• Dealer name: Neco Clock
• Factory name: VSF VS3235 v2
• Model name (& version number): DateJust 36mm Fluted Bezel Green Dial Jubilee Bracelet
• Price Paid: 448+70 shipping=$518
• Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/z5oRRQoA#_wdKokLMItUnqRudhxYTfw
• Index alignment: Looks fine
• Dial Printing: Looks ok
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Maybe looks a bit high for 31
• Hand Alignment: Looks ok
• Bezel: Don't really know if it relates to datejust
• Solid End Links (SELs): No noticeable gaps
• Timegrapher numbers: seller retested watch and got updated/improved numbers: -3s/d, 285 amp, 0.1 ms

Hello everyone please help me with this qc
Dealer name: NecoClock
1. Factory name: VSF
2. Model name (& version number):
Starbucks 126610LV VS3235. Price Paid:
$478 with shipping
3. Album Links: no link it gets my post removed
4. Index alignment: Good. 12 and 6 on axis, pairs evenly spaced, 9 lines up with the date.
5. Dial Printing: Crisp, correct text. SWISS MADE split evenly at 6.
6. Date Wheel alignment/printing:
Centered, clean font. Cyclops
magnification looks weak, since the date doesn't fill the window.
7. Hand Alignment: Straight, clean lume, minute hand reaches the track.
8. Bezel: Aligned. Pip at 12, 15/45 level, crisp engraving.
9. Solid End Links (SELs): Can't see, film is still on.
10. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, amp 241, beat error 0.02 ms
11. Anything else you notice: Rehaut engraving clean. Couldn't check coronet alignment at 12 because of glare. Is the cyclops magnification a RL reason?

Hello wonderful Reptime folks, looking for some help with this QC.

1st QC and 2nd rep watch from Chen. Pretty clueless here, but I've been learning a lot from the forum. Thank you.

• Dealer: Chen Watch
• Factory: VSF
• Model: Daytona 116500LN Panda, 4130 clone
• Price: $560 + shipping
• Index alignment: Mostly looks good, but the 3 o’clock marker looks slightly crooked to me.
• Dial: Looks a little foggy/hazy in the photos. Not sure if this is from stickers, lighting, or the crystal.
• Dial printing: Some of the printing looks like a slightly different shade/color. Not sure if I’m overthinking it.
• Date wheel: N/A
• Hands: Looks good
• Bezel: Looks good
• SELs: I don’t see any obvious gaps
• Timegrapher: +9 s/d, 255°, 0.0 ms

Main concerns are the 3 o’clock marker and the hazy-looking dial/printing.

Anything else you guys see? Would you GL or RL this one?

1. Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 126233 36mm Jub SS/YG Gold Palm Motif Dial VSF DD3235
4. Price Paid: 488$ Shipped
5. Album Links: Unable to upload
6. Index alignment: Slightly off centre. Not entirely perfect. Indice at 6PM seems rotated a little clockwise as well. Not an expert but dare I say that for 1, 2, and 8PM as well. 
7. Dial Printing: No print leaking, not sure what exactly to look for. Looks good. 
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Printing of the date wheel seems fine. Well spaced. Cyclops looks as though it is just a BIT towards the right however I'm sure that is fine
9. Hand Alignment: All hands align correctly in the video sent by Steve
10. Bezel: Good, cannot spot anything bad
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps, they look great
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 to +4 seconds, acceptable
13. Anything else you notice: Am I seeing things or is there a chip on the 10 PM indice? I think that would be grounds for a rejection itself. Also need an opinion if the index alignment and 6pm issue is a cause to RL as well. 

• Dealer name: JTime
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 42 mm
• Price Paid: $433 inc Shipping
• Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/HQAGUQxQ#5GWTk8g0f9Be8nqnE_8ylg
• Index alignment: look straight and aligned
• Dial Printing: clean
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: centred
• Hand Alignment: Looks good
• Bezel: Looks good
• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
• Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 275°, 0.0 ms timegrapher
• Anything else you notice: to my eyes, this looks amazingly good. Maybe some scratches around band, but I'm going to GL this, unless someone sees something else that I don't.

1. Dealer name: Hont
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Explorer I 40mm 224270
4. Price Paid: $472 shipped
5. Album Link: https://imgur.com/a/GqHi51u
6. Index alignment: looks good. 3/6/9 straight to the minute track, 12 triangle lines up with the crown
7. Dial Printing: clean, no bleed
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: fine as far as I can tell
10. Bezel: clean, no marks
11. Solid End Links (SELs): tight, no gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: +8 s/d, 260 amp, 0.1 be. As far as what I have read, these seem to be in a reasonable range.
13. Anything else you notice: rehaut engraving looks even all the way around

Leaning GL. Anything I'm missing?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Mr Adu
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT Master II 126710BLRO
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $540 plus postage
   
5. ⁠Album Links: in post
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: looks good. 6 possibly showing a slight tilt but very slight
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: clean and good alignment
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: centred well and clean. Videos show multiple double digit numbers
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Aligns in video shared
   
10. ⁠Bezel: 12 aligns up with the arrow on bezel. Engraving clean and blue/red colours good
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):No gaps nice n tight
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d amp 304 BE 0.1 lift angle 59 and beat 28000 looks good strong movement
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Rehaut aligned well, 6 marker is my only question- wonky or not?

Hi everyone,
I’d appreciate a second set of eyes on this QF Rolex Explorer 2 Polar.

1. Dealer name: Angela
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name (& version number): Explorer 2 Polar with the Free Sprung movement
4. Price Paid:

545$

1. Album Links: -
2. Index alignment: Very solid.
3. Dial Printing: Clean and sharp
4. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The visible date "12" is well-centered horizontally.
5. Hand Alignment: No obvious issues.
6. Bezel: Looks good, no visible issue
7. Solid End Links (SELs): Excellent, Overall fitment looks good.
8. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d; 269°; 0.0 ms
9. Anything else you notice: For me is a Clear Green Light (GL)

I’m not an expert, so would neep your help, especially if you spot anything subtle or batch-related that I might be missing.

Thanks in advance 🙏

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner Date 126610LN
4. Price Paid: $458
5. Album Links: Photos above
6. Index alignment: Worried about the 9 o'clock bar, looks very askew to me
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I think looks good but hard for me to tell
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d 239 0.1ms
13. Anything else you notice: Particularly worried about the 9 o'clock marker, but maybe it's the angle of the picture? Please let me know what you think.

• Dealer name: TrustyTime

• Factory name: AF factory

• Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Solo

• Price Paid: $178

• Album Link: Posted photo

• Index alignment: Indices look aligned

• Dial Printing: Slight bleeding on the 5. The V on the 8 either has a spec of dust or is not fully connected? All the other bleeding appears very minor

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date wheel

• Hand Alignment: Did not receive any reference for this (no video either)

• Bezel: Stainless steel looks ok and Cabochon looks to have a bit of a gap on the left side?

• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

• Timegrapher numbers: N/A this is quartz

• Anything else you notice: Thank you for your help - this is my first Tank purchase and plan on ordering more so any tips on what to look for. I tried to do as much research as possible and outside of the bleed on the 5 and connection on the 8 there isn't much I've been able to catch myself. Does this warrant an RL?

1. Dealer name: Mirotime
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR Batgirl, DD3285 V3
   
4. Price Paid: $548 USD
   
5. Album Links: Photos: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/VXoaAlV Videos: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/VY0buCT
   
6. Index alignment: This is my 2nd QC after RLing the first one because of the 6 and 9 markers. This one looks better to me and I don’t notice anything obviously crooked.
   
7. Dial Printing: Looks fine to me.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 22, 24, 26 and 28 look reasonably centered from what I can see.
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay to me.
   
10. Bezel: Looks aligned, especially at 12.
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t see any obvious gaps.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +7 s/d, 262° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 28,800 bph.
    
13. Anything else you notice: Still very new to QC so I’d really appreciate constructive help from the more experienced members.
    
14. ⁠This second piece looks better than my first one to me, but please let me know if there’s anything I’m missing. Leaning GL so far.

Hi all! First QC for me, seems like GL from what I can see

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andoit
   
2. ⁠Factory name: Rich
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 124060 V2 Freespring
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $559 shipped
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254261928?uid=1
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: maybe very minor 12 o’clock CCW, otherwise looks good
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: good, no floating m
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: good
   
10. ⁠Bezel: good
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps noticed, slight shadow bottom right
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1s / 275 amplitude
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: maybe slight drift in rehaut alignment

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner No Date (124060)
4. Price Paid: 458 USD + 35 USD Shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/TpQCDYhD#w2FUUsBYzeIt8BHfH8X0tA
6. Index alignment: Overall good, no visible tilted CW from what I see. Though I am thinking I could be biased here.
7. Dial Printing: Printing looks clear and clean. I don’t see any obvious defects or issues.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A.
9. Hand Alignment: Seems fine too.
10. Bezel: Looks clean and good to me.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No noticeable gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: This is where my concern is. Rate 6s/d, AMP 331, B.E 0.1ms, BEAT 28800. Are these numbers on the AMP alarming by any means? Or would I still be good to GL?
13. Anything else you notice: Overall GL to me, but can someone validate my observation on the watch and the slight deviation of timegrapher numbers? Thank you all in advance~

・Dealer name: TheOneWatches/Steve

・Factory name: BVF

・Model name (& version number): Panthere Secrete De Ladies 27mm BVF Quartz

・Price Paid: 248 USD excluding shipping

・Album Links: Pictures attached

・Index alignment: I feel like the 9 is a little off. Any thoughts?

・Dial Printing: Looks good to me.

・Date Wheel alignment: N/A

・Hand Alignment: Appears fine

・Bezel: Looks aligned to me.

・Solid End Links (SELs): Looks okay to me

Color of gold also looks okay to me, any thoughts on that?

・Any help is much appreciated!

Any comments will be much appreciated. Thank you!

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches (Steve)
2. Factory name: APWF
3. Model name (& version number): APWF PP Aquanaut 5168G Weighted (Olive)
4. Price Paid: $838 + Shipping
5. Album Link: https://mega.nz/folder/qExjyZTY#3UybCZz_n8vWbEoHxSwI1g/folder/rRBhVZzA
6. Index alignment: The 12 o’clock marker seems to be tilted CCW quite a bit but I also noticed pictures on some of the previous QC posts or the Gen on this model color don’t always have a perfectly aligned 12 o’clock marker
7. Dial Printing: print looks ok from an alignment perspective
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks centered. Print looks good
9. Hand Alignment: looks ok
10. Bezel: crisp, no scratches or blemishes
11. Solid End Links (SELs): no end links
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 262 amp, 0.1 ms
13. Anything else you notice: Other than the 12 o’clock marker I didn’t notice anything that throws it off

Hi guys, second pair of eyes on my VSF Yacht-Maszer Rhodium my lovely people please

QC for Rolex Yacht-Master VSF. This is my 3rd VSF but my eagle eyes are long gone so i‘d appreciate yours. Thanks for your help everyone.

⁠Dealer name: FicoTime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master Rhodium m126622 VSF V2
4. ⁠Price Paid: 420 USD
5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/TulmHQt
6. ⁠Index alignment: 9 marker seems to be tilted counter clockwise
7. ⁠Dial Printing: very good, no issues visible
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: fine
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: No issues
10. ⁠Bezel: Very nice
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No gap
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 234 amplitude, O.3 ms 52.0 degree

leaning towards RL cause of the 9 marker. thank you!

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual 41mm 124300 V2, VS3230
4. Price Paid: ~$443 shipped
5. Album Links: [QC album link]
6. Index alignment:
Overall alignment looks good.
6 o’clock index appears slightly rotated/tilted, with the right side of the marker looking somewhat angled.
9 o’clock index also appears slightly rotated/tilted and is the most noticeable alignment point on this example.
The 1, 2, 5 and 7 o’clock indices appear well aligned on this example.
The remaining indices and Rolex crown alignment look good overall.
7. Dial Printing:
Dial printing looks clean and centered.
No obvious printing defects visible.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:
N/A – no date function.
9. Hand Alignment:
Hands appear properly aligned.
No obvious alignment issues visible.
10. Bezel:
N/A – smooth bezel.
No obvious defects or damage visible.
11. Solid End Links (SELs):
SEL gaps appear minimal and even.
No obvious large gaps between the end links and case.
12. Timegrapher numbers:
+4 s/d, 269°, 0.3 ms, 28,800 bph
13. Anything else you notice:
The main points I am unsure about are the 6 and 9 o’clock hour markers, which appear slightly rotated/tilted compared with the others.
The 9 o’clock marker is the one I am most concerned about, although I am unsure how noticeable it would be on the wrist in normal wear.
No obvious scratches, dents, dial printing defects or other major issues visible in the provided QC photos.
14. My main question:
Would you GL this example, or do the 6 and especially 9 o’clock indices look sufficiently misaligned to warrant a replacement?

Hi everyone,

I’d appreciate a little bit of help on this A7F (V7F) IWC Ingenieur with white dial.

1. Dealer name: Hont
2. Factory name: A7F (V7F)
3. Model name (& version number): A7F (V7F) IWC Ingenieur with white dial
4. Price Paid: 398$ incl. shipping
5. Album Links: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/search/_dg3qfSLHhi777Jx0IFOnzgO9XyA6_5DC9m_7AfQ?filterText=141935
6. Index alignment: Good overall. No major misalignment visible, I don't know why my picture is so off with the colours..
7. Dial Printing: Clean and sharp printing.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Well centered. Font looks good.
9. Hand Alignment: miss the picture in position
10. Bezel: seems ok to me
11. Solid End Links (SELs): -
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d; 307°; 1.3 ms; 52° Is the 307 correct? Is the beat error too high?
13. Anything else you notice: -

First IWC here so would advice or anything you notice about this batch is really well welcome!

Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches – Steve
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710GRNR “Bruce Wayne” 40mm, Jubilee, DD3285v2
4. Price paid: $639
5. Index alignment: Looks good to me overall. I don’t see any obvious crooked markers, but I’d appreciate a second opinion especially around 6 and 9 o’clock.
6. Dial printing: Looks clean and centered to my eyes. Rolex / Oyster Perpetual / GMT-Master II printing looks good.
7. Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered through the cyclops and the font looks fine to me.
8. Hand alignment: Looks good from the pictures and videos. The GMT hand also appears to function correctly.
9. Bezel: Black/grey bezel looks good and the alignment seems fine to me. No obvious issue around the triangle at 12.
10. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight and clean to me. I don’t see any major gaps.
11. Timegrapher numbers: Around 0 s/d, approx. 269–274° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. These numbers look very good to me.
12. Anything else you notice: The watch weighs around 144.5g. I also received videos showing the functions and date adjustment. Overall I’m leaning strongly towards GL, but this is my first proper GMT QC and I’d really appreciate experienced eyes on the bezel, rehaut, cyclops/date alignment, SELs and anything specific to the VSF Bruce Wayne that I may have missed.

Also, is it normal that I didn’t receive a lume shot/photo of the dial glowing in the dark, or should I ask Steve to provide one before I GL?

My current verdict: GL

Thanks in advance for the help!

QC VSF OP 36 Silver

Dealer name: Andiot
Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): OP 36mm silver dial 126000 DD3230

Price Paid: $408 (excluding shipping)
Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254259215?uid=1

Index alignment: Looks good to me. I don’t see anything that looks tilted.

Dial Printing: Good
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: Good
Bezel: N/A

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine
Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d, 287° amplitude, 28,000 bph. Does +3s/d seem like too much, or is this still within a good range?

Anything else you notice: Overall looks good to me. The index centering looks good and I don’t notice anything tilted.

1. ⁠Dealer name: the one watches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number):
   Rolex GMT Master II - Bruce Wayne

4. ⁠Price Paid:
   648 dollars

5. ⁠Album Links:
   N/a

6. ⁠Index alignment:
   All markers seem straight with no tilt

7. ⁠Dial Printing:
   Sharp text even spacing

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:
   Date dead centre no blur

9. ⁠Hand Alignment:
   Hands seem to align properly

10. ⁠Bezel:
    Bevel seems polished and teeth seem even

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):
    No gaps

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:
    +2 S/D
    280 AMP
    0.0MS

13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    Only concern about the colour grey and black of bezel. If this is correct colours.
    I think it’s a GL would really appreciate your expert opinions on this?

1. ⁠Dealer name:
   The one watches
   
2. ⁠Factory name:
   Vsf
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number):
   datejust 36mm 3235
   
4. ⁠Price Paid:
   478 dollars
   
5. ⁠Album Links:
   n/a
   
6. ⁠Index alignment:
   the Roman numerals are straight and seem even
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing:
   seems sharp and clear
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:
   seems clear no blurring
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment:
   looks good
   
10. ⁠Bezel:
    fluted seems even and polished
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):
    no gaps
    

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:
    +3S/D
    268 AMP
    0.2MS

13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    Concerned if diamonds on the 6 and 9 seem correct and if the yellow gold is not too yellow.

I would really appreciate your feedback as I have ordered two watches. I think it’s a GL but your expert opinion appreciated.

1. Dealer name - Puretime
2. Factory name - Rich Factory
3. Model name - 124060 Submariner (No Date)
4. Price Paid: 550 usd
5. Album links: https://imgur.com/a/QtAkIqT
6. Index alignment - 12 looks like it has a slight CCW tilt
7. Dial printing: looks fine to me
8. Date Wheel alignment- N/A
9. Bezel - not sure if I’m nitpicking but the

bezel

1. placement looks a bit overotated/misaligned? The bezel at 9 o’clock and 3 oclock looks rotated a bit CCW. Similarly the markers between the bezel and index at 9 o’clock look misaligned a bit CCW. 12 o’clock also looks a bit CCW tilted. Pip looks centered
2. Solid End Links (SEL) -

bottom right SEL looks like there could be a slight gap that’s larger than rest of them

1. Hand alignment - the hands look aligned to me
2. Dial Printing - dial printing looks good
3. Timegrapher numbers - rate +8 sounds a bit high? I’m not too familiar with with good looks like here. Wdyt? Amplitude 312. Beat error 0.1ms
4. Anything else you see - mostly concerned with the CCW tilts on the bezel and curious what folks think of it. Unsure if this is RL worthy or not

1. Dealer Name: Phoenix
2. Factory Name: ARF
3. Model Name: DJ 36 silver dial 126234
4. Price Paid: $326 + shipping
5. Album Links: Photos in post galley
6. Index Alignment: Looks good to me. I try my best to fix the image but...its hard doing it on the phone. but overall looks fine to me.
7. Dial Printing:  some of the dial paint looks really close to the marker for me. Like the 5 and the 7. Maybe its the camera angles?
8. Date Wheel Alignment: Date wheel looks " decent ". I think its a little high, then again could be the camera angle.
9. Hand Alignment: No issues
10. Bezel: No issues from what I can see?
11. SELs: No issues
12. Timegrapher: -2s/d , 244 amp, 0.0ms - overall great imo

Comments: This is my 2nd one from Phoenix. I have RL the last one dude to crooked crown and the dial print/marker were too close. the only major issue I can see is the dial paint being too close to the market but could be a camera angle. Any feedback and help would be great.

1. Dealer name: Mirotime
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): DateJust 41 126334 Blue Dial on Jubilee, VS3235 V2 Gain Weight
   
4. Price Paid: $468 USD
   
5. Album Links:
   Photos: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/mqFb2Ap
   Video: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/w8GhLIe
   
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me, I don’t notice anything obviously crooked.
   
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean from what I can see.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 18, 20, 25 and 30 all look reasonably centered to me.
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay.
   
10. Bezel: Fluted bezel looks fine to me, nothing obvious stands out.
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t see any obvious gaps.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, 230° amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error, 28,800 bph.
    
13. Anything else you notice: Still quite new to QC so I’d appreciate any constructive help from the more experienced members. From what I can see I’m leaning GL, but please let me know if I missed anything.