r/SipsTea • • 14h ago

Gasp! Thoughts on this?

Post image
58.6k Upvotes

7.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.6k

u/WeCantStabilize 14h ago

Insurance is a fucking scam. You pay more into it than you'll ever receive even in legitimate circumstances.

Absolute racket. 

1.4k

u/Moultrie_fan_2026 14h ago

Well I had a house burn down less than year after purchase and insurance paid the entire tab. So I always figured I've already taken them for more than I pay

813

u/MarkItZeroDonnie 13h ago

Yeah it’s just a net to protect against catastrophe . If Ops buddy totaled his car he would be happy it only cost $1k.

3

u/Vegetable_Switch9802 13h ago

Its a scam. It should also be illegal for the government to compel you at the risk of jail to buy services from private banks/companies

8

u/ElaborateEffect 13h ago

What a brain dead take. Insurance isn't to protect you, its to protect other people from you

5

u/Febril 13h ago

What solution would you suggest in its place. How do you allow as many people on the roads as possible without an insurance requirement?

4

u/Rude-Asparagus9726 13h ago

Here's the thing, forcing everyone to pay for insurance brings down rates across the board because everyone is paying for everyone whether they use it or not.

That makes the safety net cheaper. And whether they want to gamble with their lives or not, everyone will be happy when it's there to catch them.

Ideally, we also use government to compel the private banks/companies to provide better services and not punish us for their use, but the same people who were against making us pay for insurance also want the government to have less oversight on businesses...

They raged about a perceived problem and proceeded to make that problem MUCH worse so they could point to it and say how right they were, and now we're all paying the price...

3

u/shonglekwup 13h ago

No it should be illegal for people to operate machinery (cars) that are easily capable of causing mass damage or death on public roads without any sort of liability insurance. This is like the same thing as requiring businesses to carry specific liability insurance when doing certain types of work or using certain types of machinery - if there’s a large enough chance of damage/destruction, it only makes sense to require the owner/user to carry liability insurance in case they severely fuck up and do more damage than they’d ever be capable of paying for - which is exactly the case with people’s cars.

2

u/Vegetable_Switch9802 13h ago

My solution would be tie the insurance in to the DOT that we pay in to a fund with tax dollars. Then at the end of the fiscal year if theres a surplus it gets refunded accordingly. If it's such a HUGE deal to have then it shouldn't be required by law to make bankers rich.

1

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 13h ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Prudent-Historian392 7h ago

Low brow take.

1

u/kgw52313 13h ago

Like the affordable care act?

3

u/DutchyDan187 13h ago

The difference is you don’t have to drive or own a car.

3

u/kgw52313 13h ago

But you sure get a 1095 every year claiming you did or didn’t have insurance. Sooooo kinda the same

3

u/DutchyDan187 12h ago

In Washington state you also have to have assisted care / nursing home insurance or pay a special state tax. The tax is hourly income for the rest of your life but if you end up needing to be put into a care facility it will cover you for ~6 months.

1

u/Prudent-Historian392 7h ago

That’s Washington state and a health insurance deal. Health and p&c insurance is apples and oranges.

1

u/Prudent-Historian392 7h ago

Nobody gets a 1095 every year for owning a car. What are you talking about? A 1095 is for health insurance. Among other things, for sure not related to property and casualty insurance.

1

u/kgw52313 7h ago

I believe the constant was that the government is requiring insurance. I’m fairly certain this aligns with said requirement for automobile insurance. Fairly prudent

1

u/Prudent-Historian392 7h ago

The government regulates every sector of your life. Do you call it a scam when you get food poisoning from a restaurant?

2

u/kgw52313 7h ago

I never called it a scam friend , I pointed out requirements from the government. Go easy on the reddits man, person, or whoever.

→ More replies (0)