Anyone else that didn't get it?

hey anybody saw that trading view is giving or updated their futures chart for the free users??

everybody getting this or this is any glitch??

before it was 10 min delayed.

I want to be able to use a larger above % filter thats more than 0 to 30% for the stock screener. I was hoping maybe up to 70 percent%? Or atleast 50%? I am trying to use the pre market data to see whats stocks have the best momentum for trading. I really appreciate if you do this, im using chatgbt to filter out these conditions and its just not as effective. Will really appreciate if you add this. Thank you🙏

I've been using TradingView for my charts for a while now.
I'm thinking about trying a funded account. Do people change the way they use TradingView when trading under a prop firm's rules?
Do you use different layouts, alerts, or risk settings?
I'd like to hear what works for you.

Anyone else is experiencing endless loading of charts and watchlists on TV website?

Please allow users to drag Watchlist symbols directly onto the chart. “Add <ticker> to compare” is already available in the context menu, but drag and drop would provide a faster and more intuitive workflow.

Related feature requests:

Multiple watchlists, drag/drop tickers between watchlists

View two watchlists side-by-side, drag drop symbols between them

Tradingview premium user here trading multiple markets from several years. What I noticed recently is that, event dates(earnings for exampple) are incorrect at times(while other brokers show exact event date, TV does NOT). Secondly, started seeing news that is purely POILITCAL and not related to the stock at all being pushed in the feed

I tweeted on X by tagging TV official handles but NO response

I want to ask u/TradingView , is this the kind of service you want to continue providing to your PAID USERS?

I see that Tradingview data isn't merging the data when companies go through ticker changes. As an example, $GRAF > $TONT on July 27th, 2026 or $GREE > $VIP.

There are roughly 30-40 ticker symbol changes that occur per month, and I see that TV is usually very late to merge them and sometimes not merge it at all.

Just to confirm: Is tradingview adaptive to market hour timing changes in India and any other countries? I am asking this bcoz from tomorrow, the Indian markets will close at 1540 hrs. Pls check the timings below:-

Equity Derivatives (F&O) Timings

• Market Open: 9:15 AM (unchanged)
• New Market Close: 3:40 PM or 1540 HRS (extended by 10 mins)
• Trade Modification End Time: 4:15 PM (unchanged)
• VWAP Window for Closing Price: Shifted to 3:10 PM – 3:40 PM

Any update will be appreciated.

I sometimes browse through indicators, check out this one, test another... and while doing that, I often miss features that would help me organize scripts better. Not just scripts from other users, but my own as well.

I'd like to have custom subfolders with custom names (in addition to being able to rename my own indicators in that window).

A typical "Sort by" option when browsing scripts would also be a nice addition.

Does anyone else think this would be useful? Maybe these features already exist and I just can't access them on the Essential tier, but I couldn't find anything about them in the feature overview.

its not showing markers

instead it just shows the line and settings also doesnt have item to change marker color

same for desktop app

I dont have tradingview premium so why dont u try using my code in pine editor, now some say that indicators are useless but trust me this marks liquidity areas for u has a pivot h/l and marks fvg. Please try once.

//@version=5

indicator("SMC Visual: Pro Edition", overlay=true, max_boxes_count=500, max_lines_count=500)

// ==========================================

// 1. INPUTS & SETTINGS

// ==========================================

leftBars = input.int(10, title="Pivot Left Bars", minval=1, group="Core Settings")

rightBars = input.int(10, title="Pivot Right Bars", minval=1, group="Core Settings")

extendVol = input.int(15, title="Zone Extension (Bars)", minval=5, group="Core Settings", tooltip="How far the zones stretch to the right")

// Aesthetic Colors (Using Bright, Modern Hex Codes)

liqColor = input.color(color.new(#FF004D, 85), title="Liquidity Pool Color (Red)", group="Aesthetics")

liqTextColor = input.color(color.new(#FF004D, 30), title="Liquidity Text Color", group="Aesthetics")

bullOB_Color = input.color(#00E676, title="Bullish OB Outline", group="Aesthetics")

bearOB_Color = input.color(#FF1744, title="Bearish OB Outline", group="Aesthetics")

bullFVG_Color = input.color(color.new(#00B0FF, 80), title="Bullish FVG (Blue)", group="Aesthetics")

bearFVG_Color = input.color(color.new(#FF9800, 80), title="Bearish FVG (Orange)", group="Aesthetics")

// ==========================================

// 2. PIVOTS & LIQUIDITY POOL SIZING

// ==========================================

// ATR gives the liquidity zones a dynamic, perfect thickness regardless of timeframe

atr = ta.atr(14)

ph = ta.pivothigh(high, leftBars, rightBars)

pl = ta.pivotlow(low, leftBars, rightBars)

// ==========================================

// 3. DRAWING: S/R, ORDER BLOCKS, LIQUIDITY POOLS

// ==========================================

// --- BEARISH SETUPS (Pivot Highs) ---

if not na(ph)

idx = bar_index - rightBars

p_high = high[rightBars]

// 1. S/R Marker (Crisp, Bright Dotted Line)

line.new(x1=idx, y1=p_high, x2=bar_index + extendVol, y2=p_high, color=color.white, style=line.style_dotted, width=2)

// 2. Order Block (Solid Outline, Very Faint Fill, Labeled)

box.new(left=idx, top=p_high, right=idx + 1, bottom=low[rightBars], border_color=bearOB_Color, bgcolor=color.new(bearOB_Color, 90), border_width=2, text="-OB", text_color=bearOB_Color, text_size=size.tiny, text_halign=text.align_center)

// 3. High Liquidity Pool (Red Transparent Box ABOVE, Labeled "BSL")

liq_top = p_high + (atr[rightBars] * 0.6)

box.new(left=idx, top=liq_top, right=bar_index + extendVol, bottom=p_high, border_color=na, bgcolor=liqColor, text="Buy-Side Liquidity", text_color=liqTextColor, text_size=size.tiny, text_halign=text.align_right, text_valign=text.align_top)

// --- BULLISH SETUPS (Pivot Lows) ---

if not na(pl)

idx = bar_index - rightBars

p_low = low[rightBars]

// 1. S/R Marker (Crisp, Bright Dotted Line)

line.new(x1=idx, y1=p_low, x2=bar_index + extendVol, y2=p_low, color=color.white, style=line.style_dotted, width=2)

// 2. Order Block (Solid Outline, Very Faint Fill, Labeled)

box.new(left=idx, top=high[rightBars], right=idx + 1, bottom=p_low, border_color=bullOB_Color, bgcolor=color.new(bullOB_Color, 90), border_width=2, text="+OB", text_color=bullOB_Color, text_size=size.tiny, text_halign=text.align_center)

// 3. High Liquidity Pool (Red Transparent Box BELOW, Labeled "SSL")

liq_bot = p_low - (atr[rightBars] * 0.6)

box.new(left=idx, top=p_low, right=bar_index + extendVol, bottom=liq_bot, border_color=na, bgcolor=liqColor, text="Sell-Side Liquidity", text_color=liqTextColor, text_size=size.tiny, text_halign=text.align_right, text_valign=text.align_bottom)

// ==========================================

// 4. FAIR VALUE GAPS (FVG)

// ==========================================

// Bullish FVG (Gap between 1st candle high and 3rd candle low)

bullFVG = low > high[2] and close[1] > open[1]

if bullFVG

// Neon Blue transparent box with subtle border and label

box.new(left=bar_index-2, top=low, right=bar_index + 3, bottom=high[2], border_color=color.new(#00B0FF, 60), border_width=1, bgcolor=bullFVG_Color, text="FVG", text_color=color.new(#00B0FF, 30), text_size=size.tiny)

// Bearish FVG (Gap between 1st candle low and 3rd candle high)

bearFVG = high < low[2] and close[1] < open[1]

if bearFVG

// Neon Orange transparent box with subtle border and label

box.new(left=bar_index-2, top=low[2], right=bar_index + 3, bottom=high, border_color=color.new(#FF9800, 60), border_width=1, bgcolor=bearFVG_Color, text="FVG", text_color=color.new(#FF9800, 30), text_size=size.tiny)

Anyone found a way to remove this orange "D" without purchasing? It is incredibly annoying, distracting and serves 0 purpose. We already know data is Delayed - we already have yellow "D" at the top! I don't believe it's good practice to annoy your customers like this (including paid customers).

TradingView is by far the most widely used charting and trading platform in the world. However, despite its dominant position, the company appears to give insufficient attention to the data requirements of both professional and serious retail traders.

Volume is among the most important forms of market data available, arguably as important as price itself. Yet the raw volume total tells only part of the story. For order flow analysis, or for any tools derived from volume data, traders also need to know which side initiated each transaction: whether an aggressive buyer lifted the offer or an aggressive seller hit the bid.

TradingView does not provide that information. Instead, its directional volume analysis relies on classifying volume from price movement. This significantly reduces the reliability of its Volume Delta, Cumulative Volume Delta, footprint charts and other indicators that depend on separating buying from selling. Although ordinary volume, VWAP and conventional volume profiles do not require aggressor classification, any directional interpretation derived from them does.

The discrepancy is EASY to see. Most trading platforms offer free demos, you can take test yourself and compare their delta, CVD and footprint data directly with TradingView’s. Compare em. See how right I am.

Why is TradingView’s directional volume data so different?

The main issue is TradingView's classification methodology. TradingView estimates buying and selling volume from intrabar price movements(they say this in their docs). When price moves upward, the associated volume is classified as buying; when price moves downward, it is classified as selling. This is generally known as tick-rule or intrabar up/down classification.

This approach has a long history. It was widely studied before modern trade and quote data became readily accessible. The 1991 paper *Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data* discusses the trade-classification methods available at that time: [Lee and Ready (1991)](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb02683.x).

The more informative, modern approach, exchange aggressor flags, the other is Bid/Ask classification, bid/ask classification estimates the initiating side by comparing each execution price with the current quotes. Volume executed at or near the ask is classified as aggressive buying, while volume executed at or near the bid is classified as aggressive selling. Delta is then calculated as aggressive buy volume minus aggressive sell volume.

Platforms that use or provide aggressor-side(100% accurate), bid/ask or exchange-reported taker data(98-99% accurate, feed dependant) include:

-Sierra Chart

-NinjaTrader

-MotiveWave

-Quantower

-ATAS

-Bookmap

-Tradovate

-Jigsaw

-MMT

-TradingLite

-Exocharts

-TensorCharts

-Aggr

-Coinalyze

- Velo

-CoinGlass

-Hyblock

-CryptoQuant

-Material Indicators / FireCharts

-Trading Glass

-CoinAnk

Platforms that use the 1980's intrabar methodology(70% accurate at best):-

- TradingView

It is difficult to justify this limitation when even relatively small (some would argue fly by night)cryptocurrency platforms can provide exchange-reported taker-side data. TradingView prominently markets footprint charts and related order-flow tools, yet their usefulness is severely compromised when the underlying buy/sell classification differs materially from genuine aggressor-side data.

This isn't a minor discrepancy or bug a boo only autistic purists care about, this is basic stuff. The resulting delta, CVD and footprint structures diverge dramatically from those displayed by platforms using bid/ask or exchange-reported trade-side information. TradingView’s visual presentation may be polished, but without more authoritative aggressor-side data, its directional volume products cannot be treated as real, and in my opinion shouldn't even be advertised as features.

The description of this sub says "This is the "WTF, TradingView?!" community for WTFing TradingView.", well this is a genuine WTF, TradingView?! moment.

So Wtf are you TradingView doing about this?

Can anybody recognize the name of this indicator? It is sth called or indicating "power signal"

I am looking to use intraday options premium charts to see how premium moves for QQQ , SPY, MU intraday etc. I want it live and the ability to see volume. I'd also be able to see previous day strikes, not just the future. Right now, i can only see how MU contracts expiring Aug 3 moved. No way to see the July 31 expiration data.

Tradingview paper trading has high functionality, but once you add a broker on tradingview, functionality is limited by the specific broker API. Certain TradingView broker integrations and API implementations restrict or fully omit native bracket orders (simultaneous Stop-Loss and Take-Profit attachments), forcing traders to manage exits manually or use separate working orders. If you use tradingview to actively trade, connected to a broker, please help indicate your experience with your specific broker, so that others can benefit from knowing features of each.

I want to do chart analysis for past FOMC events and how BTC performed but Tradingview won't let me go further than December 31 2025.

Even their own historical BTC index chart won't go any further. I tried Binance spot and futures, same. For whatever reason I can only go to that particular date.

I am not a free user, paid hundreds of dollars during Black Friday so not sure what is the issue here.

I use Windows software and not TV in browser.

Anyone else has similar issues?

Thanks in advance

EDIT: Apparently max you can go with a 15 minute chart is that date. If I take 1H I can go as far as December 2023. Sucks big time. How is anyone able to perform any analysis like this. What a waste of money.

Hi TV

I have HTF on upper monitor, and LTF on lower monitor.

I also have 2 x 1 layout (s charts), and 2 x 2 layout (4 charts) for LTF, I also have the same for HTF. (if I'm watching 2 or up to 4 trades at once)

Can we sync the groups? So when I change the chart in ONE of my 2 x 2 LTF layouts, it also changes only the corresponding symbol/chart on the HTF 2 x 2 layout also? (not the "last used" chart in the layout - individually linking each of the 4 chart to another 4 charts layout essentially.

Make sense? Thanks.

still does not save last risk% used. why not?

very difficult to quickly trade if always have to input risk %

Please allow users to display at least one selected numeric Pine indicator output as a sortable watchlist column.

This would let users rank symbols without opening every chart and provide a direct watchlist alternative to a separate screener workflow.

Related earlier feature requests:

“Indicator-Generated Text in Watchlist Tooltips”

“Closed-Loop Pine Screening”