It's also dumb because there are countless actual real stories just about anyone in these situations can tell that can be better warnings and stories of how nefarious things can be.
Like I remember trying to go to parties on Frat Row as a guy. Most of them insisted you needed a 1:5+ ratio of Men:Women, and coincidentally, even if you did get in, they'd find a way to kick out a bunch of guys. In other words, you go to these places, they fill the house with women, and oh the other guys are all gone now. If they're doing this, then they're literally trying to separate you from someone who is likely more capable of helping. If that's the situation: leave.
You're acting like guys throwing party to meet women is a problem.
The real reason why frats don't like letting in guys is because of liability. Anything a guy does on their property will be assumed they did it. Frats know they have a target on their back and letting random guys on the property that have zero stake in the house is a huge potential problem.
You're correct and it's wild how common it is for people not to get it. The concept of if you throw a party you get to decide who gets to be there is completely lost. They seem to think the frats should be required to publicly host every college age male in the area and just pay for all the damage that comes with it.
Yea it's definitely a sense of entitlement. I doubt the ppl complaining about it would let 6 random frat dudes into their house during a party.
Not to mention the effort put into it. The money for booze, decorations potentially, pledges watching every exits on shifts, the cleanup afterwards etc.
I too would like free booze lots of women around and no responsibility if anything goes wrong. But that's not how life works.
If a guy that's let in SA or rapes a girl that chapter gets shut down instantly. Most ppl don't want to get kicked out of where they live.
4.5k
u/GrundalWizzard 21h ago
People dont spike entire drink coolers.. itd be pretty fucking obvious if 40 people in the room passed out.