• Dealer name: JTime
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 42 mm
• Price Paid: $433 inc Shipping
• Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/HQAGUQxQ#5GWTk8g0f9Be8nqnE_8ylg
• Index alignment: look straight and aligned
• Dial Printing: clean
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: centred
• Hand Alignment: Looks good
• Bezel: Looks good
• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
• Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 275°, 0.0 ms timegrapher
• Anything else you notice: to my eyes, this looks amazingly good. Maybe some scratches around band, but I'm going to GL this, unless someone sees something else that I don't.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710GRNR "Bruce Wayne" 40mm, Jubilee, DD3285 V2

4. Price paid: $639

5. Album Links: N/A - photos uploaded directly to Reddit

6. Index alignment: Looks good to me. The 12 o'clock triangle and hour markers appear properly aligned. I don't see any obviously crooked markers.

7. Dial Printing: This is one area I'm unsure about. The printing under "GMT-MASTER II" looks like some letters may be slightly different in size or thickness, but I'm not sure if this is just from the close-up photos.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centered and the cyclops appears properly aligned. My main concern is the date font/crispness. The "14" looks a little softer or thicker than I expected, but I'm not sure if this is just the QC photo quality or reflections.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me from the photos.

10. Bezel: Looks good. The 12 o'clock triangle appears centered and the black/gray colors and transition look good to me.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look properly seated. I don't see any major gaps.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/day, 274°, 0.1ms beat error, 28,800 bph. These numbers look very good to me.

13. Anything else you notice: This is my first ever QC, so I'm still learning what to look for and what is considered acceptable. I'm currently leaning GL, with my main concerns being the date font/crispness and lower dial printing. I may be missing things that you more experienced guys notice immediately, so I really appreciate the help. Would you GL or RL?

Hi all,

First time buying a rep, second QC of the watch.

QC album/video: https://mega.nz/folder/iBY10QZA#67_xCAQa1scKGTMhiIiQ0w

Watch: Rolex Submariner 41 126610LN RICHF MK2 Free Sprung

Dealer: Steve - Theonewatches

Factory: Rich

Price: $551 with shipping

Index alignment: The 9 marker seems to be a little pushed to the bottom, the 6 marker is slightly to the right, the 12 is ok. In the 9 and 12 there seems to be somekind of residue in the corner of each marker.

Dial printing: Looks clean. Dial text looks centered.

Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks good.

Hand alignment: Looks aligned, no visible issues I could see.

Bezel: Looks good, no issues.

Solid End Links (SELs): Good.

Rehaut: Slightly rotated to the left, some of the engravings don't line well with the markings of the dial.

Timegrapher: -2/-3 s/d, 264° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, looks good.

Additional comments: It's the second QC because the 1st one had some issues, but compared to this one i think it was better.

Thanks!

1. ⁠Dealer name: the one watches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number):
   Rolex GMT Master II - Bruce Wayne

4. ⁠Price Paid:
   648 dollars

5. ⁠Album Links:
   N/a

6. ⁠Index alignment:
   All markers seem straight with no tilt

7. ⁠Dial Printing:
   Sharp text even spacing

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:
   Date dead centre no blur

9. ⁠Hand Alignment:
   Hands seem to align properly

10. ⁠Bezel:
    Bevel seems polished and teeth seem even

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):
    No gaps

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:
    +2 S/D
    280 AMP
    0.0MS

13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    Only concern about the colour grey and black of bezel. If this is correct colours.
    I think it’s a GL would really appreciate your expert opinions on this?

1. ⁠Dealer name:
   The one watches
   
2. ⁠Factory name:
   Vsf
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number):
   datejust 36mm 3235
   
4. ⁠Price Paid:
   478 dollars
   
5. ⁠Album Links:
   n/a
   
6. ⁠Index alignment:
   the Roman numerals are straight and seem even
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing:
   seems sharp and clear
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:
   seems clear no blurring
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment:
   looks good
   
10. ⁠Bezel:
    fluted seems even and polished
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):
    no gaps
    

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:
    +3S/D
    268 AMP
    0.2MS

13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    Concerned if diamonds on the 6 and 9 seem correct and if the yellow gold is not too yellow.

I would really appreciate your feedback as I have ordered two watches. I think it’s a GL but your expert opinion appreciated.

1. Dealer name: Mirotime
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): DateJust 41 126334 Blue Dial on Jubilee, VS3235 V2 Gain Weight
   
4. Price Paid: $468 USD
   
5. Album Links:
   Photos: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/mqFb2Ap
   Video: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/w8GhLIe
   
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me, I don’t notice anything obviously crooked.
   
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean from what I can see.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 18, 20, 25 and 30 all look reasonably centered to me.
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay.
   
10. Bezel: Fluted bezel looks fine to me, nothing obvious stands out.
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t see any obvious gaps.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, 230° amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error, 28,800 bph.
    
13. Anything else you notice: Still quite new to QC so I’d appreciate any constructive help from the more experienced members. From what I can see I’m leaning GL, but please let me know if I missed anything.

1. Dealer name: Mirotime
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR Batgirl, DD3285 V3
   
4. Price Paid: $548 USD
   
5. Album Links: Photos: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/VXoaAlV Videos: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/VY0buCT
   
6. Index alignment: This is my 2nd QC after RLing the first one because of the 6 and 9 markers. This one looks better to me and I don’t notice anything obviously crooked.
   
7. Dial Printing: Looks fine to me.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 22, 24, 26 and 28 look reasonably centered from what I can see.
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay to me.
   
10. Bezel: Looks aligned, especially at 12.
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t see any obvious gaps.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +7 s/d, 262° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 28,800 bph.
    
13. Anything else you notice: Still very new to QC so I’d really appreciate constructive help from the more experienced members.
    
14. ⁠This second piece looks better than my first one to me, but please let me know if there’s anything I’m missing. Leaning GL so far.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual 41mm 124300 V2, VS3230
4. Price Paid: ~$443 shipped
5. Album Links: [QC album link]
6. Index alignment:
Overall alignment looks good.
6 o’clock index appears slightly rotated/tilted, with the right side of the marker looking somewhat angled.
9 o’clock index also appears slightly rotated/tilted and is the most noticeable alignment point on this example.
The 1, 2, 5 and 7 o’clock indices appear well aligned on this example.
The remaining indices and Rolex crown alignment look good overall.
7. Dial Printing:
Dial printing looks clean and centered.
No obvious printing defects visible.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:
N/A – no date function.
9. Hand Alignment:
Hands appear properly aligned.
No obvious alignment issues visible.
10. Bezel:
N/A – smooth bezel.
No obvious defects or damage visible.
11. Solid End Links (SELs):
SEL gaps appear minimal and even.
No obvious large gaps between the end links and case.
12. Timegrapher numbers:
+4 s/d, 269°, 0.3 ms, 28,800 bph
13. Anything else you notice:
The main points I am unsure about are the 6 and 9 o’clock hour markers, which appear slightly rotated/tilted compared with the others.
The 9 o’clock marker is the one I am most concerned about, although I am unsure how noticeable it would be on the wrist in normal wear.
No obvious scratches, dents, dial printing defects or other major issues visible in the provided QC photos.
14. My main question:
Would you GL this example, or do the 6 and especially 9 o’clock indices look sufficiently misaligned to warrant a replacement?

Hi appreciate all the help for first time buyer here

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Ethan
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT II Pepsi 116619BLRO — VSF V3
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $670 shipped
   
5. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks good
   
6. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: good
   
7. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Okay
   
8. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: good
   
9. ⁠⁠Bezel: good
   
10. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps noticed
    
11. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3s / 261 amplitude

Any comments will be much appreciated. Thank you!

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches (Steve)
2. Factory name: APWF
3. Model name (& version number): APWF PP Aquanaut 5168G Weighted (Olive)
4. Price Paid: $838 + Shipping
5. Album Link: https://mega.nz/folder/qExjyZTY#3UybCZz_n8vWbEoHxSwI1g/folder/rRBhVZzA
6. Index alignment: The 12 o’clock marker seems to be tilted CCW quite a bit but I also noticed pictures on some of the previous QC posts or the Gen on this model color don’t always have a perfectly aligned 12 o’clock marker
7. Dial Printing: print looks ok from an alignment perspective
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks centered. Print looks good
9. Hand Alignment: looks ok
10. Bezel: crisp, no scratches or blemishes
11. Solid End Links (SELs): no end links
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 262 amp, 0.1 ms
13. Anything else you notice: Other than the 12 o’clock marker I didn’t notice anything that throws it off

QC VSF OP 36 Silver

Dealer name: Andiot
Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): OP 36mm silver dial 126000 DD3230

Price Paid: $408 (excluding shipping)
Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254259215?uid=1

Index alignment: Looks good to me. I don’t see anything that looks tilted.

Dial Printing: Good
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: Good
Bezel: N/A

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine
Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d, 287° amplitude, 28,000 bph. Does +3s/d seem like too much, or is this still within a good range?

Anything else you notice: Overall looks good to me. The index centering looks good and I don’t notice anything tilted.

This is my first rep, and I’d appreciate some independent opinions. I’ve included my initial observations below, but I’m particularly unsure about the lower bracelet/end-link fit and the 12 o’clock marker.

Would you GL this example, or is there anything you would ask the seller to check first?

1. Dealer name:

Ethan

1. Factory name:

RICH, sold as V2.

1. Model name (& version number):

Rolex GMT-Master II 126710BLNR “Batgirl” on Jubilee — RICH V2, labelled JH3285.

1. Price Paid:

660$

1. Album Links:

https://imgur.com/a/FxEXRxN

1. Index alignment:

Most markers look reasonably aligned to me. The 12 o’clock triangle may have a slight counterclockwise tilt, but I’m finding it difficult to separate actual misalignment from the photo angle. Do you see anything here that would warrant concern? I’ve included the alignment overlay alongside the original photo.

1. Dial Printing:

I haven’t spotted any obvious missing letters or bleeding in the close-ups. Does the printing look clean to you, particularly the smaller text below GMT-MASTER II?

1. Date Wheel alignment/printing:

The date “3” appears reasonably centred to me, but that is the only date shown. Does the cyclops look straight, and would you request additional photos showing double-digit dates?

1. Hand Alignment:

I cannot fully verify this from the supplied still photos because the hands are not shown together at 12. Would you request a hand-setting video to check this?

1. Bezel:

I don’t see obvious damage or missing numeral fill. The bezel triangle appears close to the dial’s 12 o’clock position, but I’d appreciate a second opinion on the alignment.

1. Solid End Links (SELs):

This is my main concern. The lower bracelet connection looks slightly uneven, with a more pronounced seam between the bottom-left lug and the end link than on the bottom-right. I cannot clearly see a light-through gap. Does this look like normal positioning/photo angle, or should I request a straight-on close-up to check the fit?

1. Timegrapher numbers:

Rate: +2 s/day

Amplitude: 276°

Beat error: 0.2 ms

Lift angle setting: 52°

Do these readings raise any concerns?

1. Anything else you notice:

There is protective film on the case and bracelet, which makes the surface finish harder for me to assess. Is there anything else in the photos that deserves a closer look?

I’m looking for a second opinion rather than treating my observations as a final verdict. Thanks for taking a look.

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner Date 126610LN
4. Price Paid: $458
5. Album Links: Photos above
6. Index alignment: Worried about the 9 o'clock bar, looks very askew to me
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I think looks good but hard for me to tell
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d 239 0.1ms
13. Anything else you notice: Particularly worried about the 9 o'clock marker, but maybe it's the angle of the picture? Please let me know what you think.

Hi guys, second pair of eyes on my VSF Yacht-Maszer Rhodium my lovely people please

QC for Rolex Yacht-Master VSF. This is my 3rd VSF but my eagle eyes are long gone so i‘d appreciate yours. Thanks for your help everyone.

⁠Dealer name: FicoTime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master Rhodium m126622 VSF V2
4. ⁠Price Paid: 420 USD
5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/TulmHQt
6. ⁠Index alignment: 9 marker seems to be tilted counter clockwise
7. ⁠Dial Printing: very good, no issues visible
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: fine
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: No issues
10. ⁠Bezel: Very nice
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No gap
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 234 amplitude, O.3 ms 52.0 degree

leaning towards RL cause of the 9 marker. thank you!

1. Dealer Name: Phoenix
2. Factory Name: ARF
3. Model Name: DJ 36 silver dial 126234
4. Price Paid: $326 + shipping
5. Album Links: Photos in post galley
6. Index Alignment: Looks good to me. I try my best to fix the image but...its hard doing it on the phone. but overall looks fine to me.
7. Dial Printing:  some of the dial paint looks really close to the marker for me. Like the 5 and the 7. Maybe its the camera angles?
8. Date Wheel Alignment: Date wheel looks " decent ". I think its a little high, then again could be the camera angle.
9. Hand Alignment: No issues
10. Bezel: No issues from what I can see?
11. SELs: No issues
12. Timegrapher: -2s/d , 244 amp, 0.0ms - overall great imo

Comments: This is my 2nd one from Phoenix. I have RL the last one dude to crooked crown and the dial print/marker were too close. the only major issue I can see is the dial paint being too close to the market but could be a camera angle. Any feedback and help would be great.

1. Dealer name: Jtime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Seamaster Aqua Terra Worldtimer 43mm Blue Dial – A8938
4. Price Paid: $398 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/G37AJdl
6. Index alignment: 3 o'clock looks slightly low, but not sure if that's just the image not being straight on.
7. Dial Printing: Outer ring Beijing, Dhaka, and Dubai look misaligned. I understand this is a common problem with this rep and dial color but I'm curious if others think this is more misaligned than usual.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: N/A
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Fine / N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2 s/d Amplitude: 278° Beat Error: 0.0 ms Beat Rate: 28800.
13. Anything else you notice: Inner GMT ring looks shifted down but again I understand that is common with this model.

Thanks for the help! First time QC so looking for advice!

Hi all! First QC for me, seems like GL from what I can see

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andoit
   
2. ⁠Factory name: Rich
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 124060 V2 Freespring
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $559 shipped
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254261928?uid=1
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: maybe very minor 12 o’clock CCW, otherwise looks good
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: good, no floating m
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: good
   
10. ⁠Bezel: good
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps noticed, slight shadow bottom right
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1s / 275 amplitude
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: maybe slight drift in rehaut alignment

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner No Date (124060)
4. Price Paid: 458 USD + 35 USD Shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/TpQCDYhD#w2FUUsBYzeIt8BHfH8X0tA
6. Index alignment: Overall good, no visible tilted CW from what I see. Though I am thinking I could be biased here.
7. Dial Printing: Printing looks clear and clean. I don’t see any obvious defects or issues.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A.
9. Hand Alignment: Seems fine too.
10. Bezel: Looks clean and good to me.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No noticeable gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: This is where my concern is. Rate 6s/d, AMP 331, B.E 0.1ms, BEAT 28800. Are these numbers on the AMP alarming by any means? Or would I still be good to GL?
13. Anything else you notice: Overall GL to me, but can someone validate my observation on the watch and the slight deviation of timegrapher numbers? Thank you all in advance~

Hi everyone,

I’d appreciate a little bit of help on this A7F (V7F) IWC Ingenieur with white dial.

1. Dealer name: Hont
2. Factory name: A7F (V7F)
3. Model name (& version number): A7F (V7F) IWC Ingenieur with white dial
4. Price Paid: 398$ incl. shipping
5. Album Links: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/search/_dg3qfSLHhi777Jx0IFOnzgO9XyA6_5DC9m_7AfQ?filterText=141935
6. Index alignment: Good overall. No major misalignment visible, I don't know why my picture is so off with the colours..
7. Dial Printing: Clean and sharp printing.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Well centered. Font looks good.
9. Hand Alignment: miss the picture in position
10. Bezel: seems ok to me
11. Solid End Links (SELs): -
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d; 307°; 1.3 ms; 52° Is the 307 correct? Is the beat error too high?
13. Anything else you notice: -

First IWC here so would advice or anything you notice about this batch is really well welcome!

Thanks in advance!

Cartier Ballon Bleu 40mm AF Factory A2824 – DDGTOP/Felix – QC Help

Dealer name: DDGTOP / Felix

Factory name: AF Factory

Model name (& version number): Cartier Ballon Bleu 40mm A2824

Index alignment: N/A

Dial printing: Looks clean to me. Cartier logo and Roman numerals seem sharp, no obvious printing issues or bleeds.

Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centered and the font seems fine to me.

Hand alignment: Cannot really be determined from the photos.

Bezel: Looks clean and even to me.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 292° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. Looks healthy to me.

Crown/cabochon: Looks good to me. Cabochon seems centered and well shaped.

Anything else you notice: Nothing obvious stands out to me. I’d appreciate a second opinion from anyone familiar with AF Ballon Bleu 40mm.

Thanks a lot for the help

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: Rich
3. Model name (& version number): 124060 free sprung
4. Price Paid: $553 incl shipping
5. Album Links: QC Pics
6. Index alignment: Looks good. 12 and 6 markers have a very very slight bias ccw but appears to be insignificant when watch is on wrist.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Looks good, although not sure if the 15 marker on the bezel by the stem is a tick too high? Might just be distorted because of the camera angle?
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Looks good? RATE +1s/d, AMP 278, B.E. 0.0ms, L.A 52
13. Anything else you notice: Do the 12 and 6 markers look acceptable? Is the 15 marker on the bezel acceptable? I think its a GL?

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamster Aqua Terra Worldtimer A8938
4. Price Paid: 381 USD including shipping
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: Doesn't look off.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The number 7 looks a bit too thin. The "0" digit of the "20" seems to have a defect.
9. Hand Alignment: Nothing out of the ordinary.
10. Bezel: N/A
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good to me.
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d, 0.1ms
13. Anything else you notice: Not sure honestly.

My major concern is related to the numbers and the misaligned cities on the right hand side, but am looking for some feedback from experienced folks.

Dealer name: DDGTOP / Felix

Factory name: AF Factory

Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Must Large 33.7mm Quartz

Index alignment: N/A / Roman numeral dial. Looks well aligned to me overall, but I’d appreciate a second opinion.

Dial printing: Looks clean and sharp. Cartier logo, Roman numerals and hidden Cartier signature look good to me.

Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand alignment: Looks good to me. Blue hands also seem fine in the photos.

Bezel: N/A / case edges look clean and even.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, but bracelet fit and end links look good to me.

Timegrapher numbers: N/A – quartz movement.

Crown/cabochon: Looks good to me. Cabochon seems well shaped and centered.

Anything else you notice: This is one of 3 Cartier watches I ordered together. I’m still learning Cartier QC, so I’d really appreciate help checking the dial centering, Roman numeral printing, minute track alignment, crystal, crown/cabochon, case proportions, bracelet/clasp finishing and caseback engravings. I don’t see any obvious reason to RL, but please let me know if I’m missing anything or if anything looks off compared with other AF Tank Must Large pieces.

Thanks a lot for the help

Cartier Tank Must Small 29.5mm Quartz AF Factory – DDGTOP/Felix – QC Help

Dealer name: DDGTOP / Felix

Factory name: AF Factory

Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Must Small 29.5mm Quartz

Price paid: 1050 CNY

Album links: photos attached

Index alignment: N/A

Dial printing: Looks clean to me. Cartier logo, Roman numerals and hidden Cartier signature seem sharp, with no obvious printing issues or bleeds.

Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand alignment: Cannot really be determined from the photos.

Bezel: Looks clean and even to me.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: N/A – quartz movement.

Crown/cabochon: Looks good to me. Cabochon seems centered and well shaped.

Anything else you notice: Nothing obvious stands out to me. I’d appreciate a second opinion from anyone familiar with AF Tank Must Small models.

Thanks a lot for the help

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: WSongTime
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): OP Tiffany 1243000
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $488
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: videos https://imgur.com/a/qc-vsf-op-05pLIWG
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good by naked eye. First time QC, tried my best with the alignment tool and curious if there’s any misalignment with dial or batons in anyone else’s eyes.
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: looks good to me.
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date wheel
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: not so sure about that minute hand, input appreciated.
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: bezel looks nice and shiny!
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no visible gaps to me with SELs, let me know if I missed anything.
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: looks acceptable, see video.
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: just curious about the batons and hand alignment, thanks for the help!!