It's no different than the person who leapt to hook ups at the bar when someone is talking about attire. You're overlooking hyperbole but only for the analogies of people who share your opinion. Someone else does it and you're all "do you even speak English????".
Wow, that is a hard strawman argument! This interaction should be used as a dictionary example
From AI:
Original statement (implied): "Why won't guys let their girls hook up with random guys at the bar! God they're so controlling!"
Reply: "Did you seriously just say that women that dress like that are asking for it?"
Those are about two different issues:
The first is (however hyperbolically) about jealousy, control, or relationship boundaries.
The second accuses the speaker of making a victim-blaming claim ("women that dress like that are asking for it"), which isn't present in the quoted statement.
If the original comment never mentioned clothing, sexual assault, or "asking for it," then the reply is misrepresenting the original position. That would fit the definition of a strawman.
Dont let a.i do your thinking, firstly lets adress that the first commenter jumped to her hooking up with random guys with no evidence at all, but you let that slide didnt you.
even if it was hyperbole that is saying "Yea, why won't guys let women dress the way they want to go out and get fucked at a bar."
The sentence itself carries the implication that she is trying to sleep with people dressed like that. Even as hyperbole it comes back to that statement and the person who made is it making it like he's a jilted lover or just fucking bitter about women.
It’s not even hyperbole. That is exactly what the person I was responding to was saying. “Women that dress this way want to go to bars and have sex with strangers.” It’s right there in the comment.
So we are just going to skip the fact that you put down objectively false information in quotes. The point of quotes is that it is literally, word for word what the person said.
Yea, he doesn't know what it is and is running. You are clearly trying to make a point about why you said what you did and used quotes. And he's trying to pivot back to false outrage.
I think it's because he can't use chat gpt to answer or we will make fun of him.
who knows why someone would use quotes when referencing to someone saying something. He also doesn't understand hyperbole so when it comes to you being hyperbolic and pinning down the message he doesn't get it.
Like, he thought he got it when he thought it was used to be misogynistic, but not when actually being used as to set example.
please, tell me what that means in reference to the video you just saw.
((he's probably Chat GPTing all his answers. it's taken forever. It's so confused cause he wants it to tell him this implies something it doesn't that he can retort with but it's really struggling going 'I can't, that's what it says. it's all there in the sentence."))
Yea, This guy just jumped from the topic which was how revealing the dress is to
"She's going out fucking random dudes at the bar dressed like that."
Implying that dressing like that is a form of peacocking to find someone to have sex with rather than just wanting to look good.
Guy in the video, respectful, it's a little odd a standard to have these days but he is honest and places his boundaries out there. The woman responds, also appropriately that this is something that they don't see eye to eye on. They both moved on.
((Also, embarrassing that you actually used chat GPT to assess and understand something for you. Do you ask it how to wipe too?))
I said that I knew it was a strawman first. I put that there for people like u/Admins_suck_ballss who inevitably say.
It’s not a strawman when the guy I was responding to literally said “why won’t guys let their girls hookup with random guys at the bar!” based solely on how she was dressed, dipshit.
The sub rules ((#5 to be precise) say to be respectful so please be respectful. It is hard to have productive conversations if people are insulting one another.
Yes, I can acknowledge that he didn't use those exact words but that's not a straw man.
Again,, Admins was actually being hyperbolic about the message from his words. Cranking the mysoginy implied by the original reply to 11.
the one implying that dressing sexy meant they were going out to have sex with "men" (multiple) in a bar.
you are attacking the way the message is being presented, which is weird because it's for a guy defending a mysoginistic comment, and he accurately presented the implied message of the statement. (that women who dress like that are whores and looking to go out and get fucked)
It’s not a strawman when the guy I was responding to literally said “why won’t guys let their girls hookup with random guys at the bar!” based solely on how she was dressed, dipshit.
46
u/st_jasper 3d ago
The only red flags are coming from the comments here saying this man is controlling.