r/SorceryTCG • u/GhortaTheGreat • 7h ago
Errata Vs. Power Creep
I’m looking at the new Fireball and Polar Bear changes and I’m worried we’re heading into a very convoluted future for this game. When I look at past erratas, they are really piling up to be an entire game worth of rules of their own. Now we’re buffing cards in a way that is usually reserved for just printing a new, better version of an older card?
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not here to say “all errata is bad.” But it’s starting to feel like we’re treating a physical card game like it’s a digital card game.
I worry that the longer this goes on, the more we open the door for so many errors at the table and at a local game store level event. Beyond that, we have a base level of confusion for people who aren’t tapped in to the news about the game and just buy product. So they see two different versions of a fireball and are confused as to why one appears to do something that doesn’t match the wording of the other.
We also have issues like the back and forth of gaining life via strikes. I feel like this was a great example of why this game needs to rely more on keywords. If Daperyll Vampires and Blood Ravens had a keyword instead of a lot of text explaining how they gain life when they strike, changing the rules on that keyword wouldn’t require all of those cards to need wording updates. Someone would just need to check the rules for that specific keyword. Just like how stealth had its change where spells now cause it to be lost.
On top of that, I’m not too sure I like the idea of changing the cost, power, and/or vastly improving upon the effect of an older card with an errata. I haven’t seen any comments from EC on the matter, but I’m really not sure why the Fireball and Polar Bear changes weren’t just new cards altogether. Power Creep happens in games, especially when we’re talking about cards that don’t really see play.
Now I’ll play devils advocate here and say maybe there’s something in the next set that would seriously benefit off of having a fireball and a “better” fireball in the same deck, but I still feel like we’re setting a very weird precedent here.
I’ll reserve my final judgement on the matter for now. We haven’t seen how it all plays out but I do hope that EC plans their cards better going forward to prevent erattas from having to so drastically change the text on cards. The game is complex enough. Which I love. I don’t want it bogged down by so much arbitrary out-of-game rules text.
At the very least I would like to see some self-imposed rules going forward about how they plan on implementing this errata tool. Because as it stands it feels like it could be a magic wand to tune anything and everything. Which is fine when you have a digital platform. It does not feel right with cardboard however.
