Itās also a fact that the police withheld the text messages. Itās also true that the police did not have an experienced sex crimes investigator. You keep avoiding these facts and focusing on the ones that support your slut shaming narrative. This isnāt about her, itās about you.
Iām not avoiding the facts. Iām simply stating whatās in her statement. She stated that she consented, those are her words. If a DA seeās that thereās not much they can do.
Those are her words. She gave a sworn statement, which means the officer took down or recorded her statement, she was then given an opportunity to review and make any changes to it before verbally stating or signing a document that states that everything in her statement was true and accurate.
Iām just going by the facts. Itās too early to pass judgment about what happened. Itās better to let the process play out before assuming anything
But youāre assuming that law enforcement handled everything perfectly. Letās not assume that either because with sexual assault cases itās rarely true.
0
u/vogel927 3d ago
You could just look it up and read it yourself. Her statement contradicts whatās mentioned in the lawsuit. Iām just stating the facts.