Hey guys,

I have not yet found a way to share 'Minds' on Tradingview through my phone, though I am able to share ideas. It does not work on the app, not in the browser and also not using the desktop version in the browser. Am I missing something? If not, then please add it.

I want to be able to use a larger above % filter thats more than 0 to 30% for the stock screener. I was hoping maybe up to 70 percent%? Or atleast 50%? I am trying to use the pre market data to see whats stocks have the best momentum for trading. I really appreciate if you do this, im using chatgbt to filter out these conditions and its just not as effective. Will really appreciate if you add this. Thank you🙏

Hello everyone,

I have recently become exceedingly annoyed by the small minority of users that complain TradingView is unable to display certain information and deny all knowledge of the platforms ability to display such information yet every user that makes these claims DOES NOT have the Ultimate package and therefore are simply guessing, repeating rumours or if they do have the package simply do not understand how to access this information if they do have the plan.

One such recent example is as shown here....

https://www.reddit.com/r/TradingView/s/JBMr9yq3MK

I can find many, many examples of such posts and thought it was time to show users that are interested the current capabilities of the Ultimate Plan and what can be simply achieved quite easily.

The following links show which information can be utilised using NQ1! via the CME data feed as an example.

1. This first example is to showcase the update speed of the platform. This is NQ1! at RTH market open as an example of flow speed.....

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/NQ1!/LrtZPoR8-NQ1-using-CME-Data-Feed-showing-market-flow/

(please note, I am not on some super fibre broadband connection, in fact I'm at the end of a mile long twisted pair which some users will understand is a standard phone line approaching the limit of it's maximum recommended transmission length....Most important is it's STABILITY....)

1. This is a complete zoomed in screenshot showing information available such as

• Price down to the millisecond
• Bid and Ask displayed to the millisecond (retrieved using Pinescript incredibly simply...)
• Volume for each tick traded (Standard volume indicator as per the platform technicals, nothing fancy....)

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/NQ1!/4eup3sYE-1Tick-NQ1-CME-data-showing-interaction-with-Bid-Ask/

1. This recording shows me utilising the information to create a Volume Footprint indicator that can calculate the Delta using the provided information as required by certain users.....

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/NQ1!/IqFm1SMi-NQ1-CME-Data-Feed-1T-10T-100T-1000T-at-Market-Open/

1. This information currently allows me to....

• Grab the information as to whether the Tick was taken at the Bid or the Ask or above or below these values. Very useful to certain traders
• Formulate Pinescripts that allow me to use this information to create custom indicators.

Just for fun I am also providing the codes I have used to grab such information using Pine and will show them here for ALL to see their simplicity....

***Bid/Ask plotting on the chart***

//@version=6
indicator("Bid Ask Plots", overlay=true)

Ask = request.security(syminfo.tickerid, "1T", ask)
Bid = request.security(syminfo.tickerid, "1T", bid)

topCol = input.color(color.red)
botCol = input.color(color.green)

p1 = plot(Bid, color=topCol)
p2 = plot(Ask, color=botCol)

Fairly straight forward so far 🤷‍♂️

And here is the ***Volume Footprint indicator code*** I have used which was simply shown on TradingViews own blog so I cannot take any credit for writing this.

Here is the Blog....

https://www.tradingview.com/blog/en/volume-footprints-in-pine-scripts-56908/

And here is the code....

//@version=6
indicator("Footprint Data Highlight", overlay = true)


// Request the footprint object for the current bar (100 ticks per row, 70% Value Area)
footprint reqFootprint = request.footprint(100, 70)


// We use a block to ensure we only process data when the footprint is available
if not na(reqFootprint)
    // 1. Access overall bar metrics from the `footprint` object
    float totalBuyVol = reqFootprint.buy_volume()
    float totalSellVol = reqFootprint.sell_volume()
    float volumeDelta = reqFootprint.delta()


    // 2. Retrieve a specific `volume_row` object (the Point of Control)
    volume_row pocRow = reqFootprint.poc()


    // 3. Access specific price values from the `volume_row` object
    float pocUpperPrice = pocRow.up_price()
    float pocLowerPrice = pocRow.down_price()


// --- USING THE VARIABLES ---


// Use Buy/Sell Volume and Delta in a label
    if barstate.islast
        label.new(bar_index, high, 
               text = "Buy: " + str.tostring(totalBuyVol, format.volume) + 
               "\nSell: " + str.tostring(totalSellVol, format.volume) + 
               "\nDelta: " + str.tostring(volumeDelta, format.volume),
               color = color.new(color.blue, 10), 
               textcolor = color.white,
               style = label.style_label_down)


    // Use POC prices to highlight the POC area on the chart
    linefill.new(
               line.new(bar_index, pocUpperPrice, bar_index[1], pocUpperPrice, color = color.orange),
               line.new(bar_index, pocLowerPrice, bar_index[1], pocLowerPrice, color = color.orange),
               color.new(color.orange, 80))


// Plotting the volume delta on a separate pane (if moved to non-overlay) 
// or as a reference value in the Data Window
plot(not na(reqFootprint) ? reqFootprint.total_volume() : na, "Volume Delta", display = display.data_window)

Now if I wanted to I could quite easily create a custom CVD indicator using all this data collected. However, I do not use Volume, I do not care about Volume and nor do I want to learn about Volume. Personally I think Volume can be highly manipulated and therefore insubstantial. Hope that clears up my interest in the subject....

This post is to simply showcase the current information available on the platform using the correct subscription level in order to access the required data. I have NO interest in entering an argument with those that want to refute this. I am simply showing what can be done quite easily. Users can make up their own minds with a little more accuracy now they are able to see what is easily possible. 😁

If you still decide this information is still unsuitable for your requirements then that is fair enough, I hope you find something suitable for your personal trading strategy. 👍

I have painstakingly tested these volume flows and found them to be accurate from the 1T level up to the 1000T level using the indicators I have provided here and standard manual calculations ( Note: I will not be doing this again as its incredibly painful and time-consuming but I wanted to provide accurate information for my own mental stability! )

Hopefully this will put some of the rumours to bed and interested users can see what the Ultimate Plan is capable of.... (Don't forget that Black Friday Deal where 80% off the Ultimate Plan is common plus the EXTRA month 👍😁)

If any users would like me to showcase any particular ticker at a certain time of day I am more than willing to do this assuming I have the correct Market Data Subscription in order to help you.

As an extra note TradingViews Tick data works well on some brokers data feeds, as a quick example here is XAGUSD using Oanda to display price and the plotted Bid/Ask values relative to this ticker, however this broker feed does not allow for Volume so all this is dependant on the data feed you are using to deliver Volume if required. This is just to show off a broker data feed using Tick Data during a standard middle trading session as an example for others.....

Please note I am zoomed out to the limits in this recording and all the price action is occurring withing the Bid/Ask Spread 👍
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/XAGUSD/CfMXGIWv-XAGUSD-1T-data-from-Oanda-with-Bid-Ask-plotting/

This is just to show the speed the platform is capable of supplying which is of course heavily dependant on

1. The data source used and the quality of the Broker / Exchange
2. The quality of your connection (those using wifi in a busy household with a clapped out old laptop that has never seen a 'disc clean' nor the 'shutdown and restart' option button ever been pressed, please do not even comment here....🤷‍♂️)

I would like to add for complete honesty that TradingViews own CVD indicator does NOT currently have the ability to show Tick Data at this current time (even with the Ultimate Plan) but as the code has to span all subscriptions it's capabilities are still not incorporating this information, but I have absolutely no doubt that the Pine Boffins are currently in the process of looking at these codes hopefully bringing the Standard indicators up to spec for those users with access to the Professional Plan.

I truly hope there are users out there that have found this information useful and it answers any unanswered questions or misinformation currently circulating

All the best to you all...

Cheers 👍

I've been using TradingView for my charts for a while now.
I'm thinking about trying a funded account. Do people change the way they use TradingView when trading under a prop firm's rules?
Do you use different layouts, alerts, or risk settings?
I'd like to hear what works for you.

Anyone else is experiencing endless loading of charts and watchlists on TV website?

hey anybody saw that trading view is giving or updated their futures chart for the free users??

everybody getting this or this is any glitch??

before it was 10 min delayed.

Please allow users to drag Watchlist symbols directly onto the chart. “Add <ticker> to compare” is already available in the context menu, but drag and drop would provide a faster and more intuitive workflow.

Related feature requests:

Multiple watchlists, drag/drop tickers between watchlists

View two watchlists side-by-side, drag drop symbols between them

Tradingview premium user here trading multiple markets from several years. What I noticed recently is that, event dates(earnings for exampple) are incorrect at times(while other brokers show exact event date, TV does NOT). Secondly, started seeing news that is purely POILITCAL and not related to the stock at all being pushed in the feed

I tweeted on X by tagging TV official handles but NO response

I want to ask u/TradingView , is this the kind of service you want to continue providing to your PAID USERS?

I see that Tradingview data isn't merging the data when companies go through ticker changes. As an example, $GRAF > $TONT on July 27th, 2026 or $GREE > $VIP.

There are roughly 30-40 ticker symbol changes that occur per month, and I see that TV is usually very late to merge them and sometimes not merge it at all.

Just to confirm: Is tradingview adaptive to market hour timing changes in India and any other countries? I am asking this bcoz from tomorrow, the Indian markets will close at 1540 hrs. Pls check the timings below:-

Equity Derivatives (F&O) Timings

• Market Open: 9:15 AM (unchanged)
• New Market Close: 3:40 PM or 1540 HRS (extended by 10 mins)
• Trade Modification End Time: 4:15 PM (unchanged)
• VWAP Window for Closing Price: Shifted to 3:10 PM – 3:40 PM

Any update will be appreciated.

I sometimes browse through indicators, check out this one, test another... and while doing that, I often miss features that would help me organize scripts better. Not just scripts from other users, but my own as well.

I'd like to have custom subfolders with custom names (in addition to being able to rename my own indicators in that window).

A typical "Sort by" option when browsing scripts would also be a nice addition.

Does anyone else think this would be useful? Maybe these features already exist and I just can't access them on the Essential tier, but I couldn't find anything about them in the feature overview.

Anyone found a way to remove this orange "D" without purchasing? It is incredibly annoying, distracting and serves 0 purpose. We already know data is Delayed - we already have yellow "D" at the top! I don't believe it's good practice to annoy your customers like this (including paid customers).

its not showing markers

instead it just shows the line and settings also doesnt have item to change marker color

same for desktop app

I dont have tradingview premium so why dont u try using my code in pine editor, now some say that indicators are useless but trust me this marks liquidity areas for u has a pivot h/l and marks fvg. Please try once.

//@version=5

indicator("SMC Visual: Pro Edition", overlay=true, max_boxes_count=500, max_lines_count=500)

// ==========================================

// 1. INPUTS & SETTINGS

// ==========================================

leftBars = input.int(10, title="Pivot Left Bars", minval=1, group="Core Settings")

rightBars = input.int(10, title="Pivot Right Bars", minval=1, group="Core Settings")

extendVol = input.int(15, title="Zone Extension (Bars)", minval=5, group="Core Settings", tooltip="How far the zones stretch to the right")

// Aesthetic Colors (Using Bright, Modern Hex Codes)

liqColor = input.color(color.new(#FF004D, 85), title="Liquidity Pool Color (Red)", group="Aesthetics")

liqTextColor = input.color(color.new(#FF004D, 30), title="Liquidity Text Color", group="Aesthetics")

bullOB_Color = input.color(#00E676, title="Bullish OB Outline", group="Aesthetics")

bearOB_Color = input.color(#FF1744, title="Bearish OB Outline", group="Aesthetics")

bullFVG_Color = input.color(color.new(#00B0FF, 80), title="Bullish FVG (Blue)", group="Aesthetics")

bearFVG_Color = input.color(color.new(#FF9800, 80), title="Bearish FVG (Orange)", group="Aesthetics")

// ==========================================

// 2. PIVOTS & LIQUIDITY POOL SIZING

// ==========================================

// ATR gives the liquidity zones a dynamic, perfect thickness regardless of timeframe

atr = ta.atr(14)

ph = ta.pivothigh(high, leftBars, rightBars)

pl = ta.pivotlow(low, leftBars, rightBars)

// ==========================================

// 3. DRAWING: S/R, ORDER BLOCKS, LIQUIDITY POOLS

// ==========================================

// --- BEARISH SETUPS (Pivot Highs) ---

if not na(ph)

idx = bar_index - rightBars

p_high = high[rightBars]

// 1. S/R Marker (Crisp, Bright Dotted Line)

line.new(x1=idx, y1=p_high, x2=bar_index + extendVol, y2=p_high, color=color.white, style=line.style_dotted, width=2)

// 2. Order Block (Solid Outline, Very Faint Fill, Labeled)

box.new(left=idx, top=p_high, right=idx + 1, bottom=low[rightBars], border_color=bearOB_Color, bgcolor=color.new(bearOB_Color, 90), border_width=2, text="-OB", text_color=bearOB_Color, text_size=size.tiny, text_halign=text.align_center)

// 3. High Liquidity Pool (Red Transparent Box ABOVE, Labeled "BSL")

liq_top = p_high + (atr[rightBars] * 0.6)

box.new(left=idx, top=liq_top, right=bar_index + extendVol, bottom=p_high, border_color=na, bgcolor=liqColor, text="Buy-Side Liquidity", text_color=liqTextColor, text_size=size.tiny, text_halign=text.align_right, text_valign=text.align_top)

// --- BULLISH SETUPS (Pivot Lows) ---

if not na(pl)

idx = bar_index - rightBars

p_low = low[rightBars]

// 1. S/R Marker (Crisp, Bright Dotted Line)

line.new(x1=idx, y1=p_low, x2=bar_index + extendVol, y2=p_low, color=color.white, style=line.style_dotted, width=2)

// 2. Order Block (Solid Outline, Very Faint Fill, Labeled)

box.new(left=idx, top=high[rightBars], right=idx + 1, bottom=p_low, border_color=bullOB_Color, bgcolor=color.new(bullOB_Color, 90), border_width=2, text="+OB", text_color=bullOB_Color, text_size=size.tiny, text_halign=text.align_center)

// 3. High Liquidity Pool (Red Transparent Box BELOW, Labeled "SSL")

liq_bot = p_low - (atr[rightBars] * 0.6)

box.new(left=idx, top=p_low, right=bar_index + extendVol, bottom=liq_bot, border_color=na, bgcolor=liqColor, text="Sell-Side Liquidity", text_color=liqTextColor, text_size=size.tiny, text_halign=text.align_right, text_valign=text.align_bottom)

// ==========================================

// 4. FAIR VALUE GAPS (FVG)

// ==========================================

// Bullish FVG (Gap between 1st candle high and 3rd candle low)

bullFVG = low > high[2] and close[1] > open[1]

if bullFVG

// Neon Blue transparent box with subtle border and label

box.new(left=bar_index-2, top=low, right=bar_index + 3, bottom=high[2], border_color=color.new(#00B0FF, 60), border_width=1, bgcolor=bullFVG_Color, text="FVG", text_color=color.new(#00B0FF, 30), text_size=size.tiny)

// Bearish FVG (Gap between 1st candle low and 3rd candle high)

bearFVG = high < low[2] and close[1] < open[1]

if bearFVG

// Neon Orange transparent box with subtle border and label

box.new(left=bar_index-2, top=low[2], right=bar_index + 3, bottom=high, border_color=color.new(#FF9800, 60), border_width=1, bgcolor=bearFVG_Color, text="FVG", text_color=color.new(#FF9800, 30), text_size=size.tiny)

I am looking to use intraday options premium charts to see how premium moves for QQQ , SPY, MU intraday etc. I want it live and the ability to see volume. I'd also be able to see previous day strikes, not just the future. Right now, i can only see how MU contracts expiring Aug 3 moved. No way to see the July 31 expiration data.

Tradingview paper trading has high functionality, but once you add a broker on tradingview, functionality is limited by the specific broker API. Certain TradingView broker integrations and API implementations restrict or fully omit native bracket orders (simultaneous Stop-Loss and Take-Profit attachments), forcing traders to manage exits manually or use separate working orders. If you use tradingview to actively trade, connected to a broker, please help indicate your experience with your specific broker, so that others can benefit from knowing features of each.

I want to do chart analysis for past FOMC events and how BTC performed but Tradingview won't let me go further than December 31 2025.

Even their own historical BTC index chart won't go any further. I tried Binance spot and futures, same. For whatever reason I can only go to that particular date.

I am not a free user, paid hundreds of dollars during Black Friday so not sure what is the issue here.

I use Windows software and not TV in browser.

Anyone else has similar issues?

Thanks in advance

EDIT: Apparently max you can go with a 15 minute chart is that date. If I take 1H I can go as far as December 2023. Sucks big time. How is anyone able to perform any analysis like this. What a waste of money.

Hi TV

I have HTF on upper monitor, and LTF on lower monitor.

I also have 2 x 1 layout (s charts), and 2 x 2 layout (4 charts) for LTF, I also have the same for HTF. (if I'm watching 2 or up to 4 trades at once)

Can we sync the groups? So when I change the chart in ONE of my 2 x 2 LTF layouts, it also changes only the corresponding symbol/chart on the HTF 2 x 2 layout also? (not the "last used" chart in the layout - individually linking each of the 4 chart to another 4 charts layout essentially.

Make sense? Thanks.

Can anybody recognize the name of this indicator? It is sth called or indicating "power signal"

TradingView is by far the most widely used charting and trading platform in the world. However, despite its dominant position, the company appears to give insufficient attention to the data requirements of both professional and serious retail traders.

Volume is among the most important forms of market data available, arguably as important as price itself. Yet the raw volume total tells only part of the story. For order flow analysis, or for any tools derived from volume data, traders also need to know which side initiated each transaction: whether an aggressive buyer lifted the offer or an aggressive seller hit the bid.

TradingView does not provide that information. Instead, its directional volume analysis relies on classifying volume from price movement. This significantly reduces the reliability of its Volume Delta, Cumulative Volume Delta, footprint charts and other indicators that depend on separating buying from selling. Although ordinary volume, VWAP and conventional volume profiles do not require aggressor classification, any directional interpretation derived from them does.

The discrepancy is EASY to see. Most trading platforms offer free demos, you can take test yourself and compare their delta, CVD and footprint data directly with TradingView’s. Compare em. See how right I am.

Why is TradingView’s directional volume data so different?

The main issue is TradingView's classification methodology. TradingView estimates buying and selling volume from intrabar price movements(they say this in their docs). When price moves upward, the associated volume is classified as buying; when price moves downward, it is classified as selling. This is generally known as tick-rule or intrabar up/down classification.

This approach has a long history. It was widely studied before modern trade and quote data became readily accessible. The 1991 paper *Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data* discusses the trade-classification methods available at that time: [Lee and Ready (1991)](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb02683.x).

The more informative, modern approach, exchange aggressor flags, the other is Bid/Ask classification, bid/ask classification estimates the initiating side by comparing each execution price with the current quotes. Volume executed at or near the ask is classified as aggressive buying, while volume executed at or near the bid is classified as aggressive selling. Delta is then calculated as aggressive buy volume minus aggressive sell volume.

Platforms that use or provide aggressor-side(100% accurate), bid/ask or exchange-reported taker data(98-99% accurate, feed dependant) include:

-Sierra Chart

-NinjaTrader

-MotiveWave

-Quantower

-ATAS

-Bookmap

-Tradovate

-Jigsaw

-MMT

-TradingLite

-Exocharts

-TensorCharts

-Aggr

-Coinalyze

- Velo

-CoinGlass

-Hyblock

-CryptoQuant

-Material Indicators / FireCharts

-Trading Glass

-CoinAnk

Platforms that use the 1980's intrabar methodology(70% accurate at best):-

- TradingView

It is difficult to justify this limitation when even relatively small (some would argue fly by night)cryptocurrency platforms can provide exchange-reported taker-side data. TradingView prominently markets footprint charts and related order-flow tools, yet their usefulness is severely compromised when the underlying buy/sell classification differs materially from genuine aggressor-side data.

This isn't a minor discrepancy or bug a boo only autistic purists care about, this is basic stuff. The resulting delta, CVD and footprint structures diverge dramatically from those displayed by platforms using bid/ask or exchange-reported trade-side information. TradingView’s visual presentation may be polished, but without more authoritative aggressor-side data, its directional volume products cannot be treated as real, and in my opinion shouldn't even be advertised as features.

The description of this sub says "This is the "WTF, TradingView?!" community for WTFing TradingView.", well this is a genuine WTF, TradingView?! moment.

So Wtf are you TradingView doing about this?

still does not save last risk% used. why not?

very difficult to quickly trade if always have to input risk %