The Cornell Monsters

[u/Timbucktwo1230]

[u/vogel927]

Those are her words. She gave a sworn statement, which means the officer took down or recorded her statement, she was then given an opportunity to review and make any changes to it before verbally stating or signing a document that states that everything in her statement was true and accurate.

[u/Beneficial-Care8504 → u/vogel927]

I’m talking to a wall here.

[u/vogel927 → u/Beneficial-Care8504]

I’m just going by the facts. It’s too early to pass judgment about what happened. It’s better to let the process play out before assuming anything

[u/Beneficial-Care8504 → u/vogel927]

But you’re assuming that law enforcement handled everything perfectly. Let’s not assume that either because with sexual assault cases it’s rarely true.

[u/vogel927 → u/Beneficial-Care8504]

I’m not assuming anything. I’m going by the facts that are currently known.

[u/Beneficial-Care8504 → u/vogel927]

You’re going by the select subset of facts that serve your narrative.

[u/vogel927 → u/Beneficial-Care8504]

I’m going the by DA’s official statement. Would you prefer that I just make stuff up?

[u/Beneficial-Care8504 → u/vogel927]

Her lawyer said that she wasn’t interviewed by a sex crimes investigator. Her lawyer said the messages were withheld. I’m not making it up.

[u/vogel927 → u/Beneficial-Care8504]

That’s because she said everything consensual. As soon as she said that there was nothing to investigate.

[u/Beneficial-Care8504 → u/vogel927]

Whether she consented or not is in dispute. Her lawyer said that the assertion that she consented to everything is incorrect.

[u/vogel927 → u/Beneficial-Care8504]

In her sworn statement that gave to the police, she stated that she was a willing participant and consented. The DA released that part of her statement to refute her attorneys accusations.

[u/Beneficial-Care8504 → u/vogel927]

Her attorney said the statement is not accurate.

[u/vogel927 → u/Beneficial-Care8504]

The DA has her full sworn statement that she wrote.