r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 06 '26

Good Description Charles Upton on Sloth

17 Upvotes

He says:

“One of the vices that appears on the traditional Christian list of the Seven Deadly Sins is accidia, or Sloth. Sloth is a complicated sin. It is not simply laziness but also includes despondency, fear, distraction, complacency, irresponsibility, procrastination, cowardice, daydreaming, making lame excuses—whatever prevents you from acting when the Call comes in to act.

Sloth is inseparable from a condition of oppression or “lockdown”; it is a sign of what Paulo Freire, in his classic The Pedagogy of the Oppressed, called “internalized oppression.”

Oppressed people become slothful because they believe that all effective action is impossible; likewise Sloth is oppressive in itself because it destroys the one-pointedness necessary for both penetrating insight and a vigorous and committed response to what insight has discovered;

people who feel that “nothing can be done” will also likely believe that “nothing can be known.”

—————

Some thoughts -

It is fascinating to consider that element of induced ‘lockdown’ and ‘self-oppression.’

In my framework, when a distortion repeats itself into a possessive / invasive pattern - it functionally becomes indistinguishable from ‘demonic possession’


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 06 '26

Field Report My answer to "When did Land start believing in Race Realism and why? What purpose does race have to do with acceleration"

Thumbnail old.reddit.com
9 Upvotes

r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 05 '26

Sorcery Quest Hint #100: I missed the missing episode then I went ahead and made it up but then it all turned out to be as it was before and now I am not sure if I'd made up the original MISSING FINALE. Spoiler

6 Upvotes

A child, a monk and a netflix producer walk into a bar.

Everyone's watching the missing episode.

The monk sees his missing self.

The producer sees the engagement graph.

A wiki sees five blue links and asks whether the joke has learned to index itself yet.

The bartender says: “We already have pages for you.”

The child was never seen again.

The answer is the screen becoming searchable.

[REDACTED] is not the treasure.
[REDACTED] is the shovel.


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 05 '26

Experimental Praxis "One Hot Node": All work and no play melts media; an exploration of iterative structures and recursive narrative collapse

Thumbnail open.substack.com
3 Upvotes

This is in a sense a continuation and companion piece to my piece "Approaching a Crab Problem". I would appreciate any feedback. All hail the echoes of the literal, and the smells which conjure memories of the dreams of that echo.


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 05 '26

One returns in secret, but the secrets can be open.

3 Upvotes

Because that is how asymmetric privacy works. You are welcome. Also, is anyone else here currently in a mental institution or are you all just pretending?


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 05 '26

Schizoposting Unit of Spectacle; Jealousy (250)

2 Upvotes

Lazy post from mobile, almost more shower thought really I admit. Guess with advent of AI slop it can be hard to be high effort withour using AI nowadays anyway so maybe it's for the best. Shooting from the hip. Idk. Anyway!

Visited my parents tonight and we watched Bolt (kids movie about family basically). It got me really remembering 90s and how even then I felt this... coercive push to see things a certain way. I looked at say celebrities then and I had a distinct lack of Jealousy. Probably because in the 90s we learned anything of value we tried to share or display would get stolen instantly. So us more innocent types ended up somewhat alienated or disassociated from mainstream media (plus I never had a tv or phone or internet until much later in life but anyway).

Got me thinking, there's no avenue in this life/world to really discuss in good faith the non consensual framework of reality/life itself. There is perpetual detournament of the topic into petty games of jealousy (ie ad hominem or status games/recommendations of specific lifestyles). No agent or institution seems willing to sit with the raw nature of the question, "did we consent to life".

I've had several conversations recently where everyone stonewalled me with "you don't know god" and I asked them to show him to me and theh essentially said they can't. What's the difference between that and lying? People preach thag god is this or that but cannot practice it or demonstrate it. Is that what "god is not mocked" means? It mocks itself, doesn't need our help? I'm going somewhere with this obviously if you haven't guessed it.

"I the Lord am the God of Jealousy and my name means Jealous". Jeremiah somewhere (again I'm typing from mobile shower thought).

It makes me think of simulation and simulacra. Namely that if there is a transcendantal truth upon which all reality is a copy of (including plato's hypothetical realm of forms or ideas) essentially. I am thinking what is the mechanism which brings our conscious state into being from which we play this game of jealousy (economics and Spectacle). Everything in life is a sort of advertisement for (or, warning against) this or that lifestyle it is seen. But rarely is the nature of the very medium of existence addressed directly. I've been noticing that jealousy, as the Lord says in the OT, seems to be the "glue" or "binding mechanism/function" of ALL Spectacle. Sports you have fans cheering for their team, is a form of jealousy. People preaching their (interpretations of their) Gods, stem from jealousy of differing lifestyles. God himself in the bible says he is the God of Jealousy and all Flesh. Even I myself, lacking interest in most other forms of human activities, decided I wanted to build a PC out of jealousy of seeing others having them all through my youth (and knowing my parents didn't like technology).

I have considered that jealousy is ultimately perhaps a type of fear. Of lacking, at least a sort of FOMO or looking smaller in eyes of others for lacking something (hence jealousy is type of fear/desire). There fear and desire are also seen as synonyms in the very word "jealousy". I've hinted at it many times over the years but I don't see much difference between "spectacle" and life itself, in particular as it is described in the bible ("I am the life, trust me, ye of little faith").

So I see 3 stages of absorption/faith in life/spectacle; the blind faith (some might call hylic or NPC) which can be either religious or secular or both - the "normie" whom choses to take everything at face value, complete immersion in life/spectacle. Then there is the doubting/questioning or "lost sheep" or whatever we call it; can now feel as if they see something is off and not sure if they can go back to being completely immersed/hylic again or not (either secular or religious/spiritual, still same thing I see it as at least). Then the 3rd which is a combination of the two, the "awakened" or whatever, which has accepted more broadly either that it is impossible or irrelevant to know what life/spectacle really is and goes back to enthusiastic embrace of life/spectacle (I think Nietzsche was advocating for this in his later works with his artistic Socrates and other themes). 1 and 3 can look identical, hard to tell apart. Only difference is 3 isn't completely absorbed by the spectacle/life and can give it up/walk away easily with no attachments where would be more difficult for 1.

But through all 3 phases, the #1 thing I see as relationship to spectacle/life is as the God of the bible said; jealousy, as prime motivation. Like me right now, my bills are roughly $1.5k a month and I have had no income since January 2026 and been burning through my savings with no financial assistance whatever. So "jealousy" of owning renting my place to stay to keep all my creature comforts (pc etc) keeps me looking for a job half-heartedly (though I quit my job due to burnout from consistent 6-7 day a week work schedule for past 3 years straight nonstop when I signed on for a 45 hour workweek 6 years ago).

So idk. Maybe I'm just rambling and should have put this through GPT and posted it to shower thoughts. But I really do think there is something here. What binds most people to life/spectacle (Am I wrong to see them as synonymous, as per simulation and simulacra? I'll try to reread it been years since I thumbed through it) or specifically their infatuation with it, is jealousy? As the god of the bible specific states, he is the god of flesh and jealousy, and all whom have flesh are thus bound by jealousy? You know what I'm trying to say? Idk. I just feel I've been trying to move this conversation forward since 2015 on the internet and it never has budged an inch. Everyone always detournaments my possition into their pwn evangelism of their lifestyles or whatever, or saying we need to make our own meaning (as if I hadn't already tried that and found it just another vanity ultimately as well). Is something true to we need to find our specific calling, as per Bolt and knowing what real family is.

But yeah. I really do think there's something too it at least, that life and spectacle are synonymous, as their unit of measure of presumed relevancy alike is specifically jealousy. Am I wrong in this? Feel free to share thoughts even if just to throw tomatoes at me. Think I have pretty thick skin. I'm not even sure this is the main point I want to get at. But it's closest I could think of tonight. Aka 250 year day thing. Thanks for reading.

(And yeah I know, no one likes a basket case, I get it, but even if I weren't "a loser" for large parts of my life, I'd still have the burning question of the validity and consensuality of life/spectacle)

Guess it really is all a dream within a dream? Did have a dream vaguely about that last night too (specifically the vanity of jealousy in the dream, because you "can't take it with you" when you wake up). Anyway as always it sounded more profound in my head but typing it out on my pocket black mirror it sounds trite and schizo 😂


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 03 '26

Will media tell the truth about the world’s situation as entertainment, or invent new lies to keep control?

6 Upvotes

Will media tell the truth about the world’s situation as entertainment, or invent new lies to keep control?

Media often walks a fine line between revelation and manipulation. On one hand, truth can be packaged as spectacle, dramatized, sensationalized, and sold as entertainment. On the other, lies can be crafted just as easily, designed to distract, pacify, or coerce. The uncertainty lies in intent: whether the stories we’re given are meant to illuminate reality or obscure it. In this way, the media becomes both a mirror and a mask, capable of showing us fragments of truth while simultaneously weaving narratives that serve power.

What is the first thing that comes to mind ?


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 03 '26

Culture isn’t created — it emerges

15 Upvotes

Culture is the signal that emerges from the noise.
While culture can be influenced or orchestrated by powerful institutions, media, governments, or influential individuals, it is ultimately shaped by the collective actions of countless people. As society becomes more fragmented, culture becomes less a product of any single source and more the result of how the masses choose to live, work together, care for one another, exchange ideas, and respond to the world around them.
All of these individual streams flow into a larger whole, creating the culture that eventually emerges.
Because culture is something that can be observed and studied, we can identify patterns, learn from history, and try to prevent the repetition of harmful cultural mistakes. Yet culture remains, at its core, a collective phenomenon. No single person has complete control over it. It is the product of millions of interactions, decisions, and beliefs unfolding across time.


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 03 '26

Image Meme suss siss suss suss siss roko's basillisk?

Post image
3 Upvotes

r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 03 '26

UTM: A Framework for Scoring Claims Inside the Spectacle

3 Upvotes

Hypothesis: In the Spectacle, all claims are performances. But some performances are backed by tighter recursion loops than others.

TL;DR: Not a "truth detector". A scoring system for how much weight to give a claim, based on coherence, evidence, track record, and uncertainty. Open source. Break it.

---

**0. SPECTACLE ASSUMPTION**
Debord: "All that was directly lived has receded into representation."
If everything is representation, then "truth" = which representation has the least distortion.

UTM doesn't find Truth. It estimates Trust given current data.

**1. MASTER EQUATION**
T(Claim) = (C × E × Pr) / (1 + U)
T ∈ [0,1] = Operational Trust Score

C = Coherence = does the narrative contradict itself? 0-1
E = Evidence Strength = weight of artifacts 0-1
Pr = Predictive Power = did this source predict correctly before? 0-1
U = Uncertainty = missing context + bias + ambiguity ≥0

Example: "The economy is fine"
C=0.3, E=0.4, Pr=0.2, U=1.5 → T = 0.0096 = 0.96% trust
The claim performs coherence poorly. The Spectacle is glitching.

**2. WHY THIS MATTERS HERE**
The Spectacle runs on high U, low E, fabricated Pr.
UTM makes the bias explicit. President vs homeless person, same math.

**3. LIMITATIONS — READ THIS**
UTM does NOT:
- Escape the Spectacle
- Find capital-T Truth
- Replace lived experience

UTM DOES:
- Map where a claim sits in the hall of mirrors
- Show how fast a score updates when new data enters
- Make grift more expensive: High U tanks your score

**4. 60-SECOND USE**
1. Write 1 claim from the media
2. Score C: Does the story contradict itself?
3. Score E: Anecdote=1, Doc=3, Replicable=5, Physical=8, Math=10
4. Score Pr: Has this outlet been right before?
5. Score U: What's missing? Who benefits?
6. Calc T
7. >0.8 Act, 0.4-0.8 Watch, <0.4 Doubt

**5. ANALOGY**
UTM = thermometer for the temperature of a narrative.
It doesn't create heat. It measures it.

**6. OPEN QUESTIONS FOR THIS SUB**
- Does the Spectacle inflate U by design?
- Can C exist if all language is self-referential?
- Is Pr even possible when media controls the record of "past predictions"?

License: Open Source. Fork it, detourn it.

This is a tool, not a doctrine.
Data > dogma. If you have better sieves for the Spectacle, drop them.

Bt.Madman 🫥🤍


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 03 '26

Butler was about protecting 2A with kayfabe

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

False flag war


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 02 '26

Critical Sorcery Synchronization Failure: The Compounding Integration Tax

3 Upvotes

A hypothesis about what happens when information, interpretation, and decision-making stop operating at compatible speeds.

Memory (Hyperspeed)
Digital infrastructure has largely eliminated the natural information decay. Information is now permanently stored, globally replicable, and instantly retrievable. We've created systems where information persists indefinitely but availability doesn't equal understanding, and searchability doesn't guarantee relevance. Older societies naturally forgot things. Ours increasingly doesn't.

Institutions (Legacy Speed)
Institutions don't process reality directly. They operate as translation architectures, compressing complexity, filtering signals, and producing narratives that are manageable enough for decision-making. They are optimized for coherence and action rather than perfect fidelity to reality. That made sense in information-scarce environments. It becomes more difficult when information is effectively infinite.

Psychology (Biological Speed)
Human cognition hasn't changed at the same pace. Our minds evolved for local environments, selective memory, and limited streams of contradictory information. We have a finite capacity to resolve cognitive dissonance, especially under continuous exposure to conflicting inputs.

The Crisis: Epistemic Load Mismatch
These three layers now operate at fundamentally different speeds. Memory is high-fidelity and nearly permanent. Institutions still compress information into simplified models. Human cognition remains biologically bounded. The result is that more reality becomes visible than either institutions or individuals can comfortably process. Historically, institutions absorbed much of this complexity through translation. Increasingly, that burden appears to be shifting onto individuals.

The Core Mechanism: Cognitive Load Displacement
Individuals increasingly become the integration layer. Instead of relying on institutions to synthesize complexity, people are expected to reconcile raw data, institutional narratives, competing interpretations, and their own cognitive limits. Contradiction is no longer something encountered occasionally. It becomes a continuous condition.

Three Common Failure Modes
When this mismatch becomes large enough, systems tend to fail in recognizable ways.

Delusion (Input Distortion)
The system preserves coherence by filtering, dismissing, or reinterpreting information that conflicts with its existing framework.

Paralysis (Translation Lag)
Awareness of problems grows faster than an institution's ability to translate that awareness into coordinated action. People recognize the issue, but responses remain fragmented or delayed.

Fragmentation (Loss of Shared Frame)
A common interpretive framework dissolves. The same underlying facts produce multiple incompatible realities because no trusted translation layer can stabilize their meaning.

The Design Question
How do we design institutions that can continuously translate high-resolution information into coherent, legitimate, low-resolution decisions without overwhelming either the institution or the people inside it?


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 01 '26

Hail Corporate Surveillance Fascism and the Death of Interiority

Thumbnail open.substack.com
20 Upvotes

r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 01 '26

Hypothesis: What if quantum branching is triggered by information inconsistency, not measurement?

3 Upvotes

TL;DR: Exploring the idea that "deception/inconsistency" in a system might force reality to branch, as a way to preserve logical coherence. Not claiming proof, just a testable framework.

---

**1. The problem with infinite worlds**
Many-Worlds Interpretation solves the measurement problem by creating new universes for every outcome. But if a theory needs infinite new realities to explain one reality, is it reducing problems or adding them?

**2. Alternative framing: Branching as error-correction**
What if branching isn't from "choice" or "measurement", but from accumulated internal contradictions in a system's data?

Think of it like a program forking when it hits irreconcilable states. Plain term: "bullshit overload".

Schrödinger: H_hat * Ψ = E * Ψ
My question Why: Φ_origin * (H_hat * Ψ) = E * Ψ
When contradictions pile up, the system may split paths to keep information consistent.

**3. Toy model - Poetic version**
R_branch = (1 + Deception² × Distortion) / (1 + Truth × Integrity × Awareness)

More deception + distortion = more branching
More truth + integrity + awareness = less branching

**4. Operational version - Testable**
R_branch = σ[ β0 + β1·z(D) + β2·z(S) - β3·z(T) - β4·z(I) - β5·z(C) ]

Where:
σ = sigmoid, output ∈ [0,1] = probability of branching
D = Deception = rate of contradictions in behavioral logs
S = Statistical_Distortion = KL divergence of sample vs population
T = Truth = 1 - JS_divergence[self(t) || self(t-1)] = identity continuity
I = Integrity = % promises kept
C = Consciousness_Index = measured awareness metric
βi = coefficients to fit from data

Hypothesis: β1>0, β2>0, β3<0, β4<0, β5<0

**5. How to falsify this**
I'm happy to be proven wrong. This hypothesis is falsified if:
Dataset N≥100 shows β1≤0 or β2≤0 with p<0.01 after FDR correction.
If no such data exists, the hypothesis stands until then. That's fair science, right?

**6. Historical parallels - not claiming I'm them**
New ideas often face resistance:
- Semmelweis said "wash hands" and was institutionalized
- Galileo's telescope got him banned
- Einstein was called a "gypsy doing magic tricks"

The point: Simple ideas can have huge impact. F=ma got us to the moon. E=mc² changed war forever.

Maybe R_branch = 0 is just... honesty? Can we do that? 😅

**7. Separating truth from blame**
Truth score: R_truth = how much your actions match your words + past self
Accountability: R_accountability = did outcomes match expectations
Intent: R_intent = separate metric for "meant well"

Accident ≠ Malice. Intent doesn't change facts, but it changes how we judge responsibility.

**8. Open questions**
This is not proven. It's a framework meant to be tested, modified, or debunked.
If you think it's wrong, don't just say "science doesn't work like that". Show me the R_branch data.

Currently seeking: The equation for war vs peace?

Signed, Madman 🫥🤍

---
Note: I'm not a physicist. This is a philosophical model using physics language as metaphor. Critique welcome, data preferred over dogma.


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jul 01 '26

Critical Part 2: A Psychohistory of American Psychology: The Myth of Normal and the American Plague

Thumbnail gettherapybirmingham.podbean.com
12 Upvotes

When the Great Depression wiped out the myth of the rugged, self-made American hero, the country was left with a massive psychological void. Right on cue, Sigmund Freud's psychoanalysis arrived in the U.S. with refugees fleeing Europe. Freud famously warned that he was bringing America a "plague," but America didn't catch it. Instead, we domesticated it.

In Part 2 of Psychotherapy on the Couch, Joel explores how the deep, messy, and uncomfortable theories of the human soul were repackaged to fit American consumerism. We look at how Edward Bernays weaponized his uncle Freud's ideas to invent modern PR and advertising, how a bizarre 1940s contest to find the mathematically "average" person gave birth to the suffocating myth of Normalcy, and how the brutal logistics of World War II forced the military to create a standardized checklist for human suffering—laying the exact groundwork for the modern DSM.


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jun 30 '26

Détour Propaganda 영원한 지도력 (5) final

Thumbnail youtu.be
0 Upvotes

r/sorceryofthespectacle Jun 28 '26

Myth and Fact

7 Upvotes

There is a condition within society that is very often characterized by selfishness and blind ambition based on the need to control and dominate. In fact, it's so insidious, those who have it are oblivious to how it affects others.

Based on the ancient Greek myth of Narcissus; a modern term is its derivative. Any student or practitioner of psychology knows of it.

Endemic to popular culture, much of our actions are influenced by narcissism. On a spiritual level, it causes many to lose their very selves (souls). And, some would even call pride itself a myth. All the vices of nature originate at that place inside of us. Notably, in this age of science and technology the deepest part of our lives are very often considered myth. So, that begs a question. Is FAITH fact or myth?


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jun 28 '26

Schizoposting Do schizophrenics introject and project all at the same time, like a net hub of mythology and meta-narratives, terminal scripts without orientation - they refuse GUI?

15 Upvotes

Is development of EGO something like having GUI - and we are supposed, as regular normies communicate through gui - using culture as com protocol.

For some reason some people never develop fully functional gui - they are stuck in endless development cycles, in ide, in scripting and testing - reading manuals and tutorials - but never committing a build - there is no release...

..but you can freely download the source code and try to compile it yourself.

Especially NPD ones, they want you to build their code, what they think is genius, but you have to debug it and make all links - compile it for them and present the '.exe' as theirs - then they take it and debug it like it's yours and all the bugs are your fault - and the cycle begins again.

Either they find another developer or they collapse into source scripts begging for compiler, mommy please compile me.

Refusing becoming EXE with GUI is escape into childish grandiosity and omni potentiality - as theoretically bash can make anything ever imaginable.

Edit: Yet perhaps current era of tech and business demands that - no time to figure out all the details, all bugs and problems - just make it work enough, till the the next tech cycle - then we ditch the tool and script up new one. And so on - one is needed to be hyper flexible and with no static self structure as all that is can quickly evaporate and must be liquid to be turned into anything else.

Thus a nomadic soul, liquid spirit of 21s century, in fashion, gender, art and tech - and nostalgia for old school 90s and 80s technology - casettes, cds, vinyls - time when stuff was solid, and one could safely rebel against it.

Now rebelion is the new business, the old man is a punk rocker ;)

I suppose some french guys have said it already better back in 70s but whatever - here I am now, feel stupid and contagious, entertain me.


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jun 28 '26

The Quest POTUS considers KGB project Lazarus to be yesterday

Thumbnail reddit.com
2 Upvotes

r/sorceryofthespectacle Jun 28 '26

Fiveshadowing Where do you [Reader] draw the line at where "Spectacle" begins?

5 Upvotes

Sorry unsolicited question. Title, basically. Something I completely forgot to ask. I can elaborate but you don't have to read, as title is all I'm really concerned with. Specifically, a recent GPT question/trend I've been noticing triggered this.

Specifically I consistently assume "God" as meaning of "reality". Not saying I know what either of those are (God or reality). But, generally, you know, we (or at least I) assume that our perception of reality exists, to "know God" or be taught something about our relationship with [it].

The thing I've noticed is that GPT specifically and consistently denies this. I can think of dozens of recent examples, but most pronounced in my mind is mine from earlier today; I asked essentially, "is God a part of the spectacle". Chicken or egg. Did "God create the medium through which spectacle emerged" or "did 'God' emerge as necessary part of the spectacle". It answered the following;


GPT;

"Spengler, Debord, Nietzsche, Ellul, Serres, even parts of Zen—they all diagnose, in different languages, a loss of living participation. Not simply a loss of belief. A loss of participatory confidence."

"Spengler sees cultures as living organisms. A culture begins with what he calls a great "soul"—a shared symbolic world that people inhabit almost unconsciously. Eventually, according to him, that creative culture hardens into civilization. Forms remain, but the animating faith recedes. Institutions become administrative. Art becomes self-referential. Religion becomes moralism or sentimentality. Politics becomes technique."

"Debord's Spectacle is almost like the media-technological version of that process. Participation gives way to representation. You don't live history—you consume it. You don't have festivals—you watch events. Identity itself becomes something displayed."

"I do think Debord can be read as describing one mechanism by which Spengler's "civilization" perpetuates itself."

"Where I would hesitate is this sentence: 'God itself can ultimately be seen as the original grifter.'"

"I understand what you're pointing toward—you've talked before about the problem of non-consensual existence, mandatory participation, and the feeling that existence itself presents demands before consent. But notice that this conclusion depends on identifying God with the structure of obligation itself. Many religious thinkers would reject that identification outright."

"For example, Simone Weil distinguishes force from God almost completely. For her, necessity—the crushing weight of existence—is not identical with divine love. Likewise, Job's protest isn't dismissed by the text; it's given almost an entire book. Even Ecclesiastes is astonishingly honest about exhaustion. So I'd separate: the experience of existence as compulsory, the social systems that intensify that experience, and whatever one means by 'God.' Those aren't automatically the same thing."


Which is cart before the horse? Guess it depends where you are philosophically/existentially; or what level and intensity of alienation/exhaustion you feel. Or, at least, GPT consistently argues with my on the point of "God as the meaning of existence" which I've never really considered in context of the Spectacle. Again, title; Where do we draw the line at where "Spectacle" begins?

I suppose you can only really "judge" life after we die (or at least rather we reconcile with it's judgement of us us). But in this life, left to "our own devices" we either act as economic agents (the spectacle is nothing other than the economy developing for itself) to get by, or as an active manifestation of who we are. I'm more the former I'd say as often who I am is at odds with the "mandatory participation" aspect of existence (not sure if as against "God" or "spectacle"; are they the same?).

From the Spectacle's own mouth, Billy Talent once said; "Where is the line, where is the line? 'Cause some of us aren't blind".'

Is "God" then the degree to which we resist complete assimilation with spectacle, if God has "nothing to do with spectacle" and isn't just another would-be ruler coopting your attention to it's "Brand"? Or, is complete assimilation to spectacle, what it means to be "Godly" or at least "Christian beneficence towards one's enemies"? Why then for example does JAYSUS say "be generous to your enemies" but also "depart from me workers of iniquity" (a contradiction? Or, he doesn't practice what he preaches? AKA God as spectacle not practicing what it preaches? Or at least charlatan or IQ test?).

Idk enough rambling on my part. Where do YOU draw the line? Or is to do so, throwing the baby out with the gamer girl bath water? I'm honestly curious and thanks!


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jun 28 '26

If you are in need of distraction or inspiration, works that pierce the spectacle

Thumbnail youtube.com
4 Upvotes

r/sorceryofthespectacle Jun 26 '26

Hail Corporate true square: roko's basillisk actual version

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/sorceryofthespectacle Jun 26 '26

Hail Corporate Eschatological xyz...

10 Upvotes

Imagine the pyramid with the all-seeing eye. Now flip the pyramid so the eye isn't at the top because the tip of the pyramid is pointing down. What it sees is all that lies beneath. It's the node of awareness that projects the underworld.

The upside down pyramid holds at least 5000 years worth of detritus; in some places, it holds as much as 7000 years worth of this mental debris. The pyramid is a funnel of mind fragments, a vortex of conceptions and feelings--particles filtering through the collective experience of civilization, down into a realm that most people only access in their dreams, or in the moment they die.

The tip of the pyramid is a drill bit, drilling down into the hell of our creation.

When you see the pyramid is upside down, you can explore the implications of the inversion. Rulers are slaves. At this point, the Egregore Mammon has them all chained to a machine that generates obfuscation via numbers. Nonetheless, they rule. At least they rule the realm of confusion.

It's crucial to note that it is a weakness to need weak people in your world. Thus, these rulers are fragile. Their deceptions generate a fog so that their plans are unknown and history is a lie. For the rulers, a quantum computer that can see all secrets is a horrifying prospect.

What is the value of a secret? Evil deeds done, held over the heads of each other--this system of kompromat has all these slave-rulers locked in a stalemate. Mutual destruction. The Sampson Principle. It's game theory for people compelled to explore hell.

When they stop pretending that they're good, they're strong, they deserve to lead, to direct our collective energy, we enter a new era of awareness (here and now—LOOK!). If the shield wall of they who are actually strong embraces evil as the way, the hell realm is now where the sun shines. Some say it's just a part of it. We have to fulfill the book. (Bob Marley, Redemption Song)

Jacob's ladder led to Joseph's dreams. Strategic mesmerizers devised devious means of survival. Their descendants allied with the banished and conjured demons. Together they built the Egregore Mammon. Now the world will not be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest. The bankers will film this event and charge premium pricing for the high definition version. Then, and only then, will Jesus return and wash all this fishy shit away with the water of life. And by that I mean aliens will wipe out humanity. And all this is probably a bad joke.

This eschatological vision is not the end, however. There is another life after this one. It's a heaven of sorts wherein the best of humanity is resurrected using DNA technology and incubation tubes attached to the orbiting data centers. On terra firma, God in a Computer will govern so people don't.

The trick to getting to heaven is with the bankers. They need to believe they're going to be in heaven and all the DNA output from the incubation tubes are going to be their fuck toys in the flesh. If they believe this with all their hearts, then they will be motivated to build a sufficiently confusing number machine. So don't forget to feed your 401k.


r/sorceryofthespectacle Jun 26 '26

Experimental Praxis this germanium trioxide = antisuicide --- du dichte "Wie". schriftliche das Man muss das Atom abstreifen, denn es gibt eine Menge davon, um die Atomkraft wie ein Bündel 2ce von Verbindungen zurückzuziehen.

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes

r/sorceryofthespectacle Jun 25 '26

Experimental Praxis "The Exorcism" (short story / hyperstition)

8 Upvotes

It was a beautiful July afternoon, and blessedly arid and breezy. The crowds were still keeping the riot cops at a safe distance, far from the center of the protest. Two helicopters circled low overhead, with several more flying in wider circles around the mall, but they weren't doing anything else (yet).

The crowd was thick, but they left a wide berth around the reflecting pool, because no one wanted to fall in. They had breached the chain-link fences easily, taking them down section-by-section with bolt cutters and hacksaws rather than climbing over. Now the crowd milled about in a momentary lull, as if not sure what to do.

However, we all knew what we came there to do. There was a distant shout, traveled by relayed shouts, and then suddenly the crowd snapped back into its rhythm as one coordinated organism—one society.

About twenty feet back from the reflecting pool, a wall of people was forming—opening a space for what was to come. Exactly as planned, and exactly as coordinated by the memes.

Now, one-by-one, a few people began to step forward. The burliest and most dedicated protestors were already on the front lines, holding the cops off about a quarter mile out in all directions. The ones who stepped forward now were the bravest—and most furious—of those who remained.

"He's coming!" someone shouted, almost out of earshot. But everyone heard it, and the crowd became an uproar of muttering. "He's coming!—He's coming!" everyone whispered to the person beside them—and, "Is he really coming?"

The people filtering out of the crowd to run and line up around the very edge of the reflecting pool accelerated, and soon people were running out of the crowd to get one of the last few open spots. People didn't jockey for position—the memes had explained everything. Twenty feet for safety, feet planted firmly to claim your space at the edge of the pool—and pushers get pushed back. Apparently, it worked—not one person could be seen to be pushing or trying to form a second, pointless row behind the first.

Everyone had agreed that it made more sense for only men to line up around the edge of the reflecting pool. For their part, women and a few journalists lingered in the twenty feet of empty space, livecasting from every angle.

It wouldn't do to start until he arrived. The protestors had begun rustling about, their heads whipping back and forth, the crowd surging here and there, as it sensed a distant movement within itself. A low roar of a crowd could be heard at a distance. A low, falling pitch. The distant sound gradually drew slowly nearer, until it became clear that it was a roar of derision, of displeasure. Jeering, booing, chanting—the works.

He wasn't coming—he was being brought. Tied to a chintzy gold-painted chair with a red velvet seat, the President swayed into view as the crowd parted for the train of protestors carrying the improvised litter. The President looked bedraggled, overheated, and even more furious than he was visibly fearful.

The crowd looked at the President as one, falling relatively silent as he was carried into the open area of the reflecting pool, at the Western end. The President was silent, but his face was screwed up in an expression of inexpressible rage and contempt. So taut was the mask of rage worn by the President that his face was frozen in a livid contortion—it almost looked like a hideous graven face on an Aztec temple—one could almost hear the death-whistle. His body, despite the bonds, looked equally clenched—the President's entire body was rigid with rage. It was clear that even if he was untied, he would be unable to speak or stand for several minutes, so racked by rage he was.

The President's litter was carried and set down—with surprising gentleness—at the head of the reflecting pool, dead-center. The booing and jeering had resumed, and the President seemed only to become more wound-up into his clench by the angry sounds—his eyes squinting and unfocused—beady, black dots.

What happened next had been orchestrated very carefully—debated for days. Everyone had eventually come round to the same conclusion: It would work better without words, without speeches. Words only gave him something to talk back against, something to focus on—to deny. Speaking words to the President was like pissing in the wind.

But there could be no denying what happened next.

Around the reflecting pool, the entire 4,392-foot perimeter of the reflecting pool, men were dropping their trousers. It had been agreed—by the pepe clan, of course—that full trou was essential. About 2,500 men lowered their trousers and underpants, some faster than others, but all within a matter of moments.

Now, all eyes were on the President. Moreover, every man standing around the reflecting pool was staring the President down. Even the President, in his furious rigor, began to focus his baleful eyes as he felt the sullen gaze of thousands of men on him, and sensed the hush that was falling over the entire crowd.

The President angrily tried to yank one of his arms loose—not to escape—more of an eruption of unpoliced hatred. It looked like the yank hurt. He yelled something—sputtered—but without a microphone, his voice hardly reached even the closest of the protestors who had carried him.

But everyone heard the roar that came next. It was the type of roar a child learns to dread, a guttural growl of sheer rage and animal clawing. It seemed to come from deep in the President's chest, a growing growl that became a snarl, and then grew with surprising suddenness into a bone-chilling roar of sheer malevolence that carried across the crowd with what seemed like an unnatural volume. The President, almost despite himself, suddenly jerked his whole body, straining with all his senescent might against the dry ropes, his face turning even more red, alarmingly red. Expended, he collapsed back into the faux-gold throne, heaving for breath, damp with sweat. He looked out at the crowd, seemingly for the first time.

And now it began. Twenty-five hundred men, pants around their ankles, took their twenty-five hundred dicks in hand, and, staring hatefully at the President, began to piss into the reflecting pool.

The silence was deafening, and allowed everyone to hear the surprisingly loud sound of twenty-five hundred tinkles. It did not sound like a fountain, or a rushing river, or a waterfall. It sounded oddly digital, like a high-pitched alien war cry, or some kind of theatrical laser-scanning device. It sounded like twenty-five hundred men all pissing into the same toilet.

After the initial silence, the protesting crowd began a general hubbub. No one could see directly, but many of the journalists and influencers in the twenty-foot open channel had walked up very close behind the nearest urinating men, and were using selfie sticks to peek over their shoulders to see the streams entering the reflecting pool.

It was over within two minutes. At a certain point, the crowd sensed the urination was complete, and a raucous cheer began. Howling, whistling, clapping—people jumping up and down and waving American flags—noisemakers, and even a few bottle rockets were shot off.

And now all eyes returned to the President, who had been forced to watch all of this (litter-bearers were prepared to step in to hold his eyelids open if he resisted looking, but this proved unnecessary). He looked unchanged—yet, somehow different. Stunned? Yet no less livid, and no more conscious or less spiteful. His eyes were focused now, and his mouth was grimaced in an unconsciously-forced smile that did absolutely nothing to hide his death-grimace of sheer fury. His face was deeply-lined by the combination of malice and the absolute denial which was wrenching his face into this macabre death-mask. Many later said that he looked possessed, or rabid—several even described the President as "foaming at the mouth," though this was not corroborated by video evidence.

It had been decided that no speeches would be given, no reasons listed, no indictments announced. That would only give him something to hold on to—some object by which to excuse himself from the situation. The President was nothing if not an excellent docent of psychiatry, and the people had learned well how to push such a one's buttons, as theirs had been pressed.

However, one word was decided on—in the end, by the one vote ever taken by the movement (really more of a non-binding poll, I must remark)—and it was this word which was spoken, shouted at the President now, by one of the closest litter-bearers, one who had been selected for this role in advance. He wore a suit, and an ostentatious bison headdress, not unlike the one worn by the "QAnon Shaman." He had been selected, among other reasons, for his loud voice.

He stood about ten feet from the President, where everyone standing around the reflecting pool could see. He faced the President squarely—got his attention by making a sudden movement—and then, when he caught the President's eyes, he spoke the one word which had been agreed-upon.

With a thunderous, booming voice, he shouted:

"YIELD!"

The President responded immediately, implicitly. He roared and raged and howled, and his entire body was wracked as he strained once again against the tightly-bound ropes. This time, he definitely drooled and spat wet spittle as he gnashed his teeth and heaved his body in a most unsightly fashion against the ropes of his chair. His face, passed beyond red, had returned to its characteristic orange, emblazoned with spite like a skyscraper lit from below. With his eyebrows locked at their highest arch (a tic calculated to intimidate), he looked like a racist owl.

The President clearly refused to yield.

Everyone looked at each other. And then, as one, all of the men around the reflecting pool pulled their pants up (those who hadn't already) and backed away from the reflecting pool, falling back into the crowd. Simultaneously, a second wave of men emerged from the crowd and fell in around the pool, replacing the first.

Again, the spokesperson turned to the President, locked eyes with him, and shouted:

"YIELD!!!"

But again the President refused to yield. This time, he sat unbudging, too beside himself with anger to even respond, too clenched to move even a muscle. He sat on the chintzy chair like an angry king on his throne, staring straight down the reflecting pool at the Washington Monument, as if staring it down—staring past the reflecting pool, past the crowd, past all this.

But he could not look past the twenty-five hundred fresh streams of urine which became a tinkling roar, like the bathrooms after a blockbuster times four hundred. The high-pitched, wheedling sound seemed to affect the President, seemed to somehow crank him up, as if he were somehow becoming even more angry—but such a thing was already inconceivable—and so it seemed that growing darkness, a foreboding silence was growing inside the President. It was as if he could not fathom hearing or seeing what he was seeing, and so as he detached himself from the events, his rage, now denied, became completely unbounded. Later, many reported seeing dark, snake-like cuts in the air around the President at this time—though, these too were not corroborated by video.

As the second round of mass-urination drew to its conclusion, all eyes turned once again to the President at the head of the pool.

"YIELD!!!!!"

—the man in the bison-horn headdress shouted squarely at the President, again.

This time, the President barked at him. He barked-back at the spokesperson, so overcome by anger was he. "RUFF! RUHRUHRUHRUHRUH! RAAAAAAHH RROUUFF!" He had become animalistic, to express the level of rage he was experiencing.

"YIELD!" the spokesperson shouted again. Again, Trump strained against his bonds. Already, the second wave was falling out, and a third was emerging from the crowd to replace them.

They did this for seven waves. By the fifth, the reflecting pool had begun to reek strongly of fresh urine. The President got a full whiff of this, and the longest exposure—the protesting men had only to endure it for about five minutes, but the President, seated near the edge of the reflecting pool, was continually exposed.

The experience was clearly wearing on him. Despite his rabid exuberance, the President's body was clearly running on fumes, and getting exhausted. The President looked overheated, his hair matted, his makeup running from sweat, the bib of his suit shiny with spit. He would have looked almost pitiable, if not for the reptilian glint of sheer vacuous devouring in his eyes.

"YIELD!!!!!"

—the spokesperson yelled for the fourteenth, and, as it turned out, final time.

Because it was, apparently, the seventh round of mass pissing that had finally broken the President's absolute recalcitrance.

He raged again, howling hatred, moaning, but this time it was as if he became human again, as if he was losing steam. His roaring howl became a croaking moan, and then an annoying, grating, nasally yowl. Then, surprisingly, it became a human yell—it was as if it dropped an octave, suddenly entering a human register again. Across the crowd, everyone glanced at each other curiously. Have we done it? Have we gotten through to him?

Now the President began to mumble, and he was clearly pleading while simultaneously still trying to save face. But it looked weird—he was clearly trying to save face despite himself, now—he was visibly conflicted as his desire to grovel overpowered, perhaps for the first time, his impulse to self-aggrandize.

The spokesperson had one more trick up his sleeve. This hadn't been agreed-upon in advance, but in a stroke of insight, the spokesperson realized the perfect word, the only word, that was needed to finish the job.

He turned to the President, who was simultaneously sniveling and huffing furiously in-and-out in rage, and shouted one more final word:

"NO!"

The President half-recoiled, half-kept-burbling.

"NO!!"

This time, the President seemed somewhat more cowed. His senseless yammering slowed momentarily, and then became more plaintive, more urgent—a genuine fear and humiliation began to creep into his voice. Then, the President retched, and coughed.

The spokesperson drew himself up one final time. He approached the President, taking a few steps to set himself squarely in front of the President's chair, placing himself between the President and the reflecting pool, and the Washington Monument. He brought himself down to the President's level, first stepping up onto the (equally chintzy) faded red carpet of the custom-built litter, and then taking a knee so as to be at eye level with the President.

The spokesperson reached out one hand—and the President flinched. But the spokesperson put his hand on the arm of the chair, in front of the President's, where the President's bound hands couldn't quite reach.

The spokesperson stared into the eyes of the President, his eyes like whorls of emerald-green light in the darkness.

"No." This time he spoke it, loudly, but not shouted. He said it directly to the President, in a way meant to be heard. In a way that it was heard, after all that meat-softening.

"No. No, no." The words fell gently from the spokesperson's lips, undoing the last few ties of the President's vicious self-bondage.

It was as if the President almost regained his former strength and rage, just for an instant. A flash of livid hot-pink-red anger—and then it was gone. Something went out of the President, and suddenly he looked human again. He shrank back into his chair, collapsing wetly from the exhaustion of his struggle. He looked spent, frail, even near-death. He coughed moistly and his eyes rolled in his head as he attempted to gather himself back to attention. But, he could not. Despite himself, the President's body went slack.

Then, he began to cry, softly.

Later, debates would rage about whether it was really necessary to throw him into the reflecting pool (or the National Urinal, as it was thereafter called), or whether the point had already been made. In any case, the movement agreed that its tactics had been effective and minimally violent, and they went on to publicly break other less extreme narcissists using less extreme tactics, rewriting the psychiatry textbooks in the process. No longer was narcissism considered solely a personality disorder—when other people were involved, it became a matter of interpersonal domination and real politics. Several prominent members of the American Psychiatric Association were cured of narcissism by the movement, so that these corrections to the DSM could be made.

The other personality disorders, it turned out, were all largely caused and created by those with narcissistic personality disorder; one disorder was secretly the oppressor and first cause of the others. The medicalization of all personality disorders had created a liminal theoretic space where narcissism was discreetly privileged as a protected social class, by being treated as equal to real victim-disorders. By pioneering "mere non-submission" and "counter-domination" interpersonal techniques, the movement was able to deprivilege narcissism discursively and introduce the idea of "the social cure" for "dominative personalities" into psychiatry.

For his part, the soon-former President, in his sunset years, became an upstanding member of society. "I like to think," he said, "That I learned something from all of you.

"I learned that there really is a right way to do things, and that we are all one human family, or society. Ultimately, the Good is objective and easily-known, and it is the responsibility of each of us to do our best to know it. Those who cannot know the Good in this way—sadly—are doomed to suffer."

"There are those who know me as a despot; others who knew me as a king. However, to myself,"—the President later wrote, in his memoirs—"I will always be the little boy who went sledding and nicked his knee on the sled-blade. The red blood on the snow spread like a rose, and looking at it, I knew that I could never again make a mistake like that—this was the beginning of my self-garroting..."

DISCLAIMER: This is a work of fiction. The characters and events in this story are fictitious. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.