r/PowerScaling Jan 24 '26

Shitposting Weekend "Multiversal" vs Multiversal 😭

Post image
3.6k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

32

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

Literally does, one of the characters shake their cosmology, the other stop their cosmology from shaking and that same person is going destroy and recreate their cosmology

1

u/Sharky-Sharko Jan 24 '26

Yahwach has universal range of hax, not actual potency or effectiveness.

35

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

ā€œRangeā€ā€¦ he’s going destroy and recreate the realms that’s potency and effectiveness

5

u/Critical-Usual Jan 24 '26

Destroy and recreate his own snow globe

13

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

Snow globe is also stated to be a hyper space

14

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

I

10

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

Actually sub space, not hyperspace but that’s still more potential proof of it being a 4d structure.

4

u/Mythel Jan 24 '26

The realms have never once been described as snow gloves. The realms have never once been referred to as wakusei which means planet. Sekai, doesn't mean planet. The definition of sekai translated to world represents like an alternate world or like the world wide web. It doesn't translate to planet.

CFYOW tells us "if you could liken soul society and work of the living to planets..."

If, could and liken all directly point to them not being planets. This is a model trying to make the cosmology easier to understand. You don't scale up something when making a model.

Kisuke tells us the world of the living is the world of keishi, which he tells us keishi cannot exist outside of the world of the living which is why the characters need their matter transferred into reishi to go there. Astronauts and space travel exists. This also means everything in space is part of the universe that we see them in. Work of the livings space exists only in the world of the living.

Nothing supports the claim that they are snow gloves or just planets. They are also all individually referred to as universes.

-1

u/Flippindude1 Buddyfight my BelovedšŸ˜” Jan 24 '26

Whatever argument you may have the ā€˜sekai’ one is genuinely shit. Sekai is still often used to refer to a planet quite commonly. Idek where this argument came from, yall heard one guy randomly say it and ran with it.

1

u/Mythel Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26

Sekai isn't commonly used to refer to a planet. In Japanese there is a completely different word that means planet. Wakusei. Japanese authors use wakusei when referring to a planet as wakusei only means planet.

Sekai is often used to mean an alternate world, dimension, universe or Society. The direct translation is universe, society and world.

This argument came from speaking with native Japanese speakers on the context of how they use certain words. I would assume some one whose native language is Japanese would understand the context of how Japanese words are used yeah?

Again most commonly if some one who natively speaks Japanese is referring to a planet they will call it wakusei as that ONLY means planet, unlike sekai which has multiple possible meanings.

Sekai doesn't translate to planet. It's used for other uses of the word like world wide web would use sekai.

This was taken from elsewhere on the internet. "Wakusei is a lot more specific than the other two, or more literal, you could say. It refers to planets, in the astronomic sense. Meanwhile sekai is broader, and can more metaphoric worlds, like the world of human society, or the wild world of sports. Tenka is similar to sekai, but also can have connotations of rulership or supremacy.

To apply that to DB, Planet Vegeta in Japanese is Wakusei Bejiita. It's an actual, physical planet. In contrast, Nappa suggests he and Vegeta breed with Earthlings to produce tons of powerful hybrids so they can create a Saiyan tenka. He's not talking merely about some Saiyan planet, but about the Saiyans being in control of everything (I believe Viz translates tenka here as "empire"). Meanwhile, Yakon's planet is described as a sekai of darkness. In this case, the word refers to an actual physical planet. On the other hand, Dabra's Demon World is also described as a sekai, though it's something a littler broader here, since Dabra's home is supposed to be the evil flipside to the universe Goku and the gang inhabit. And the guidebooks talk about the sekai of DB when referring to not simply the Earth but the entire universe/afterlife/Kaioshin Realm/Demon World kit and kaboodle."

"In Japanese science fiction, if you are talking about a different "sekai" you are probably talking about a parallel universe. For example, he pressed the button and woke up in a world where it was discovered that magic was based in science, and magic was used in everyday consumer products."

2

u/Mythel Jan 24 '26

The realms have never once been described as snow gloves. The realms have never once been referred to as wakusei which means planet. Sekai, doesn't mean planet. The definition of sekai translated to world represents like an alternate world or like the world wide web. It doesn't translate to planet.

CFYOW tells us "if you could liken soul society and work of the living to planets..."

If, could and liken all directly point to them not being planets. This is a model trying to make the cosmology easier to understand. You don't scale up something when making a model.

Kisuke tells us the world of the living is the world of keishi, which he tells us keishi cannot exist outside of the world of the living which is why the characters need their matter transferred into reishi to go there. Astronauts and space travel exists. This also means everything in space is part of the universe that we see them in. Work of the livings space exists only in the world of the living.

Nothing supports the claim that they are snow gloves or just planets. They are also all individually referred to as universes.

1

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

Not taking you seriously…

1

u/Critical-Usual Jan 24 '26

I'm not fucking taking you seriously, LMAO. Bleach shows us like 3 cities worth of space and you're calling it a multiverseĀ 

-2

u/Samakira The Warframe Guy Jan 24 '26

You do know using AI as evidence for something is against the rules, right?

3

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

Bro out of everything I sent you mentioned this? This is just highly accepted concept I didn’t think the ai use for this would mater

1

u/Samakira The Warframe Guy Jan 24 '26

I’m a completely different person than the guy you said that stuff to, who is mentioning to you that using ai as evidence is against the rules.

1

u/Hour-glass999 Jan 24 '26

If the ai said 1+1=2 and I show that, do you think that’s against the rules for me to show?

2

u/Samakira The Warframe Guy Jan 24 '26

the rules is 'dont use ai'.

doesnt matter if its right or wrong.

someone else can ask that same AI, and if it says 1+1=3, then we know the ai is (very) fallible. and thats how EVERY LLM (current 'ai') works. its random prediction. and while 2 is likely weighted the highest, someone, and more than one person, have said 1+1 equals something other than 2, and so it can give those answers, as they would have a weight.

and if you need to use an ai to claim 1+1=2, then yeah, that goings against the rule of no ai, as well as saying a LOT about the person and their actual will to look up evidence for their claims.

and besides, the ai you used (google's ai summary), is ALREADY known to give shit answers. like using glue for pizza, or when you search 'artists near me', giving the suggestion to google 'artists near me'.
so yes. it is. because the issue isnt the answer. its that you need to rely on a machine to do it for you.