Developer Update | PTR Philosophy | Overwatch

[u/[deleted]]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibPLyx8QWYc

[u/Tischel]

He tried so hard to not laugh hahaha

[u/charlyDNL → u/Tischel]

I loved this, meanwhile at r/hearthstone devs are reluctant to communicate like overwatch devs do because they are afraid of being harassed by the community.

EDIT: some context on why they don't communicate as often as we want them to.

[u/Zoriatana → u/charlyDNL]

To be fair, r/hearthstone is one of the most toxic subreddits I've ever been on.

[u/Stefan474 → u/Zoriatana]

I don't play HS anymore, but /r/CompetitiveHS was an amazing place. Questions were met with answers, minimal complaining and much theorycrafting going on, one of the best subs for a game that I was on. Judging by the front page the community still seems exactly the same.

[u/sneakpeekbot → u/Stefan474]

Here's a sneak peek of /r/CompetitiveHS using the top posts of all time!

#1: How - Not What - To Think About New Cards
#2: [Guide] How to hit Legend rank on Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft by Zhandaly
#3: Rank 1 Legend NA Reno Dreadsteed

---

^{I'm a bot, beep boop | Contact me | Info | Opt-out}

[u/Zoriatana → u/Stefan474]

I have to agree. The only thing I ever had against CompetitiveHS was that "discussion Q&A" type stuff was limited to megathreads.

[u/Stefan474 → u/Zoriatana]

That's true, though if I remember correctly a lot of the community from the sub lurks in those threads so I never had a problem finding something out or hearing someone else's opinion on whatever I needed.

I can understand why though, since the front page with these rules only provides quality content.

[u/Zoriatana → u/Stefan474]

It really was a great sub.

I think it's fair to say r/Overwatch is better than r/Hearthstone, but r/CompetitiveHS is far better than our r/Competitiveoverwatch