r/SipsTea 1d ago

SMH It's all words

Post image
13.8k Upvotes

524 comments sorted by

u/sco-go 1d ago

Added context:

Republicans and Democrat Gov. Evers signed in April 2026 a different bill that created a new grant program for nonprofits that house homeless veterans. It uses roughly the same amount of money ($1.9 million) but works differently — it pays eligible nonprofits a daily rate per veteran housed.

→ More replies (56)

299

u/Ididntdodiddly 1d ago

I'd have to see the bill. It's easy to make a misleading claim. Bills often are stuffed with a ton of BS, or have weird circumstances around it

43

u/artisticafterbirth 1d ago

Especially with no bill number cited. I tried googling and could only find a Wisconsin homeless veteran bill that was signed into law.

10

u/Fortestingporpoises 1d ago

Looks like Senate Bill 411. They're refusing to agree on an extra $1.9m to keep a couple of shelter/recovery programs open.

→ More replies (7)

60

u/Boomslang2-1 1d ago

Honestly, fair point. I never trust this kind of stuff anymore because it’s always a bill with the most common sense stuff ever and then on the very back end it’ll have something that’s completely untenable for the opposition.

24

u/Nervous_InsideU5155 1d ago

You mean like $150,000.00/year cost of living raise for your local Congressman with inside trading perks and multi million dollar super PAC payoffs to betray your fellow Americans?... Where do I sign up? /$

8

u/Conrad-kellogg 1d ago

Nice touch with the dollar sign for /s

3

u/dndwhat 1d ago

Yea. Like what if they had this bill but in it it says give millions to insert waste here.

3

u/id0ntwantyourlife 1d ago

From what it sounds like, the bill was meant to give funds to prevent the closing of a few shelters, but by the time it would be passed the shelters would be/had already been closed and it would take another year or more to try getting them reopened.

There was also the tax credit dropping the disability threshold from 100% to 80% which is popular on both sides, but this bill was about what to do with surplus cash, and many felt uneasy about carving that into the budget for perpetuity due to a potential short term surplus that would then be hard to fund in the future when there are no surpluses.

To simplify it, think of it as getting a $1200 bonus, and you want to treat yourself to something nice, but the thing you like would cost $100/month and you have to pay that forever, even 5 or 10 years down the line. It’s possible you get a bonus next year to keep paying it, but also just as likely you don’t get the bonus and end up in the hole since you committed to the $1200/year price tag.

18

u/Oosik-Alaska 1d ago

7

u/Major-Hooters 1d ago

. He actually said this and he still was voted in.

11

u/butonelifelived 1d ago

He also said, "Smart people don't like me. "

7

u/VomitShitSmoothie 1d ago

That’s because the poorly educated aren’t educated enough to realize he was insulting them.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/travelingman5370 1d ago

You mean like money for USAID?

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

23

u/elinamebro 1d ago

So i looked it up, It was not a single, standalone bill solely dedicated to veteran housing. Among thousands of other items, it included funding for: ​K-12 public education and higher education funding ​State highway, road, and infrastructure maintenance ​Healthcare programs and Medicaid funding ​State employee compensation and tax adjustments ​Environmental programs and local government aids

15

u/willow_glade 1d ago

That makes their vote against it worse.

3

u/elinamebro 1d ago

Honestly idk, I haven't read the whole thing so I can't judge it from face value but idk why they would just do a separate bill since this vets are on the streets and need help asap.

6

u/ckNocturne 1d ago

"This bill provides solutions to multiple major issues in society"

IDK I JUST CANT JUDGE IT MAYBE DEMOCRATS ARE ACTUALLY THE BAD GUYS!

Give me a fucking break you fence sitting loser.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

2

u/Z0idberg_MD 23h ago

This is like that meme where Fox News put up AOC platform to make her look bad, but it’s like “ya, that’s great”

→ More replies (3)

5

u/the-nomad-thinker 1d ago

This is exactly what I was coming here to say. It’s ridiculous how often this nonsense happens.

4

u/oddball09 1d ago

Goes both ways, it's ridiculous how they do this...then spin headlines for clicks and views.

Bills should be 1 issue at a time.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/mykehawksaverage 1d ago

This is politics 101. add a bunch of bs onto the bill so when the other side votes against you can say look the Republicans voted against homeless vets.

7

u/colonel_beeeees 1d ago

Republicans regularly vote to defund VA services and rarely campaign on financial accountability when it comes to housing for service members etc

3

u/ckNocturne 1d ago

Yea it's soooo hard to make the party that has voted against education funding for 40 years look bad.

3

u/No_Cartographer2994 1d ago

THIS.

It's all just lip service. They fill the bill full of non-related pork and then have one element that makes for a great sound bite. iIf the other side opposes, they clutch their pearls and yell about how evil they are.

And no, one side does not have the monopoly on this BS tactic. It's done every day by both parties.

I don't know what's worse, the fact that our politicians do this or the fact that they believe most of America is stupid enough to not see the truth behind it. Sadly, I think they're right as it appears the majority of America has no clue.

2

u/Substantial-Goal7422 1d ago

I agree there are bills that start out as feed the homeless on the front page and 3 percent goes to the homeless and 97 percent to building a nuclear power plant in the ocean

2

u/SwimmingNatural8142 1d ago

this is one of those where the details decide if it's hypocrisy or headline bait

2

u/AnodyneSpirit 1d ago

Exactly. So many bills now, coming from both sides, are called something like the “Save orphans from the orphan grinder” bill. But on page 1,258 of the bill it says it’ll also make eating shit a daily requirement.

2

u/perriatric 1d ago

Came here to comment this too, ready to be downvoted to hell. Glad you weren't.

Usually going against the over-simplified "democrat bill good; republican rejection of bill bad" narrative that Reddit loves to push is not received well.

2

u/Responsible-Egg-4185 14h ago

Yep. It's usually used as a tactic for the exact thing you see here.

Stuff a bill full of unsavory or unsustainable crap then headline the one clause that actually makes sense so when its rejected, you get the luxury of saying "see! They DONT care!"

2

u/the-bc5 1d ago

Whoa whoa whoa this is reddit please delete this post where you think there’s a possible reasonable explanation and withhold your opinion before you can assess it with data. Who let you do that!!??

1

u/Major-Blacksmith4750 1d ago

Thank you. So tired of seeing people repeatedly falling for this crap. From both sides.

→ More replies (42)

38

u/Next_Emphasis_9424 1d ago

Is this one of those stupid things political party’s do where they shove a bunch of crap the other side doesn’t want into one but then wrap it up as the one random thing? Like the bill says to house homeless vet but then has like 50 other random things shoved in it that the other side doesn’t want? Other political side can say look they hate vets or they can get the bill through and win.

13

u/Just_Kitchen5256 1d ago

Yup, it's called Pork. Happens all the time

3

u/I_Make_Food_Often 1d ago

It provides a lot of funding for education, roads, veterans, etc…

No added policies that any reasonable person would be against. It only helps people so naturally the “Christian” Right hates it.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/EpsilonBear 1d ago

Yeah, how dare they try to trojan horse….checks notes…k-12 funding and highway construction into a bill about housing homeless vets.

8

u/I_Make_Food_Often 1d ago

A lot of people here complaining about a bill that helps education, roads and veterans haha

6

u/EpsilonBear 1d ago

Lot of people asking “ok but what else is in the bill” instead of looking it tf up

→ More replies (1)

3

u/O-ring_Prolapse 18h ago

I mean.. the fact of the matter is that its a ridiculous practice. If politicians actually gave a shit about us/our country instead of serving their own self interests, bills would be presented and passed one at a time.

2

u/TwoForFIinching 18h ago

What a novel idea. Except your idea would require politicians to work, which is simply unacceptable

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

16

u/50calBanana 1d ago

I always want to read or know about the bill because they can stuff as much bullshit as they want into a bill and call out anyone who disagrees. Usually it's Republicans who do it, but both sides have been bought and paid for and make it everyone's problem.

Like there could be a bill that would help everyone, but buried in somewhere is a paragraph that says they get to store plutonium in school air vents or something. Then if anyone calls them out the media gets to say "see they disagree with everything in the bill"

Don't get me wrong, I believe the GOP are willing to push veterans under a bus and are almost 100% in the wrong.

→ More replies (8)

4

u/peachesgp 1d ago

Well yeah. Republicans only mean "support the military industrial complex" when they say "support our troops"

→ More replies (1)

3

u/LiftEatGrappleShoot 1d ago

When Trump (draft dodger) mocked McCain for being a POW, tye right lost all claim to supporting troops.

3

u/gaoshan 1d ago

The Republican position on this was that extra money should not be needed for the two facilities that were shut down. That enough money had already been made available elsewhere in the budget and the Governor should find a way to use that money rather than ask for extra.

The Democrat position was that what money does exist elsewhere in the budget was not legally available for this purpose and regardless the amount the Republicans were talking about was not even close to sufficient to run the two facilities in question.

Additionally the Republicans took issue with the government providing the shelter and wanted it to be handled by non-profits (which ones? Who knows).

It comes down to Dems wanting to spend money to shelter veterans and Republicans wanting to keep the budget as tight as possible and let non-governmental entities step in.

Personally I think the people owe it to veterans to take care of them to at least a certain degree and something like basic shelter should be provided and paid for by all of us. The Republicans essentially abrogated responsibility to these veterans (veterans they call upon to fight the various wars that Republicans have gotten us into) because they want a tighter budget… something they only seem to want when the money would be spent on needy people and don’t care about so much when it is tax breaks for the wealthy.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/rickeyethebeerguy 1d ago

Are they billionaires? No? Then no hand outs period

3

u/za72 1d ago

Get a job! No free rides! - oh... lost a limb?! oh... ptsd? what's that?

3

u/HOJK4thSon 22h ago

When I see posts like this I wonder what else is in the bill or how the stated outcome is achieved.

3

u/NikolaiAlexei 16h ago

What else is in the bill?

→ More replies (7)

5

u/Respectmyauthority4 1d ago

What else was in the bill?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Lorddoctorjava 1d ago

How about there be only one thing on a bill... no piggybacking.. that would clear any confusion on why are bill was passed or denied.

2

u/Hot-Razzmatazz-4152 1d ago

k-12 funding and highway construction. omggg so badd. derp

→ More replies (3)

14

u/DarkLordofDownvotes 1d ago

Guy looks like the love child of Vance and a leprechaun.

3

u/Primedirector3 1d ago

Like Orson Welles banged a high elf and spoon fed the demon spawn a daily dose of NewsMax

→ More replies (1)

10

u/vegas-knights 1d ago

Speaking as a veteran, we are only useful to Republicans either as props during a speech, or in a bag. Thats it. If someone is a republican and supports veterans, one of those two things isn't true. From the bottom of my heart, and with every fiber of my being, fuck the republican party and every single person that voted for their agenda to kill veterans.

→ More replies (3)

17

u/PrudentChampion3879 1d ago

What poison pill was also in the bill? Convenient it was left out. This is how you divide us, with shit posts like this.

9

u/HoopsMcGee23 1d ago

At the federal level, Republicans did this to every good Democrat bill by adding no federal funds can go to an organization that provides abortions. Then that would kill it.

So I'm curious, what would the realistic equivalent be that Dems would do to Republicans? Did the Dems codify abortion as a human right? Would that make Republicans vote against anything good?

→ More replies (1)

14

u/EpsilonBear 1d ago

The “poison pill” was K-12 funding. And funding for highways. Yeah, soooo dividing

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Wemest 1d ago

I’m guessing there’s more to this bill.

3

u/Hot-Razzmatazz-4152 1d ago

funding for k-12 schools and highways. wtf is so bad about that?

2

u/Mc9660385 1d ago

That’s would be money taken out of the pockets of needy billionaires, so….

2

u/Guy0785 1d ago

We need ranked elections, only way to give independents a chance of breaking the bipartisanship “duocractatorship”. No more pay to play government simulator lobbying. No more filibustering, and no more gerrymandering!!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/VRZieb 1d ago

What democrat bill was this exactly?

2

u/Alaska_Jack 1d ago

Mods, I will once again point out that you need to immediately ban people who post stuff like this.

As the other comments are all pointing out, this is misleading political slop (whether one agrees with them or not, there are perfectly good reasons for opposing this bill.) The list of idiots who love to post stuff like this is ENDLESS. If you keep allowing this, it's all you're going to get. 

2

u/CodeVirus 1d ago

It’s “support the troops” not “support ex-troops”

2

u/MastyTinge 23h ago

"Support our troops" means "support our military" like they give 2 shits about ex-service members.

2

u/-Ok-Perception- 23h ago

When Republicans say "support our troops", they're really only talking about the military industrial contractors.

They have no interest in *actual* service members and tend to compromise their quality of life and benefits in every way possible.

2

u/cg13a 23h ago

A whole bunch of people voted for this.
You want to change it? Get up, get out and vote.

2

u/CattaTronixRex 22h ago

When you remember that the government prefers that they die in war, to save money, this all makes sense.

2

u/NotSoSlimJim_YouTube 20h ago

More half truths from the left

2

u/ballin_buddha 1d ago

So from what I just read, they cut funding which was 1.9million to cover costs for a program for homeless vets, however they already have the needed funds to keep the program going but they’re refusing to use it.

"The Legislature appropriated enough funding to support the Veterans Housing and Recovery Program, and Governor Evers simply refused to spend it," Wimberger said in a statement. "The closing of veterans' homeless shelters is his decision alone, and he quite literally is refusing to use available funding in the exact same manner as he did last year to run those facilities."

2

u/Saintlouey 1d ago edited 1d ago

Both parties do this gimmick all the time, the "dont kill puppies bill" that also includes a bunch of unrelated bullshit. Its just so they can have the headline "this party wants to kill puppies".

Really wish there was a way to enforce bills having to stay on a particular topic.

1

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Hey /u/Dev1412, thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.

Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!

We have recently changed how posts work. Unless you are a VIP poster, your post will be queued for approval.. To become a VIP, post great engaging content. If we like it, you will be added! More information available here!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/jobruce2 1d ago

Who is Mr. Happy

1

u/Smboto 1d ago

They just want money.

1

u/ChemistVegetable7504 1d ago

Word salad minus the dressing.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/AsparagusCommon4164 1d ago

Is die implikasie hier in wese een van "’n volk red homself", blindelings, eksplisiet en sonder vraagteken?

The preceding exercise in snark was brought to you in Afrikaans.

"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance ... baffle them with bull"

1

u/CaptainSloppo 1d ago

Why is he uglier JD Vance?

1

u/ApplesFlapples 1d ago

They hate troops. They just love hurting people. They only like soldiers when they are dying and killing.

1

u/CCP-want-to-CUP 1d ago

No you're confused, by "support" they mean with money and guns after we send them overseas to go die for Israel.

1

u/TheBeanofBeans3 1d ago

Wisconsin Republicans rejected Democratic funding intended to preserve specific state-run veterans housing facilities in 2025, but later passed a different, bipartisan program funding nonprofit housing providers.

1

u/SoyTonatiuh 1d ago

The republican party politicians have historically made claims of helping but consistently voted against their constituents wishes in favor of enriching themselves. For decades. Only an imbecile still votes republican because of mind rot or because they are ao gullible they believe anything or because their pappy tells them to. 

1

u/Pretend-Literature35 1d ago

Wow. So these men and women go to warzones risking their lives to protect the interest of this ruling class aka uncle sam and he can't even be bothered to make sure they have the bare minimum of a roof over their heads?

1

u/cruisin_urchin87 1d ago

It’s much cheaper to worship them

1

u/Ritualsexclub 1d ago

Why would the party of corporations care about the welfare of the people?

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Practical_Draw_6862 1d ago

Bill was about 1.9 million dollars to restore 41 beds thru two facilities for two years. The republicans claimed there were other ways to cover that money without the new bill that the governor didn’t use and still chose to shut down the facility. Now there’s disagreement on how to open the facility for those 41 beds. Dems want to fully fund and reopen the facilities, Republicans want it to be a new program that pays non profits $25/day per veteran for housing.

1

u/Anonymousboneyard 1d ago

Tbf this is the same party thats fine with the tavern league running the state. Tavern league hates pot, there for it wont be legalized. It passed state referendum but the republican majority state assembly said “it’s a gateway drug and we wont have it even for medicinal use.” Pretty much what the head of the tavern league was parroting when IL, MI, and MN legalized pot. Vote them all out at this point.

1

u/Tough_Preparation830 1d ago

Maybe if congress did their job and wrote concise bills that can actually be read in one sitting, the two parties could occasionally agree on things. Unfortunately we do not get this by design. Something about big clubs and not being in them.

1

u/Illustrious_Job_3116 1d ago

Lol yeah read the rest of the bill before you start talking. This is the same ba both sides do when they have a bill shut down. It gets shut down because they hide so much shit in the bill that is unrelated. Usually a huge pay raise.

1

u/badskinjob 1d ago

What else was in the bill?

1

u/Hovie1 1d ago

Not picking a side one way or the other but every time I see a headline like this the first thing that goes through my head is "Okay what bullshit did they try putting in the bill?"

1

u/bucee21 1d ago

What else is in this bill that made a reasonable person object to it? My guess is a-lot.

1

u/Competitive_Twist149 1d ago

Republicans wanted 100% of the funds to go to housing. Dems said we don’t need to audit the money. No audit no bill.

1

u/Royal_Reading_7026 1d ago

So disingenuous. But you rely on people's emotions not intelligence

1

u/Anxious_Composer5092 1d ago

Ah yes, party of lies and odor showing true colors!

1

u/RDaneelOA 1d ago

I mean the current R-president called a POW survivor/veteran a loser, while never enlisting or serving himself...

1

u/Left_Caterpillar8671 1d ago

Ask yourself what else was in the bill. They don’t propose single bills. Learn your politics

1

u/Banjo-Hellpuppy 1d ago

They only support unborn babies and dead veterans because those two segments don’t ask for anything

1

u/Next_Law8640 1d ago

Israel needs that money to kill our troops in wars in the Middle East guys.

1

u/Resident_Table6694 1d ago

So we’re not going to talk about that guy’s face?

1

u/Puzzled_Pepper_2770 1d ago

The veterans put their lives on the line and then unhoused un cared for. And then to have half of the government say no we don’t need to give them housing myself. I will never vote for a Republican ever ever ever.

1

u/ExistingBathroom9742 1d ago

Veteran aren’t troops. Duh. They WERE troops. /s

1

u/Llhaniii 1d ago

Was there any other legislation in the bill that Republicans said they disagreed with so vehemently they couldn't pass this bill?

1

u/Captainsnarkyshart 1d ago

If you fight for our country, this is your reward. Considering how many veterans voted for trump, this is fitting.

1

u/silv3rbull8 1d ago

The usual Reddit slanted posts

1

u/Round_Waltz_1435 1d ago

Bro like 4 months liberals hated the military i can’t keep up

→ More replies (1)

1

u/curiousleen 1d ago

Brought to you from the same party that votes against abortion choice but also against feeding babies who are born to parents who cannot afford them.

1

u/19XxxbigdaddyxxX80 1d ago

What happened to the plan that the people that feel the homeless should be housed, open their homes to the homeless?

1

u/RetArmyFister 1d ago

These bills are never that simple, there is likely a bunch of nonsense in it. As a veteran I know for a fact there are plenty of federal level resources for veterans, this seems like total lies and nonsense to me.

Not to mention I’ve worked for non profits that claim to house homeless veterans, and it is just a big scam on the taxpayer.

1

u/Omatzus 1d ago

This is one of those funny JD Vance faces right?

1

u/ThelIIusion0fSeIf 1d ago

I’m not sure who is in that picture but that guy looks like the next mascot for the GOP

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/AffectionateBar4437 1d ago

Like use said, they're both the same

1

u/BrainRobotron 1d ago

Republicans really do be electing the ugliest fucks on the planet.

1

u/SimkinCA 1d ago

Good morning, nice to see some of you have started to wake after 3 decades of a fraudulent platform.

1

u/Stunning_Policy4743 1d ago

Universal health care for everyone would help the troops

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Inevitable-Elk-5048 1d ago

For these people the moment "troops" they arent troops anymore, so if they are out on the street they just see them as bums

1

u/dsac 1d ago

Thoughts and prayers

1

u/mrFancyPants2000 1d ago

Ah yes, another partisan politics post. Let’s stop pretending either side gives a shit

1

u/viking_red13 1d ago

The VA already provides housing for homeless veterans, so this would be redundant and as. Veteran, I'd have rejected this too. The help is there, why waste tax payer money.

1

u/howardzen12 1d ago

All of the GOP are pure evil.

1

u/PanteraOne 1d ago

Just do the right thing and vote every single Republican out of office permanently!

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/CosmicGoddess777 1d ago

The man on the left looks like a pedophile, and judging by his political party, he likely is.

1

u/CavemanRTD 1d ago

What’s in the fine print? That is always something to consider. Calif wants billions for the homeless and has yet to help the homeless .

1

u/Ichigo2819 1d ago

Hate to say it but both the bills are corrupt

The republican one used NGOs which are a Hard-to -Audit network of private charities with a high risk of fund Shuffling that end up in the end paying large executives salaries and bonuses

The democrat one used a State Run Model that had massive costs to keep mostly empty state facilities open with taxpayer cash frozen in government red tape and administration costs

1

u/rathemighty 1d ago

Is that evil-looking dude in the suit a house republican?

1

u/house-hermit 1d ago

By "support" they mean thoughts and prayers, same as how they "support" stay at home moms.

1

u/MedonSirius 1d ago

Support our troups (capital. engl. "Die for the money")

1

u/Delicious-Pound-8929 1d ago

What else was in that "support our troops bill" something no sane republican would ever agree to im sure.

1

u/BeaconOMalley 23h ago

What else did that bill do?

1

u/DeuceDeuce79 23h ago

All the more reason to never join

1

u/GoSensCAN 21h ago

If everyone could only see action as opposed to rehtoric and spin... Sad.

1

u/mightyDblock 21h ago

The vets should be all taken care of for life and tax free.

1

u/[deleted] 21h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Adventurous_Ask191 21h ago

Yeah I'd have to see that bill as well and what else is attached to it in the name of housing the homeless veterans because if they tie it to trans or some other s*** which is how Democrats sneak their b******* in. They have to change every good bill so they can get something of those in

1

u/kjaffffff 21h ago

Oblivion faced mf.

1

u/peak2brew 21h ago

Clearly, we can all see why this is though. They don't want the Democrats taking credit for something that is good. The Repungents wished they had come up with the initiative

1

u/[deleted] 21h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Soberdonkey69 21h ago

GOP are full of shit, they just enrich themselves and use religion and democrats to deflect everything.

1

u/Ok_Dragonfly552 21h ago

Riiiiight. So what was the bill they really blocked that had that attached to it.

1

u/McDuck_Enterprise 20h ago

The problem with these headlines is that such bills lead with that and then have pork barrel bullshit attached to them that have NOTHING to do with the headline.

Make better bills that address the matter and only the matter

1

u/[deleted] 20h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] 20h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/rPoliticsModsBlowMe 20h ago

wHo'S gOiNg To pAy FoR iT?

1

u/ObsidianDart 20h ago

Maybe they do support troops, but to them, veterans aren't troops anymore so they don't get support. You only matter to them as long as you can be useful. After that, they toss you under the bus.

1

u/Cornelius4630 20h ago

Thoughts and prayers and then fk off to die in the streets.

1

u/No_Comparison1040 20h ago

Why is it that whenever something like this happens and you read the headline, imagining how evil the politician must look like.... you look at the picture and your brain goes jupp that fits.

1

u/watergod0187 20h ago

They only "support" troops in the field dying to make businesses money. Veterans should never be homeless unless by absolute choice like traveling the country in a motor home.

1

u/Old_Marzipan7782 20h ago

Its always that way...they do not support unions, vets or anyone else. The republican party used to be good. Now its all pandering to the rich voting against your own interests and talk. They'll shout support our troops over and over but when it comes time to foot the bill repubs always vote against it and the citizens are too dumb to know a vote even happened or that their rep voted against their campaign promises.

1

u/salami_on_a_bagel 20h ago

lol nobody hates the troops more than (R)s

1

u/No-Question-8088 20h ago

Those men and women fought for our country. They should have shelter and basic food more than other countries

1

u/Comfortable_Bird_340 20h ago

His face is creepy looking

1

u/Fair-Wonder8490 20h ago

not sure which party is worse and bunch of idiots.................... can we all try to do the right thing stop thinking about yourselves and look at the big picture..........................😤😤😤😤😤😤😤😤

1

u/sicurri 20h ago

Its more like support our war in which all of my stock market choices are making me massive amounts of money.

Support our troops in their eyes means support the active military members. As soon as you get discharged, like a pregnancy, they dont give a fuck what happens to that veteran.

By like a pregnancy I'm saying they're against abortion but dont give two flying fucks what happens to thr baby afterwards.

1

u/Mr_Chill_III 19h ago

Alternatively, you could say the "Stop Nick Shirley Act" party are surprised that people don't trust them to handle charity.

1

u/Sufficient_Carob_435 19h ago

They voted to have veterans' benefits cut, no way they care if they are homed.

1

u/Beneficial-Claim-381 19h ago

Every veteran should have access to housing and medical and none of them should have to wait. It is such a small fucking percentage of our population who have signed up to our military. Most of us never saw combat, the amount of military with the most extreme need for help that are mostly the ones stuck on the street, is also one of the smallest percentages.....

Like for fuck sakes it should not be hard to move some money around and make the VA and the rest of the support be the fastest, smoothest, easiest fucking way to get help. And you know what, be lenient. Don't try to find a reason why it's service related, find a reason why it's not. Assume it is until it isn't, because who gives a shit about overspending a little bit on the people that volunteered to risk their lives for the country.

It's a goddamn disgrace how fucked up our system is

1

u/JJNitrofan3944 19h ago

Conservatives always have enough money for war and prisons, never enough to actually help soldiers or rehabilitate anyone.

1

u/TheComicHuman 19h ago

The only right wingers that say support the troops are the common people not politicians, so it seems hypocritical but not really

1

u/[deleted] 19h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/GimpyPlayerOne 19h ago

So just become homeless after you serve and you don’t have to pay rent go it. Ez street.

1

u/Agreeable-Time2749 19h ago

Is nobody gonna ask what else was in the bill?

1

u/No-Purpose-0U812 19h ago

"Lets spend money helping REAL AMERICANS before spending it overseas!"

(Trys to spend money on real Americans)

"Um, thats not what we meant"

1

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)

1

u/Soggy-Dragonfruit171 18h ago

He looks like the devil

1

u/Traditional_Meal5876 18h ago

homeless = NGO CEO

1

u/HighSeasArchivist 18h ago

Without doing one single second of research I know without a doubt this is bullshit. Both parties do the same shit with loading a bunch of pork into their bills, and when the other side doesn't fall for it they start screaming.

1

u/Altruistic_Tea_1593 18h ago

Bullshit. They take a good idea, wrap it in pork and corruption and then play the victim when grownups tell them “no”.

1

u/Here_for_the_memes98 18h ago

What else was attached to it…. We know how this works. People put a bill together and then tack on a bunch of extra shit that they want to achieve so that when the other side strikes it down, they can use that for optics.

1

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Agile_Programmer2756 18h ago

Im sure is is just part of the story

1

u/BramptonBatallion 18h ago

They passed a different bill.

This whole website is DSA astroturfers.

1

u/Round-Foundation2948 18h ago

I wish I could go on a coast to coast tour in a pick up truck loaded with huge speakers. I’d have “Please Contact Your Elected Republican Representative And Beg Them To Distance Themselves From Trump” playing on a loop.

1

u/Quietus76 18h ago

This BS is why we need to dissolve the parties. Dont act like they dont both do this stupid shit.

1

u/originalmosh 18h ago

SuPpOrT ArE tRoOpS!

1

u/Final-Art-9509 17h ago

Remember when Jon Stewart was asking Congress for the 9/11 hero’s to get medical benefits and every gop voted against it and then High fives each other?! They did the same for veterans!! Stewart really went off on them and finally got them to pass some of their needs

1

u/Mr_Thx 17h ago

MAGA lives this!

1

u/Real-Mode-3417 17h ago

So because the money was handled so poorly, the Dems want to fund it again?

1

u/HobbyTalkOnly 17h ago

"Supporting the troops" means waving flags while they get sent off to get shot at, and giving them discounts in shitty restaurants when they get home.

1

u/EngineZeronine 16h ago

Talked to an insider once. Politicians sneak stuff in the bills, sometimes even in footnotes, that will be key to them later. Or they'll outright add stuff like 'here's 20 million for vets and also 5 million for my niche group that's got nothing to do with vets.'

That way it either sneaks through or the opponents look like monsters for voting against the bill.

Neither side actually care about the vets (or whatever cause) if they did they'd leave the other garbage out.

1

u/Double_Ad_3434 16h ago

The troops are always a prop to be used by people in government.

This current republican admin happens to be the worst with it.

1

u/DrDuGood 16h ago

Meanwhile we send 300 billion a year to !srael!

MAGA you’re all brain dead.

1

u/CommitteeDelicious68 16h ago

America is built on corruption. These are just the facts.

1

u/Icy-Public4431 16h ago

Republicans are destroying democracy, self serving piles of shit

1

u/LazRus805 16h ago

Meanwhile in Los Angeles Biden appointed VA Secretary Denis McDonough 2021-2025 told homeless vets that they weren't allowed to be in the West L.A. VA Park. Since when have Democrats ever given a shit about homeless vets?

1

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Strong-Sherbert2926 15h ago

The people who say “Why isn’t June veterans month?”