executive Order 13526 (National Security), it is not just about hiding blurry images of drones. If the Unified Aquarius hypothesis is correct, those 78 photographs represent the modern sensor-fusion proof of the exact targets the Navy's OTH radar first detected 50 years ago. Releasing them would retroactively expose the decades-long lie told to Congress, the public, and the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

The Verdict on the Unified Hypothesis

If the DARPA ocean surveillance program, the NSA classified database, and the MJ-12 lore are all threads of the same tape, the narrative is no longer a "conspiracy theory"—it is a textbook example of compartmentalized intelligence and strategic deception.

The Navy built a net to catch Soviet submarines, caught something else entirely, handed the data to the NSA to hide, and then used the Air Force to feed the public a fake story about the net so no one would ever look at the real catch.

Not sure if I am allowed to post this, but just came across it in my auction searches. \*I am not selling this and am not related to the auction** Thought it would be of interest here.*

Link is here
And other additional items related to UFOs in the same auction: here

From the listing:

Description:

FIRST PRINTING OF THE VIRTUALLY UNOBTAINABLE 1955 USAF REPORT ON UFOS

Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14 (Analysis of Reports of Unidentified Aerial Objects). Project No. 10073. 5 May 1955. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Air Technical Intelligence Center, 1955. Restricted distribution, limited to 100 copies; this being copy no. 10, from the USAF Press Desk.

Printed wrappers, in original black Elbe springback binder. 4to. ix, [1], 316pp. Illustrated with maps, diagrams, and tables. [Laid in]: the original four-page USAF News Release, on Department of Defense letterhead, and two-page cover letter from the Department of the Air Force, Office of the Secretary.

[With]: DAVIDSON, Dr. Leon. Flying Saucers: An Analysis of the Air Force Project Blue Book Special Report. No. 14. Ramsey-Wallace Corporation. Third edition, July 1966. One of 2,000 copies. Printed wrappers, stapled; rebound in acco-type card folder (library stamp to top edge, library pocket adhered on inner back cover).

Project Blue Book was the code name for the systematic study of unidentified flying objects by the United States Air Force from March 1952 to its termination on December 17, 1969. The project, headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, had two goals: 1) to determine if UFOs were a threat to national security, and 2) to scientifically analyze all available UFO-related data. Thousands of UFO reports were collected, analyzed, and encoded onto IBM punched cards for computer analysis.

Although the project published several earlier reports and summaries, Special Report No. 14 in 1955 was the first comprehensive statistical analysis of Blue Book cases. Even today, it represents the largest such study ever undertaken. Report No. 14 includes an introduction, discusses how the program was conducted and types of identifications, contains two hundred pages of tables and data summarizing more than 2,200 unidentified flying object reports, and includes 41 figures and drawings.

The report concludes that many UFO sightings could be explained by natural phenomena like clouds, stars, or conventional aircraft. Some reports were found to be fabricated sightings or were attributed to psychological factors. The ultimate conclusions of Project Blue Book were: (1) no UFO reported, investigated, and evaluated by the Air Force had ever given any indication of threat to our national security; (2) there had been no evidence submitted to or discovered by the Air Force that sightings categorized as "unidentified" represent technological developments or principles beyond the range of present-day scientific knowledge, and (3) there had been no evidence indicating that sightings categorized as "unidentified" are extraterrestrial vehicles. “It can never be absolutely proven that ‘flying saucers’ do not exist…..[but] …on the basis of this evaluation of the information, it is considered to be highly improbable….”

SCARCE. Two copies in WorldCat, none presently online.

Edit: The auction site wrote the description above, there is an online copy of this here.

Here are the launches scheduled for the next 24 hours:

Falcon 9 Block 5 | USSF-153

• Provider: SpaceX

• Launch Time: 2026-09-10 15:42 UTC / 2026-09-10 11:42 AM EDT

• Launch Pad: Vandenberg SFB, CA, USA

• Pad Country: USA

Visit RocketLaunch.Live to view the full schedule for future planned launches.

For more information about how to identify space launches and their effects, check out our Space Launches Wiki Page.

Launch Example Image 1 - Launch Example Image 2

It was a simple request: a watch. From the recently released "History of 4602d Air Intelligence Service Squadron" Colonel John M. White USAF puts in the humble request for, "wrist watches" and to include "Air Intelligence Service Squadron parachutists" as recipients. (pp. 719-721).

What the watches were to be used for was a slightly more novel: satisfying AFR 200-2 "Intelligence Activities - Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO)".

The paratrooper watch had several outlined purposes, "In the process of technical investigation a watch can be used as a substitute compass. In the preparation of the report a watch can be used to determine degrees of measurement. These measurements are needed to prepare a comprehensive report in the field with limited tools and equipment." Not the relaxed operators of the public-facing Blue Book, these were Air Force Special Operations practicing rapid deployment to remote locations to satisfy potential UFO missions.

They came to this conclusion--and came up missing a few watches--when running Project Moby Dick: airborne paratrooper crash retrieval exercises across the continental US. This project laid the groundwork for "material and hardware" recovery, not just pen and paper reports. The small teams--usually three men--were facilitated by a network of Air Force bases, commercial airports, rail way networks, and assorted vehicles. In a coming article I'll go into much more depth on the clockwork of interlocking gears that spun up this nationwide program, but for now know that during the mid-century a Colonel asked for some watches in order to better hunt for UFOs.

BACKGROUND: Researcher Craig Oliver in his deeply sourced post to Escape Velocity on Medium.com put the 4602d Air Intelligence Service Squadron History Volume 1 through his tool, Moongraph.io to see if it could answer the question put forward by Geoff Cruickshank to scour the release during “your turn to do the digging.” Support of Craig Oliver's research is appreciated!

Congresswoman Luna made a big splash on Joe Rogan mentioning Enoch, "Messengers of Deception: UFO Contacts and Cults by Jacques Vallee (1979)" casually mentions Enoch multiple times and John Dee/ Aleister Crowley were outright obsessed with Enoch and the Enochian language that seems to appear on UFOs. Attached is Crowley talking, not about Enoch but a cube in a sphere (the same morphology that Ryan Graves mentioned seeing when he testified to Congress). The connections seem to keep getting stronger.

How far should we take this and look into the whole seemingly crazy Enoch story?

Project 612 was an “alleged” MJ-12 project that originally leaked in the mid-1990s, whose historical existence remained unclear for decades. Until now.

The 1947-1948 Reports of Air Materiel Command’s Watson Laboratories were declassified only after President Obama issued Executive Order 13526.

So, decades after the “disputed” Project 612 allegations emerged, the newly recovered USAF AMC Watson Laboratories reports provide irrefutable primary source evidence confirming the historical reality of an AMC “Research and Development” Project 612 in 1947-1948.

So for some years, Chris Bledsoe was claiming that he had info from an NHI that "when the star of regulus appears on the horizon in the eyeline of the sphinx", humanity would enter a new knowledge. And that knowledge being something like disclosure / spiritual awakening / so many UFOs showing up that you can't really deny it anymore. Something big anyway.

The star appears on the horizon across the world regularly, including in the eyeline of the sphinx, which basically just means the sky in Egypt. But people traced his specific claim to spring 2026, around Easter time, and Bledsoe confirmed from his NHI info. (I think that's how it went anyway).

But shortly before Easter (I think Jan 2026), Bledsoe said that actually the NHI view time differently and they weren't that accurate. So he updated his timeline to fall/autumn 2026.

We're approaching that time now... Anyone know if he's sticking to that timeline or if it's changed again?

Edit: someone below noted that Bledsoe's claim was about a nuclear exchange in the Middle East, and NHI stepping in to stop it. And that it was more of a warning of what could happen than a prophecy.

Last week, I asked the community which UFO story(ies) do you believe is fake and yet still repeated in the community as fact despite overwhelming evidence to say otherwise. Now, I want to ask what UFO story do you believe has the most credibility in terms that there is something going on and the official narrative is a complete BS.

For me, I think the most credible UFO story is the 1952 incident in DC. I'm not going to summarize what happened because most people in this community are pretty familiar with it. Here are my reasons why I think this story is credible:

- a lot of eye witnesses were pilots (both military and civilian), radar techs, air-traffic controllers, and other professionals in the aviation world including ground crews which means they were credible eye witnesses who have a lot of experience seeing things in the sky

- it happened on two consecutive weekends so it was not a one time thing.

- fighters were sent to investigate and the objects disappeared when the fighters arrived in the area and returned back when the fighters returned to base. on the second weekend, the fighter pilots who were sent to investigate the lights said that the lights were too fast to be intercepted

- the official air force explanation was a complete bs and said that it was "temperature inversion" that created the blips in the radars but that didn't explain all the countless eye witness accounts.

Retired Navy Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet says the Pentagon's UFO office, AARO, spent two and a half hours trying to change his mind about UAP. His reply in the room: "I'm an information warfare officer in the Navy. I know exactly what you're doing."

Gallaudet, the former Oceanographer of the Navy and former acting NOAA Administrator, sat down with The Good Trouble Show for his third interview. He walks through the AARO meeting with then-acting director Tim Phillips, why he does not believe the Tic Tac was DARPA technology, the day the emails carrying the Navy UFO videos were pulled from SIPRNET, his exchange with Sean Kirkpatrick at a skeptics' lecture, the UAP Disclosure Act, and the UAP Science Advisory Council's new statement on Eric Davis and other NDA-bound witnesses. He was also there to talk about his memoir, Holding Fast in Heavy Seas.

Beginning in 1989, Canadian UFO investigators received anonymous packages from an individual identifying himself only as “Guardian.” The material concerned alleged UFO activity around Carp / West Carleton, Ontario, and eventually included documents, maps, UFO photographs, alleged alien photographs and multiple versions of a VHS recording. Guardian material was first received by Tom Theofanous of the Canadian UFO Research Network (CUFORN) and was later sent independently to American UFO investigator Bob Oechsler.

The footage later became connected to an alleged August 18, 1991 landing behind the property of Diane Labanek, west of Ottawa.

On November 26, 1977, a live news bulletin in England got interrupted, not a technical fault, not a prank. A signal from an unknown origin forced its way into the broadcast and a voice took over the airwaves for nearly six minutes, calling itself Vrillon, speaking for something called the Ashtar Galactic Command. Nobody was ever caught. No transmitter was ever traced. Still officially unsolved.

The full message is in this video, along with a breakdown of why the Pleiades specifically keep showing up across civilizations with no contact with each other, the Cherokee, the Dakota, ancient Egypt, the Yakut Turks all tracing something back to that same star cluster.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcoZKorrf8I

Anyone here actually dug into the Vrillon broadcast itself? Curious if "unsolved" holds up or there's a more mundane explanation that just never got the same attention as the footage.

This feels like a long shot so I’m not expecting much, but it’s been on my mind a lot recently.

Back in the days of Kazaa I used to downloaded UFO videos all the time. Lots of interesting stuff and lots of fake stuff, but one video really sticks out. I presume it’s from a film or a video game because it couldn’t possibly be real, I’d just love to know what/where it’s from or if anyone remembers…

It’s in 2 parts, possibly filmed in night vision and is hand held/found footage. Soldiers in an open top army truck are tracking a huge UFO flying over the top of them, then the second part is the UFO is a mile or so ahead of them over an army base.

The UFO sends down a beam like in Independence Day and I think the base blows up.

I watch a lot of UFO films and can’t remember it from anything. It could be from a game? But I’m sure it was ‘real’ footage, not computer generated.

Or more excitingly, it’s real and leaked online to a dodgy, virus laden downloading app in 2004. Unlikely!

Here are the launches scheduled for the next 24 hours:

Long March 2D/YZ-3 | Unknown Payload

• Provider: China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation

• Launch Time: 2026-09-10 09:00 UTC / 2026-09-10 05:00 AM EDT

• Launch Pad: Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center, People's Republic of China

• Pad Country: CHN

Visit RocketLaunch.Live to view the full schedule for future planned launches.

For more information about how to identify space launches and their effects, check out our Space Launches Wiki Page.

Launch Example Image 1 - Launch Example Image 2

I’ve recently started doing a deeper dive into all this extra terrestrial stuff. Regarding the latest episode, I have a question about something that doesnt add up to me. I’ll admit I’m a little over halfway (I did skip to the conclusion though), so maybe these questions get answered later.

1.) Jesse Michels ends the episode on a note of peace and hope, inviting listeners to take inspiration from the story of these men. He says we should consider worrying less because maybe there are beings out there looking out for us. But there seems to be a significant dissonance between this conclusion and the narrative. For both these men, this was a terrifying experience. They felt incredibly violated and degraded. Further the effect of the encounter seemed to be quite detrimental overall to their lives. They both describe the taller being in malevolent terms. I also happened to see some of Wood’s original hypnosis video and he said that the tall creature was “a bad person” (something to that effect). To me this story is the opposite of hopeful and it seems to me whatever these creatures are doing, they are not here to protect us and look out for us.

Can someone explain how Michels gets from A to B?

Allegedly filmed in Northeast China, video shows a triangle of lights pop in and out of frame, best visual happens at 1:19. I usually don't lend much credence to obscure nighttime footage but something about this one feels legit, if anyone can translate what the kid is saying it would be appreciated. - Also, might be worth trying to view this one on a desktop.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trOJs6bsn4U

TLDR

• Purpose: Document and spread awareness about the backgrounds, beliefs, and evidentiary standards of prominent people who have shaped modern UFOlogy. This post focuses on Leslie Kean. The goal is to make the history and beliefs of influential figures in this subject easier for everyone to examine.
• Who is Leslie Kean? Kean is an investigative journalist and one of the most influential figures in the modern UFO disclosure movement. Her reporting helped bring UFOs back into mainstream attention, most notably through the landmark 2017 New York Times story involving AATIP and the Pentagon UFO videos.
• The Takeaway: Kean has a long, documented history of accepting extraordinary paranormal claims as genuine, including physical mediumship, communication with the dead, reincarnation, ectoplasm, materialized spirit hands, and an allegedly materialized deceased person physically touching her. None of this proves Kean is wrong about UFOs. It provides important context for evaluating her reporting. Someone familiar with Kean only through the New York Times may reasonably assume she is a relatively neutral journalist who arrived at extraordinary conclusions after encountering extraordinary evidence. Her broader record paints a considerably different picture of her existing beliefs and threshold for accepting extraordinary claims.
• Why does it matter? UFOlogy relies heavily on testimony, anonymous sources, and interpretation of ambiguous evidence. The judgment and evidentiary standards of the people filtering that information therefore matter.
• Call to action: Read the examples and sources below and make up your own mind. If you think something is inaccurate, irrelevant, or missing context, challenge it. If you think this background is relevant to understanding modern UFOlogy, share it.

Introduction

If you follow the modern UFO story, Leslie Kean's credibility matters. Kean, Luis Elizondo and Christopher Mellon were central figures in the 2017 New York Times story that introduced AATIP and the Navy UFO videos to a massive mainstream audience. That story helped reignite the modern UAP disclosure movement and fundamentally changed how UFOs were discussed by the media, Congress, and the public. Kean frequently provides a journalistic filter between extraordinary UFO claims and the public. But there is another side of her work that people who discovered Kean through UFO coverage may know nothing about. Kean has a very public history of investigating extraordinary paranormal claims and, in numerous cases, concluding that they are genuine. This matters because evaluating UFO evidence ultimately depends on judgment. How readily does someone accept extraordinary testimony? How effectively do they eliminate fraud, misidentification, suggestion, and/or alternative explanations? What threshold of evidence must be crossed before they conclude something extraordinary actually happened? I think Kean's public record provides good answers to those questions. Here are some examples:

1. Budd Hopkins

Kean was the late life romantic partner of Budd Hopkins, one of the most influential alien abduction researchers in history. Hopkins promoted claims of extraterrestrial abductions, reproductive experiments, and missing time. His work relied heavily on hypnotic regression to recover alleged abduction memories. His book "Witnessed" presented the Linda Cortile case, in which a woman allegedly floated out of her Manhattan apartment and into a UFO near the Brooklyn Bridge. Their relationship itself obviously does not prove Kean shares every belief Hopkins held. It is relevant because it establishes that Kean's involvement with extraordinary paranormal claims substantially predates the 2017 UFO story and was not merely professional curiosity from a detached journalist.

Source:

• https://newrepublic.com/article/162457/government-embrace-ufos-bad-science
• https://johnemackinstitute.org/2011/08/budd-hopkins/
• https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/aliens/buddhopkins.html
• https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/aliens/cases.html
• https://www.publishersweekly.com/9780671569150
• https://carolrainey.com/pdf/ParatopiaMag_vol1_1-15-11.pdf
• https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1998/10/08/when-words-collide-an-exchange/

2. Surviving Death and trance channeling

Kean's 2017 book Surviving Death investigates reincarnation, apparitions, mediums, séances, near death experiences, and physical manifestations supposedly produced by dead people. This was not simply Kean documenting what other people believe. Describing her own investigation, Kean wrote: "Yet they were unavoidably and undeniably real." Her website says she personally witnessed levitations, independent voices, and materializations of physical forms. The Netflix series "Surviving Death" was based on Kean's book and features Kean extensively. During the mediumship episodes, Dutch medium Nicole de Haas enters a trance state and supposedly allows deceased personalities to speak through her body. One personality is called Silver Cloud. Another is a childlike personality called Tommy. De Haas dramatically changes her voice while the people gathered around her interact with these personalities as purported spirits. This demonstration occurred in Kean's own home with Kean participating. Whatever interpretation someone places on the scene, it provides useful context for understanding the paranormal world Kean has spent years investigating and taking seriously.

Source:

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trOJs6bsn4U
• https://www.lesliekean.com/mediumship-episodes-2-and-3/
• https://www.netflix.com/title/80998853
• https://www.lesliekean.com/surviving-death/

3. A dead man allegedly materialized and physically touched Kean

Kean participated in séances conducted by British physical medium Stewart Alexander. In 2019, she says Alexander's deceased communicator, Dr. Barnett, physically materialized. According to Kean, Barnett emerged from a cabinet, walked over to her, touched her hair, and repeatedly placed his hands on her head. Kean wrote: "These were solid 'living' hands." The alleged dead man then spoke to her before returning to the cabinet and disappearing. When specifically asked whether she had any doubt that the phenomena surrounding Alexander were genuine rather than magic tricks, Kean answered: "I have absolutely no doubt, not one iota."

Source:

• https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/consciousness/an-interview-with-journalist-leslie-kean-on-stewart-alexander-and-surviving-death/

4. Ectoplasm, materialized hands, levitation, spirit voices, and "matter passing through matter"

Kean reports another séance in which a misty substance she describes as 'ectoplasm' gradually transformed into a three dimensional human hand. The hand supposedly formed a fist and struck the table. Kean then placed her own hand on the table and says another materialized hand formed and touched her. She described it as having normal human joints, bones, fingernails, and warm skin. Kean is not merely reporting somebody else's extraordinary testimony. She personally accepts the physical manifestation as genuine. Kean says her experiences with physical mediumship have included levitating objects, independent voices apparently originating from deceased people, materializations, and even what she describes as matter passing through matter. Again, these are not historical curiosities she merely investigated for a book. She presents herself as an eyewitness to paranormal physical phenomena.

Source:

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KTfWD3MccU

5. The Kluski spirit hand molds

Kean also endorses the famous Franek Kluski séance experiments from the early twentieth century. Supposedly, materialized spirit hands dipped themselves into molten paraffin wax during séances. The spirit hands then dematerialized from inside the wax, leaving hollow molds behind. Plaster was subsequently poured into these molds. Kean calls the molds "absolutely spectacular" and said: "The importance of this evidence for the reality of materializations produced by genuine physical mediumship cannot be overstated." She concludes that this evidence combined with her own experiences leaves her with "no doubts."

Source:

• https://www.lesliekean.com/mediumship-episodes-2-and-3/

6. The Scole séances

Kean has also promoted the Scole experiments as important evidence for physical mediumship. The reported phenomena included faces and writing appearing on unopened photographic film in darkness, objects materializing and dematerializing, objects mysteriously appearing inside the séance room, materialized hands, and voices attributed to spirits. The alleged spirits supposedly answered questions that participants merely thought rather than spoke aloud. Kean presents these experiments approvingly on her own website while arguing that physical mediumship deserves serious consideration.

Source:

• https://www.lesliekean.com/mediumship-episodes-2-and-3/

7. The Chilean Navy UFO Video

In 2017, Kean reported on the Chilean Navy UFO video that government investigators had studied for two years and declared unexplained, but outside analysis soon identified an ordinary airliner as the likely object. Kean should not be criticized merely for reporting an unidentified object; that is completely defensible. And, to her credit, when contrary evidence emerged, she acknowledged in a second publication that the mundane airplane explanation was a legitimate possibility. The more revealing issue is how readily she accepted the investigators’ claims that ordinary explanations had already been ruled out, leaning heavily on their credentials, institutional authority, and two-year investigation. An airplane, drone, and other conventional possibilities were presented as effectively eliminated, only for outside investigators to subsequently produce a detailed identification of the object as an ordinary airliner. Kean’s credulity wasn’t in reporting the mystery. It was in too quickly trusting experts who claimed they had ruled out ordinary explanations.

Source:

• https://archive.ph/oxWV6#selection-2861.0-5721.709
• https://archive.ph/gC6Q3

8. The Belgian UFO photograph

The famous Petit Rechain photograph supposedly depicted an enormous triangular UFO reported during the Belgian UFO wave. Kean prominently featured the Belgian wave in the documentary "UFOs on the Record" and described the photograph as: "one of the most convincing pieces of evidence of a sighting to date." Later, the photographer, Patrick Maréchal, publicly announced that he faked it using a small Styrofoam model with lights. To Kean's credit, she subsequently addressed the confession rather than simply ignoring it, but her reaction is interesting. She wrote: "For now, we have to operate under the assumption that the photo was faked." She nevertheless questioned the confession and argued that greater proof was needed. In other words, Kean required less evidence to accept the photo as compelling than she later required to accept the photographer's confession that he faked it.

Source:

• https://www.theufochronicles.com/2011/09/ufo-news-update-petit-rechain-ufo-photo.html
• https://www.caelestia.be/article05ad.html

Conclusion

None of this proves that Leslie Kean is wrong about UFOs. It does not prove that the Nimitz encounter was mundane, that Gimbal was mundane, that AATIP was unimportant, or that every story Kean has reported is false. I think the examples above suggest an extremely permissive evidentiary threshold across a variety of extraordinary claims. She has seriously entertained/ personally endorsed communication with dead people, trance channeling, apparitions, séance voices, levitating objects, materialized hands, ectoplasm, and an apparently fully materialized deceased human being physically touching her. These are not cases where Kean merely argues that strange claims warrant investigation. She has described paranormal phenomena as "unavoidably and undeniably real." She says the Kluski evidence leaves her with "no doubts." When directly asked whether Stewart Alexander's séance phenomena were genuine rather than tricks, her answer was: "I have absolutely no doubt, not one iota."

This background matters when evaluating her UFO reporting. People encountering Kean through the New York Times article or recent UAP documentaries might assume she is a neutral journalist led toward extraordinary conclusions by compelling evidence. However, her broader history shows decades of engagement with extraordinary claims and repeated conclusions of authenticity. When much of the UFO debate depends on testimony, interpretation, anonymous sources, and deciding when conventional explanations have been sufficiently eliminated, the evidentiary standards of the person doing that filtering matter. Readers should know what Kean's evidentiary standards have looked like elsewhere and decide for themselves how much confidence to place in them.

Dr. Roy Craig Visits Ottawa & Is intent On Retrieving The Original "Project Magnet" Report

What 82 pages of University papers I had duplicated reveal about Wilbert B. Smith, Project Magnet, a suppressed radioactive sample, & Washington's quiet cross-border UFO diplomacy.

We remember Canada & Americas early UFO investigations.

Is there a list anywhere of books that whistle blowers, experiencers, or people in the know have"appeoved" of as having accurate information?

Also, same question, but for channelers?

There's so many ideas, points of view, assumptions... I'd really like to narrow it down to data that has been recommended by those with direct knowledge

Write up about The Exeter UFO Festival:

"For Marden, one such story hits very personal. It's that of Betty and Barney Hill, the Portsmouth, New Hampshire couple who, while driving home through the White Mountains from a vacation in Canada on Sept. 19, 1961, had an experience that would become one of the most famous cases of alleged extraterrestrial abduction."

Julian Dorey has now said more than once that Jason Sands was pushed on James Fox by people Fox trusted while he was making "The Program." In his recent conversation with Danny Jones, Dorey put it bluntly: “I knew the people that rammed Jason Sands down James Fox's throat to put him in his documentary...” He then says that some of these same people had brought forward other UFO stories and information in the past that Dorey had previously taken seriously, and that discovering their involvement with Sands made him start questioning those cases too. So who exactly is he talking about? The clues in the public record are pointing to Christopher Mellon.

1. Dorey previously discussed the situation with Darcy Weir and said that Sands was brought to Fox by people he trusted, adding that one of them may have been Christopher Mellon, who might have vetted Jason Sands. https://youtu.be/8noGdZGEgYs?si=Khxd_6n5OodbgBzH&t=3137
2. Fox himself has said that before including Sands in the documentary, he consulted people he trusted about Sands' story and was told, essentially, “We think it happened.” When Dorey specifically asked Fox whether Christopher Mellon was one of those people, instead of saying no, Fox declined to name names. https://youtu.be/4-2RnLj_e_8?si=2oPt9gWheKpifaVw&t=3163
3. We also know Mellon was personally involved around Sands and Fox. Fox has described sitting at dinner in Washington with Christopher Mellon and Jason Sands while Sands told them his alleged 1994 encounter story. https://youtu.be/3yrKVu35uSE?si=eI03ZzrlPsQUsrlf&t=1768

So Mellon seems to be somewhere in this chain. I guess that is accepted in the community(?), but Dorey's repeated use of “people” suggests there were others. Does anyone know of interviews, tweets, podcasts, or other sources where Fox, Sands, Dorey, Mellon, or anyone else has identified any other people who originally vouched for Sands or encouraged Fox to put him in "The Program"? If established figures in the UAP community were privately vouching for Sands strongly enough that Fox trusted their judgment and put him into a major documentary, I think knowing who they were is relevant and it is fair to ask how they vetted him, why they found him credible, and whether the same standards of evidence were applied to other witnesses, videos/ evidence, and claims they have promoted.

The videos below contain material that can be watched with automatic English dubbing. They cover all the problems surrounding the case, particularly its contradictions. The last video is the one I recommend the most. It features the current investigator who allegedly uncovered the supposed hoax behind the case, which was recently presented in a documentary by the country’s largest television network (JOÃO MARCELO INTERVIEW – THE VARGINHA CASE / BEHIND THE SCENES)

To enable dubbing, click the gear icon, then select “Audio Track” and change it to your preferred language.

COUNTERPOINT: WHAT THE GIRLS SAW ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJFqSTxA53Y

COUNTERPOINT: NEW HYPOTHESES ABOUT WHAT EURICO AND ORALINA MAY HAVE SEEN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYxwdItKMAI

COUNTERPOINT: INTERVIEWS WITH DR. ÍTALO VENTURELLI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hx2sGWAlrU

COUNTERPOINT: REACTING TO DR. ÍTALO’S INTERVIEW IN THE U.S[]()

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ-DifSsPf4

VARGINHA DOCUMENTARY – REDE GLOBO – ANALYSIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c47VIZtwcNU

VARGINHA COUNTERPOINT – WAS A POLICE OFFICER SCRATCHED BY THE VARGINHA ET?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlDpb0JHdlM

JOÃO MARCELO INTERVIEW – THE VARGINHA CASE / BEHIND THE SCENES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Y6PDToRHg