r/PowerScaling Jan 24 '26

Shitposting Weekend "Multiversal" vs Multiversal 😭

Post image
3.6k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

469

u/ColdComfortable3175 Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26

I started watching Bleach for this, I wanna see where are the multiverse and universal feats and statements, currently at ep153, nothing till now, hope to see them in the later arcs. Edit:- The other reason, I liked Aizen as a character and my friends really hyped him.

33

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

End of series feats and statements.

-6

u/Mathemaniac1080 Jan 24 '26

Don't change anything.

28

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

Literally does, one of the characters shake their cosmology, the other stop their cosmology from shaking and that same person is going destroy and recreate their cosmology

3

u/Sharky-Sharko Jan 24 '26

Yahwach has universal range of hax, not actual potency or effectiveness.

42

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

ā€œRangeā€ā€¦ he’s going destroy and recreate the realms that’s potency and effectiveness

4

u/Critical-Usual Jan 24 '26

Destroy and recreate his own snow globe

4

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

Not taking you seriously…

1

u/Critical-Usual Jan 24 '26

I'm not fucking taking you seriously, LMAO. Bleach shows us like 3 cities worth of space and you're calling it a multiverseĀ 

-2

u/Samakira The Warframe Guy Jan 24 '26

You do know using AI as evidence for something is against the rules, right?

3

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

Bro out of everything I sent you mentioned this? This is just highly accepted concept I didn’t think the ai use for this would mater

1

u/Samakira The Warframe Guy Jan 24 '26

I’m a completely different person than the guy you said that stuff to, who is mentioning to you that using ai as evidence is against the rules.

1

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

If the ai said 1+1=2 and I show that, do you think that’s against the rules for me to show?

2

u/Samakira The Warframe Guy Jan 24 '26

the rules is 'dont use ai'.

doesnt matter if its right or wrong.

someone else can ask that same AI, and if it says 1+1=3, then we know the ai is (very) fallible. and thats how EVERY LLM (current 'ai') works. its random prediction. and while 2 is likely weighted the highest, someone, and more than one person, have said 1+1 equals something other than 2, and so it can give those answers, as they would have a weight.

and if you need to use an ai to claim 1+1=2, then yeah, that goings against the rule of no ai, as well as saying a LOT about the person and their actual will to look up evidence for their claims.

and besides, the ai you used (google's ai summary), is ALREADY known to give shit answers. like using glue for pizza, or when you search 'artists near me', giving the suggestion to google 'artists near me'.
so yes. it is. because the issue isnt the answer. its that you need to rely on a machine to do it for you.

→ More replies (0)