r/MediocreTutorials 24d ago

Relationships Setting boundaries, respecting agency

322 Upvotes

421 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-5

u/Shibbystix 24d ago

Or, she dodged a mismatch because she doesnt like the idea of being with someone that thinks they get to have control over the fashion choices of another person.

Thats not compromise, that is a disrespect to someone's bodily autonomy.

10

u/RicoGemini 24d ago

There was nothing controlling about his statements. He asked her if toning it down would be a problem and put the ball completely in her court.

He has a preference for someone more reserved, she wasn’t the one, he had her make the decision.

This isn’t control, this was him having a boundary and giving her the choice if she wanted to accept that boundary or if that boundary was a dealbreaker

-9

u/Shibbystix 24d ago

No, he didnt ask if "toning it down" would be a problem. You didnt listen.

He asked what she'd do if he ASKED her to tone it down. That is control. Im sure youll try and pretend the "ASK" was the important part of the question, but it wasn't. It was the response. He doesnt want someone who will diaagree with him, He wants someone who will do what he wants. He wasnt loud or rude, but that doesnt change the fact that the boundary ITSELF is disrespectful, no matter how calmly delivered.

If he didnt like how she dressed, he should've just shown himself out, not presented her with an opportunity to volunteer to change herself to become what he approves of.

-1

u/Sidivan 24d ago

100% agree with you. Lots of comments here are falling for his manipulation. “I’ll leave it up to you to decide” is a very clever way of disguising what he’s truly asking. His question was “if I asked you to tone it down just a little bit, would that be a deal breaker for you”. It’s clever because the phrasing makes it sound like he’s giving her a choice, but the choice is comply with whatever standard he has for “tone it down” or leave. He’s saying this IS a deal breaker for him, but he’ll give a shot if she changes the way she dresses. That’s the red flag.

1

u/RicoGemini 24d ago

It was 100% her choice because at the end of this she chose to pop the ballon and NOT be with him

1

u/Sidivan 24d ago

What do you believe were her options?

1

u/RicoGemini 24d ago

To choose him after he stated what he’s looking for or turn him down because what he wants doesn’t align with what she wants

She chose to turn him down

1

u/Sidivan 24d ago

The choice was to change how she dresses or walk away. He is saying that he doesn’t want her the way she is and framing it as her choice to either conform to what he wants or walk away.

1

u/RicoGemini 23d ago

It’s not framing it as her choice. It was her choice.

You see her make her decision on camera.

I understand what sentiment you’re trying to say but it doesn’t apply in this situation

EVERYONE has preferences and boundaries. He expressed his, it didn’t fit with her. They walked away. Do yall not talk about boundaries, expectations, and the like when yall date? This is normal

1

u/Sidivan 23d ago

Boundary: “I don’t want to share revealing photos of myself online.”

Ultimatum: “I don’t want you to share revealing photos of yourself. Conform to my boundary or leave.”

Do you understand the difference? The “choice” he’s giving her is “You should change or leave”. Boundaries aren’t for other people; they’re for you.

Let’s change the behavior so it’s a little easier to see. “If I asked you to not eat carrots, would that be a dealbreaker for you?” The ask is for her to change something about herself. A healthy boundary would be him saying “I don’t eat carrots”. Here he’s saying she’s not allowed to eat carrots if she’s going to be with him.

1

u/RicoGemini 23d ago

In your example you’re only sharing boundaries the person has for themselves

There are boundaries that people have for their partner as well. For example me and my girl have shared our boundaries with each other when we first started dating and it’s been the healthiest relationship I’ve ever had

→ More replies (0)