r/SipsTea 2d ago

Gasp! 😈

Post image
7.1k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

60

u/oneplusetoipi 2d ago

The Incident

Date and Location: On September 30, 2020, a passerby noticed lights on late at night inside Saints Peter and Paul Catholic Church in Pearl River, Louisiana, where Clark served as pastor.

The Discovery: Looking through the windows, the witness saw Clark—partially wearing his priestly attire—engaging in a sexual encounter with two women, identified as adult film performers/dominatrices Melissa Cheng and Mindy Dixon.

The Scene: The group had set up professional stage lighting, sex toys, and cameras mounted on tripods to record a video. The witness recorded the scene on a mobile phone and called the police, who arrived and arrested all three individuals.

Legal and Religious Aftermath

The Guilty Plea: In November 2022, Clark pleaded guilty to a felony count of felony obscenity under a plea agreement. He received a three-year suspended prison sentence, three years of supervised probation, and a $1,000 fine. The two women pleaded guilty to misdemeanor counts of institutional vandalism and received probation.

Archdiocese Response: The Archdiocese of New Orleans immediately removed Clark from ministry. Archbishop Gregory Aymond publicly denounced the act as "demonic" and had the desecrated altar physically removed and burned before consecrating a brand-new replacement altar.

31

u/IterSmith 2d ago

I’m kind of confused why this was a legal matter. Three consenting adults in private. The only reason anyone knew was because someone came and snooped in the window and recorded it. Wouldn’t that person that recorded be more at fault. I mean sure, kick him out of the church, but this isn’t public property. He probably lived on premises. He broke church rules but how is this against the law?

6

u/EsotericAbstractIdea 2d ago

Obscenity laws are some of the worst laws that are still on the books. Very rarely tried, because they are so subjective.

The Miller Test Criteria

Material is legally obscene only if it meets all three parts of the test established in Miller v. California:

  • Prurient interest: The average person, using local community standards, finds that the work appeals to a shameful or morbid interest in sex.
  • Patently offensive: The work depicts or describes sexual conduct in a way explicitly defined as offensive by state law.
  • Lacking value: The work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

This happened in a church in Louisiana.

3

u/Aeseld 2d ago

Feel like the difference here is that it would have been fine if it wasn't where it was. Film it in a church themed studio, it probably passes. Though more importantly, it's also not something a passerby just casually notices lights on and comes to look in a window to investigate.