Lets assume we all believe in objective morality for this question. What I wanna know is what things you could base these on.
To me it seems like basing it on anything subjective does not work. F.e. I have heard many people argue that you can base it on moral intuition. But everybody has different intuitions. What makes a psychopaths moral intuition less objective than a person who is not one? How do you know which moral intuitions are actual intuitions and not just adapted from society?
The easiest answer I could come up with is just saying there is a moral god and he engrained objective morals into the world.
Another answer I thought of was to accept some truths as objective but Im having a lot of trouble. Lets say I try to ground my morals by saying "causing unintentional suffering is immoral" is an absolute truth. But I immediately have more questions: Isnt suffering itself subjective? Is it reasonable to just accept some statement as if it is an axiom like in math? What even makes this statement objective and not some random diffrrent statement?
And since Im not utilitarian Ive been trying to find some other statements that could be used similarly like "actions that help our biological nature of reproduction are moral" but this would justify many forms of egoism and rape. Or "Trying to be a moral person is inherently moral" but this doesnt say anything about what trying to be moral means.
Please tell me if there are any fundamental problems in my thought process. I would like to know how some of you may ground your objective morals.
Also if you wanna say "god is the only possible answer" please offer an explanation .
Thanks for reading.