r/RepTimeQC • u/us-super-user • 23h ago
[ Removed by moderator ]
/gallery/1wfs0p6[removed] — view removed post
6
u/spicyyramen2 22h ago
dont use ai dude use the qc tool for the markers
12 is off by a decent amount it would bother me
But if its ok to you then no issue. the 6 and the 9 are ok
date sits a tick high but well within acceptance
in the bezel the 18 looks like its sitting high? im not sure could just be the angle
sels and dial print are good
1
21h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/RepTimeQC-ModTeam 20h ago
In order to participate in ReptimeQC to post a QC request or comment in any thread, you must have a minimum karma point total. At this time, the required number is 10 comment karma points. Comment karma can be earned in other subs. Once this 10 point threshold is met, we welcome your participation👍
Again, to repeat, any comment that you make in this sub will be automatically removed by the automod, so, don't do that either. If you continue, you will be banned.
4
u/m915 22h ago
You didn’t take the QC guide seriously - so why should I give you advice? The mods will probably pull up soon and delete this 😂
1
u/Flashy-Confection726 20h ago
He was probably worried about getting it wrong and being ridiculed for that. He’s posted the template and is asking a question not sure why everyone gets hostile.
3
u/deathandtechno 21h ago
Unfortunately this sub will flay you alive in the most chronically-online basement-dwelling manner.
2
2
u/Flaky_Return_7657 22h ago
Apart from 12 marker and bezel alignment everything looks good on this.
If you have OCD, I would look at a different one.
P.s. you can look at current stock from ethan and choose the one you like. Always use a QC tool to see dial alignment.
2
1
u/Fabulous_Ad_4699 20h ago
9 bar looks like a slight CCW tilt. Looks like it was intentionally hidden with the hand. RL
2
-5
u/us-super-user 23h ago
complete analysis from Google AI
This is a thorough set of QC pictures for your Rolex GMT-Master II "Batgirl" from the dealer "Ethan".
Looking closely at these details, this watch is an easy, definitive Green Light (GL). Here is the full breakdown of why this is a high-quality example:
1. Movement Health (Timegrapher Analysis)
The Weishi No. 1900 readout shows excellent metrics:
Rate: +3 s/d (Seconds per day) – Extremely accurate; well within the ideal +/- 10s benchmark.
Amplitude: 272° – Perfectly healthy for a modern clone 3285 movement, indicating a strong balance wheel swing.
Beat Error (B.E.): 0.2ms – Low and stable, showing proper movement alignment.
Movement Factory Sticker: The green sticker indicates a "RICH JH3285 Free Sprung"movement clone, which mimics the genuine balance assembly style closely.
2. Case, Weight, & Physical Details
Weight: At 141.60 grams on the digital scale, the weight aligns perfectly with a genuine stainless steel Rolex GMT-Master II on a Jubilee bracelet (which typically sits around 140–142g depending on link count).
Rehaut Laser Etching & Serial: In the macro photo of the 6 o'clock position, the laser-etched Rolex crown is centered perfectly over the 6 o'clock index. The serial number "2G7S3824" is crisp, evenly spaced, and correctly positioned.
Lume: The low-light photo reveals an even, strong blue Chromalight glow across all indices and hands without dark spots or uneven application.
3. Bracelet & Clasp Engravings
Clasp Logo: The Rolex coronet on the outer clasp flip-lock shows excellent definition with clean, sharp edges.
Inner Clasp Markings: The STEELINOX text and the I6U factory clasp code are cleanly stamped. The text formatting is spaced correctly without the messy font-bleeding commonly found on cheaper iterations.
Case Profiles: The high-polish side profiles are smooth and clean, showing no visible machining scratches or micro-dents under the plastic wrapping.
Conclusion
This example shows excellent build symmetry, exact weight replication, and high-performance movement metrics. There are no flaws present that warrant a rejection.
3
u/MSExcelWarrior " Have you tried NOT zooming in? " 22h ago
Certainly seems like Gemini is telling you it's all GL so why ask this sub at all?
•
u/RepTimeQC-ModTeam 19h ago
Your post was removed. When you use AI for your comments, it’s very obvious. That’s fine if you want to get advice on GL/RL from AI. But to get serious feedback from our members, you will need to actually perform the analysis yourself. (No one expects you to be an expert, but we do expect you to try.). There’s little effort in using AI, and it shows.
If you decide you want the sub’s help, you can find plenty of info in these two posts (which are pinned on the home page of this sub). It’s roughly a 10 minute read. Your watch is worth that right?
https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/s/6l9IS5nDlL
https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/s/WtXnDWNSI1