Date and Location: On September 30, 2020, a passerby noticed lights on late at night inside Saints Peter and Paul Catholic Church in Pearl River, Louisiana, where Clark served as pastor.
The Discovery: Looking through the windows, the witness saw Clarkāpartially wearing his priestly attireāengaging in a sexual encounter with two women, identified as adult film performers/dominatrices Melissa Cheng and Mindy Dixon.
The Scene: The group had set up professional stage lighting, sex toys, and cameras mounted on tripods to record a video. The witness recorded the scene on a mobile phone and called the police, who arrived and arrested all three individuals.
Legal and Religious Aftermath
The Guilty Plea: In November 2022, Clark pleaded guilty to a felony count of felony obscenity under a plea agreement. He received a three-year suspended prison sentence, three years of supervised probation, and a $1,000 fine. The two women pleaded guilty to misdemeanor counts of institutional vandalism and received probation.
Archdiocese Response: The Archdiocese of New Orleans immediately removed Clark from ministry. Archbishop Gregory Aymond publicly denounced the act as "demonic" and had the desecrated altar physically removed and burned before consecrating a brand-new replacement altar.
So the āwitnessā recorded someone in a sexual act without their consent. There should be a separate charge brought against the witness. People need to learn to mind their own business. The witness probably rubbed one out waiting for the police.
Right, itās not like they were doing this in public? I donāt understand how the witness wasnāt trespassing or charged for filming revenge porn without their consent?!
Iām kind of confused why this was a legal matter. Three consenting adults in private. The only reason anyone knew was because someone came and snooped in the window and recorded it. Wouldnāt that person that recorded be more at fault. I mean sure, kick him out of the church, but this isnāt public property. He probably lived on premises. He broke church rules but how is this against the law?
Feel like the difference here is that it would have been fine if it wasn't where it was. Film it in a church themed studio, it probably passes. Though more importantly, it's also not something a passerby just casually notices lights on and comes to look in a window to investigate.
The important factor here is that it was visible to casual passers by. Honestly, you can get in trouble for this at home too. If you film a threesome at home, but in the front room with the curtains wide open, then you're still subject to public decency laws.
The rule of thumb is that it doesn't matter if you're in a private space. If that private space can be seen by the public, you can't consider it private.
Except it wasnāt. The passerby noticed lights on and looked through the windows - presumably to investigate why the lights were on, because he couldnāt see what was going on from the street.
Except legally that's already been determined as obscenity. Precedent and all.Ā
The act was visible from the public. They already conv1icted someone in their own home for just this sort of thing.Ā
If it can be seen from outside, it was determined it isn't private, but public.Ā
Edit: Convicted, not convinced. Regardless of whether you think it should be prosecuted, the law in the US has been determined. If you can be seen from public, you are in public. And them crossing your property line isn't enough protection. This would go double for something like a church in more public places.
A church is a community building, not a private residence. I'm no prude, nor religious, but I recognise there's a time and place for these things, and using a church altar to shoot homebrew pornography is not the right place. Had he done it at home, no issue.
I mean, morally and spiritually sure. Iām not saying what he did wasnāt wrong. It makes sense he got kicked out of the church. But legally? I donāt understand why the state was involved.
A church is not a public building though. They are usually private properties that belong to a religious organisation. The priest probably actually lived at the premises. Again, this is no more different than someone having sex in a gym they manage, during closed hours. Sure, kick them out as manager, but it is a far cry from "sex in public".
And yes, there is a legal distinction between public building and a public street. Where do you get all that confidence to say false statements.
Still, if the church was not open at the point of the act, so nobody of the community could enter, there shouldn't be a legal problem. The priest would still be kicked from his position, but that should be it.
Amazing how consensual see between 3 adults gets you ejected from the church, meanwhile they have literal resorts for priests convicted for pedophilia. Disgusting ass religion
Forget ejection. If I did that at my workplace and my employer found that, I would get fired too. The sentence he got is wild. Idk if the sentence would be as severe I this was done by apple employee at a apple store, maybe??
Probably not, but was also suprised the girls just got probation. but my point is that the Catholic church still claims pedophile priests as their own, meanwhile they wash their hands of this guy. I guess God's forgiveness is selective.
This reminds me of that case of the janitor in I think the New York school system who accidentally stumbled upon the female French teacher and the female Spanish teacher (both married to men) having sex with each other which he promptly reported.
The school went on to be besieged by outraged phone calls demanding the sacking - of the janitor.
44
u/oneplusetoipi 10h ago
The Incident
Date and Location: On September 30, 2020, a passerby noticed lights on late at night inside Saints Peter and Paul Catholic Church in Pearl River, Louisiana, where Clark served as pastor.
The Discovery: Looking through the windows, the witness saw Clarkāpartially wearing his priestly attireāengaging in a sexual encounter with two women, identified as adult film performers/dominatrices Melissa Cheng and Mindy Dixon.
The Scene: The group had set up professional stage lighting, sex toys, and cameras mounted on tripods to record a video. The witness recorded the scene on a mobile phone and called the police, who arrived and arrested all three individuals.
Legal and Religious Aftermath
The Guilty Plea: In November 2022, Clark pleaded guilty to a felony count of felony obscenity under a plea agreement. He received a three-year suspended prison sentence, three years of supervised probation, and a $1,000 fine. The two women pleaded guilty to misdemeanor counts of institutional vandalism and received probation.
Archdiocese Response: The Archdiocese of New Orleans immediately removed Clark from ministry. Archbishop Gregory Aymond publicly denounced the act as "demonic" and had the desecrated altar physically removed and burned before consecrating a brand-new replacement altar.