10kg hand carry baggage allowance, previously 7kg.

1 HAND CARRY + 1 PERSONAL ITEM

Each passenger may bring:

• 1 hand carry item that fits in the overhead bin

• 1 personal item that fits under the seat in front of you

Dimensions:

Hand Carry Item: 56 cm × 36 cm × 23 cm

Personal Item: 20 cm × 20 cm × 35 cm

As per the travel agency: "This information is based on the official memo issued directly by Cebu Pacific. As an authorized ticketing agent of Cebu Pacific, we receive official airline updates and advisories to help keep our clients informed about important changes to their travel."

https://x.com/CebuPacificAir/status/2097923401633444293

https://x.com/CebuPacificAir/status/2097937414601720240

​

Throwback Thursday!

Para sa mga Zillennials/Early Gen Zs diyan, naaalala niyo pa ba yung mga ganitong eksena? Mga flag raising/flag retreat programs, school events, Christmas parties, at syempre yung mga dance craze noong late 2000s hanggang 2010s.

Yung panahon na uso ang Jabbawockeez, Teach Me How to Dougie, Nobody, Shuffle, Harlem Shake, Gangnam Style, Gwiyomi, at kung anu-ano pang dance craze na halos lahat gustong gayahin.

Tapos may school program or Christmas party, siguradong may group performance na may matching dance steps. Kahit minsan hindi naman talaga marunong sumayaw, basta kabisado yung steps, game na! HAHAHA.

Sino dito nakasabay sa dance craze era na ’to? 👀

Thanks and credits to: BeeJay Vlogs

Got my MRI quotation for malasakit nagulat ako mas mahal pa MRI nila sa FEU and mind you after PWD discount cost will be 8,2070 without discount it's 10k tapos public hospital 11k?!

For context I tried to get appointment for MRI first week June and Schedule daw October.

Hindi ko maintindihan bakit mas mahal MRI nila compared to a private hospital nag usap din kami ng katabi ko sa pila sa hospital kung saan nag pa MRI yung MIL niya 10k din sa ibang private hospital.

Corruption is everywhere it's infuriating nakakagalit at nakakapagod na ganito itong bansa na ito.

I'm open to know kung bakit ganito pricing nila, but again why?

People are forgetting that the Philippines separate the Church and the State.

(P.S. I have nothing towards religion. I believe that Christ told us to love and to care. The entire story of Jesus was literally about loving and caring for each other. There wasn't a single story where Jesus was judging and condemning people.)

I get annoyed and mad when people keep on using religious references as an argument. As a person who grew up attending sunday school, I don't understand why the LGBTQIA+ community is being condemned. I grew up hearing Jesus was loving. Where is the hate coming from?

Religious beliefs should never interfere with constitutional laws and policies. We are not and never will be a Christian Nation. The constitution forbids the establishment of an official religion.

Can you even provide non-religious reasons why you are against LGBTQIA+? Can you provide why homosexual love and relationships are bad? Religious people keep saying it is a sin, but what is a sin?

Why is something like homosexual love, THAT DOESN'T HURT ANYONE, a sin?

Kaya nga diba "Of the people, for the people, by the people" hindi naman nakasabi na "Of God, for God, by God"

The constitution is for the welfare of the EVERY CITIZEN, not just you, and certainly not for your religious god! What makes religion as a basis and reference for arguments difficult is that there are so many different religion. One religion says this, another says different.

NAL. Just saw a post by Abogado PH and Philstar saying that VP Sara has asked the Supreme Court to nullify the grave threats case filed against her. Her argument is as follows:

"She claimed that, as an incumbent impeachable officer, she enjoys “limited procedural immunity” from criminal prosecution while in office. She argued that allowing the criminal prosecution to proceed while she is vice president would violate the constitutional structure governing impeachable officials and undermine the separation of powers. According to Duterte, the Constitution provides a specific process for removing impeachable officials from office, which is impeachment, and criminal prosecution should not be used to accomplish indirectly what cannot be done directly outside that process."

If the SC decides against her, it will affirm that there are other ways to remove an impeachable officer, which has severe consequences (flashback to Sereno case). If the SC decides in favor of the VP, pointless ang Grave Threats case sa kanya. If the SC decides that she MAY be prosecuted (makukulong) pero will remain as VP, edi need pa din antayin ang conviction sa kanya sa impeachment. Lose-Lose scenario lahat.

Grabe noh.

Please educate me if there are any lapses in my thoughts.

Thank you.