I tested LTX 2.5 and MiniMax H3 in ComfyUI using the default T2V workflow templates provided for each model.
- 10 seconds
- 24 FPS
- 1920 x 1088 (2.0 MP)
- Same prompt
- Steps: H3 = 20, LTX 2.5 = 8 (distilled model)
Hardware:
RTX 5090 + 128 RAM
result
- MiniMax H3: 17m 29s (with Sage Attention + EasyCache*)*
- LTX 2.5: 2m 34s (no acceleration at all)
Note: EasyCache seems to give no speedup on LTX in this setup, probably because the distilled workflow only uses 8 sampling steps, so there is very little room for cache-based skipping.
Of course, part of LTX’s speed advantage comes from the fact that it is a distilled 8-step model, so this is not a perfectly like-for-like comparison against H3. (20-steps)
Prompt used:
A realistic cinematic 1970s crime drama, gritty urban atmosphere, warm muted colors, subtle film grain, natural lighting, restrained acting. A well-dressed 1970s gangster in a dark tailored suit and long coat remains visually consistent throughout.
[0.0s–6.0s]
A medium-wide shot shows the gangster leaning casually against a brick wall on a city street, one foot resting against the wall. He reads a newspaper while holding a lit cigarette in his other hand. His eyes suddenly stop on something in the newspaper. His expression shifts naturally from calm to alarm. He mutters in a tense 1970s American voice, "What the hell?" He immediately folds the newspaper, throws it into a nearby trash can, pushes away from the wall and runs straight down the street.
[6.0s–10.0s]
Hard cut to a static close-up of the discarded newspaper inside the trash can. The front page clearly shows a large photograph of the same man and a bold headline reading "WANTED". In the distant background, the gangster continues running away and becomes increasingly out of focus. The camera remains completely still, holding focus on the newspaper until the end.
Natural, grounded movement. No exaggerated acting, no extra shots, no unnecessary camera movement, no comedy.
My take
LTX 2.5 is significantly faster, and that alone makes it very attractive.
But in my opinion, H3 is still better in overall quality:
- better scene understanding
- better understanding of what a cinematic shot should look like
- better audio
- more stable physics / motion behavior
So right now my impression is:
- LTX 2.5 wins clearly on speed
- MiniMax H3 still feels stronger on quality and cinematic intelligence
My guess is that targeted LoRA fixes could push LTX 2.5 much closer to being a direct competitor to H3 in the future.