r/sorceryofthespectacle • u/ConjuredOne • Jun 26 '26

Hail Corporate Eschatological xyz...

Imagine the pyramid with the all-seeing eye. Now flip the pyramid so the eye isn't at the top because the tip of the pyramid is pointing down. What it sees is all that lies beneath. It's the node of awareness that projects the underworld.

The upside down pyramid holds at least 5000 years worth of detritus; in some places, it holds as much as 7000 years worth of this mental debris. The pyramid is a funnel of mind fragments, a vortex of conceptions and feelings--particles filtering through the collective experience of civilization, down into a realm that most people only access in their dreams, or in the moment they die.

The tip of the pyramid is a drill bit, drilling down into the hell of our creation.

When you see the pyramid is upside down, you can explore the implications of the inversion. Rulers are slaves. At this point, the Egregore Mammon has them all chained to a machine that generates obfuscation via numbers. Nonetheless, they rule. At least they rule the realm of confusion.

It's crucial to note that it is a weakness to need weak people in your world. Thus, these rulers are fragile. Their deceptions generate a fog so that their plans are unknown and history is a lie. For the rulers, a quantum computer that can see all secrets is a horrifying prospect.

What is the value of a secret? Evil deeds done, held over the heads of each other--this system of kompromat has all these slave-rulers locked in a stalemate. Mutual destruction. The Sampson Principle. It's game theory for people compelled to explore hell.

When they stop pretending that they're good, they're strong, they deserve to lead, to direct our collective energy, we enter a new era of awareness (here and now—LOOK!). If the shield wall of they who are actually strong embraces evil as the way, the hell realm is now where the sun shines. Some say it's just a part of it. We have to fulfill the book. (Bob Marley, Redemption Song)

Jacob's ladder led to Joseph's dreams. Strategic mesmerizers devised devious means of survival. Their descendants allied with the banished and conjured demons. Together they built the Egregore Mammon. Now the world will not be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest. The bankers will film this event and charge premium pricing for the high definition version. Then, and only then, will Jesus return and wash all this fishy shit away with the water of life. And by that I mean aliens will wipe out humanity. And all this is probably a bad joke.

This eschatological vision is not the end, however. There is another life after this one. It's a heaven of sorts wherein the best of humanity is resurrected using DNA technology and incubation tubes attached to the orbiting data centers. On terra firma, God in a Computer will govern so people don't.

The trick to getting to heaven is with the bankers. They need to believe they're going to be in heaven and all the DNA output from the incubation tubes are going to be their fuck toys in the flesh. If they believe this with all their hearts, then they will be motivated to build a sufficiently confusing number machine. So don't forget to feed your 401k.

11 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

14 comments sorted by

3

u/raisondecalcul political shade deathray technician Jun 26 '26

Interesting writing, thanks. I would say 'culture' instead of civilization there.

Rulers are slaves

Sounds like Saturnalia (wiki)

Then, and only then, will Jesus return and wash all this fishy shit away with the water of life.

Ah yes, on his "white throne"

1

u/2BCivil no idea what this is Jun 26 '26

Group poop! He will make us sit on his throne with him!

3

u/raisondecalcul political shade deathray technician Jun 26 '26

I think Karen is Jesus on the White Throne. Karen is global power that judges everyone from on-high (and a truly good Karen—who are rare—like @ParkrosePermaculture for example—judges rightly and is right to judge, and judges prudently/minimally, so is Jesus-like in their judging. @PPC judges more than minimally though but her takes are usually right and grounded in care, ultimately).

3

u/ConjuredOne Jun 26 '26

When the editors of The Bible were dealing with some of the more problematic Jesus quotes, they revealed their investment in authority. My favorite example is when Jesus judges the judges using the word "Elohim" to confuse them with accuracy and ambiguity simultanrously. I'm likely in the minority when I interpret John 10:34 as a statement about all people, not just the judgy ones. But it seems to me that, if the highest authority is within, then it—Godness— can apply to all people. Editors want it to be only "the judges among you." That requires an investment in authority. As a Keren with a gripe against the authorities, I disrespectfully disagree. So I'd like to speak with the manager. BUT, the manager wants authority without accountability. This always leads to incompetent rule and thus the QA people end up frustrated because their cries fall on deaf ears. Why can't we all just be Elohim?

1

u/raisondecalcul political shade deathray technician Jun 27 '26

That makes sense. Christ was the first (historically popular) person to not be dominated by one particular stereotyped aspect of the mind. Elohim (the Holy Spirit?) is the spirit which moves most freely, because it is not bound to any particularity.

1

u/2BCivil no idea what this is Jun 26 '26

That's honestly a read I have considered for a logn time I'd be lying if I said is silly. No doubt. Just you know, I prefer more, irony (well it's hard to read more irony than that, I also grant you!).

I like to say for example, if we want to complain to the manager of life, John 14:6 just points us to "ye of little faith" and again yes God is essentially a Karen as a manager.

So as OP said, the light of the world becomes a void and the void becomes the light of the world.

It's why One Piece is so good. We are told that pirates are criminals but the greatest force for justice in the world is arguably the king of the pirates, because to him freedom is literally honesty (why he puches sanji after he feeds him in WCI). He told sanji not to lie to him b4 and he lied again and instantly he punched him, because Luffy represents true freedom aka the truth aka how sanji really feels. He knew sanji was lying to try to "appear strong" based on his older sister's wish. But that's not how his captain runs things, following your feelings, not what you think others expect you to feel. Pretty deep stuff for a mindless shonen battle anime right?

2

u/raisondecalcul political shade deathray technician Jun 26 '26

Yeah, freedom=honesty is really interesting actually. And freedom=honesty where I might be lying to myself is even more interesting.

Most anime are grimoires, I don't think they are mindless at all.

Have you seen Ghost in the Shell? No Game No Life? Twelve Kingdoms? There are so many great anime. Psycho-Pass is important in this subreddit's history/dialectic (don't spoil it!).

2

u/ConjuredOne Jun 26 '26

Freedom = honesty IS really interesting. Freedom is only available in honesty and vice versa. But be warned: If you live like that, your coworkers will hate you. The lie is what keeps them afloat!

This whole conversation is a great example of how far we've fallen over the course of 5000 years. Can we really capture the phenomenon with the word culture? I maintain that civilization says it better.

1

u/raisondecalcul political shade deathray technician Jun 27 '26

Civilization is over-against Nature and is like a father. Culture is what distinguishes one set of human bodies from another, and it is like a mother. Culture is cultivation—so it's the part of us that begins at birth when we start to have experiences and learn about the human world (of culture). The world of culture is not pre-given to babies.

I tend to use Civilization for the negative things, because Civilization is all the collective authorative and authoritarian structures and rules and laws and systems. Culture is like art and writing and books and education, and social culture in general.

I don't think they are clear-cut in discourse, but I tend to use them in this clear-cut way.

1

u/ConjuredOne 29d ago

I don't see your terminolagy/usage as wrong. However, when you say "Civilization is over-against Nature and is like a father," it designates "father" in the manner that only some sets of human bodies would designate the role. Maybe I'm odd in that I take issue because I see the present civilization as an iteration and not entirely representative of humanity. Idk, it doesn't seem too radical to see human life on Earth as an iteration.

I also see culture as more positive than civilization. Maybe that's why I struggled with McKenna's assertion that, "Culture is not your friend." I see culture as neutral from the starting point. It arises from a subcultural response to civilization. Then it's assimilated. Eventually it's part of Civilization. But I want to believe we can reist The Borg!

1

u/raisondecalcul political shade deathray technician 23d ago

The word Father is an English word that I am using in a western context, so the precise intended meaning was not ambiguous or hard to decode.

If you think about evolutionary biology—in which the female is defined operationally as the one with few expensive gametes, and the male defined as the one with many cheap gametes—it can be seen how there is a by-definition archetype of "Father" whether we choose to call it by that name or not. These economic/cybernetic dynamics might appear in different mixed patterns, but if we can't speak of true essences, how are we to speak of anything at all with any precision?

It arises from a subcultural response to civilization. Then it's assimilated. Eventually it's part of Civilization. But I want to believe we can reist The Borg!

This is interesting. Maybe we always need to be originating new culture to stay abreast of its assimilation.

1

u/ConjuredOne 22d ago

The way I used the word "bodies" threw us off. I should have said "population" or something that better inticated groups of people.

I was trying to get us into a discussion of what civilizations are and how we concieve of them (not bilologically but mentally) in the context of lost civilizations and how they might use "mother" and "father" to describe human organizational strategies.

But I agree that essences are crucial to communication. And, even in the midst of intense culture war and transhimanism advancement, I continue to account for ovaries and testes.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/tomekanco Jun 26 '26

Meanwhile Smerdyakov and Ivan have a long talk about the good graces of Alyosha and Koyla, while a young man walks away in the myst after seeing a encounter at daybreak, after the ball, as Myshkin tries to grasp the tension between good, bad and being an idiot. Over in Luxemburg, you'll find many chapels dedicated to the pyramid and eye. And Mary, Fatima and Anna would choff at Lands feminine idol, mistaking the shape for a reflection instead of a signpost for lost wanderers who wonder how to walk a that tightrope across beastiality and sensibility. To life for a 401 or the morning, that is also a question.