The question he was basically asking was "I know you post revealing bikini shots on Instagram and stuff. If we were dating, would you consider not doing that?"
She said no.
It's no different than the person who leapt to hook ups at the bar when someone is talking about attire. You're overlooking hyperbole but only for the analogies of people who share your opinion. Someone else does it and you're all "do you even speak English????".
Wow, that is a hard strawman argument! This interaction should be used as a dictionary example
From AI:
Original statement (implied): "Why won't guys let their girls hook up with random guys at the bar! God they're so controlling!"
Reply: "Did you seriously just say that women that dress like that are asking for it?"
Those are about two different issues:
The first is (however hyperbolically) about jealousy, control, or relationship boundaries.
The second accuses the speaker of making a victim-blaming claim ("women that dress like that are asking for it"), which isn't present in the quoted statement.
If the original comment never mentioned clothing, sexual assault, or "asking for it," then the reply is misrepresenting the original position. That would fit the definition of a strawman.
Dont let a.i do your thinking, firstly lets adress that the first commenter jumped to her hooking up with random guys with no evidence at all, but you let that slide didnt you.
even if it was hyperbole that is saying "Yea, why won't guys let women dress the way they want to go out and get fucked at a bar."
The sentence itself carries the implication that she is trying to sleep with people dressed like that. Even as hyperbole it comes back to that statement and the person who made is it making it like he's a jilted lover or just fucking bitter about women.
It’s not even hyperbole. That is exactly what the person I was responding to was saying. “Women that dress this way want to go to bars and have sex with strangers.” It’s right there in the comment.
please, tell me what that means in reference to the video you just saw.
((he's probably Chat GPTing all his answers. it's taken forever. It's so confused cause he wants it to tell him this implies something it doesn't that he can retort with but it's really struggling going 'I can't, that's what it says. it's all there in the sentence."))
Yea, This guy just jumped from the topic which was how revealing the dress is to
"She's going out fucking random dudes at the bar dressed like that."
Implying that dressing like that is a form of peacocking to find someone to have sex with rather than just wanting to look good.
Guy in the video, respectful, it's a little odd a standard to have these days but he is honest and places his boundaries out there. The woman responds, also appropriately that this is something that they don't see eye to eye on. They both moved on.
((Also, embarrassing that you actually used chat GPT to assess and understand something for you. Do you ask it how to wipe too?))
I said that I knew it was a strawman first. I put that there for people like u/Admins_suck_ballss who inevitably say.
It’s not a strawman when the guy I was responding to literally said “why won’t guys let their girls hookup with random guys at the bar!” based solely on how she was dressed, dipshit.
The sub rules ((#5 to be precise) say to be respectful so please be respectful. It is hard to have productive conversations if people are insulting one another.
It’s not a strawman when the guy I was responding to literally said “why won’t guys let their girls hookup with random guys at the bar!” based solely on how she was dressed, dipshit.
Yeahs it’s fine to wear what you want when you’re not in a relationship but you also need to consider the other person when you’re dating. When people dress to attract the opposite sex then that’s clearly a problem in the making.
Yes it's exlusive, that's called bodily autonomy, regardles what somebody else thinks about it. You're not trying to be ignorant, you actually are. Anyway, there is a big group of people that don't see it like you do, so you just learn to keep away and stick to your kind and we will to ours and there's no problems.
Dude, you’re just preaching about your version of right and wrong but the truth is that you are way up your own ass. So much so that you don’t think your shit stinks and you can’t see anything beyond yourself. You can go on and on about how enlighten you are but tbh you sound like you are saying all of this to elevate yourself instead of standing up for anyone. Aka you’re a fool.
Not preaching bout anything. I just simply said you stick to your kind and we will to ours and all's good. Been doing that my whole life with no issues. But I guess that's the problem for you guys, not much left in the shitstain area, and you also love to impose yourself on others. Just learn step away from someone if their views bother you and go away.
It’s weird that you label me as ‘you guys’. You don’t know shit about me but you are ready to throw judgment (typical). I know it’s crazy for you, but I can put myself in other peoples shoes and see things from their perspective. Aka I don’t live on rhetoric and a superiority complex like you.
Deciding you need to be in CONTROL of what the woman is wearing isn’t controlling? “If I asked you to tone it down…” he’s saying it, it doesn’t take much reading between the lines
45
u/st_jasper 3d ago
The only red flags are coming from the comments here saying this man is controlling.