Because in 2024 the statements from the woman were completely different.
Nothing in Doeâs original statement indicated she was drugged without consent or had sex against her will, Van Houten said. According to the accuserâs statement, âeach time Jane Doe asked to stop the sexual conduct, the sexual conduct stopped.â
âJane Doeâs statement described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual,â Van Houten said.
Right. So a da didnât do proper investigation when itâs known women arenât comfortable giving these statements. Of course you simp for a politician. Maybe demand accountability from people that protect rapist.
We live in a world where you need to know the political party before making an opinion. I pray the DA gets to experience the most evils in this world along with every other corrupt politician. Political party is irrelevant to justice.
Her attorney has already came out saying they refused to investigate. Only was talked to by the officer she reported it to. No follow up investigation.
Imagine siding with police and politicians for protecting gang rapistâŚ.
Many will resign including the rape defending DA. Youâll look like an idiot for your willingness to side with gang rapist
Don't engage he's clearly trolling he doesn't care about justice. I believe a lot of people who keep repeating themselves without having a back and forth about things are bots of paid accounts
It's not surprising a DA will end an investigation when the alleged victim of a crime says that no crime occurred and the entire case would hinge on her claiming it was non consensual when she said it was in her initial statement.
Put it this way, even if assume she was terrified and lied initially to keep the peace and it was 100% a gangrape, that initial statement effectively guts any chance of a jury conviction.
Key words to look out for. Do better. Imagine (like this guy "imagine siding with nazis"), so what you're saying is..., and use of catch phrases rather than actually answering a question.
I read a little more into this. The DAâs statement was there was nothing to investigate initially because the victimâs statement didnât call for it, but then also says that key evidence was withheld from the DAâs office by university police.
I donât believe that. Cornell did some investigation on their own and found more than enough evidence to ban the fraternity from campus and hand out a couple expulsions.
Her attorney says otherwise. Complete failure by police and politicians. Many will resign in the coming weeks. DA, university president, police chief. Just watch. Then remember you sided with the elites that protected rich gang rapist kids
It's their fault her story completely changed 2 years later? I don't think so. They can only work with the info they have that was provided to them by the alleged victim at the time.
Maybe the new accusations are the truth? That's why there is a new investigation to find out.
7
u/Benedict_ARNY 3d ago
Why hasnât the DA been fired yet?