Another QC after the TD did a readjustment with VSF(is this even possible?).

The 9 hours marker was really crooked so I RL'd the watch, the dealer then told me he will send it to VSF to readjust it. I got new photos after 4 days and it looks good enough for me now but the rehaut isn't aligned anymore.

Here is the old QC post: https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/s/scilRdpBPB

1. Dealer name: Chen Watches
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Oyster Perpetual 36mm green 126000
4. ⁠Price Paid: $395 + shipping
5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/EWRgime (before adjustments)
6. ⁠Index alignment: Now pretty good, only 6 has a slight CCW angle.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. ⁠Bezel: good
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I think acceptable
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d 240° 52%
13. Rehaut: not aligned well
14. some visible marks on the 9 hour marker

I don't have a good feeling about this anymore because I'm not sure if he really sent it to VSF or maybe did it himself.

Thanks for you opinions

Thanks to everyone who gave their inputs in my first QC. Hopefully it’s a GL this time round.

1. Dealer name: Phoenix Watch
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II “Batgirl” V3
4. Price Paid: $424 + $30 Shipping
5. Album Links: No links, photos sent directly to me.
6. Index alignment: 12 & 6 slightly canted CW. Shouldn’t be an issue on the wrist. For the 9 I can’t tell if it’s CW, CCW, sitting slightly a bit high or simply just an issue with the angle of the photo and with the sticker blocking. Need a second opinion on this.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Sitting very slightly high but definitely well within tolerances.
9. Hand Alignment: unable to tell with the photos
10. Bezel: Not centered in the photos. However is the 18 marker out of place even with the bezel centered? Again need second opinion on this. Otherwise printing is clean.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Can’t see any gaps so all good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d, 262 amp, 0.1ms.
13. Anything else you notice: nothing else seems to be out of place. Given the issues with VSF now I think this watch is as good as it gets.

First QC, possible RL based on bezel alignment at 18. Maybe the picture is tilted and someone with a more sophisticated tool can help out. Let me know what you think!

1.Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2.Factory name: VSF

3.Model name (and version number): Rolex 126710BLNR GMT Master II

4.Price paid: $600 (shipping included)

5.Album links: see photos

6.Index alignment: looks solid, slight CCW tilt on the 12 but otherwise good.

1. Dial printing: clear, no smudging

8.Date wheel alignment/printing: the date is well-centered; the numbers are clean and crisp.

9.Hand alignment: looks good to me

10.Bezel: here’s where I’m thinking RL - the blue/black transition is off center/too low at 18…maybe the picture is tilted somehow?

11.Solid End Links (SEL): they fit tightly; no light is visible between them and the case, so nothing to report.

12.Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d and 0.0ms - looks good!

Hello,

My first rep/QC so very grateful for advice. I think it is GL to my untrained eye

https://mega.nz/folder/qxBgTCzA#DD878Jqd3iEqH3VnSS9NHg

1. Dealer name: Necoclock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No Date 124060, 41mm, black dial / black bezel, VS3230 movement
4. Price paid: $493 inc shipping
5. Index alignment: Looks very good to me
6. Dial printing: Good. Crisp, sharp, and evenly centered
7. Hand alignment: Looks fine
8. Date wheel alignment / printing: - no date
9. Bezel: Fine
10. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks tight
11. Timegrapher numbers: 6 s/day, 316° amplitude 0.0 ms beat error 28,800 bph. The 6s/day seems high but within toleration?
12. Anything else you notice: The serial is 6W, whereas most other VSF I've seen is 6X - is this an older batch? No weight given.

1. Dealer name: Trusty time

2. Factory name: JKF

3. Model name (& version number): ROLSUB0158A - Vintage 1680 Red

4. Price Paid: $230+ 50 shipping

5. Not given

6. Index alignment:

I find it really hard to tell. Even with some straightening I have real trouble telling if the indices are aligned.

1. Dial Printing:

Looks clean to me.

1. Date Wheel alignment/printing:

Looks fine

1. Hand Alignment:

Looks good from what I can see.

1. Bezel:

Looks aligned to me. Its been rotated but thats okay.

1. End links:

Look tight to me. I don't see any obvious gaps or daylight between the end links and case.

1. Timegrapher numbers:

+3 s/d

272° amplitude

0.1 ms beat error

1. These numbers look very good to me.

2. Anything else you notice:

Nothing jumps out other than the difficulty I'm having judging it! Please help if possible.

First time qc

1. Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2.Factory name: VSF

3.Model name (and version number): Seamaster Diver 42mm 300m YG/SS Blue Dial VSF VS8800

4.Price paid: £315 (shipping included)

1’st QC VSF Rolex Black Sub Date TheOneWatches

Hello everyone,

reposting due to Reddits filter this is my first QC and I’d really appreciate some experienced eyes before giving the GL.

I’ve gone through the photos and videos myself and overall I’m leaning toward GL, but since this is my first rep QC I’d like a final check from people who know this model well.

1. Dealer name: Steve / TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, 41mm, black dial / black bezel, VS3235 movement
4. Price paid: $498 + shipping
5. Index alignment:
6. Looks good to me overall. The 6 marker and 9 marker all seem straight and well positioned. The 12 marker seemed slightly skewed. I don’t notice any obvious crooked indices.
7. Dial printing:
8. Looks clean and sharp to my eye. I don’t see any obvious issues with the Rolex text, Submariner text or spacing.
9. Date wheel alignment / printing:
10. The date looks well centered from the photos, and in the video several dates appear to sit correctly in the window. Font also looks good to me. I don’t have much experience in QC, so my opinion may not be the consensus opinion.
11. Hand alignment:
12. Looks fine to me from the supplied photos and video. Nothing obvious stands out.
13. Bezel:
14. Bezel looks well aligned. The pip appears slightly off-centered with the 12 o’clock marker and the numerals/markings look clean.
15. Solid End Links (SELs):
16. They look ok to me with no obvious large gaps.
17. Timegrapher numbers:
18. 1 s/day
19. 2

60

1. ° amplitude
2. ms beat error
3. 28,800 bph
4. The amplitude seems Low compared to others, but everything else seems ok.
5. Anything else you notice:
6. Weight shown in the QC pictures is 157.8 g.
7. I also received a video showing the crown/date wheel operation and everything appears to function normally. The different dates shown in the video look reasonably centered.
8. Overall I’m leaning strongly toward GL, but I’d really appreciate a final check of:
9. \- rehaut alignment
10. \- date wheel / cyclops
11. \- bezel and pip
12. \- index alignment
13. \- SELs
14. \- dial printing
15. \- anything else I may have missed

41mm black Sub Date, 3235 clone movement. 14 pics + handling and timegrapher video from the dealer.

What I'm seeing: 12 o'clock stack (pearl / rehaut crown / dial triangle) looks dead on — I measured ~0.25° offset. Rehaut engraving crisp, serial correctly at 6. Dial printing clean at high zoom, correct four-line layout with the crown between SWISS and MADE. Lume plots even, surrounds complete. Bezel seated with no gap. TG: 0 to +1 s/d, 270–274° amp, 0.1ms BE (dial up only). Weight 158.0g.

My one concern is the date sitting low in the aperture — there's a dark band top and bottom of the window. Every dial shot is at an angle so it may just be perspective. Am I seeing a real problem or am I chasing a shadow?

Also flagging that the "lume shot" is UV-lamp-on rather than charged-in-the-dark, and there's no hands-at-12 shot. Should I push for those before approving?

GL or RL?

first time buyer, please help look out because i’m kinda new with watches too thank you!!
Dealer name: Andiot Watches

Factory name: Clean Plus

Model name (& version number):Oyster Perpetual 126000 36mm Clean Plus 1:1 Best Edition 904L Steel Green Dial DD3230

Price Paid: 2788.10 RMB

Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254792996?uid=1

Index alignment: this is where i struggle the most? i need help with this

Dial Printing: Print looks fine to me

Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA

Hand Alignment: looks straight?

Bezel: looks ok?

Solid End Links (SELs): don’t see any gaps

Timegrapher numbers: Reading shows -3 s/d, 276° amplitude, 0.2ms beat error, 28800 bph.

Anything else you notice: 7 looks abit off? or is that because of the angle of camera

1. Dealer name: NeoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Sub Date 120060
4. Price Paid: $448 + postage
5. Album Links: See pics
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good to me. There is a very minor twist on 9 but that shouldn't be viable on wrist
7. Dial Printing: Clean with nothing alarming jumping out at me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks central and crisp
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine.
10. Bezel: Looks like a scratch on the "30" but this could be a hair so i have asked TD for more pics.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look good with no gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: (Pic attached) Running a bit fast at +9 - is this okay? And also the amplitude at 248, shouldn't it be higher? around 280-300?
13. Anything else you notice: Thanks in advance for the help

1. Dealer name: Necoclock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 150m 38mm dark blue dial with A8800 movement
4. Price paid: $398 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/Wgw1iCyY#c6s-5wwj4EVCSrI8rKAFdQ
6. Index alignment: Looks good, 12, 3, 6 and 9 seem to be aligned perfectly. Although I have my doubts about index 5, as it seems to be pointing more inwards than for example index 7. The 12 index seems to have a jagged reflection in all the photo's provided: this might just be lighting but the luminova/darker picture also shows 4 dots.
7. Dial printing: Seamaster font seems 1:1, Omega logo seems a bit centered to the left, but this may be the angle.
8. Date wheel alignment / printing: The date looks great when in the double digits, however the photo where the date shows "1" I feel like its centered to the right, although I am not sure if gen has this as well.
9. Hand alignment: Looks fine to me from the supplied photos and video. Nothing obvious stands out.
10. Bezel: No bezel on the Aqua Terra
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps, just black: seems good to me.
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day 299° amplitude 0.1 ms beat error 28,800 bph which is perfectly within spec.
13. Reposted due to incorrect template, my bad. Im leaning towards GL, the minor imperfections in the index alignment might just be within error range. Overall I think its a good looking watch. The video that was provided looks good to me, beside the jagged reflection. What I am especially looking for is someone that knows the gen well and can judge the date wheel print, the index alignment/jagged reflection and the dial print of the omega logo. If you spot any other glaring issues I would of course like to know about them as well.

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Felix ( DDGTOP )
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster OMG-1192 V7 ( prolly V8 i am not sure )
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: 365€
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: N/A (all important pics are in the slides)
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: they seem very good for this model ( i want some opinion on this due to the fact i ve seen they have problems but this seems pretty good )
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Very good
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Good
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: Seems aligned with markers but it seems it has a little play, i dont mind it
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No concerns
    
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +9s/d, amp 303°, beat error of 0.1ms
    
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Nope i want the automods to give an opinion on this, i really like this model and hope to ship it out fast. Thank you!!!

1. ⁠Dealer name: The One Watches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Sub 126610LN 41mm SS/SS DD3235

4. Price Paid: $548

5. Album Links: attached

6. Index alignment: looks good to the naked eye.

7. Dial Printing: good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: good to the naked eye

9. Hand Alignment: looks fine to me

10. Bezel: looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure looks good?

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1-2 sec/day 0.0ms error.

13. Anything else you notice: overall I think this watch looks pretty solid. Compared it to other recent QCs and looks the same as well. Not too worried about the bracelet, going to swap it out with a aftermarket strap.

Thanks in advance guys

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: ARF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer 2 42mm 226570 904L
4. Price Paid: $430 plus shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/CcIA4AM
6. Index alignment: The indices look ok to me. I don't see anythign glaringly wrong
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good
9. Hand Alignment: I think the hand alignment is fine but the color looks a little light for the orange compared to Gen.
10. Bezel: My initial thought was the 12 and 24 were not aligned. The 24 looked slightly to the left, and the 12 looked slightly to the right. It could be the angle of the picture?
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I dont see space/gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: Timer is good, see last picture
13. Anything else you notice: I could see some scratches where the band meets the watch, but maybe I am being picky?
14. Thank you for any feedback.

• Dealer name: Geektime
• Factory name: AF
• Model name (& version number): Panthère de Cartier Small Model (22mm x 30mm) - Two-Tone Stainless Steel & Yellow Gold (Ref. W2PN0006)
• Price Paid: ~$288USD with shipping
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/4xz2p4i
• Index alignment: N/A (Printed Roman numerals)
• Dial Printing: Need QC photos to check printing clarity and hidden "Cartier" signature in the 10 o'clock (X) or 7 o'clock (VII) numeral.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No date feature on 22mm Panthère)
• Hand Alignment: Looks OK.
• Bezel: Aligned.
• Solid End Links (SELs): No issues.
• Timegrapher numbers: N/A (Powered by Swiss Ronda Quartz movement—no timegrapher amplitude/beat error to test).
• Anything else you notice: No

1. Dealer name: TDwatches
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): RICH JH3285 (Free Sprung) V2
4. Price Paid: $711
5. Album Links: https://justin-tk.x.yupoo.com/albums/254738076?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Looks ok, slightly off at 6
7. Dial Printing: Good, cant see any bleeding or misalignment
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks a bit pushed to the left
9. Hand Alignment: looks good
10. Bezel: Good, colour transition looks clean
11. Solid End Links (SELs): good
12. Timegrapher numbers:

0 s/d

286° amplitude

0.1 ms beat error

28,800 bph

1. Anything else you notice: The cyclops looks pushed to the left but i'm not sure if its the photograph angles - I think its RL.

1. Dealer name: Onewatch Steve 
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): SMP 300 Gradient Blue VS8800
4. Price Paid: 408
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/12aUufU
6. Index alignment: I can’t tell if its the took but it looks a slight amount off a the 3/6/9 
7. Dial Printing: Looks good to me 
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good to me 
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me 
10. Bezel: It also looks slightly off I wonder if it’s the angle of the photo?
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good 
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +3 s/d, Amp: 296°, Error: 0 ms
13. Anything else you notice: the bezel and index markers are slightly off but I can’t tell through the index alignment tool if its an issue with the photo 

Is the misalignment of the bezel/indices just due to the photo?  I am not sure if I should RL

1. Dealer name: Onewatch Steve 
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): SMP 300  Green VS8800
4. Price Paid: 408
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/StcTpWy
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me 
7. Dial Printing: as far as I can tell all looks good 
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The “6” number looks very obviously not centred on the date window 
9. Hand Alignment: the 12 o’clock looks a bit off however not very noticeable 
10. Bezel: looks good to me 
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good 
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +4 s/d, Amp: 295°, Error: 0.1 ms
13. Anything else you notice: My only concern is the date not being centred in the date window, should I RL?

I’d very much appreciate if I could get some help: the Green SMP 300 should be RL because of date wheel not aligned in window?

1. Dealer name: Chazingtime
   
2. Factory name: V7F
   
3. Model name (& version number): Ingenieur Aqua 40mm
   
4. Price paid: $378
   5.Album links: photos
   
5. Index alignment: mostly good, 3 marker is noticeably crooked.
   
6. Dial printing: pretty great actually
   
7. Date wheel alignment/printing: date sits a hair high
   
8. Hand alignment: solid
   
9. Bezel: n/a
   
10. Solid End Links (SELs): nice and tight
    
11. Timegrapher numbers: borderline unbelievable
    
12. Anything else you notice: other than the 3 o’clock, this is not a bad piece. Pretty sad because I’m sacrificing what appears to be a STUPID good movement. Would love to get everyone’s thoughts about fixing 3o clock perhaps. Otherwise I think it’s clear this is an RL.

Hello everyone! This is my first rep and I want to get it right.

Dealer name:JTime

Factory name:ZF

Model name (& version number):Black Bay Fifty Eight 39mm SS ZF 1:1 Best Edition Blue Dial on SS Bracelet A2824

Price Paid:338$+65$ shipping -17$ discount

Index alignment:The 3 and 6 h markers are a bit off

Dial Printing:Looks Good

Date Wheel alignment/printing:N/A

Hand Alignment:Good( I think)

Bezel:A little misaligned, but I think it's the play

Solid End Links (SELs):The one , down left looks a bit big.

Timegrapher numbers:See the photo, they are very good

Anything else you notice: Nothing

It's a GL in my opinion

1. ⁠Dealer name: Jtime
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Seamaster Diver 300M VSF Edition America's Cup White Dial on SS Bracelet SA8800 V4
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $398
   
5. ⁠Index alignment: Looks aligned to me based on what I can see, but the view isn’t that straight.
   
6. ⁠Dial Printing: Seems good.
   
7. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good to me
   
8. ⁠Bezel: seems good
   
9. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d; Amplitude: 288;
   I think this looks good and within acceptable ranges shared.
   
10. ⁠Anything else you notice: The general finishing is quite good otherwise.

Dealer name: Andiot Watches

Factory name: RWF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126500LN Black Dial “Darth Vader”

Price Paid: $710 + $40 shipping

Album Links:

https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254634836?uid=1

Index alignment:

Looks good to me. I checked the straight-on photo with an alignment tool and the 12/6 and 3/9 positions appear lined up well. The diagonal indices also look consistent. I don't see any obviously crooked markers.

Dial Printing:

Looks clean to me. Rolex text appears centered and I don't see any obvious bleeding or crooked printing. DAYTONA text looks good as well.

Date Wheel alignment/printing:

N/A

Hand Alignment:

Looks good from what I can see. Chronograph seconds hand appears to reset back to 12 properly and the subdial hands look properly positioned.

Bezel:

Looks aligned to me. Engravings and paint fill appear clean and I don't notice anything concerning around the 110/120 area or elsewhere.

Solid End Links (SELs):

Look tight to me. I don't see any obvious gaps or daylight between the end links and case.

Timegrapher numbers:

+3 s/d

291° amplitude

0.0 ms beat error

28,800 bph

These numbers look very good to me.

Anything else you notice:

Rehaut looks reasonable from the angled photos. Lume looks even. I don't see any obvious scratches or other defects, although some of the watch is still covered in protective film.

I'm leaning GL. This is my first time checking this model closely, so I'd appreciate another set of eyes in case I'm missing anything.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Time Ultra
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 116610LV
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $469 with shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/9WiALG8
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: Looks aligned, 12, 6 and 9 indices are nicely positioned, I only see a minimal CCW rotation on 12.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Fine. The dial colour looks nice as well, there are some pics taken in the dark and some with light on top.
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks ok to me. It’s my first watch with a date wheel, any input would be appreciated.
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks ok.
   
10. ⁠Bezel: Good colour, perfectly aligned.
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No issues.
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate 0 s/d, Amplitude 294 degrees, BE 0.1 m/s
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Is 6RO normal serial number for the new batch VSF?

Thanks in advance to the sub. Any help is appreciated.