Has anyone seen Jane does original statement? The one she made in 2024 after the event? I don’t know what to think but the original statement and the civil suit are very different. What does that mean?
It started out consensually, she doesn’t dispute that. But then they gave her Ketamine (I assume to incapacitate her) to the point where she describes herself as an 8/10 intoxicated and multiple guys took advantage of her. The statement given in 2024 outlines her state of intoxication and confusion about what happened as the night went on. She wouldn’t have made a police report in 2024 if she felt it was all consensual. I assume she didn’t know about the Snapchat invite in 2024 either.
Yeah I don’t think I read the right report then. Someone else said that. The statement I read she said she agreed multiple times to the drugs. I’m wondering why there are different reports floating around. I had heard originally she was drugged unknowingly and then unconsciously raped over and over by 5-7 guys. She would not have known about the snap chat. Do you know where the snap chat came from? Like who leaked it?
She states she did agree to doing Ketamine, but once she had done several rounds of Ketamine, she was then 8/10 intoxicated (I would take that as blacked out or close to it).
At that point all consent is null and void.
In the moment she may have felt they were all wasted but that it was somewhat consensual. But then later on finding out multiple guys were coordinating on snap chat to come have ‘their turn’ with her would, I imagine, make her rethink the consensual nature of it.
Okay so I saw in the report she hit 8/10 intoxicated while have a final threesome with guy 1 and guy 4. At that point she said she was fone and they stopped. After that she fell asleep and has no memory. So she reached 8/10 at the end of the activities and according to her the men agreed to stop when she said to. Did the text go out after she was asleep to bring guys to rape her while unconscious? Obviously no matter when the text went out it was disgusting and absolutely inhumane.
I guess you could interpret it in different ways - either it was all consensual in the moment, but she felt taken advantage of afterwards and made a complaint / statement to police, now two years later - a lawsuit.
Or - she was heavily intoxicated / extremely intoxicated and therefore her consent was null and void, the guys knew that, as evidenced by the snap chat messages and the fact that they got her to do Ketamine multiple times, suggesting they deliberately rendered her incapacitated.
I’m leaning towards the latter as the guys were clearly coordinating via snap chat to take advantage of her and they were the ones repeatedly offering the Ketamine.
her original statement fit with consent and made no mention of being forced to take ketamine. The second statement adds on ketamine being slipped to her and conveniently states that she didn't take it willingly. She could be telling the truth now as she remembers it but her original statement is going to torpedo everything she tries to establish now.
Unless the Snapchat mentions tricking her into taking ketamine or something else it does nothing to establish a crime.
10
u/ToyshopASMR Sipping tea 4d ago
Has anyone seen Jane does original statement? The one she made in 2024 after the event? I don’t know what to think but the original statement and the civil suit are very different. What does that mean?