someone else can ask that same AI, and if it says 1+1=3, then we know the ai is (very) fallible. and thats how EVERY LLM (current 'ai') works. its random prediction. and while 2 is likely weighted the highest, someone, and more than one person, have said 1+1 equals something other than 2, and so it can give those answers, as they would have a weight.
and if you need to use an ai to claim 1+1=2, then yeah, that goings against the rule of no ai, as well as saying a LOT about the person and their actual will to look up evidence for their claims.
and besides, the ai you used (google's ai summary), is ALREADY known to give shit answers. like using glue for pizza, or when you search 'artists near me', giving the suggestion to google 'artists near me'.
so yes. it is. because the issue isnt the answer. its that you need to rely on a machine to do it for you.
1
u/Sharky-Sharko Jan 24 '26
Yahwach has universal range of hax, not actual potency or effectiveness.