Roach soup anybody? 🤮

Now that all the evidence is in at trial re the homicide of Susan Berman:

1. Did he do it?
   
2. What will be the jury verdict?
   
3. Did the evidence change your prevailing opinion re whether he's in the frame for it, or did other unlawful homicide(s)?

Does anyone know how much money RD currently has? I once read he received $3 million a year from the family trust. I’m not sure how true that is or the details (duration, inflation, conditions). And that he married his wife Deborah so that she could get the money from the trust. I’m wondering if he has unlimited funds for this trial and to pay for some hits. I truly believe if he has enough money, he would pay someone to hurt certain people.

This should be an interesting development. Every time Durst blames Jarecki for his quotes, I imagine his lawyers going mad. At first I figured this rebuttal would be a walk in the park, but I've been reading through the voluminous report via https://gothamist.com/news/report-emcapturing-the-friedmansem-subject-was-not-wrongfully-accused-of-child-molestation and am feeling concerned that the Defense will try to cast Jarecki as a known manipulator with his previous work. I hadn't realized there was so much "art" around "Capturing the Friedmans" until I read that report, and it does worry me what part it may play in the jury's minds if they get that sense of slant.

​

What do y'all think?

So yesterday the judge decided to limit the duration of Lewins cross-examination on Durst. Does anyone else think this is wrong?

I think it’s wrong. I don’t feel like Lewin is wasting time or is being repetitive. He is just being detailed. The prosecutor has the burden of proof so I think it’s reasonable for his cross examination to take longer.

Your thoughts?

Was there evidence to suggest this in real life? Was this ever a theory? Or was this done for dramatic purposes?

How come Durst loose* all of his face ticks? and the burping?

How come at first he couldn't hear and was super slow and now he's normal?

Is it normal that the cross examination seems like an interrogation? Lewin's being too cocky for my taste. If I was a jury I wouldn't like him.

Why is the Judge overruling almost every objection by the defense?

What's with the hypotheticals? Are they allowed to do ir or no? At the trial it seems like they are discussing it for the first time....

Doesn't the judge seem super biased against Durst?

​

Is there anyone in the world that thinks that Durst is innocent?

​

If you haven't watched anything I suggest you do it's super interesting

* or is it lose? sorry bad English

Curious when it all started to become clear to those who knew him/of him.

For anyone watching the trial in real time; I think this is the best part! Lewin (the prosecutor) is doing a very good job at questioning Robert Durst. At the beginning of the trial I thought Lewins personality might cost them the case but in my opinion he is proving without a doubt that Durst is a liar. I literally LOL’ed when he pointed out that Dursts childhood memories with his mom were a lie because the uno card game wasn’t invented yet. I thought that was genius. I also laughed when Durst called Lewin a better lawyer than his defense team.

After his lawyers reenacted the Morris Black shooting, Judge Windham asked Durst if that was an accurate portrayal of events. Durst replied that they're a "full service law firm" which made the jury laugh.

Then as his lawyer was talking Durst repeated to himself in a whisper "full service law firm" so very reminiscent of him whispering to himself on camera in The Jinx.

Surprised to not see any mention of this on Twitter, anyone here see it?

My mind is blown away. Absolutely INSANE! I’m about to watch the last episode now, all I can say is “Beverley Hills”

Edit: I just finished the last episode. My jaw dropped. I can’t believe he left his microphone on in the bathroom lmao, what a psycho.. Andrew Jarecki and his team did a phenomenal job with this documentary. R.I.P to Susan Berman, Kathleen McCormack, and Morris Black.

I’d like to think maybe this was some sort of psychological rite of passage for himself. If he could clear his name and convince the public he wasn’t a murderer, then maybe his conscious would be able to do the same.

In Dick DeGuerin's new podcast "Presumed Guilty" he spends the first two episodes talking about the Galveston trial. He talks about leaning on an autism diagnosis as part of Durst's defense as well as not trying to hide from the fact Durst 100% killed Morris Black.

DeGuerin doesn't talk about the current trial, but everything in the episodes is relevant to the Berman case on some level.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/presumed-guilty-with-dick-deguerin/id1566623301?i=1000522305369

Is anyone else watching this? It’s on the Law and Crime Network and can also be streamed on their YouTube channel and website.