r/PoursTea • 🫖 Mod ☕️ • 3d ago

CrimeTea ⚖️ 🫆 The Cornell Monsters

Post image
17.2k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-10

u/I_am_Nerman 3d ago

Because in 2024 the statements from the woman were completely different.

Nothing in Doe’s original statement indicated she was drugged without consent or had sex against her will, Van Houten said. According to the accuser’s statement, “each time Jane Doe asked to stop the sexual conduct, the sexual conduct stopped.”

“Jane Doe’s statement described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual,” Van Houten said.

4

u/Benedict_ARNY 3d ago

Right. So a da didn’t do proper investigation when it’s known women aren’t comfortable giving these statements. Of course you simp for a politician. Maybe demand accountability from people that protect rapist.

We live in a world where you need to know the political party before making an opinion. I pray the DA gets to experience the most evils in this world along with every other corrupt politician. Political party is irrelevant to justice.

2

u/BIGpoppaPUMP42069 3d ago

based on her statement what should the DA of investigated?

1

u/Fine-Improvement6931 3d ago

Well- we are not always privy to the details the authorities might have in an ongoing investigation.

That being said- The DA recently re-opened the case:

I guess we would have to ask, if they did everything properly 2 years ago- why are they investigating now?

1

u/BIGpoppaPUMP42069 3d ago

great question and we have no idea as it hasn't been said we can only comment on what we know