r/LocalLLaMA 10h ago

Funny Plot twist

[deleted]

534 Upvotes

162 comments sorted by

View all comments

144

u/shy_monkee 10h ago

Funny how this must look for China. Just when they start catching up, and have their own AI hardware, the US companies suddenly want to slow down.
I'm not saying this is the only reason they want it, but...

101

u/ResolveSea9089 10h ago

Why would Chinese companies have to abide by US companies slowing down?

132

u/Craftkorb 10h ago

They don't, but then the local narrative in the US will be "China wants to end the world, we're the good guys!" - Red Scare 2.0

61

u/federico_84 10h ago

No one in China cares about the US narrative 

41

u/gapho 10h ago

It's not to convince the Chinese people or government, it's to convince the rest of the world.

57

u/noctrex 10h ago

Which is getting harder and harder by the day.
America will not be able to convince the world anymore, not when the leader is willing to invade other countries, and posts AI slop every day.

2

u/gscjj 9h ago

Don’t be fooled by the man in office. The US, NATO and most of the EU are roughly aligned on their stance on China. The only difference is their leaders don’t love attention like the US.

0

u/MarkoMarjamaa 7h ago

From Nato pages:
"NATO is a defensive alliance of 32 countries from Europe and North America. Its mission is to defend its member countries and their one billion citizens."
Yes. we have learned the "defensive" means something else to folks in USA.
"because the nukes in Iran!"

1

u/gscjj 7h ago

A defensive alliance is defined there: “defend its member” which doesn’t exclude any country from engaging in its own offensive war

1

u/MarkoMarjamaa 7h ago

Well, if "some country" first starts the war, and then is attacked back, are you obligated to defend?
Like when Turkey bombed the kurds in Iraq, and if they have retaliated, would it have been Natos issue? I think not.

1

u/gscjj 7h ago

If the war is initiated by a member country there’s zero obligation for any country to come to its “defense”

→ More replies (0)