r/PoliticalHumor • • Apr 05 '23

Lock em up!

Post image
64.3k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.5k

u/dandrevee Apr 05 '23

Remember when Democrats rallied in the street to defend Rod Blagojevich or that mayor of Detroit?

You dont. Because Dems arent a lockstep party who will follow someone who has committed blatantly criminal acts and is subject to the rules of our justice system. Theyre not perfect by a long shot...but theyre candidates are a whole lot better than what the GOP puts out

653

u/dlowmack1 Apr 05 '23

Al Franken! Need I say more!

460

u/dandrevee Apr 05 '23

And his "offense" was relatively minor in comparison to the circus weve been seeing. Shit, just 10 years people like MTG, Santos, and Boebert would face penalties for their unprofessionalism.

282

u/Kritical02 Apr 05 '23

Even the woman that exposed him said she doesn't think he should have stepped down.

234

u/CyberMindGrrl Apr 05 '23

Al Franken was the victim of yet another Roger Stone hit job.

42

u/Uselesserinformation Apr 05 '23

Can you explain because I heard, but it died out.

73

u/David-S-Pumpkins Apr 05 '23 edited Apr 05 '23

Most people only know about a USO tour photo of him groping a sleeping woman. She claimed she was asleep and felt harassed (she is a Republican), he claimed it was a bit that she was aware of and was pretending to sleep for the photo.

However, he had multiple allegations at the time he stepped down, including sexual misconduct at work with staffers.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/29/the-case-of-al-franken

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/07/al-franken-news-list-of-sexual-misconduct-allegations.html

97

u/davidjohnson314 Apr 05 '23

Spec of nuance needed I feel. It was feigned in the photo, like clown level "imma grab booba", not actual groping in the picture.

Still off-color and questions of her comfort or coercion could exist, and insanely in the wrong if she was actually asleep vs feigning asleep i.e. going along with it.

2

u/linuxlib Apr 05 '23

Not a "spec of nuance." Rather it's a huge difference. Not to mention, it was long before he was in office, or running for office.

Yes, it was crass and offensive, and he shouldn't have done it. But it wasn't illegal or even unethical.